HOME    ABOUT US    CONTACT    ADVERTISE WITH US       
                                                    The Strep Throat File
                                            
       C  E  N  T  E  R      F  O  R      C  U  R  R  E  N  T      R  E  S  E  A  R  C  H
  
Approved
by

   

Physicians'
Home Page

   

Medinex
Seal of Approval

   

WellnessWeb:
The Patient's Network

   

HONcode
Principles of the
Health On the Net
Foundation

   

Partners of
CareData.com

   
      

   Site Index
   
Alcoholic Liver Disease
Alcoholism
Alzheimer's Disease
Amblyopia
Anemia
Angina
Anorexia
Arthritis
Asthma
Attention-Deficit Disorder
Autism

Back Pain
Bladder Cancer
Brain Tumor
Breast Cancer
Bronchitis
Bulimia
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Cataracts
Cerebral Palsy
Cervical Cancer
Cirrhosis
Colorectal Cancer
Compulsive Gambling
Constipation
Deep Vein Thrombosis
Depression

Diabetes
Diverticulitis
Dyslexia
Dyspepsia
Emphysema
Endometrial Cancer
Endometriosis
Epilepsy
Erectile Dysfunction
Fibromyalgia
Gallstones
Gastroesophageal Reflux
Glaucoma
Gout
Hair Loss
Hemorrhoids
Herpes
Hyperlipidemia
Hypertension
Impotence
Insomnia
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Lung Cancer
Lupus
Lyme Disease
Macular Degeneration
Melanoma
Meniere's Disease
Menstrual Cramps
Multiple Sclerosis
Oral Cancer
Osteoporosis
Ovarian Cancer
Panic Disorder
Parkinson's Disease
Pleurisy
Reflux Disease
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Retinitis Pigmentosa
Stomach Cancer
Strep Throat
TMJ Syndrome
Testicular Cancer
Tinnitus
Ulcerative Colitis
Uterine Cancer
Uveitis
Varicose Veins
Venous Thrombosis
Vitiligo
Vulvodynia

   

  Welcome to the Strep Throat File
   
Patients all over the world have used the information in The Strep Throat File since 1992, when the Center for Current Research—one of the first 80 companies on the Internet—was founded. Our highly trained researchers (all of whom hold Ph.D.s) have searched the advanced medical database at the National Library of Medicine and compiled a comprehensive collection of research descriptions on Strep Throat and its care.
   
As you will see, the following research descriptions detail the findings published in the most respected journals in the field. Because the research descriptions are written in medical terms, most people will bring all or parts of the Strep Throat File to their doctor for further explanation and discussion. Often your doctor will have access to full-text articles and other information that could be useful in planning a successful course of treatment and prevention. Note that the titles of the journals are abbreviated according to the National Library of Medicine's format; your doctor can provide the full title if you need it.
   
Thank you for accessing the Strep Throat File. We truly hope the information fosters better health.
   
Sincerely,
Gregory A. Fraser, Ph.D.
Director of Research

Important Note: The following information is provided for your education. It should not be relied upon for personal diagnosis or treatment. If you believe that a particular therapy applies to you or someone you care about, be sure to consult a doctor before trying it.
   

On Downloading (Please Read Carefully)   
To download or print the Strep Throat File, point your mouse to "File" in the top bar of your Explorer or Netscape window, and click once. Now click once on either "Save As" (download), or "Print" (print), and follow the appropriate prompts.
 

Latest Research on Strep Throat
     
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;133(10):969-72.
Alterations of the oropharyngeal microbial flora after adenotonsillectomy in children: a randomized controlled trial.
Le TM, Rovers MM, van Staaij BK, van den Akker EH, Hoes AW, Schilder AG.
Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, E 04.140.5, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85090, 3590 AB Utrecht, the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the oropharyngeal microbial flora changes after adenotonsillectomy (ATY) in children with mild to moderate symptoms of throat infections or adenotonsillar hypertrophy and to relate these findings to recurrence of throat infections. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty-three general hospitals and 3 academic centers. PATIENTS: Three hundred children aged 2 to 8 years who were selected for ATY because of recurrent throat infections (3-6 episodes per year) or obstructive complaints. Children with a history of 7 or more throat infections in the previous year and those with a high suspicion of obstructive sleep apnea according to current medical practice were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Children were randomly assigned to either ATY or watchful waiting. Oropharyngeal swabs were taken at baseline and at 3 and 12 months after baseline. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of potentially pathogenic bacteria
in the oropharynx at 3 and 12 months. The secondary outcome measure was the association between carriage of group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) at baseline and at 3 months' follow-up and the number of throat infections during the 12 months of follow-up. RESULTS: In the ATY group, prevalences of Haemophilus influenzae, GABHS, and Staphylococcus aureus decreased from 40%, 13%, and 5%, respectively, at baseline to respective levels of 24%, 0%, and 0% at 3 months and 26%, 0%, and 0% at 12 months. In the watchful waiting group, prevalences of H influenzae, GABHS, and S aureus did not change substantially. In neither the ATY nor the watchful waiting group was carriage of GABHS associated with recurrence of throat infections. CONCLUSIONS: Adenotonsillectomy reduced oropharyngeal carriage of potential respiratory pathogens. Changes in the carriage rate of GABHS, however, had no beneficial effect on recurrence of throat infections.

-----

Rev Prat. 2007 Oct 31;57(16):1777-83.
[Pharyngitis in children]
[Article in French]
Cohen R.
Service de microbiologie, CHI Créteil, 94010 Créteil. robert.cohen@wanadoo.fr

The care strategy of pharyngitis has been changed dramatically these last years. Because of evolution of antibiotic resistance, the attitude which prevailed of the systematic treatment of pharyngitis in order to prevent a hypothetical acute rheumatic fever, could not persist. Discrimination between pharyngitis due to group A streptococcus (GAS) and nonstreptococcal pharyngitis (usually of viral causes) cannot be made in a reliable way by the clinical signs and symptoms, even if clinical scores are used. The free availability to practitioners of GAS rapid diagnostic tests, sensitive (>90%) and specific (>95%), changes the rule by simplifying it: pharyngitis with positive test must be treated with antibiotics, those with negative test should not be received such treatment. A reduction of two thirds of antibiotics consumption for pharyngitis can be expected, while maintaining the benefit (improvement of the clinical signs, reduction of contagiousness and the complications) for the patients for whom it is necessary. Because of GAS resistance to macrolides and the absence of resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, a compound belonging of this last family should be prescribed and for a short treatment duration: amoxicillin (50 mg/kg/j, b.i.d for 6 days), cefpodoxime proxetil (8 mg/kg/j b.i.d for 5 days), cefuroxime axetil (30 mg/kg/j b.i.d for 4 days).

-----

Ann Fam Med. 2007 Sep-Oct;5(5):436-43.
Differences among international pharyngitis guidelines: not just academic.
Matthys J, De Meyere M, van Driel ML, De Sutter A.
Department of Family Medicine and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Belgium. jan.matthys@ugent.be

PURPOSE: Many countries have national guidelines for the treatment of pharyngitis. We wanted to compare the recommendations and the reported evidence in national guidelines for the management of acute sore throat in adults. METHODS: Guidelines were retrieved via MEDLINE and EMBASE and through a Web-based search for guideline development organizations. The content of the recommendations and the underlying evidence were analyzed with qualitative and bibliometric methods. RESULTS: We included 4 North American and 6 European guidelines. Recommendations differ with regard to the use of a rapid antigen test and throat culture and with the indication for antibiotics. The North American, French, and Finnish guidelines consider diagnosis of group A streptococcus essential, and prevention of acute rheumatic fever remains an important reason to prescribe antibiotics. In 4 of the 6 European guidelines, acute sore throat is considered a self-limiting disease and antibiotics are not recommended. The evidence used to underpin these guidelines was different in North America and Europe. North American guidelines cited more North American references than did European guidelines (87.2% vs 48.0%; ods ratio, 4.6-11.9; P<.001). CONCLUSION: Although the evidence for the management of acute sore throat is easily available, national guidelines are different with regard to the choice of evidence and the interpretation for clinical practice. Also a transparent and standardized guideline development method is lacking. These findings are important in the context of appropriate antibiotic use, the problem of growing antimicrobial resistance, and costs for the community.

-----

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Aug;137(2):338-40.
Powered intracapsular tonsillectomy in the management of recurrent tonsillitis.
Schmidt R, Herzog A, Cook S, O'reilly R, Deutsch E, Reilly J.
Division of Pediatric Otolaryngology, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE.

OBJECTIVE: To compare intracapsular tonsillectomy (IT) and traditional tonsillectomy (TT) in treating recurrent adenotonsillitis or streptococcal pharyngitis. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary care pediatric referral center. RESULTS: Of 166 patients who met all inclusion criteria, 117 received TT and 49 received IT. Seventeen TT patients and 8 IT patients were treated at least once postoperatively for streptococcal pharyngitis or tonsillitis. The mean number of infections after surgery in each group did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.295). CONCLUSION: There was no difference between the IT and TT groups in postoperative infection rates.

-----

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD004877.
Chinese medicinal herbs for sore throat.
Shi Y, Gu R, Liu C, Ni J, Wu T.

BACKGROUND: Chinese herbal medicines are commonly used to treat sore throat in China and among Chinese people worldwide. Their efficacy in treating sore throat has not previously been systematically reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicines for patients with sore throat. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2006) which contains the Acute Respiratory Infections Group's specialised register; MEDLINE (1966 to August 2006); EMBASE (1980 to August 2006); AMED (1985 to August 2006); the Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) (1975 to August 2006), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) (1994 to August 2006). SELECTION CRITERIA: We only included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing Chinese herbal medicines for the treatment of sore throat with the outcomes of recovery, inefficacy, and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author contacted the trial authors of claimed RCTs. Three review authors extracted and analysed the data. MAIN RESULTS: Seven trials involving 1253 participants were included. All trials were identified as being of methodologically poor quality (C category). All of the Chinese herbal preparations in this review were inadequately characterised and were assessed in one trial only. It is highly likely that there was selection bias or detection bias, or both, in all of the included trials. Conflict of interest may have been another factor in producing a positive result in three studies as the prepared drugs were made in the trial author's hospital. We did not perform a meta-analysis and the results of the studies are reported separately. Three formulations were shown to be superior to the control in improving recovery: Ertong Qingyan Jiere Koufuye was more effective than Fufang Shuanghua Koufuye for acute pharyngitis (OR 1.54, 95% Cl 1.11 to 5.74); Yanhouling mixture was more effective than the gentamicin atomised inhalation for acute pharyngitis (OR 5.39, 95% CI 2.69 to 10.81) for acute pharyngitis; and Qinganlan Liyan Hanpian was more effective than Fufang Caoshanhu Hanpian for chronic pharyngitis (OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.67). Four four formulations were shown to be equal in efficacy to the control. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on the existing evidence included in this review, the efficacy of Chinese herbal medicine for treating sore throat is controversial and questionable. We cannot recommend any kind of Chinese medical herbal formulation as an effective remedy for sore throat, due to the lack of high quality clinical trials.

-----

BMJ. 2007 May 5;334(7600):939. Epub 2007 Mar 8. Comment in:
BMJ. 2007 May 19;334(7602):1019. BMJ. 2007 May 19;334(7602):1019. BMJ. 2007 May 5;334(7600):909.
Tonsillectomy versus watchful waiting in recurrent streptococcal pharyngitis in adults: randomised controlled trial.
Alho OP, Koivunen P, Penna T, Teppo H, Koskela M, Luotonen J.
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Oulu, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014, Finland. opalho@cc.oulu.fi

OBJECTIVE: To determine the short term efficacy and safety of tonsillectomy for recurrent streptococcal pharyngitis in adults. Design Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Academic referral centre in Finland. PARTICIPANTS: 70 adults with documented recurrent episodes of streptococcal group A pharyngitis. INTERVENTION: Instant tonsillectomy (n=36) or remaining on waiting list as control (n=34). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage change in the risk of an episode of streptococcal pharyngitis at 90 days. Rates of all episodes of pharyngitis and days with symptoms and adverse effects. RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow-up was 164 (63) days in the control group and 170 (12) days in the tonsillectomy group. At 90 days, streptococcal pharyngitis had recurred in 24% (8/34) in the control group and 3% (1/36) in the tonsillectomy group (difference 21%; 95% confidence interval 6% to 36%). The number needed to undergo tonsillectomy to prevent one recurrence was 5 (3 to 16). During the whole follow-up, the rates of other episodes of pharyngitis and days with throat pain and fever were significantly lower in the tonsillectomy group than in the control group. The most common morbidity related to tonsillectomy was postoperative throat pain (mean length 13 days, SD 4). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with a history of documented recurrent episodes of streptococcal pharyngitis were less likely to have further streptococcal or other throat infections or days with throat pain if they had their tonsils removed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00136877.

-----

J Paediatr Child Health. 2007 Apr;43(4):203-13.
Group A streptococcal infections in children.
Steer AC, Danchin MH, Carapetis JR.
Centre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, Department of Paediatrics, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

The group A streptococcus causes the widest range of disease in humans of all bacterial pathogens. Group A streptococcal diseases are more common in children than adults with diseases ranging from pharyngitis and impetigo to invasive infections and the post-streptococcal sequelae--acute rheumatic fever and acute post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis. The global burden of severe group A streptococcal disease is concentrated largely in developing countries and Indigenous populations such as Aboriginal Australians. Control of group A streptococcal disease is poor in these settings and the need for a vaccine has been argued. With an ever-increasing understanding of the group A streptococcus at a molecular level, new and sophisticated vaccines are currently in human trials and the next decade holds exciting prospects for curbing group A streptococcal diseases.

-----

J Fam Pract. 2007 Mar;56(3):234-5.
Should you treat a symptomatic patient by phone when his child has confirmed strep throat?
Sheridan E, Ludwig J, Helmen J, Thevatheril IT.
St Joseph Regional Medical Center, South Bend, IN USA.

Although no studies specifically evaluate this question, treatment for Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis without laboratory confirmation in the general population is not advisable (strength of recommendation [SOR]: C, based on consensus guidelines) due to poor diagnostic accuracy. When you suspect GABHS pharyngitis either clinically or epidemiologically, confirm the diagnosis of pharyngitis by a laboratory test. Patients with a positive throat culture or a rapid antigen detection test should receive appropriate treatment with antimicrobial therapy (SOR: A, based on clinical trials).

-----

BMJ. 2007 Mar 8; [Epub ahead of print]
Tonsillectomy versus watchful waiting in recurrent streptococcal pharyngitis in adults: randomised controlled trial.
Alho OP, Koivunen P, Penna T, Teppo H, Koskela M, Luotonen J.
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Oulu, PO Box 5000, FIN-90014, Finland.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the short term efficacy and safety of tonsillectomy for recurrent streptococcal pharyngitis in adults.Design Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Academic referral centre in Finland. PARTICIPANTS: 70 adults with documented recurrent episodes of streptococcal group A pharyngitis. INTERVENTION: Instant tonsillectomy (n=36) or remaining on waiting list as control (n=34). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Percentage change in the risk of an episode of streptococcal pharyngitis at 90 days. Rates of all episodes of pharyngitis and days with symptoms and adverse effects. RESULTS: The mean (SD) follow-up was 164 (63) days in the control group and 170 (12) days in the tonsillectomy group. At 90 days, streptococcal pharyngitis had recurred in 24% (8/34) in the control group and 3% (1/36) in the tonsillectomy group (difference 21%; 95% confidence interval 6% to 36%). The number needed to undergo tonsillectomy to prevent one recurrence was 5 (3 to 16). During the whole follow-up, the rates of other episodes of pharyngitis and days with throat pain and fever were significantly lower in the tonsillectomy group than in the control group. The most common morbidity related to tonsillectomy was postoperative throat pain (mean length 13 days, SD 4). CONCLUSIONS: Adults with a history of documented recurrent episodes of streptococcal pharyngitis were less likely to have further streptococcal or other throat infections or days with throat pain if they had their tonsils removed.Trial registration Clinical Trials NCT00136877.

-----

Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Mar;57(3 Suppl):S39-45. Epub 2007 Feb 9.
The evidence base for cephalosporin superiority over penicillin in streptococcal pharyngitis.
Casey JR, Pichichero ME.
Elmwood Pediatric Group, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.

Current treatment guidelines from the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the American Heart Association, and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend only oral penicillin V or intramuscular benzathine penicillin G as the drugs of choice for treatment of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis. Ten-day treatment courses with 1st-generation oral cephalosporins or erythromycin are recommended as suitable alternatives in patients who are allergic to penicillin. Despite these recommendations, oral cephalosporins are used as drugs of choice for many patients with GABHS pharyngitis. Simpler and/or short-course regimens of cephalosporins that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration offer alternatives with the potential for unchanged patient compliance. Increasing cephalosporin use in patients with GABHS pharyngitis has followed from numerous reports and metaanalyses of cephalosporin superiority over penicillin for bacteriologic eradication and clinical response. This review examines the evidence supporting the use of cephalosporins as a first choice of treatment for many patients with GABHS pharyngitis.

-----

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Jan;22(1):127-30.
Pharyngitis management: defining the controversy.
Centor RM, Allison JJ, Cohen SJ.
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-3407, USA. rcentor@uab.edu

Full text at: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=17351852

Despite numerous controlled trials, clinical practice guidelines and cost-effective analyses, controversy persists regarding the appropriate management strategy for adult pharyngitis. In this perspective, we explore this controversy by comparing two competing clinical guidelines. Although the guidelines appear to make widely diverging recommendations, we show that the controversy centers on only a small proportion of patients: those presenting with severe pharyngitis. We examine recently published data to illustrate that this seemingly simple problem of strep throat remains a philosophical issue: should we give primacy to relieving acute time-limited symptoms, or should we emphasize the potential societal risk of antibiotic resistance? We accept potentially over treating a minority of adult pharyngitis patients with the most severe presentations to reduce suffering in an approximately equal number of patients who will have false negative test results if the test-and-treat strategy were used.

-----

Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2007 Feb;26(2):139-141.
Efficacy of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Intrafamilial Transmission of Group A beta-Hemolytic Streptococci.
Kikuta H, Shibata M, Nakata S, Yamanaka T, Sakata H, Fujita K, Kobayashi K.
From the Pediatric Clinic, Touei Hospital, Sapporo, Japan; the Department of Pediatrics, Health Sciences University of Hokkaido; Nakata Pediatric Clinic; Yamanaka Tatsuru Pediatrics; Department of Pediatrics, Asahikawa Kosei Hospital; Sapporo City Institute of Public Health, Sapporo, Japan; and the Department of Pediatrics, Sapporo Hokuyu Hospital, Sapporo, Japan.

BACKGROUND:: The role of chemoprophylaxis for household contacts of patients with acute streptococcal disease is uncertain. METHODS:: The subjects were 1440 sibling contacts of 1181 index patients with group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) pharyngitis. Instances of subsequent GABHS pharyngitis in sibling contacts who received chemoprophylaxis and in a control group without prophylaxis were compared. RESULTS:: Of the 948 siblings in the prophylaxis group, 507 were treated with cephalosporins and 441 were treated with penicillins for 3 to 5 days. Subsequent GABHS pharyngitis occurred within 30 days in 28 (3.0%) of the 948 siblings in the prophylaxis group and in 26 (5.3%) of the 492 siblings in the control group. Among siblings in the prophylaxis group, subsequent GABHS pharyngitis occurred in 9 (1.8%) of the 507 siblings in the cephalosporin prophylaxis group and in 19 (4.3%) of the 441 siblings in the penicillin prophylaxis group. When these data were each compared with that in the control group (5.3%), a significant statistical difference was seen in the cephalosporin prophylaxis group (P = 0.003) but not in the penicillin prophylaxis group (P = 0.542). Only 5-day cephalosporin prophylaxis showed significant reduction in the rate of subsequent GABHS pharyngitis compared with that in the control group (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS:: In view of the low incidence of subsequent GABHS pharyngitis in the nonprophylaxis group, the usual self-limited nature of GABHS pharyngitis, the cost of prophylaxis and the risk for selecting resistant flora, routine chemoprophylaxis against GABHS pharyngitis for sibling contacts is not recommended.

-----

Laryngoscope. 2006 Nov;116(11):1946-50.
Efficacy of tonsillectomy in treatment of recurrent group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis.
Orvidas LJ, St Sauver JL, Weaver AL.
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA. orvidas.laura@mayo.edu

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether children with tonsillectomies experienced fewer recurrent group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal (GABHS) infections after surgery compared with children who did not receive tonsillectomies. STUDY DESIGN/METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of 290 children 4 to <16 years who experienced three or more episodes of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis at least 1 month apart in 12 months. RESULTS: Children without tonsillectomy were 3.1 times (95% confidence interval, 1.9-4.9; P < .001) more likely to develop a subsequent group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis infection during follow up than children who underwent tonsillectomy after adjusting for the number of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis infections per patient within the previous year and the presence of preexisting conditions. Among the children who developed a subsequent group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis infection, the children without a tonsillectomy developed a group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngeal infection sooner (median, 0.6 vs. 1.1 years). CONCLUSIONS: Tonsillectomy is associated with a decrease in the number of group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis infections in children with a history of recurrent groups A beta-hemolytic streptococcal pharyngitis infection. Tonsillectomy also increased the amount of time before development of further GABHS pharyngitis.
 


 
 The Strep Throat FileSM
Compiled and Maintained by
  
The Center for Current Research, Inc.
708 Aubrey Avenue • Ardmore PA USA 19003
Phone: 610-649-3165
Email:
customerservice@lifestages.com
Website: www.lifestages.com

©Copyright 1992-date by The Center for Current Research. The Strep Throat File is a proprietary compilation of the Center for Current Research. The information in the File is solely for your use, and the use of your family, friends, and doctors. The information is the property of the individual researchers and institutions that produced it. It is an infringement of copyright law to attempt to "resell" the information as it is presented here.

 

   

  
Purpose of
This Site
   
At the Center for Current Research, we gather important medical information from the top medical journals so that you can be better educated about current medical practices and procedures, often difficult to find. We are regularly adding new medical information so come back frequently. 

  
Visit Our
Partners