| |
Important Note: The following information
is provided for your education. It should not be relied upon for
personal diagnosis or treatment. If you believe that a
particular therapy applies to you or someone you care about, be
sure to consult a doctor before trying it.
Stomach Cancer Research:
2002-2006
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006 Oct;132(4):755-62. Epub 2006 Aug 30.
Surgical treatment of tumors of the proximal stomach with involvement of the
distal esophagus: a 26-year experience with Siewert type III tumors.
Shen KR, Cassivi SD, Deschamps C, Allen MS, Nichols FC 3rd, Harmsen WS,
Pairolero PC.
Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine,
Rochester, Minn 55905, USA.
OBJECTIVE: A paucity of outcome data exists regarding patients with proximal
stomach cancer involving the distal esophagus (Siewert type III tumors). This is
especially true with regard to long-term survival rates after surgical
intervention. METHODS: Medical records were reviewed of all patients who
underwent total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy with Roux-en-Y
esophagojejunostomy for Siewert type III tumors from January 1975 through
December 2000. RESULTS: There were 116 patients (93 men and 23 women). The
median age was 66 years (range, 22-87 years). Pathologic stage was 0 (carcinoma
in situ) in 1 patient, IB in 13 patients, II in 17 patients, IIIA in 34
patients, IIIB in 10 patients, and IV in 41 patients. Complete resection was
achieved in 69 (59.5%) patients. Eleven (9.5%) patients were treated with
neoadjuvant therapy, 49 (42.2%) received adjuvant therapy, and 6 (5.2%) received
intraoperative radiation. Follow-up was complete in 114 (98.3%) patients,
ranging from 1 to 281 months (median, 14 months). Operative mortality was 5.2%.
Complications occurred in 51 (43.9%) patients. Clinically significant
anastomotic leaks occurred in 15 (12.9%) patients. Median hospitalization was 13
days (range, 8-70 days). Median follow-up was 14 months (range, 1-281 months).
Overall median survival was 434 days, with 1-, 5-, and 10-year survivals of
56.2%, 19.0%, and 13.5%, respectively. The only factor associated with increased
hospital mortality was anastomotic leakage (P = .002). Incomplete resection,
increased tumor stage and grade, and splenic involvement significantly worsened
long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Total gastrectomy and distal esophagectomy for
Siewert type III tumors is associated with reasonable mortality and significant
morbidity. Although often palliative, surgical intervention can provide
long-term survival, especially in patients with completely resected,
early-stage, low-grade tumors.
-----
Clin Transl Oncol. 2006 Aug;8(8):611-5.
Evaluation of the toxicity of the combined treatment of chemoradiotherapy,
according to the scheme of Macdonald, after radical surgery in patients
diagnosed of gastric cancer.
Tormo Ferrero V, Andreu Martinez FJ, Cardenal Macia R, Pomares Arias A.
Radiotherapy Oncology Service, Sant Joan University Hospital, Alicante, Spain.
PURPOSE: In this study we evaluated the acute toxicity of the combined treatment
with chemoradiotherapy, according to the scheme of McDonald et al, in patients
diagnosed with gastric cancer, after radical curative surgery. METHODS: From
July 2001 to December 2005, a total of 24 patients, with diagnosis of
adenocarcinoma of the stomach or adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal
junction, who were operated with total or subtotal gastrectomy with free
resection margins, were treated at our service with a combined scheme of
adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Grade 3 toxicity or higher appeared in
three patients (12%) and grade 2 in five of the twenty-four patients (21%). Two
patients (8%) needed to suspend treatment before the scheduled end date of
treatment due to acute toxicity. No acute toxicity of cardiological, hepatic or
renal nature was registered, and the most frequent toxicity was the
gastrointestinal toxicity (detected in the 79% of the patients). CONCLUSIONS:
Combined treatment with chemoradiotherapy, according to the scheme of Macdonald,
in diagnosed patients with gastric cancer, after radical curative surgery is a
well tolerated treatment, with a low degree of acute toxicity, thus the
treatment compliance is not difficult.
-----
World J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug 28;12(32):5108-12.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for stomach neoplasms.
Fujishiro M.
Recent advances in techniques of therapeutic endoscopy for stomach neoplasms are
rapidly achieved. One of the major topics in this field is endoscopic submucosal
dissection (ESD). ESD is a new endoscopic technique using cutting devices to
remove the tumor by the following three steps: injecting fluid into the
submucosa to elevate the tumor from the muscle layer, pre-cutting the
surrounding mucosa of the tumor, and dissecting the connective tissue of the
submucosa beneath the tumor. So the tumors are resectable in an en bloc fashion,
regardless of the size, shape, coexisting ulcer, and location. Indication for
ESD is strictly confined by two aspects: the possibility of nodal metastases and
technical difficulty, which depends on the operators. Although long-term outcome
data are still lacking, short-term outcomes of ESD are extremely favourable and
laparotomy with gastrectomy is replaced with ESD in some parts of therapeutic
strategy for early gastric cancer.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 20;24(24):3953-8.
Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric
adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): quality of combined modality therapy and pathologic
response.
Ajani JA, Winter K, Okawara GS, Donohue JH, Pisters PW, Crane CH, Greskovich JF,
Anne PR, Bradley JD, Willett C, Rich TA.
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA. Jajani@mdanderson.org
PURPOSE: Preoperative therapy for localized gastric cancer has considerable
appeal. We hypothesized that, in a cooperative group setting, preoperative
chemoradiotherapy would induce a 20% pathologic complete response (pathCR) rate.
Combined-modality therapy quality, survival, and safety were secondary end
points. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma
were eligible. A negative laparoscopic evaluation was required. Patients
received two cycles of induction fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin
followed by concurrent radiation and chemotherapy (infusional fluorouracil and
weekly paclitaxel). Resection was attempted 5 to 6 weeks after chemoradiotherapy
was completed. Quality of therapy was assessed with other end points. RESULTS:
Twenty institutions participated. Forty-nine patients were entered and 43 were
assessable (12% stage IB; 37% stage II; and 52% stage III). The pathCR and R0
resection rates were 26% and 77%, respectively. At 1 year, more patients with
pathCR (82%) are living than those with less than pathCR (69%). Grade 4 toxicity
occurred in 21% of patients. Chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery per
protocol (including acceptable variations) occurred in 98%, 44%, and 63% of
patients, respectively. A D2 dissection was performed in 50% of patients. Of 18
major radiotherapy variations, 17 were due to the lack of inclusion of the L3-4
vertebral interphase as prespecified. CONCLUSION: For localized gastric cancer,
preoperative chemoradiotherapy strategy achieved a pathCR rate of more than 20%
in a cooperative group setting. The quality of surgery improved (50% with D2
dissection) possibly because surgery was part of this trial. With some
refinements, this preoperative chemoradiotherapy strategy is poised for a
randomized comparison with postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients
with gastric cancer.
-----
Am J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug;29(4):376-9.
Paclitaxel poliglumex (PPX-Xyotax) and concurrent radiation for esophageal and
gastric cancer: a phase I study.
Dipetrillo T, Milas L, Evans D, Akerman P, Ng T, Miner T, Cruff D, Chauhan B,
Iannitti D, Harrington D, Safran H.
Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, RI, USA.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting
toxicities of poly(l-glutamic acid)-paclitaxel (PPX) and concurrent radiation (PPX/RT)
for patients with esophageal and gastric cancer. METHODS: Patients with
esophageal or gastric cancer receiving chemoradiation for loco-regional,
adjuvant, or palliative intent were eligible. The initial dose of PPX was 40
mg/m2/wk, for 6 weeks with 50.4 Gy radiation. Dose levels were increased in
increments of 10 mg/m2/wk of PPX. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were enrolled
over 5 dose levels. Sixteen patients had esophageal cancer and 5 had gastric
cancer. Twelve patients received PPX/RT as definitive loco-regional therapy, 4
patients had undergone resection and received adjuvant PPX/RT, and 5 patients
had metastatic disease and received PPX/RT for palliation of dysphagia. Dose
limiting toxicities of gastritis, esophagitis, neutropenia, and dehydration
developed in 3 of 4 patients treated at the 80 mg/m2 dose level. Four of 12
patients (33%) with loco-regional disease had a complete clinical response.
CONCLUSIONS: The maximally tolerated dose of PPX with concurrent radiotherapy is
70 mg/m2/wk for patients with esophageal and gastric cancer.
-----
Am J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug;29(4):371-5.
Oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in
patients with metastatic gastric cancer (MGC).
Cavanna L, Artioli F, Codignola C, Lazzaro A, Rizzi A, Gamboni A, Rota L, Rodino
C, Boni F, Iop A, Zaniboni A.
Department of Oncology, Hospital of Piacenza, Italy.
OBJECTIVE: Treatment options for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (A/MGC)
are limited and inclusion of novel substances is necessary. Few studies have
confirmed the activity and tolerability of the combination of oxaliplatin (OXA)
and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) modulated with leucovorin (LV) administrated to
patients with A/MGC. The goal of current study was to evaluate the efficacy and
toxicity of Folfox-4 regimen in patients with A/MGC. PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Fifty-six patients were treated with Folfox-4 regimen. Treatment was continued
until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or until a patient chose to
discontinue treatment. Responses to treatment and toxicity were recorded
according to the WHO criteria and NCI toxicity criteria. RESULTS: All patients
were assessable for toxicity and response. Patients (71.4% male, 28.6% female)
had a median age of 65 years (range, 28-78). All patients had histologically
confirmed metastatic (89.3%) or advanced (10.7%) gastric cancer. Response was
evaluated every 6 weeks; 1 complete (1.8%) and 23 (41.1%) partial remission were
observed (overall response rate 42.9%). Twenty patients (35.7%) showed stable
disease and 12 (21.4%) had a progressive disease. Median overall survival, time
to progression and follow up were 10 months, 6 months, and 11.5 months,
respectively. WHO grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxicities included leucopenia,
neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. No patient experienced neutropenic
fever. Other grade 3/4 toxicities included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea,
stomatitis, and anorexia. Three patients (5.3%) experienced grade 3 peripheral
neuropathy. No treatment-related deaths were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Folfox-4
regimen is active and well tolerated in patients with advanced/metastatic
gastric cancer.
-----
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2006 Aug;7(12):1627-31.
Chemotherapy for advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer: defining the
contributions of docetaxel.
Ajani JA.
Department of GI Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer
Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 426, Houston, TX 77030, USA. jajani@mdanderson.org
Despite continuing decline in its incidence, gastric cancer remains the fourth
most commonly diagnosed malignancy and is the second leading cause of cancer
death around the world. There are > 50% of patients who develop metastatic
cancer, which in the majority is beyond cure and, despite many advances that
have been achieved in the management of gastric cancer over the past 15 years,
patient prognosis remains very poor. The need for the development of more
effective therapies that are likely to further improve survival time cannot be
overemphasised. A number of new active classes of agents have been identified
and these include camptothecins, taxanes, platinols and oral fluoropyrimidines.
This review explicitly focuses on the development of docetaxel in the treatment
of advanced gastric or gastroesophageal cancer. Docetaxel, a potent taxane, is
active as a single agent and in combination with other active agents. Most
importantly, the final results of a pivotal randomised Phase III trial have
demonstrated a higher overall response rate, longer time to progression and
longer overall survival when docetaxal was added to cisplatin plus
5-fluorouracil and compared with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (a reference
regimen). This regimen with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil is intense
and proper patient selection and monitoring of the patients is recommended.
Future developments will lead to the incorporation of docetaxel in regimens with
improved safety profile.
-----
Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1299-304. Epub 2006 Jul 24.
Lessons learned from laparoscopic treatment of gastric and gastroesophageal
junction stromal cell tumors.
Granger SR, Rollins MD, Mulvihill SJ, Glasgow RE.
Department of Surgery, University of Utah, 30 North, 1900 East, 3B110, Salt Lake
City, UT 84132, USA.
BACKGROUND: Stromal cell tumors of the gastric and gastroesophageal junction are
rare neoplasms that traditionally have been resected for negative margins using
an open approach. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy laparoscopic
resection of gastric and gastroesophageal stromal cell tumors and the lessons
learned from experience with this method. METHODS: This retrospective review
evaluated all patients who underwent laparoscopic resection of gastric or
esophageal stromal cell tumors at a tertiary referral center between December
2002 and March 2005. Medical records were reviewed with regard to patient
demographics, preoperative evaluation, operative approach, tumor location and
pathology, length of operation, complications, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: A total of 12 consecutive patients with a mean age of 55 +/- 5.9 years
were treated. Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was performed for 11 of
12 patients with a diagnostic accuracy of 100%, whereas EUS-guided fine-needle
aspiration was performed for 10 of 12 patients with a diagnostic accuracy of
50%. Four patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal junction leiomyomas were
treated with enucleation and Nissen fundoplication. Eight patients were treated
with laparoscopic wedge resection of gastric lesions. Complete R0 resection was
achieved for all the patients undergoing laparoscopic resection. Intraoperative
endoscopy was performed for four patients and resulted in shorter operative
times. The average operative time for this entire series was 169 +/- 17 min: 199
+/- 24 min for the first six cases and 138 +/- 19 min for the last six cases.
The median hospital length of stay was 2 days. One patient with esophageal
leiomyoma had persistent dysphagia at the 12-month follow-up assessment. There
were no other complications and no deaths in this series of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection of gastric and gastroesophageal junction
stromal cell tumors may be performed safely with low patient morbidity. This
approach can achieve adequate surgical margins and lead to short hospital stays.
Improvements in the technique have led to shorter operative times.
-----
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2006 Jul-Aug;10(4):179-82.
Palliative treatment of upper gastrointestinal obstruction using self-expansible
metal stents.
Fiocca E, Ceci V, Donatelli G, Moretta MG, Santagati A, Sportelli G.
Department of Surgical Endoscopy, P Stefanini Department of General Surgery, La
Sapienza University, Umberto I General Hospital, Rome, Italy. fausto.fiocca@uniroma1.it
Gastric outlet obstruction is either a late event in the natural history of
bilio-pancreatic tumors or the result of recurrent gastric or pancreatic tumors.
Self-expansible metal stents, inserted under endoscopic and fluoroscopic
control, can be used for palliative treatment. The present study was aimed at
evaluating both the feasibility and the results of stenting in patients with
malignant gastric outlet obstruction; in addition, some technical suggestions
are presented. A total of 33 patients, who had a metal stent positioned, were
retrospectively evaluated; 20 of them were women and 13 were men, aged from 45
to 94 years, with a mean age of 75 years. Twenty-seven patients had a pancreatic
adenocarcinoma, 4 had a stricture of a gastrojejunal anastomosis due to
recurrent pancreatic tumor, 2 had a stricture of a gastrojejunal anastomosis
secondary to gastric cancer surgery. No postoperatory complications were
observed. Improvement in the quality of life was obtained in all patients.
Following the stenting procedure, the median duration of hospitalization was 8
days (range: 6-20 days), and the mean survival rate was 12 weeks (range: 2-66
weeks). Endoscopic stenting for the palliation of malignant gastric outlet
obstruction is feasible and is well tolerated by most patients. In some cases a
period of enteral nutrition had to be necessarily carried out; nonetheless, the
insertion of the stent improved the quality of life.
-----
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2006 Jul;12(7):306-17.
Palliative treatments for patients with inoperable gastroesophageal cancers.
Popat S, Lopez J, Chan S, Waters J, Cominos M, Rutter D, Hill ME.
Kent Oncology Centre, Maidstone Hospital, Kent ME16 9QQ, UK.
Most patients with cancers of the stomach, oesophagus or gastroesophageal
junction ultimately develop metastatic or inoperable disease, rendering them
incurable. They can, however, benefit from a variety of palliative interventions
involving the multidisciplinary team, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy,
endoluminal stenting, laser, or surgery. Often a combination of such strategies
will be used to control symptoms, and maintain or improve quality of life. In
this article, we review these multidisciplinary interventional approaches in
patients with gastroesophageal cancers, and highlight future trends.
-----
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Apr;7(4):309-15. Comment in: Lancet Oncol. 2006
Apr;7(4):279-80.
Nodal dissection for patients with gastric cancer: a randomised
controlled trial.
Wu CW, Hsiung CA, Lo SS, Hsieh MC, Chen JH, Li AF, Lui WY, Whang-Peng J.
Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang-Ming
University, Taipei, Taiwan. cwwu@vghtpe.gov.tw
BACKGROUND: The survival benefit and morbidity after nodal dissection for
gastric cancer remains controversial. We aimed to do a single-institution
randomised trial to compare D1 (ie, level 1) lymphadenectomy with that of D3 (ie,
levels 1, 2, and 3) dissection for gastric cancer in terms of overall survival
and disease-free survival. METHODS: From Oct 7, 1993, to Aug 12, 1999, 335
patients were registered. 221 patients were eligible, 110 of whom were randomly
assigned D1 surgery and 111 of whom were randomly assigned D3 surgery, both with
curative intent. Three participating surgeons had done at least 25 independent
D3 dissections before the start of the trial, and every procedure was verified
by pathological analyses. The primary endpoints were 5-year overall survival and
5-year disease-free survival. We also analysed risk of recurrence. Main analyses
were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered at the US National
Institute of Health website . FINDINGS: Median follow-up for the 110 (50%)
survivors was 94.5 months (range 62.9-135.1). Overall 5-year survival was
significantly higher in patients assigned D3 surgery than in those assigned D1
surgery (59.5% [95% CI 50.3-68.7] vs 53.6% [44.2-63.0]; difference beteween
groups 5.9% [-7.3 to 19.1], log-rank p=0.041). 215 patients who had R0 resection
(ie, no microscopic evidence of residual disease) had recurrence at 5 years of
50.6% [41.1-60.2] for D1 surgery and 40.3% [30.9-49.7] for D3 surgery
(difference between groups 10.3% [-3.2 to 23.7], log-rank p=0.197).
INTERPRETATION: D3 nodal dissection, compared with that of D1, offers a survival
benefit for patients with gastric cancer when done by well trained, experienced
surgeons.
-----
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Apr;202(4):612-7.
Prophylactic gastrectomy for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer
syndrome.
Newman EA, Mulholland MW.
Section of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of
Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA.
BACKGROUND: Germline mutations in the E-cadherin gene, CDH1, were recently
identified in families with hereditary diffuse gastric cancer. The efficacy of
endoscopic surveillance by current methods is largely ineffective because most
tumors spread diffusely. There has been little evidence that prophylactic
gastrectomy should be performed in patients with the genetic mutation, and few
data are available on the outcomes of operations in patients with the CDH1
mutation undergoing prophylactic gastrectomy. We report the outcomes of patients
with the CDH1 mutation who have undergone prophylactic gastrectomy in the year
2003 to 2004. STUDY DESIGN: After genetic counseling and informed consent, two
patients underwent total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. Demographic
information, pedigree analysis, preoperative screening results, operative
course, and postoperative data, including complications, were collected and
reviewed for each patient. RESULTS: Pathologic examination of the stomach
revealed no evidence of in situ or invasive carcinoma. There were no operative
complications. Both patients reported diarrhea and moderate weight loss. There
were no other postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic gastrectomy
can be performed safely, without mortality or severe morbidity, in patients with
CDH1 mutations, and should be curative in this population of patients.
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2006 Apr 1;93(5):368-72.
Presentation, treatment, and outcome of type 1 gastric carcinoid
tumors.
Dakin GF, Warner RR, Pomp A, Salky B, Inabnet WB.
Department of Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York,
NY, USA.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review the presentation,
treatment, and outcome of patients with Type 1 gastric carcinoid tumors.
METHODS: A retrospective review of 1,600 carcinoid patients was analyzed to
identify patients with gastric carcinoid tumors. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were
found to have biopsy-confirmed Type 1 gastric carcinoid tumors on upper
endoscopy. Reasons for endoscopy included abdominal pain (n = 4),
gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 4), surveillance for pernicious anemia (n = 8),
and other (n = 2). The mean pre-treatment serum gastrin and chromogranin A
levels were 1,436 ng/ml (+/-771 ng/ml) and 91.6 ng/ml (+/-68.6 ng/ml),
respectively. Imaging revealed evidence of gastric carcinoid in 4 of 10 patients
undergoing CT scanning and 3 of 10 patients undergoing octreotide scintigraphy.
Of the 18 patients, 8 were treated medically (acidification or octreotide) and
10 were treated with surgery (laparoscopic antrectomy or partial gastrectomy).
Mean gastrin levels decreased by 37.2% in the medically treated group (median
follow-up 6 months), versus 94.0% in the surgically treated patients (median
follow-up 5 months). Mean chromogranin A levels decreased by 56.2% in patients
undergoing surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric antrectomy is the most efficacious
treatment for Type 1 gastric carcinoid, leading to a significant reduction in
serum gastrin levels and regression of carcinoid tumors. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss,
Inc.
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2006 Apr 1;93(5):394-400. Comment in: J Surg Oncol. 2006 Apr
1;93(5):345-6.
Extended lymph node dissection without routine
spleno-pancreatectomy for treatment of gastric cancer: low morbidity and
mortality rates in a single center series of 250 patients.
Biffi R, Chiappa A, Luca F, Pozzi S, Lo Faso F, Cenciarelli S, Andreoni B.
Division of General Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Via Ripamonti 435,
20141 Milan, Italy. Roberto.Biffi@ieo.it
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To verify the hypothesis that avoidance of routine
splenectomy and distal pancreatectomy in a modified D-2 resection for gastric
cancer can significantly lower the complications rate of this procedure in a
population of Western patients. METHODS: A series of 250 consecutive Italian
patients suffering from localized, histology-proven gastric cancer was submitted
to gastrectomy and extended D-2 lymphadenectomy for treatment of their disease
during an 8-year period (1994-2002) at the European Institute of Oncology in
Milano, Italy. Caudal pancreas and spleen were routinely preserved, unless the
tumor was not closely adjacent to or directly invading these organs.
Postoperative morbidity, overall mortality, and length of hospital stay were
recorded. RESULTS: One hundred forty patients underwent total gastrectomy and
110 a subtotal distal one; splenectomy was performed in 8 cases and
spleno-pancreatectomy in 15. The postoperative morbidity rate was 18%, the
mortality rate was 1.2% and 9 patients experienced re-operation. The median
length of stay was 14.8 days. CONCLUSIONS: These results compete favorably with
those reported after standard D-1 gastrectomy in Western patients series. D-2
gastrectomy with spleen and pancreas routine preservation can be considered a
safe treatment for gastric cancer in Western patients, at least in experienced
centers. (c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2006 Mar;33(3):327-31.
[Combined chemotherapy with weekly Paclitaxel and doxifluridine
for advanced and recurrent gastric cancers]
[Article in Japanese]
Mizutani S, Oyama T, Hatanaka N, Uchikoshi F, Yoshidome K, Tori M, Ueshima S,
Okuma K, Hiraoka K, Yamagami Y, Takahashi H, Sueyoshi K, Taira M, Nakahara M,
Nakao K.
Dept. of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital.
We conducted combined therapy of weekly paclitaxel and doxifluridine (5'-DFUR)
for 23 cases of advanced and recurrent gastric carcinomas to investigate their
efficacy and safety. Subjects included 7 unresectable cases, 5 noncurative
resection cases, and 11 recurrent cases. Twenty of the 23 subjects had a history
of prior treatment with another anticancer drug. The treatment regime consisted
of one course comprising 70 mg/m(2)of paclitaxel weekly for three consecutive
weeks followed by one week rest, combined with 800 mg/day of 5'-DFUR orally.
Results revealed a response rate of 17.6% (3/17), with 2 cases of CR, 1 case of
PR, 10 cases of NC, and 4 cases of PD. One of the CR cases was an unresectable
case involving a primary tumor, liver metastasis, and abdominal lymph node
metastasis, while the other was a recurrent case involving abdominal lymph node
metastasis. The median survival period was 387 days. The one-and two-year
survival rates were 52% and 24%, respectively. In terms of adverse effects,
there were only single cases of grade 3 leukopenia and grade 3 neutropenia, with
no cases of grade 4 hemotoxicity. Both patients could be treated as outpatients.
Combination therapy of weekly paclitaxel and 5'-DFUR can be an effective and
safe therapy for advanced and recurrent gastric carcinomas.
-----
J Formos Med Assoc. 2006 Mar;105(3):194-202.
Clinical outcome of primary gastric lymphoma treated with
chemotherapy alone or surgery followed by chemotherapy.
Chang MC, Huang MJ, Su YW, Chang YF, Lin J, Hsieh RK.
Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
mmhdonald@yahoo.com.tw
BACKGROUND: The role of surgical resection in the treatment of primary gastric
lymphoma (PGL) remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical
outcome of PGL treated with chemotherapy alone or surgery followed by
chemotherapy. METHODS: During 1986-2003, 59 patients with PGL (other than
mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type lymphoma) were identified from hospital
files. The medical records, pathologic sections, radiographic images and
treatment modalities of these patients were reviewed. Patients were categorized
into localized (stage IE and IIE-1) and advanced (stage IIE-2 or beyond) stage
groups. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study
included 55 patients who received treatment at the same institute. Among them,
32 had localized PGL (15 stage IE, 17 stage IIE-1) and 23 had advanced disease.
The median survival of the localized stage group was not reached during a mean
follow-up of 168.1 +/- 16.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 135.4-200.8
months), while that of the advanced stage group was 33.0 +/- 6.8 months (95% CI,
19.7-46.5; p < 0.001, log-rank test). Among patients with localized PGL, the
5-year overall survival rate of those receiving chemotherapy alone (n = 19) or
combination therapy (surgery followed by chemotherapy, n = 13) was 73.4% and
87.5%, respectively (p = 0.229). The 5-year disease-free survival was 68.4% and
84.6%, respectively (p = 0.540). However, post-chemotherapy life-threatening
hemorrhage occurred in five of the 32 patients (15.6%) in the localized stage
group: four in the chemotherapy-alone group, and one in the combination therapy
group, all of whom had failed to achieve complete response. CONCLUSION: The
clinical outcome of localized PGL treated by chemotherapy alone is similar to
that treated by surgery followed by chemotherapy in terms of tumor response,
disease-free survival and overall survival, suggesting that surgery be reserved
for those with residual tumors after chemotherapy.
-----
Cancer. 2006 Feb 2; [Epub ahead of print]
Cytoreductive surgery followed by intraperitoneal hyperthermic
perfusion: analysis of morbidity and mortality in 209 peritoneal surface
malignancies treated with closed abdomen technique.
Kusamura S, Younan R, Baratti D, Costanzo P, Favaro M, Gavazzi C, Deraco M.
Department of Surgery, National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective Phase II study was to analyze
morbidity and mortality of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal
hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP) in the treatment of peritoneal surface
malignancies. METHODS: A total of 205 patients (50 with peritoneal mesothelioma,
49 with pseudomyxoma peritonei, 41 with ovarian cancer, 32 with abdominal
sarcomatosis, 13 with colon cancer, 12 with gastric cancer, and 8 with
carcinomatosis from other origins) underwent 209 consecutive procedures. Four
patients underwent the intervention twice because of disease relapse. There were
70 men and 135 women. Mean age was 52 years (range, 22-76 yrs). CRS was
performed by using peritonectomy procedures. IPHP through the closed abdomen
technique was conducted with a preheated (42.5 degrees C) perfusate containing
cisplatin + mitomycin C or cisplatin + doxorubicin. RESULTS: Major morbidity
rate was 12%. The most significant complications were 23 anastomotic leaks or
bowel perforations, 4 abdominal bleeds, and 4 sepses. Operative mortality rate
was 0.9%. On logistic regression model multivariate analysis, extent of
cytoreduction (odds ratio [OR], 2.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-6.40)
and dose of cisplatin for IPHP >/= 240 mg (OR, 3.13; 95% CI, 1.24-7.90) were
independent risk factors for major morbidity. Ten patients presented with Grade
3 to 4 toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: CRS + IPHP presented acceptable morbidity,
toxicity, and mortality rates, all of which support prospective Phase III
clinical trials. Cancer 2006. (c) 2006 American Cancer Society.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):663-7.
Multicenter phase II trial of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with
untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.
Ajani JA, Lee FC, Singh DA, Haller DG, Lenz HJ, Benson AB 3rd, Yanagihara R,
Phan AT, Yao JC, Strumberg D.
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. jajani@mdanderson.org
PURPOSE: S-1 plus cisplatin is considered highly active in Japanese gastric
cancer patients. We conducted a phase II multi-institutional trial, in the West,
in patients with untreated advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction
adenocarcinoma to evaluate activity and safety of this combination. METHODS:
Patients received cisplatin intravenously at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and S-1 orally at
25 mg/m2/dose bid (50 mg/m2/d) on days 1 to 21, repeated every 28 days. Patients
with histologic proof of gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma
with a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) of > or = 70% and near-normal organ
function were eligible. All patients provided a written informed consent. To
observe a 45% confirmed overall response rate (ORR), 41 assessable patients were
needed. RESULTS: All 47 patients were assessed for safety and survival, and 41
patients were assessed for ORR. The median age was 56 years and median KPS was
80%. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was four. The confirmed ORR was
51% (95% CI, 35% to 67%) and it was 49% by an independent review. At the 6-month
interval, 71% of patients were alive, with a median survival time of 10.9
months. Frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicities included fatigue (26%), neutropenia
(26%), vomiting (17%), diarrhea (15%), and nausea (15%); however, stomatitis
(2%) and febrile neutropenia (2%) were uncommon. There was one (2%)
treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: S-1 plus cisplatin is active against
gastric cancer and has a favorable toxicity profile. A global phase III study of
S-1 plus cisplatin versus fluorouracil plus cisplatin currently is accruing
patients.
-----
Anticancer Drugs. 2006 Feb;17(2):231-236.
Phase II study of a 4-week capecitabine regimen in advanced or
recurrent gastric cancer.
Sakamoto J, Chin K, Kondo K, Kojima H, Terashima M, Yamamura Y, Tsujinaka T,
Hyodo I, Koizumi W; on behalf of the Clinical Study Group of Capecitabine.
aKyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan bCancer Institute
Hospital, Tokyo, Japan cNagoya National Hospital, Nagoya, Japan dAichi Cancer
Center Aichi Hospital, Okazaki, Japan eFukushima Medical University, Fukushima,
Japan fAichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan gOsaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
hNHO Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan iKitasato University School of
Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine in
chemotherapy-naive patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric
cancer. An open-label multicenter phase II study was conducted for previously
untreated patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. Oral capecitabine
828 mg/m twice daily was given on days 1-21 every 4 weeks. Baseline
characteristics of 60 enrolled patients were: male/female 49/11, median age 64
years (range 28-74), good performance status (ECOG 0-1) in 98% of patients and
27 patients had prior gastrectomy (45%). A median of 4 treatment cycles were
administered (range 1-37). Five patients were excluded from the efficacy
analysis because they did not meet eligibility criteria. The overall response
rate (RR) in the evaluable patient population (n=55) was 26% [95% confidence
interval (95% CI) 15-39%] and a further 29% of patients had stable disease. The
overall RR in the intent-to-treat population (n=60) was 23% (95% CI 13-36.0%).
Median time to progression in the evaluable patient population was 3.4 months
(95% CI 1.8-6.1) and overall survival time in the intent-to-treat population was
10.0 months (95% CI 6.4-13.6). The most frequent grade 3/4 drug-related adverse
event was hand-foot syndrome (13%), but this was readily managed by treatment
interruption and dose reduction. No patients developed grade 3/4 drug-related
diarrhea, vomiting, leukopenia or thrombocytopenia. We conclude that this 4-week
regimen of capecitabine showed promising activity and was well tolerated as
first-line therapy for advanced/metastatic gastric cancer. Further investigation
of this regimen is warranted.
-----
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2006 Feb;57(2):123-31.
Gastric cancer: Standards for the 21st century.
Archie V, Kauh J, Jones DV Jr, Cruz V, Karpeh MS Jr, Thomas CR Jr.
Department of Radiation Oncology, The David Geffen U.C.L.A. School of Medicine,
Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Although the incidence of gastric cancer has been decreasing in the United
States, it remains a leading cause of cancer death in the world, only lung
cancer causes more deaths worldwide. The combination of relatively low
prevalence, lack of pathognomonic symptoms, and lack of defined risk factors are
associated with a delay in diagnosis leading to a dismal prognosis. For
localized disease, surgery remains a cornerstone of treatment but much
controversy remains regarding optimal peri-operative therapy. For advanced
disease, several new agents and new combination chemotherapies have offered
encouraging results. This paper seeks to review the major topics surrounding
gastric cancer and cover the results of recently reported and ongoing trials.
-----
Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense. 2005;76 Suppl 1:49-51.
Palliative surgery for gastric cancer in elderly patients.
Martella B, Militello C, Spirch S, Bruttocao A, Nistri R, De Rossi A, Barbon B,
Terranova O.
Department of Geriatric Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Poor survival rate of elderly patients affected by locally advanced or
metastatic gastric cancer is related to primary tumour complications. Bleeding
is the most important adverse event, other major complications are gastric
outlet obstruction and nutritional deprivation. Rarely the patients will
perforate the stomach cancer and there is a sudden end to their life;
contamination of the ascites result in a rapid death. Thus, an aggressive
approach toward palliation of this condition is resection: in this manner the
expected survival is approximately one year. Derivation techniques or endoscopic
treatments are applied in those patients whose operative risk is inacceptable;
in these cases poor median survival is expected. The aim of this report in to
refer about the experience in palliative surgery for gastric cancer in the
Department of Geriatric Surgery of the University of Padua.
-----
Bull Cancer. 2006 Jan 1;93(1):E1-6.
Epirubicin-docetaxel in advanced gastric cancer: two phase II
studies as second and first line treatment.
Nguyen S, Rebischung C, Van Ongeval J, Flesch M, Bennamoun M, Andre T, Ychou M,
Gamelin E, Carola E, Louvet C.
Service d'oncologie, Centre hospitalier, 40 avenue Leon-Blum, 60021 Beauvais
Cedex, France. s.nguyen@ch-beauvais.fr
METHODS: We evaluated the Epitax combination (epirubicin 60 mg/m2 and docetaxel
75 mg/m2, every 3 weeks) in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) as second-line
treatment after fluorouracil and platinum in 50 patients, then as first-line
treatment in 36 patients. We report here the results of these two phase II
studies. RESULTS: In the second-line treatment, the response rate (RR) was
15.5%. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 68% (febrile neutropenia in 40%,
one treatment-related death). Median time to progression (TTP) and overall
survival (OS) were 2.4 and 5.0 months, respectively. In the first-line
treatment, the RR was 19.4%. With prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating
factor, grade 3-4 neutropenia was reported in 38.9%. Then 22 patients received a
second-line and 11 patients a third-line treatment. Median TTP and OS were 4.5
and 12 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Epitax showed moderate activity in AGC.
RR in both trials suggests a non-cross resistance with fluorouracil/platinum
combination. The 12-month OS in the first-line treatment could be partly
explained by early evaluation and active non-cross resistant second-line
therapy.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;(1):CD004276.
Endoscopic mucosal resection for early gastric cancer.
YP W, C B, T P.
BACKGROUND: The treatment of early gastric cancer (EGC) using an endoscopy,
namely, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), has been adopted for about 20 years,
but the effectiveness and the safety of the modality are still controversial.
The quality of these trials has not been assessed systematically. OBJECTIVES:
The purpose of this review was to compare the effectiveness and the safety of
EMR with gastrectomy for the treatment of EGC. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches were
conducted on the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which
includes the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group
Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 2005) MEDLINE (1966 to March
2005) and EMBASE (1980 to March 2005), CINAHL (1985-March 2005) and CBM (Chinese
BioMedical Database 1982 -2002). Reference lists from trials selected by
electronic searching were handsearched to identify further relevant trials.
Published abstracts from conference proceedings from the United European
Gastroenterology Week (published in Gut) and Digestive Disease Week (published
in Gastroenterology) were handsearched. Members of the Cochrane UGPD Group, and
experts in the field were contacted and asked to provide details of outstanding
clinical trials and any relevant unpublished materials SELECTION CRITERIA: All
randomised controlled trials of EGC patients involving a treatment arm of EMR
and a comparison arm of gastrectomy were to be included, but no RCTs were found.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers (YP Wang, C Bennett and T Pan)
independently assessed the eligibility of potential trials and extracted the
data. MAIN RESULTS: There are no included randomised control trials for the
systematic review. Available evidence derived from non-randomised controlled
trials is discussed in the main text of this review. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There
is a lack of randomised controlled trials in which EMR is compared with
gastrectomy for EGC. There is a need for well designed randomised controlled
trials to determine the effects of EMR compared to gastrectomy.
-----
J Chemother. 2005 Dec;17(6):656-62.
The emerging role of oxaliplatin in the treatment of gastric
cancer.
Zaniboni A, Meriggi F.
Fondazione Poliambulanza, Brescia, Italy. zanib@numerica.it
Gastric cancer is often diagnosed in locally advanced or metastatic stages and,
therefore, of poor prognosis. Many controversies exist about surgery,
neoadjuvant, adjuvant and palliative treatments of gastric cancer. So we need to
explore a variety of novel management options including the use of new agents
and new combinations. Some of these agents include oral fluoropyrimidine,
irinotecan, docetaxel and oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin is a diaminocyclohexane-platinum
compound that is significantly different from cisplatin and carboplatin with
respect to its activity and toxicity. Oxaliplatin is an alkylating agent
inhibiting DNA replication by forming adducts between two adjacent guanines or
guanine and adenine molecules. However, the adducts of oxaliplatin appear to be
more effective than cisplatin adducts in regard to the inhibition of DNA
synthesis. In contrast to cisplatin, oxaliplatin has demonstrated efficacy alone
and in combination with 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer. Many
studies are ongoing to test the combination in noncolorectal gastrointestinal
tumors and other malignancies. This review focuses on the increasing amount of
data concerning the clinical activity of oxaliplatin-based regimens in advanced
gastric cancer.
-----
Dig Dis Sci. 2005 Dec;50(12):2218-23.
A phase II trial of irinotecan in patients with previously
untreated advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma.
Enzinger PC, Kulke MH, Clark JW, Ryan DP, Kim H, Earle CC, Vincitore MM,
Michelini AL, Mayer RJ, Fuchs CS.
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston,
Massachusetts 02115, USA. Peter_Enzinger@dfci.harvard.edu
Chemotherapy options for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma remain limited.
Irinotecan has demonstrated broad activity in a variety of epithelial
malignancies. Forty-six patients with previously untreated, measurable,
unresectable, or metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled.
Patients received irinotecan (125 mg/m2 intravenously over 90 min weekly) for 4
consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Forty-three patients received at
least one treatment and were evaluable for response and toxicity. One complete
and five partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 14%
(95% CI, 4-24%). Median survival for all 43 patients was 6.4 months (95% CI,
4.6-8.2 months). Grade 3 to 4 toxicity included 10 patients (23%) with
neutropenia, 13 patients (30%) with late diarrhea, 6 patients (14%) with
vomiting, and 6 patients (14%) with fatigue. We conclude that although
single-agent irinotecan is an active agent for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma,
the schedule utilized in this trial is associated with moderate toxicity. When
used as a single-agent, a tri-weekly schedule may be preferable for this patient
population.
-----
World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov 28;11(44):7014-7.
Treatment for isolated loco-regional recurrence of gastric
adenocarcinoma: Does surgery play a role?
Carboni F, Lepiane P, Santoro R, Lorusso R, Mancini P, Carlini M, Santoro E.
Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Regina Elena Cancer
Institute, via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. fabiocarb@tiscali.it.
AIM:To evaluate the role of surgical treatment for isolated loco-regional
recurrences of operated gastric adenocarcinoma.METHODS:Among the 837 patients
operated for gastric adenocarcinoma between December 1979 and April 2004, 713
(85%) underwent resection with curative intent. A retrospective review of a
prospectively collected gastric cancer database was carried out. Overall
recurrence rate was 44% (315 cases), with 75% occurring within the first 2 years
from the operation. Isolated L-R recurrences were observed in 38 (12%) patients.
Symptomatic lesions were observed in 27 (71%).RESULTS:Six (16%) patients were
macroscopically resected with curative intent. The recurrence was located in the
gastric stump after a STG in three patients, in the esophagojejunal anastomosis
after a TG in two patients and in the gastric bed after a TG in one patient.
Surgical procedures consisted of three secondary TG, two esophagojejunal
resection and one excision of an extraluminal recurrence. Postoperative
complications occurred in two patients (33%), including one anastomotic leakage
and one hemorrhage. The latter patient died of sepsis 35 d after the surgery
(mortality rate 17%). All patients died of recurrent gastric cancer: 2 within 1
year from surgery (8 and 11 mo, respectively), 2 after 16 and 17 mo respectively
and 1 after 28 mo from the second operation.CONCLUSION:Surgery plays a very
limited role in the treatment for isolated loco-regional recurrence of gastric
adenocarcinoma.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):6957-65. Epub 2005 Sep 6.
Phase I pharmacokinetic study of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients
with advanced gastric carcinoma.
Ajani JA, Faust J, Ikeda K, Yao JC, Anbe H, Carr KL, Houghton M, Urrea P.
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. jajani@mdanderson.org
PURPOSE: The conversion rate of tegafur (a component of S-1) to fluorouracil
(FU) differs in Asians and whites because of polymorphic differences in the
CYP2A6 gene. S-1 with cisplatin is considered highly active in Japanese gastric
cancer patients. Therefore, we initiated a phase I pharmacokinetic study of this
combination in our gastric cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients
received cisplatin intravenously on day 1 and S-1 orally, twice daily, on days 1
to 21 every 28 days. At level 1, the S-1 dose was 25 mg/m2/dose (50 mg/m2/d),
but it was increased by 5 mg/m2/dose for the next level. Cisplatin was
administered at 75 mg/m2 (for levels 1 and 2) but was then reduced to 60 mg/m2
(level 1A). At every level, a cohort of three patients, which could be expanded
to six patients, was studied. Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was determined based
on the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first cycle. Patients with histologic
proof of gastric adenocarcinoma and near-normal organ function were studied.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled. No DLTs occurred at level 1. However,
DLTs occurred at levels 2 and 1A. The area under the curve for FU correlated
significantly with DLT (P = .006) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (P = .004). Six
partial responses were confirmed, including three at the MTD. CONCLUSION: At the
established MTD of S-1 plus cisplatin, the S-1 dose (50 mg/m2/d for 21 days) is
lower in our study than in the Japanese study (80 mg/m2/d for 21 days). A
multi-institutional phase II study of this active combination is currently
accruing patients.
-----
Anticancer Res. 2005 Sep-Oct;25(5):3513-6.
The efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection in the diagnosis and
treatment of group III gastric lesions.
Katsube T, Konnno S, Hamaguchi K, Shimakawa T, Naritaka Y, Ogawa K, Aiba M.
Department of Surgery and Surgical Pathology, Tokyo Women's Medical University
Daini Hospital, 2-2-10 Nishiogu, Arakawa-ku Tokyo 116-8567, Japan.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in diagnosing and
treating group III lesions was analyzed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three
patients, with group III lesions confirmed by histopathological examination of
the biopsy specimens, were included. All of these patients underwent EMR. The
final diagnosis after EMR broadly classified the lesions as adenocarcinoma or
adenoma. The clinicopathological features and therapeutic results were analyzed.
RESULTS: Adenocarcinoma was identified in 16 patients (37.2%) and adenoma in 27
patients (62.8%). There were no differences in gender, age, lesion site,
macroscopic type, or maximum diameter between the two groups. A significant
difference in the maximum diameter of elevated lesions (p<0.05) was found
between adenocarcinomas and adenomas, with the elevated lesions of
adenocarcinomas measuring more than 10 mm. No residual focus recurrence was
found among the adenomas. CONCLUSION: We conclude that EMR is effective and
useful in diagnosing and treating group III lesions.
-----
Ugeskr Laeger. 2005 Sep 26;167(39):3678-81.
[Self-expanding metal stents as palliative treatment of a malign
obstruction in the distal part of the ventricle or duodenum]
[Article in Danish]
Olsen E, Kiil J, Petersen JB.
Viborg Sygehus, Organkirurgisk Afdeling og Billeddiagnostisk Afdeling. eyo@dadlnet.dk
INTRODUCTION: Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) have emerged as a simple
therapeutic option for the palliation of patients with non-resectable malignant
gastric outlet obstruction. We present our results from a three-year period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with obstruction from tumors in the
pancreas (15), bile ducts (3), stomach (9) or transverse colon (2) underwent
palliative stenting with a 9-cm-long, 22 mm Wallstent under general anaesthesia.
Insertion of the SEMS was done under endoscopic and fluoroscopic control.
Biliary stents were implanted prior to or simultaneously with the duodenal stent
in eight patients. Seven were covered 6-cm-long, 10 mm Wallstents. Two patients
had biliary stents implanted 12 and 262 days, respectively, after the duodenal
stent by "rendezvous" technique. RESULTS: The stent deployment was successful in
all patients. There were no procedure-related complications, but one patient
died of cardiac arrest 12 hours after the operation. Obstruction was relieved in
all patients, and an exclusively oral diet was possible for 23 of them. Seven
patients with rapid progression of the disease stayed in hospital and died 0-16
days after the procedure. The median length of stay in hospital after the
procedure was 2 days (1-32 days), after which the patients stayed at home for 40
days (2-270 days). The overall median survival time was 47 days (median, 0-274
days). There were no late complications (stent migration or perforation), but
two patients needed an overlapping stent due to tumor overgrowth. DISCUSSION:
Duodenal stents effectively resolve the obstructive symptoms of gastric outlet
obstruction. There are few procedure-related complications, and the vast
majority of patients can leave hospital and spend the short time left to them at
home.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2005 Sep;32(9):1319-22.
[A pilot study of TS-1+CDDP therapy for highly advanced stage IV
gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Sakai Y, Saotome T, Fujimori M, Shimizu S, Inkyo T, Yugeta H, Ohbu M, Koma Y,
Sato T, Nagashima F, Hayasaka A, Fukuyama Y, Tsuchiya S, Tsuyuguchi T, Saisho H.
Division of Gasttroenterlogy. Chiba University.
We performed a pilot study of combination chemotherapy with TS-1 and cisplatin
for highly advanced gastric cancer. From June 2002, 12 patients with multiple
liver metastases, carcinomatous lymphangitis or peritoneal dissemination, were
enrolled in the study. TS-1 was administered at a daily dose on day 1-21 and an
intermediate-dose of cisplatin (60 mg/m2) was administered on day 8. The
combination was repeated in a 5-week cycle. The median administered cycles were
three (one to eight). An objective response was obtained in 9 cases (75.0%) of
primary sites and 6 cases of metastatic sites. No severe hematological toxicity
occurred, and grade 3 stomatitis (in one case) and vomiting (in two cases)
occurred as non-hematological toxicities. The improvement of clinical symptoms
such as appetite loss and abdominal discomfort was obtained in 9 of 10 cases.
The median survival time is 244 days. The TS-1/CDDP regimen had almost no
survival benefits, but may induce relief of symptoms due to cancer and better
quality of life.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Sep 1;23(25):6220-32.
Adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer.
Lim L, Michael M, Mann GB, Leong T.
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia.
Gastric cancer has a poor prognosis. The majority of patients will relapse after
definitive surgery, and 5-year survival after surgery remains poor. The role of
adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer has been controversial given the lack of
significant survival benefit in many randomized studies so far. The results of a
large North American study (Gastrointestinal Cancer Intergroup Trial INT 0116)
reported that postoperative chemoradiotherapy conferred a survival advantage
compared with surgery alone, which has led to the regimen being adopted as a new
standard of care. However, controversies still remain regarding surgical
technique, the place of more effective and less toxic chemotherapy regimens, and
the use of more modern radiation planning techniques to improve treatment
delivery and outcome in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting. This article
reviews the current status of the adjuvant treatment for gastric cancer
including discussion on the research directions aimed at optimizing treatment
efficacy. Issues such as the identification of patients who are more likely to
benefit from adjuvant therapy are also addressed. Further clinical trials are
needed to move towards better consensus and standardization of care.
-----
Oncology. 2005;69(3):261-8. Epub 2005 Sep 1.
Phase I study of a combination of s-1 and weekly paclitaxel in
patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.
Ueda Y, Yamagishi H, Ichikawa D, Morii J, Koizumi K, Kakihara N, Shimotsuma M,
Takenaka A, Yamashita T, Kurioka H, Nishiyama M, Morita S, Nakamura K, Sakamoto
J.
Department of Surgery, Division of Digestive Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural
University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan. yueda@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
OBJECTIVE: A phase I study of weekly intravenous paclitaxel combined with a
fixed dose of S-1, a dihydropyrimidine-dehydrogenase-inhibitory oral
fluoropyrimidine, was conducted for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric
cancer (ARGC). Endpoints of this study were to examine the toxicity profile OF
this regimen and to determine the recommended dose (rd) of paclitaxel. METHODS:
S-1 was fixed at a dose of 80 mg/m(2) per day and was administered for 2 weeks
(days 1--14) followed by a 2-week rest. Two dose levels of paclitaxel (level 1:
60 mg/m(2), level 0: 50 mg/m(2)) were studied. Paclitaxel was infused over 1 h
on days 1, 8, and 15. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the
pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of paclitaxel in some patients. Fifteen
patients were enrolled (6 patients in level 1, and 9 patients in level 0).
Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as grade 4 hematological (including grade
3 febrile neutropenia) and grade 3 non-hematological (except anorexia, nausea,
vomiting and depilation) toxicities. RESULTS: Three of 6 patients in level 1
developed grade 4 neutropenia or grade 3 febrile neutropenia, and 1 of them also
showed grade 3 diarrhea, which settled the maximum-tolerated dose at this level.
At level 0, 2 of 9 patients developed grade 4 neutropenia or grade 3 febrile
neutropenia, and the RD of paclitaxel for this protocol was set at this level.
Pharmacologic studies demonstrated the persistence of significant serum
paclitaxel levels over 24 h after drug administration at both levels. Objective
responses according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors were
observed in 3 of 6 patients who had measurable disease. CONCLUSION: A
combination of S-1 and weekly paclitaxel was feasible and well tolerated, and is
suggested to produce a worthwhile response in ARGC. These results warrant
further investigation, and a phase II study has already been started. Copyright
(c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Sep 15;91(4):232-6.
Results of total gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for
gastric cancer in elderly patients.
Otsuji E, Fujiyama J, Takagi T, Ito T, Kuriu Y, Toma A, Okamoto K, Hagiwara A,
Yamagishi H.
Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kawaramachi
Hirokoji Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan. otsuji@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The incidence of gastric cancer, in people over 70
years of age, has increased remarkably. Aggressive lymphadenectomy with
gastrectomy has been reported to improve survival in patients with gastric
cancer. Because complication rates following gastrectomy increase with advancing
age, we sought to determine whether this procedure was merited in elderly
patients with gastric cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of
202 patients who underwent total gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for
gastric carcinoma. Postoperative complication rates were compared between
patients over and under 70 years of age. RESULTS: The 10-year survival rates of
patients under and over 70 years of age following total gastrectomy with
extended lymphadenectomy were not significantly different. Although medical
comorbidities in each group were similar, pulmonary dysfunction was
significantly more common following total gastrectomy in patients over 70 years
than in patients under 70 years. Moreover, logistic regression analysis revealed
that patient's age was the only variable that independently correlated with the
presence of postoperative complications. CONCLUSIONS: The prognosis of the
gastric cancer patients over 70 years of age was similar to that of younger
patients after total gastrectomy with extensive lymphadenectomy. However,
pulmonary dysfunction was significantly more common in patients over 70 years
old. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Sep 15;91(4):276-9.
Needle catheter jejunostomy at esophagectomy for cancer.
Sica GS, Sujendran V, Wheeler J, Soin B, Maynard N.
Department of Surgery, Upper G.I. Unit, The John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington
Oxford, United Kingdom. sica.giuseppe@fastwebnet.it
Important physiological changes occur after major abdominal surgery. Cellular
and morphological changes follow a period of malnutrition. Enteral feeding is an
important strategy for maintaining gut integrity and function. Controversies
remain on the use of feeding jejunostomy after major abdominal surgery and its
use had not gained widespread acceptance. The records of 262 consecutive
patients who underwent esophagectomy for cancer were reviewed retrospectively to
assess whether the placement of a needle catheter jejunostomy (NCJ) at the time
of surgery is a safe and useful procedure. All the patients had a 9 Fr. NCJ
place in a standardized fashion at the time of the esophagectomy. The technique
of placement, the utilisation, and the complications of the NCJ were examined.
The enteral nutrition was started in the first post-operative day. Sixty-three
percent of our patients required enteral nutrition for 10 or more days. In 19%,
this requirement was prolonged for more then 20 days, upto 68 days. The
complications related to NCJ were four (1.5%). The use of the NCJ as described
is safe, with an extremely low rate of complications. It may provide adequate
nutritional support for a prolonged period of time at low costs. Its routine use
in patients undergoing esophagectomy is recommended. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss,
Inc.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5660-7.
Phase II multi-institutional randomized trial of docetaxel plus
cisplatin with or without fluorouracil in patients with untreated, advanced
gastric, or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Ajani JA, Fodor MB, Tjulandin SA, Moiseyenko VM, Chao Y, Cabral Filho S, Majlis
A, Assadourian S, Van Cutsem E.
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas M.D.
Anderson Cancer Center, Box 426, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
jajani@mdanderson.org
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define the contribution of docetaxel
to combination chemotherapy in the outcome of patients with advanced gastric or
gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. We compared the overall response rate (ORR) and
safety of docetaxel plus cisplatin (DC) with DC plus fluorouracil (DCF) to
select either DC or DCF as the experimental treatment in the ensuing phase III
part of trial V-325. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase II randomized study,
untreated patients with confirmed advanced gastric or gastroesophageal
adenocarcinoma received either DCF (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on
day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m2/d as continuous infusion on days 1 to 5) or DC
(docetaxel 85 mg/m2 and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1) every 3 weeks. An
independent data monitoring committee (IDMC) was to select one of the two
regimens based primarily on ORR and safety profile. RESULTS: Of 158 randomly
assigned patients, 155 (DCF, n = 79; DC, n = 76) received treatment. The
confirmed ORR was 43% for DCF (n = 79) and 26% for DC (n = 76). Median time to
progression was 5.9 months for DCF and 5.0 months for DC. Median overall
survival time was 9.6 months for DCF and 10.5 months for DC. The most frequent
grade 3 and 4 events per patient included neutropenia (DCF = 86%; DC = 87%) and
GI (DCF = 56%; DC = 30%). CONCLUSION: Both regimens were active, but DCF
produced a higher confirmed ORR than DC. Toxicity profiles of DCF were
considered manageable. The IDMC chose DCF for the phase III part of V-325, which
compares DCF with cisplatin plus fluorouracil.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2005 Aug;32(8):1145-8.
[Clinical study of TS-1 for inoperative and recurrent gastric
cancer and evaluation of long survival cases]
[Article in Japanese]
Tanabe K, Yoshida K, Hamai Y, Ukon K, Ohta K, Hihara J, Toge T.
Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and
Medicine, Hiroshima University.
The clinical efficacy and safety of TS-1 therapy were studied retrospectively in
patients with inoperable and recurrent gastric cancer. The subjects were 67
patients who were treated with TS-1 in our department between June 1999 and
September 2004. The objective overall response rate was 41.0% (16/39; 95%
confidence interval, CI, 25.3-56.7). By location, the response rate of
peritoneal dissemination was high (57.1%), as were those of primary lesion
(53.3%) and lymph nodes (42.9%). The prevalence of adverse reactions with a
grade of 3 or 4 was 12.8%. The median survival rate (MST) was 276 days with
1-year and 2-year survival rates of 48.9% and 27.8%, respectively. This resulted
in 6 long-term survival cases (over 2.5 years) after TS-1 therapy, and the
longest survival time was 3y 5m after TS-1 therapy. PRs or long-term NCs after
TS-1 therapy were likely to be important factors for long-term survival. In
conclusion, TS-1 is safe and effective for patients with inoperable and
recurrent gastric cancer, and is promising as a first-line treatment.
-----
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Aug 1;22(3):233-41.
Trends in the management and survival of digestive tract cancers
among patients aged over 80 years.
Bouvier AM, Launoy G, Lepage C, Faivre J.
Registre des cancers digestifs de la Cote-d'Or, EMI INSERM 0106, Dijon Cedex,
France.
Summary Background: Advances have occurred in the management of digestive tract
cancers, but it is not known how much they have benefited the elderly. Aims: To
determine trends in treatment, stage at diagnosis and prognosis of digestive
tract cancers among patients aged >/=80 years in two well-defined French
populations. Design: Time trends were studied in three age classes and in 5
four-year time intervals. A multivariate relative survival analysis was
performed to estimate the independent effect of both age and period on
prognosis. Results: Five-year relative survival rates were 1.9% for oesophageal
cancer, 12% for stomach cancer, 41% for colon cancer and 37% for rectal cancer.
The survival rates improved between the first and the fifth period for all
cancer sites except for oesophageal cancer. This improvement remained
significant after adjustment for age, sex, site and treatment. It was associated
with an increase in the proportion of patients who underwent curative resection.
Very few patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The use of adjuvant
radiotherapy for rectal and oesophageal cancers did not significantly increase
over time. Conclusions: Except for oesophageal cancers, substantial advances in
the care of digestive tract cancers in the elderly have been achieved. Surgery
should not be restricted on the basis of age alone. Further improvements can be
made in particular to enhance adjuvant therapy whenever possible.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 10;23(20):4509-17.
Optimal locoregional treatment in gastric cancer.
Jansen EP, Boot H, Verheij M, van de Velde CJ.
Department of Radiotherapy and Gastroenterology of the Netherlands Cancer
Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Worldwide, gastric cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death.
The mainstay of curative treatment is radical surgery. But even with optimal
surgical resection, the prognosis remains modest in the Western world. Numerous
attempts have been undertaken to improve clinical outcome. More extensive lymph
node dissection, adjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy did not result
in a survival benefit in randomized trials. Only postoperative chemoradiotherapy
has proven to be valuable in prospective randomized trials. Questions are to be
answered about optimization of surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and fine
tuning of the three modalities. One of the key issues that should be addressed
is whether pre- or postoperative chemoradiotherapy will benefit survival or
locoregional control in the case of optimal surgery with an "over-D1"
lymphadenectomy and without splenectomy. In this article the most relevant
literature on locoregional treatment in operable gastric cancer will be reviewed
and future strategies will be discussed.
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;91(1):26-32.
Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node
dissection: a phase II study following the learning curve.
Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Miura S, Kanyama Y, Yokoyama H, Ohashi N, Hibi K, Ito K,
Akiyama S, Nakao A.
Department of Surgery II, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya/Aichi,
Japan.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A preliminary study on the use of
laparoscopy-assisted approach to treat gastric carcinoma resulted in higher
morbidity. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective phase II study of laparoscopy-assisted
distal gastrectomy (LADG) was performed for patients with preoperative diagnosis
of T1 N0 stage cancer located in the lower or middle-third stomach. Bleeding
amount, operating time, mortality, morbidity, and the number of lymph node
retrieval were recorded and compared with the preliminary series reported
previously by the same authors. RESULTS: Between 2000 and 2002, 47 patients were
accrued. The mean blood loss and postoperative hospital stay were significantly
decreased compared with the previous series, whereas the operating time was not.
There were no in-hospital deaths, with the incidence of anastomotic leakage
significantly decreased. All patients remain disease-free to date. CONCLUSIONS:
LADG can be performed safely and morbidity, no longer, is a drawback by
experienced hands that have reached plateau of the learning curve, although it
remains a time-consuming procedure. Its application to gastric cancer surgery is
feasible for early stage cancer, and its applicability to the treatment of T2
stage cancer will be the next issue to be explored.
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;90(3):134-8; discussion 138.
New strategies for the prevention of gastric cancer: Helicobacter
pylori and genetic susceptibility.
Correa P.
Department of Pathology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New
Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA. correa@lsuhsc.edu
Recently acquired knowledge points to the potential of markedly improved
strategies for the prevention of gastric cancer. The International Agency for
Cancer Research has reached the conclusion that infection with Helicobacter
pylori (H. pylori) is carcinogenic to humans (Group I). The bacterium displays
marked genetic heterogeneity. Virulence related genes, especially cag A and vac
A s1 m1 are associated with an increased cancer risk. Genetic susceptibility,
especially polymorphisms of the cytokine genes may increase cancer risk. Highly
susceptible individuals infected with high virulence bacterial genotypes have a
markedly increased gastric cancer risk. They should be targeted for endoscopic
monitoring to detect advanced precancerous lesions. The state of the art is
briefly reviewed and the needed research identified. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss,
Inc
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;90(3):166-70.
Role of post-operative chemoradiation in resected gastric cancer.
Macdonald JS.
Saint Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center, New York, New York 10011, USA.
jmacdonald@aptiumoncology.com
The curative management of gastric adenocarcinoma depends upon complete
resection of the primary tumor. In patients with lymph node metastases in the
resected specimen, the relapse and death rates from recurrent cancer are at
least 70%-80%. There is continued debate over whether more extensive lymph node
dissection (D2) improves survival when compared to less extensive operations.
Until recently, attempts at preventing recurrence have employed adjuvant
chemotherapy and have been ineffective. A large U.S. Intergroup study (INT-0116)
demonstrated that combined chemoradiation following complete gastric resection
improves median time to relapse (30 vs. 19 months, P < 0.0001) and overall
survival (35 vs. 28 months, P = 0.01). The improvements in disease-free and
overall survival resulting from post-operative chemoradiation have defined a new
standard of care. An update of the results of INT-0116 analysis performed in
2004 with 7 years median follow-up, not only confirms the benefits from
post-operative chemoradiation but also shows that chemoradiation does not
produce significant long-term toxicity. The recent publication of the first
large adequately powered III neoadjuvant chemotherapy trial suggested this
technique might down-stage tumors and increase resectability. Future advances in
the therapy of resectable gastric cancer may come from studies of pre-operative
neoadjuvant chemoradiation and the application of targeted therapies such as
growth receptor antagonists and anti-angiogenesis agents. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss,
Inc
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;90(3):153-65.
Status of extended lymph node dissection: locoregional control is
the only way to survive gastric cancer.
Hartgrink HH, van de Velde CJ.
Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The
Netherlands. H.H.Hartgrink@lumc.nl
There are many factors that are of influence on gastric cancer treatment. The
only way to survive is complete locoregional control. More extended dissections
should lead to better outcome, but increased morbidity and mortality probably
offset its long-term effect in survival in randomised studies. In this article
the factors of influence on outcome of gastric cancer treatment such as the
extent of lymph node dissection, splenectomy, pancreatectomy, age, volume and
additional treatments are discussed. A literature review of these factors in
relation to the latest results of the Dutch Gastric Cancer Trials are presented.
If morbidity and mortality can be reduced there might be an advantage of
extended lymph node dissection. Splenectomy and pancreatectomy should be
performed only in case of direct in growth from the tumour into these organs.
Centralisation of gastric cancer treatment should be achieved in order to
improve results and to facilitate research. By refining selection criteria in
the treatment of gastric cancer further improvements are to be expected.
Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;90(3):174-86; discussion 186-7.
Perioperative adjunctive treatment in the management of operable
gastric cancer.
Silberman H.
Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern
California, Los Angeles, California 90033, USA. hsilber777@aol.com
Outcome in the management of clinically resectable gastric carcinoma has been
disappointing, at least in Western populations, despite increasingly radical
surgery and extensive experience with adjunctive perioperative treatment with
innumerable single and combined modality regimens. The United States Intergroup
Study, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial of adjuvant chemoradiation,
demonstrated significant improvement in disease-free and overall survival.
Consequently, this regimen of postoperative fluoruracil plus leucovorin and
locoregional radiation has been incorporated into current clinical practice. In
hopes of further improving cure rates, many other regimens are under
investigation, including the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy alone, combined
neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy, and adjuvant therapy alone. In these clinical
trials, therapeutic agents are prescribed alone or in multimodal regimens and
include systemic chemotherapy, intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy with or without
hyperthermia, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), and postoperative external
beam irradiation. Several molecular markers have been identified, which seem to
predict that a given tumor may be effective or resistant to a drug, raising the
possibility of customized chemotherapy regimens. Preclinical studies suggest
potential efficacy of angiogenesis inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and
antisense agents. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2005 Jun 1;90(3):195-207; discussion 207.
Gastric GI stromal tumors (GISTs): the role of surgery in the era
of targeted therapy.
Heinrich MC, Corless CL.
OHSU Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University and VA Medical
Center, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA. heinrich@ohsu.edu
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasm
arising in the stomach. These tumors were previously classified as smooth muscle
tumors, but in recent years it has become clear that they are clinically,
pathologically, and molecularly distinct from other tumors and are much more
common than previously appreciated. Historically, patients with primary
localized or advanced GIST have been managed surgically, as there was no proven
role of other treatment modalities such as radiation or chemotherapy. However,
the field of GIST was revolutionized with the 1998 discovery that the vast
majority of these tumors have oncogenic gain-of-function mutations of the KIT
receptor tyrosine kinase. Follow-up studies have confirmed that KIT is both a
useful diagnostic marker and an excellent therapeutic target. Imatinib, an
inhibitor of KIT kinase activity, is now the standard front-line therapy for
patients with advanced GIST. In this review, we discuss pathological and
molecular features of gastric GISTs and review the historic and current roles of
surgery in the treatment of patients with primary or metastatic GIST. The
importance of a multi-disciplinary approach using both surgery and imatinib
therapy is emphasized. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc
-----
Gut. 2005 Jun;54(6):735-8.
The time to eradicate gastric cancer is now.
Graham DY, Shiotani A.
Michael E DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, RM 3A-320 (111D), 2002
Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA. dgraham@bcm.tmc.edu
Worldwide gastric cancer remains one of the most common cancers, killing upwards
of one million people each year. While the molecular pathogenesis remains
unclear, infection with the bacterium Helicobacter pylori is considered a
"necessary but not sufficient" cause, not surprisingly as gastric cancer has
long been known to be associated with atrophic gastritis. Eradication of H
pylori is expected to virtually eliminate gastric cancer and H pylori associated
peptic ulcer within approximately 40 years and thus reduce overall mortality. In
the USA, the incidence of gastric cancer in the general population is low,
reflecting the change in the pattern of gastritis from atrophic to non-atrophic
and in the low and decreasing prevalence of H pylori infection in the middle and
upper classes. However, the plan for eradication of this important pathogen must
be considered within the context of the prevalence and outcome within specific
populations.Anticancer Res. 2005 Mar-Apr;25(2B):1297-301.
-----
A phase II multicentric trial of S-1 combined with 24 h-infusion
of cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Iwase H, Shimada M, Tsuzuki T, Horiuchi Y, Kumada S, Haruta J, Yamaguchi T,
Sugihara M, Ina K, Kusugami K, Goto S.
Department of Gastroenterology, Nagoya Medical Center, Japan. iwaseh@nnh.hosp.go.jp
BACKGROUND: The aim of this multicentric trial was to determine the clinical
toxicities and antitumor effects of a chemotherapy regimen of S-1 combined with
cisplatin in patients with inoperable locally or metastatic advanced gastric
cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients were entered into the study.
S-1 (80 mg/m2) was administered orally daily for 14 consecutive days and 24-h
infusion of cisplatin (70 mg/m2) was administered on day 8 of every 28-day
cycle. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 50% and complete response rate was
5%. The most common adverse event was leucopenia, which occurred with grade 3 in
7 patients (16.6%) and grade 4 in 2 patients (4.8%). Non-hematological adverse
events were generally mild. The median survival time was 342 days. The 2-year
survival rate was 22.9%. CONCLUSION: This combination chemotherapy is active,
convenient and well tolerated in patients with high-grade advanced gastric
cancer.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2005 Mar;32(3):405-10.
[Limited surgery for early gastric cancer using lymphatic basin
dissection--a sure method of sentinel node biopsy for gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Kinami S, Miwa K, Ishii K, Miyashita T, Fushida S, Fujimura T, Ohta T.
Dept. of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Division of Cancer Medicine, Graduate School
of Medicine, Kanazawa University, Japan.
The results of our sentinel node biopsy for early-stage gastric cancer had a
high predictive value for nodal metastasis, with a sensitivity of 85% (34/40)
and an accuracy of 98% (259/265). Therefore, sentinel node biopsy is expected to
be decided as an adaptation of limited surgery for early gastric cancer.
However, there were two serious problems in sentinel node biopsy for gastric
cancer; one was the great difficulty of sentinel node detection and biopsy in
the operative field, and the other was the possibility of false negative cases
in the frozen section diagnosis. To solve these problems, we developed lymphatic
basin dissection, a new technique suitable for sentinel node biopsy of gastric
cancer. The lymphatic basin is an own lymphatic components dyed in blue in the
dye method. In the lymphatic basin dissection method, sentinel nodes are
detected and harvested at the back table after en bloc dissection of the
lymphatic basins. Lymphatic basin dissection is an excellent method because of
the certainty in sentinel node biopsy, and the sure back-up dissection.
Lymphatic basin dissection and following limited surgery was performed on 143
patients for early-stage gastric cancer in our hospital. No patient had a
recurrence of gastric cancer; 9 patients died of other diseases, and the other
134 survived.
-----
Surgery. 2005 Mar;137(3):317-22.
Laparoscopic assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric
cancer: Five years' experience.
Mochiki E, Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, Nakabayashi T, Asao T, Kuwano H.
Department of General Surgical Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma
University, Japan. emochiki@showa.gunma-u.ac.jp
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic assisted gastrectomy is being reported increasingly as
the treatment of choice for early gastric cancer. However, no reports concerning
the prognosis of patients who have undergone laparoscopic assisted distal
gastrectomy (LADG) for early gastric cancer or data comparing the results to
those obtained after open gastric surgery are yet available. METHODS: A
retrospective study was performed comparing laparoscopic assisted and open
distal gastrectomies for early gastric cancer. Eighty-nine patients who
underwent LADG were compared to 60 who underwent conventional open distal
gastrectomy (DG) in terms of pathologic findings, operative outcome,
complications, and survival. RESULTS: There were no significant differences
between LADG and DG in operation time (209 vs 200 minutes), complication rate
(9% vs 18%), and 5-year survival rate (98% vs 95%). There were differences
between LADG and DG with regard to blood loss (237 vs 412 mL), number of lymph
nodes (19 vs 25), postoperative stay (17 vs 25 days), and the duration of
epidural analgesia (2 vs 4 days) ( P < .05 each). CONCLUSIONS: For properly
selected patients, LADG can be a curative and minimally invasive treatment for
early gastric cancer.
-----
Br J Surg. 2005 Mar;92(3):370-5.
Treatment of peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer by
peritonectomy and chemohyperthermic peritoneal perfusion.
Yonemura Y, Kawamura T, Bandou E, Takahashi S, Sawa T, Matsuki N.
Peritoneal Dissemination Programme, Shizuoka Cancer Centre, 1007 Shimo-nagakubo,
Nagaizumi-machi, Suntougun, Shizuoka 411-8777, Japan. y.yonemura@scchr.p
BACKGROUND: There is no standard treatment for peritoneal dissemination from
gastric cancer. A novel treatment consisting of peritonectomy and intraoperative
chemohyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP) was compared with conventional
surgery and CHPP. METHODS: Records of all patients who underwent CHPP after
cytoreductive surgery between 1992 and 2002 were reviewed. RESULTS: Data for 107
patients with peritoneal dissemination were available. Complete cytoreduction
was achieved in 47 (43.9 per cent) of the 107 patients: 18 of 65 who underwent
conventional surgery and 29 of 42 who had peritonectomy. Twenty-three patients
(21.5 per cent) suffered from complications. The overall operative mortality
rate was 2.8 per cent. Seventeen patients (15.9 per cent) were disease free and
87 subsequent deaths were related to disease progression. The median survival
for all patients was 11.5 months, with a 5-year survival rate of 6.7 per cent.
Median survival after complete cytoreduction was 15.5 months and that after
incomplete cytoreduction was 7.9 months, with 5-year survival rates of 13 and 2
per cent respectively. Completeness of cytoreduction and peritonectomy were
independent prognostic factors. The 5-year survival rate after complete
cytoreduction by peritonectomy with CHPP was 27 per cent. CONCLUSION: Complete
cytoreduction after peritonectomy and CHPP may improve the survival of patients
with peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer.
-----
Onkologie. 2005 Mar;28(3):128-32.
Infusional 5-fluorouracil and mitomycin C: an effective regimen
in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.
Rudi J, Werle S, Bergtholdt D, Hofheinz RD.
Abteilung Innere Medizin I, Theresienkrankenhaus und St. Hedwig-Klinik GmbH,
Mannheim, Germany.
BACKGROUND: Weekly infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (FA) as
part of multi-drug chemotherapy regimens in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) has
shown to be effective with low toxicity. The present analysis was carried out to
evaluate the safety and efficacy of 5-FU/FA in combination with 3-weekly
mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND
METHODS: A total of 28 patients with AGC were analysed (first line n=23). They
received weekly 24-h 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2 preceded by 2-h FA 500 mg/m2 for 6 weeks
followed by a two week rest period. Bolus MMC 10 mg/m2 was applied on days 1 and
22. Patient characteristics were: m/f 17/11; median age 67 years (43-79). The
most common metastatic sites were liver and peritoneum (n=12, respectively).
RESULTS: A median of 3 and a total of 91 cycles were administered. Mean dose
intensity in cycle I was: 5-FU 86%, MMC 87%. Responses were observed in 43%, no
change was seen in 29% of the patients. Median overall survival was 9.7 months
(10.7 months for patients treated first line). Non-haematological toxicities
(NCI CTC grades 3 and 4) were observed in 2 patients, leukopenia and
thrombocytopenia grades 3/4 were observed in 50 and 25% of the patients,
respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Infusional 5-FU/FA plus MMC may safely be used in
patients with AGC in the routine clinical setting. This regimen yields response
rates and survival data comparable to platinum-based regimen.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2005 Feb;32(2):195-9.
[Results of treatment of far advanced and recurrent stomach
cancer with TS-1]
[Article in Japanese]
Johira H, Yunoki S, Kawata N, Watanabe N, Hachisuka Y, Kimura M, Uomoto M,
Hatano H, Sanada E, Watanabe R, Ohmori K, Miyata N.
Dept of Surgery, Matsuyama Shimin Hospital.
We used TS-1 as first-line therapy to treat 44 patients with far advanced or
recurrent gastric cancer, and assessed the results and safety. One treatment
cycle consisted of TS-1, 80 mg/m2/day, for 28 days followed by a 14-day rest
period. The efficacy rate in the cases capable of being evaluated was 30.1%
(11/36), and 25.0%, (7/28) when TS-1 was used as monotherapy. The efficacy rate
was lower than in a phase II study, however, the median survival time (MST) of
10.7 months for the patients as a whole, the 1-year survival rate of 43.2%, and
the 2-year survival rate of 20.5% were favorable. There were many NC cases in
which long-term therapy was possible, and they contributed to the long-term
survival. The incidence of adverse events was 84.1%, but the incidence of grade
3 or more events was low at 13.6%. Since TS-1 is highly efficacious and safe, as
well as convenient because of being an oral preparation, it appears that it can
be ranked as the drug of first choice for chemotherapy of far advanced or
recurrent gastric cancer.
-----
Cancer J. 2005 Jan-Feb;11(1):18-25.
Minimally invasive treatment of stomach cancer.
Otsuka K, Murakami M, Aoki T, Tajima Y, Kaetsu T, Lefor AT.
Department of Surgery, Division of General & Gastroenterological Surgery, Showa
University School of Medicine, 1-5-8, Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666,
Japan.
The rate of detection of early gastric cancer has increased because of the
development of diagnostic techniques, such as endoscopy, biopsy, and endoscopic
ultrasonography. Recently, minimally invasive surgical procedures for benign
gastric conditions have been advocated, and the laparoscopic approach is noted
as a technique that increases the quality of life. However, the development of
laparoscopic gastric resections and laparoscopically assisted gastric operations
for malignancy still deserve a word of caution. Laparoscopic local resection of
the stomach is used to treat mucosal cancer without lymph node metastasis, and
laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy is used to treat early gastric cancer
with lymph node metastasis in the perigastric portion. According to short-term
results reported by a small group of surgeons, laparoscopic approaches for
gastric cancer result in a minimally invasive approach, early recovery, and
decreased morbidity and mortality. However, the longterm results of these less
invasive treatments are not known in advanced gastric cancer. If the results of
randomized controlled studies for advanced gastric cancer are confirmed, the use
of these techniques will spread worldwide and may become a standard technique
for the resection of gastric cancer.
-----
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Dec 18;148(51):2529-34.
[New insights in the adjuvant treatment of gastric cancer]
[Article in Dutch]
Jansen EP, Boot H, Cats A, van Coevorden F, Zoetmulder FA, Verheij M.
Afd. Radiotherapie, Het Nederlands Kanker Instituut/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek
Ziekenhuis, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam. epm.jansen@nki.nl
The current standard treatment of patients with gastric cancer is partial or
total stomach resection and dissection of the draining lymph nodes. This
approach, however, results in a rather low survival rate, partly because the
diagnosis is often established in an advanced stage. Various strategies,
including adjuvant radiotherapy, chemotherapy or more extensive surgical
procedures, have resulted mainly in increased morbidity without improving
survival. In a recent randomised trial, concurrent postoperative radiotherapy
and chemotherapy prolonged survival and reduced the chance of a local recurrence
at an acceptable toxicity. Although several aspects of combined
radiochemotherapy require further study, this new treatment concept appears to
be a promising addition to the therapeutic arsenal for gastric cancer.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Dec;31(13):2183-6.
[Low-dose paclitaxel therapy as second-line chemotherapy for
patients who previously received TS-1 therapy]
[Article in Japanese]
Takemura M, Osugi H, Lee S, Kaneko M, Tanaka Y, Fujiwara Y, Nishizawa S, Iwasaki
H.
Dept. of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of
Medicine.
TS-1 is often used as first-line chemotherapy for treatment of advanced or
recurrent gastric cancer, but there is no definite therapeutic policy for
patients for whom TS-1 is not effective, or to whom it cannot be administered.
We have treated 6 patients with low-dose weekly paclitaxel therapy as
second-line chemotherapy after initial treatment with TS-1. These patients
consisted of 3 males and 3 females with a mean age of 56 years. Four patients
had recurrent gastric cancer and two had unresectable advanced gastric cancer.
Paclitaxel was administered in doses of 80 or 100 mg weekly. Adverse events more
severe than grade 3 were not observed, but there were 2 cases of leukopenia
(grade 1) and 2 cases of decreased hemoglobin (grade 2). Mean survival time
after the administration of paclitaxel was 139 days. Five patients died of their
cancer, and one is still alive 382 days after the paclitaxel administration. The
one-year survival rate after administration was 16.7%. Low-dose weekly
paclitaxel therapy is therefore safe and effective for patients with advanced
and recurrent gastric cancer who previously received TS-1 therapy.
-----
J Surg Oncol. 2004 Dec 15;88(4):201-5.
Surgical treatment for gastric carcinoma in the elderly.
Coniglio A, Tiberio GA, Busti M, Gaverini G, Baiocchi L, Piardi T, Ronconi M,
Giulini SM.
Surgical Clinic, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Brescia
University, Brescia, Italy.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The incidence of gastric cancer is increasing in the
elderly. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of advanced age (> or
=80 years) on morbidity, mortality and late outcome after curative surgery for
gastric cancer. METHODS: The cases of 30 octogenarians (Group A) with gastric
cancer who underwent surgical treatment in our Institution from 1990 to 2003
were reviewed and compared to a simultaneous group of 228 younger patients
(Group B). RESULTS: The rate of resective and curative procedures was not
different in the two groups, although the American Society of Anaesthesiologists
(ASA) risk was significantly higher in the elderly (P < 0.001) and the lymphatic
dissection was less extended in group A. In the two groups, the curability was
directly correlated to the cancer stage, but not affected by the ASA risk. The
postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were similar in the two groups and
were not related to the ASA risk. Considering the mortality for gastric cancer
alone, the two groups showed a similar survival rate, only correlated to the
cancer stage. CONCLUSIONS: In the elderly, an oncologically correct surgical
procedure can safely be prosecuted with satisfactory immediate and late results.
-----
World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Dec 1;10(23):3405-8.
Surgical treatment and prognosis of gastric cancer in 2,613
patients.
Zhang XF, Huang CM, Lu HS, Wu XY, Wang C, Guang GX, Zhang JZ, Zheng CH.
Department of Oncology, Affiliated Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University,
Fuzhou 350001, Fujian Province, China. zjzchina@vipsina.com
AIM: To analyze the factors influencing the prognosis of patients with gastric
cancer after surgical treatment, in order to optimize the surgical procedures.
METHODS: A retrospective study of 2 613 consecutive patients with gastric cancer
was performed. Of these patients, 2,301 (88.1%) received operations; 196
explorative laparotomy (EL), 130 by-pass procedure (BPP), and 1 975 surgical
resection of the tumors (891 palliative resection and 1 084 curative resection).
The survival rate was calculated by the actuarial life table method, and the
prognostic factors were evaluated using the Cox regression proportional hazard
model. RESULTS: Of the patients, 2,450 (93.8%) were followed-up. The median
survival period was 4.6 mo for patients without operation, 5.2 mo for EL, 6.4 mo
for BPP, and 15.2 mo for palliative resection (P = 0.0001). Of the patients with
surgical resection of the tumors, the overall 1, 3 and 5-year survival rates
after were 82.7%, 46.3% and 31.1%, respectively, with the 5-year survival rate
being 51.2% in patients with curative resection, and 7.8% for those with
palliative resection. The 5-year survival rate was 32.5% for patients with total
gastrectomy, and 28.3% for those with total gastrectomy plus resection of the
adjacent organs. The factors that independently correlated with poor survival
included advanced stage, upper third location, palliative resection, poor
differentiation, type IV of Borrmann classification, tumor metastasis (N3),
tumor invasion into the serosa and contiguous structure, proximal subtotal
gastrectomy for upper third carcinoma and D1 lymphadenectomy after curative
treatment. CONCLUSION: The primary lesion should be resected as long as the
local condition permitted for stage III and IV tumors, in order to prolong the
patients' survival and improve their quality of life after operation. Total
gastrectomy is indicated for carcinomas in the cardia and fundus, and gastric
cancer involving the adjacent organs without distant metastasis requires
gastrectomy with resection of the involved organs.
-----
Hepatogastroenterology. 2004 Nov-Dec;51(60):1872-6.
Phase-II randomized study of preoperative IL-2 administration in
radically operable gastric cancer patients.
Romano F, Piacentini MG, Franciosi C, Caprotti R, De Fina S, Cesana G, Uggeri F,
Conti M, Uggeri F.
Department of Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, II University of Milan, Bicocca,
Italy. fabriziorom@hotmail.com
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surgery has appeared to induce lymphocytopenia and this
decrease in host defenses during postoperative period could promote both the
proliferation of possible micrometastases and the implantation of surgically
disseminated tumor cells. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the
preoperative subcutaneous injection of IL-2 (interleukin-2) may be able to
abrogate surgery-induced immunosuppression in radically operable gastric cancer
and to assess its toxicity. METHODOLOGY: This phase II study included 39
consecutive patients with histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma (M/F
26/13; mean age 68; range 48-82) who underwent radical surgery from October 1999
to December 2000. Patients were randomized to be treated with surgery alone as
controls (20 patients) or surgery plus preoperative treatment with recombinant
human IL-2 (19 patients). IL-2 was administered subcutaneously, at a dose of
9,000,000 IU, for three consecutive days, followed by surgery within 36 hours
from IL-2 withdrawal. We considered the total lymphocyte count and lymphocyte
subset (CD4, CD4/CD8) during the preoperative period, before IL-2
administration, and on the 14th and 50th day. RESULTS: Two groups were well
matched for type of surgery and extent of disease. All the patients underwent
radical surgery plus D2 lymphadenectomy. At baseline, there were no significant
differences in total lymphocyte and lymphocyte subsets between groups. The
control group showed a significant decrease of total lymphocytes, CD4 cells, and
CD4/CD8 ratio at the 14th postoperative day relative to the baseline value.
Among the 22 patients evaluated in the control group 13 had a decreased of CD4
under 500 cells/mm3 (65%). Instead in the IL-2 group a significant increase was
observed over the control group values of total lymphocytes and CD4 cells (14th
ly total and CD4: IL-2 vs. control p<0.05). Moreover in this group only 3
patients had CD4 under 500 cells/mm3 (15%). This difference in CD4 count, is
significant at the 50th postoperative day too (p=0.006). No anesthesiologic or
surgical complication was seen in IL-2 treated group, with low grade of toxicity
(WHO grade:1): the main effect was fever (14/19) easily manageable, with no
cardiovascular complications. Furthermore, IL-2 group showed lower postoperative
complications (p<0.05) and higher lymphocyte/eosinophil infiltration into the
tumor (p<0.002). CONCLUSIONS: This phase II study would suggest that a
preoperative immunotherapy with IL-2 is a well tolerated treatment able to
prevent surgery induced lymphocytopenia. IL-2 seems to neutralize the
immunosuppression induced by operation and so to stimulate the host reaction
against tumor tissue (lymphocytes/eosinophils infiltration). Next randomized
clinical trials could investigate the prognostic impact of IL-2 on the clinical
course.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Nov;31(12):1982-6.
[Combination chemotherapy of TS-1 and docetaxel on advanced and
recurrent gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Yoshida K, Toge T.
Dept. of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and
Medicine, Hiroshima University, Japan.
In the present article, we have summarized the clinical trials on docetaxel and
the phase I study of docetaxel and combination therapy. Patients with a
performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 received docetaxel at the starting dose of 40
mg/m2 by iv infusion over 1 hour on day 1 and TS-1 at the full dose of 80 mg/m2
daily for two weeks every three weeks. Nine patients were treated with
increasing dose levels of docetaxel as follows: (docetaxel/TS-1, mg/m2): 40/80
(level 1), 50/80 (level 2) and 60/80 (level 3), and all the cases were found to
be assessable for drug safety, while 7 were assessable for response. The MTD was
reached at the 50/80 mg/m2 dose level in three patients out of six, who
experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT). On the other hand, partial response
was achieved in 5 (71.4%) of the 7 patients with evaluable lesions. The drug
combination showed a good safety profile, and the responses observed in the
study suggest that the drug combination shows a high degree of efficacy in
patients with advanced and or recurrent gastric cancer.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Nov;31(12):1978-81.
[Current combination chemotherapy containing paclitaxel for
advanced, recurrent gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Emi Y, Kakeji Y, Baba H, Ishida T, Maehara Y.
Department of Surgery, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital, 1-9-6 Senda-machi, Naka-ku,
Hiroshima 730-8619, Japan.
5-FU has been a key chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment of advanced or
recurrent gastric cancer. In order to enhance the effect of 5-FU, biochemical
modulation or combination chemotherapy has been developed. Although several
phase III studies were reported in the 1990s, a standard chemotherapeutic
regimen has not been established worldwide. Recently, a newly developed
anticancer agent, Paclitaxel, can be clinically used for advanced gastric cancer
either as a single agent or in combination with such as 5-FU, cisplatin, and
TS-1. It may well further improve the quality of life and prolong the survival
of patients with gastric cancer. Further assessment for the well design phase
III clinical trials will be necessary to establish the availability of such
combination modalities for the treatment of advanced, recurrent gastric cancer.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Nov;31(12):1952-6.
[Combination chemotherapy for gastric cancer including LV/5-FU]
[Article in Japanese]
Sasaki T, Maeda Y, Kandaba-shi K, Ono M.
Dept of Chemotherapy, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
LV (l-LV)/5-FU therapy has been used broadly and is considered to be a standard
treatment for large bowel cancer due to an enhancing therapeutic effect of 5-FU.
According to recent clinical study reports on large bowel cancer in Europe and
the United States, various administration methods of LV/5-FU with a combination
of other drugs have been devised. It appeared that 5-FU used together in bolus
and continuous infusions have yielded outstanding results. Although the basis of
combination therapy for gastric cancer seemed to be LV/5-FU, there were many
reports on TS-1 combined with other drugs because the oral medicine TS-1 was
domestically available for the past one or two years. Currently, controlled
randomized trials of LV/5-FU therapy and TS-1 have been ongoing. However, when
patients cannot take oral intakes, LV/5-FU therapy is important. It seems that
LV/5-FU therapy in combination with other drugs, in particular, CDDP, CPT-11,
paclitaxel, docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and ETP will be given as candidates for the
standard treatment of gastric cancer.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Oct;31(11):1723-6.
[Treatment results of peritoneal dissemination from gastric
cancer by neoadjuvant intraperitoneal-systemic chemotherapy]
[Article in Japanese]
Yonemura Y, Kawamura T, Bando E, Takahashi S, Sawa T, Yoshimitsu Y, Obata T,
Endo Y, Sasaki T, Sugarbaker PH.
Peritoneal Dissemination Program, Shizuoka Cancer Center.
No standard treatment exists for peritoneal dissemination from gastric cancer.
We reviewed our experience using a novel treatment consisting of peritonectomy
and intraoperative chemo-hyperthermic peritoneal perfusion (CHPP). Records of
all patients who underwent CHPP and cytoreductive surgery from 1992 to 2001 were
reviewed. RESULTS: Data from 107 patients (average age, 52 years) were
available. P3 dissemination was found in 72 patients, and 8 and 27 patients
showed P1 or P2 dissemination, respectively. Peritoneal metastasis was
synchronous in 75 and metachronous in 32 patients. All patients received CHPP
after cytoreductive surgery. Peritonectomy was performed in 42 patients.
Complete cytoreduction (CC-0) was achieved in 47 patients (44%). Peritonectomy,
resulted in CC-0 in 69% (29/42), but CC-0 was achieved in 18 of 65 (28%)
patients by ordinary surgical techniques. There were 23 postoperative
complications (21%) after operation. The overall operative mortality was 2.8%
(3/107). Median follow-up for the entire study group was 46 months. Seventeen
patients (15%) were disease-free, and 90 patients were dead at the time of
analysis. Eighty-seven deaths were related to progression of disease. The median
survival of all patients was 16.2 months, with an actual 5-year survival of 6%.
Median survival of CHPP plus ordinary cyoreduction was 12.0 months and that
after CHPP and peritonectomy was 22.8 months. Completeness of cytoreduction and
peritonectomy were significant prognostic factors on univariate analysis and
5-year survival rate was 27%. Lymph node status, grade of peritoneal
dissemination (P1-2 vs P3), age (>60 years vs <60 years), tumor volume of
dissemination (>2.5 cm vs <2.5 cm in diameter), and histologic type
(differentiated vs. poorly differentiated type) did not affect survival. The cox
proportional model demonstrated that completeness of cytoreduction was the
strongest prognostic factor. Patients who had an incomplete resection had
2.8-fold higher risk of dying from disease than patients who underwent complete
cytoreduction. The 5-year survival after complete cytoreduction was 12%,
compared with 2% for incomplete resection. Four patients lived more than 5
years. Cytoreduction was incomplete in one 5-year survivor who showed complete
response to CHPP. CONCLUSION: Complete cytoreduction using peritonectomy and
CHPP may improve survival of patients with peritoneal dissemination from gastric
cancer. This procedure is most appropriate for highly motivated patients who are
committed to survive as long as possible.
-----
Oncology. 2004;67(1):48-53.
Long-term follow-up of a pilot phase II study with neoadjuvant
epidoxorubicin, etoposide and cisplatin in gastric cancer.
Barone C, Cassano A, Pozzo C, D'Ugo D, Schinzari G, Persiani R, Basso M,
Brunetti IM, Longo R, Picciocchi A.
Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Universita Cattolica
del S. Cuore, Roma, Italy. carlobarone@rm.unicatt.it
OBJECTIVE: The prognosis in T3-T4 or N+ gastric cancer is dismal, and the role
of adjuvant therapy remains uncertain. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could improve
both resectability and survival. Here, we report the results of the long-term
follow-up of a pilot study aimed at evaluating a neoadjuvant treatment in a
group of patients carefully staged by computed tomography (CT), endoscopic
ultrasound and laparoscopy. METHODS: Twenty-five stage II-III patients with
histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study. All
patients gave informed consent and were thoroughly staged. Patients were treated
with epidoxorubicin (40 mg/m2 i.v.) on days 1 and 4, etoposide (VP-16; 100
mg/m2) on days 1, 3 and 4 and cisplatinum (80 mg/m2) on day 2, every 21-28 days
for 3 pre-operative cycles before CT clinical restaging followed by laparotomy
and D2 gastrectomy. Three further cycles of chemotherapy were planned after
radical surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received the planned
pre-operative chemotherapy and underwent surgical resection; total (13 patients)
or subtotal (7 patients) R0 D2 gastrectomy was possible in 20 patients. One
patient died as a result of gastric bleeding. Perioperative complications
occurred in 5 patients (failure of anastomosis in 1 patient and wound infection
in the other 4). The pathologic response rate included 7 partial responses
(29.1%) and 10 patients with stable disease (41.7%). The main toxicity was grade
3/4 neutropenia (68%), which occurred more frequently during the postoperative
chemotherapy, and fatigue (68%). Fever or infection, however, were never
observed. The median disease-free survival was 37 months, and median survival
has not been reached after 40 months of median follow-up. One-, 2- and 3-year
survival rates were 80, 64 and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The notable
long-term survival in the present study suggests a comparison between the
neoadjuvant approach, including new drug combinations, and adjuvant chemo- or
chemoradio-therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer. Copyright 2004 S. Karger
AG, Basel
-----
Gut. 2004 Sep;53(9):1217-9.
Is gastric cancer preventable?
Correa P.
Louisiana State University, Department of Pathology, LSU Health Sciences Center,
1901 Perdido Street, New Orleans, LA 70112, USA. correa@lsuhsc.edu
Gastric cancer is a major health burden worldwide and prevention is the most
promising strategy to control the disease. The available scientific evidence
indicates that curing Helicobacter pylori infection results in a modest
retardation of the precancerous process but does not prevent all cancers.
Individuals at the highest risk should be cured of their infection and monitored
endoscopically to detect dysplasia and "early" cancer, amenable to successful
treatment.
-----
Oncology. 2004;66(6):445-9.
FLEP chemotherapy for alpha-fetoprotein-producing gastric cancer.
Kochi M, Fujii M, Kaiga T, Takahashi T, Morishita Y, Kobayashi M, Kasakura Y,
Takayama T.
Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Itabashi-ku,
Tokyo, Japan. gann@med.nihon-u.ac.jp
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at comparing the efficacy of FLEP chemotherapy in
the treatment of stage IV AFP-producing gastric cancer and stage IV non-AFP-producing
gastric cancer. METHODS: Between 1989 and 2002, 57 patients with stage IV
inoperable gastric cancer were given a combination of chemotherapy with
5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV), etoposide (VP-16) and
cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) (designated as FLEP). In the two groups
classified histologically according to AFP positivity, the rate of response and
conversion to surgery, disease-free and overall survival were compared. The
disease-free and overall survival in the two groups was compared by a log-rank
test. RESULTS: Patients of the AFP-producing group had a significantly better
response rate (70 vs. 31.9%, p = 0.03) and a better conversion rate (40 vs.
12.8%, p = 0.04) than those of the non-AFP-producing group. Patients of the AFP-producing
group also had a significantly better disease-free and overall survival (p =
0.02) than those of the non-AFP-producing group. AFP-producing gastric cancer
was identified as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSION: FLEP
chemotherapy was more effective for stage IV AFP-producing gastric cancer than
in stage IV non-AFP-producing gastric cancer. Preoperative FLEP chemotherapy
improved the prognosis of AFP-producing gastric cancer because of downstaging.
Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
-----
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2004 Jul-Sep;5(3):246-52.
Helicobacter pylori eradication as a preventive tool against
gastric cancer.
Hamajima N, Goto Y, Nishio K, Tanaka D, Kawai S, Sakakibara H, Kondo T.
Department of Preventive Medicine/Biostatistics and Medical Decision Making,
Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan. nhamajim@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), which increases the risk of gastric diseases,
including digestive ulcers and gastric cancer, is highly prevalent in Asian
countries. There is no doubt that eradication of the bacterium is effective as a
treatment of digestive ulcer, but eradication aiming to reduce the gastric
cancer risk is still controversial. Observational studies in Japan demonstrated
that the eradication decreased the gastric cancer risk among 132 stomach cancer
patients undergoing endoscopical resection (65 treated with omeprazol and
antibiotics and 67 untreated). In Columbia, 976 participants were randomized
into eight groups in a three-treatment factorial design including H. pylori
eradication, resulting in significant regression in the H. pylori eradication
group. A recent randomized study in China also showed a significant reduction of
gastric cancer risk among those without any gastric atrophy, intestinal
metaplasia, and dysplasia. Efficacy of eradication may vary in extent among
countries with different incidence rates of gastric cancer. Since the lifetime
cumulative risk (0 to 84 years old) of gastric cancer in Japan is reported to be
12.7% for males and 4.8% for females (Inoue and Tominaga, 2003), the
corresponding values for H. pylori infected Japanese can be estimated at 21.2%
in males and 8.0% in females under the assumptions that the relative risk for
infected relative to uninfected is 5 and the proportion of those infected is
0.5. Both the fact that not all individuals are infected among those exposed and
the knowledge that only a small percentage of individuals infected with the
bacterium develop gastric cancer, indicate the importance of gene-environment
interactions. Studies on such interactions should provide useful information for
anti-H. pylori preventive strategies.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Aug;31(8):1147-51.
[COX and study of cancer therapy]
[Article in Japanese]
Yamada N, Ohira M, Hirakawa K.
Dept of Surgical Oncology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine.
The increased expression of COX-2 in carcinoma tissue is found in gastric
cancer, lung cancer and breast cancer as well as colon cancer. It was shown that
COX-2 played an important role in carcinogenesis by an experiment using a
cultured cell and an animal experiment using a knockout mouse. The inhibitory
effect of COX-2 inhibitor on polyps in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP)
patients was reported from the clinical aspect, and the U. S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) approved administration of a COX-2 inhibitor to FAP
patients. COX-2 plays an important role in proliferation, invasion and
metastasis of cancer. COX-2 expression was reportedly enhanced in lung cancer by
an anticancer agent and radiotherapy, and clinical application of a COX-2
inhibitor is attempted. In addition, the experimental examination showed the
inhibitory effect of a COX-2 inhibitor on hematogenous metastasis of colon
cancer. The mechanism of the COX-2 inhibitor remains unclear. Clinical
application of the COX-2 inhibitor to an effective anti-tumor agent is expected
after more studies have been conducted on its molecular biologic function.
----
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2004 Aug 7 [Epub ahead of print]
Clinical overview: adjuvant therapy of gastrointestinal cancer.
Macdonald JS.
St. Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center, 325 West 15th Street, NY 10011, New
York, USA.
Adjuvant therapy has been tested widely in the treatment of cancers of the
stomach, pancreas, and large bowel. In the USA, the use of postoperative
chemoradiation in stomach cancer is considered a standard of care after the
publication of the Intergroup Study 0116 in September 2001. This study
demonstrated significant benefit in overall and disease-free survival for
patients receiving postoperative treatment with fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin
chemotherapy and radiation after gastric resection. Adjuvant chemotherapy is not
considered to be of significant benefit, and such therapy for patients with
resected gastric cancer is investigational. There is interest in the use of
neoadjuvant chemotherapy strategies as preoperative treatment followed by
surgical resection. This approach has been tested in a randomized study of over
500 patients carried out by the Medical Research Council in the UK. This study
demonstrated that patients receiving preoperative and postoperative epirubicin,
cisplatin, 5-FU (ECF) chemotherapy, had a downstaging of tumor size, an increase
in rates of curative resection, and an increase in disease-free but not overall
survival. With pancreatic cancer, there is a controversy over postoperative
chemoradiation after pancreatic resection. A recently completed Intergroup Study
compared gemcitabine to 5-FU chemotherapy given before and after radiation in
resected pancreatic cancer. Over 500 patients have been accrued to this study,
which recently closed. In Western Europe, the results of a large clinical trial
(ESPAC) have suggested that chemoradiation is not beneficial in patients with
resected pancreatic cancer. In large bowel cancer, 5-FU-based adjuvant
chemotherapy regimens are superior to surgery alone, particularly in
node-positive patients. The use of newer combinations including 5-FU/leucovorin
plus irinotecan and 5-FU/leucovorin plus oxaliplatin are also of interest as
chemotherapy in resected colon cancer patients. The recent publication of the
MOSAIC trial demonstrated that 5-FU/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX 4) improves
progression-free survival in node-positive patients over 5-FU/leucovorin alone.
The results of studies of 5-FU/leucovorin and irinotecan both in Europe (PETACC)
and the USA (IFL vs 5-FU/leucovorin) are awaited with interest. Another area of
interest in resected colon cancer is the use of molecular genetic monitoring to
assess the likelihood of patient relapse. The data over the past several years
have demonstrated that patients whose tumors do not have deletion of the deleted
in colon cancer (DCC) gene on chromosome 18 have an improved outcome. Recent
data are available with tumors that demonstrate microsatellite instability (MSI).
Such tumors represent about 15% of all colon cancers and have an improved
outcome when compared to those not expressing MSI, and may not benefit from
adjuvant chemotherapy.
-----
Semin Oncol. 2004 Aug;31(4):566-73.
Treatment of localized gastric cancer.
Macdonald JS.
Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Saint Vincent's Comprehensive Cancer Center,
New York, NY 10011, USA.
The curative management of gastric adenocarcinoma depends upon complete
resection of the primary tumor. In patients with lymph node metastases in the
resected specimen, the relapse and death rates from recurrent cancer are at
least 70% to 80%. There is continued debate over whether more extensive lymph
node dissection (D2) improves survival when compared to less extensive
operations. Until recently, attempts at preventing recurrence have employed
adjuvant chemotherapy and have been ineffective. A large US Intergroup study
(INT-0116) demonstrated that combined chemoradiation following complete gastric
resection improves median time to relapse (30 v 19 months, P <.0001) and overall
survival (35 months v 28 months, P =.01). The improvements in disease-free and
overall survival created by postoperative chemoradiation have defined a new
standard of care. Also the publication of a large phase III neoadjuvant
chemotherapy clinical trial using epirubicin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil
(5-FU) suggested that this technique may downstage tumors and increase
resectability. Future advances in the therapy of resectable gastric cancer may
come from studies of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation and the application
of targeted therapies such as growth receptor antagonists and antiangiogenesis
agents.
-----
Br J Surg. 2004 Aug;91(8):1061-5.
Laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric
cancer in the elderly.
Yasuda K, Sonoda K, Shiroshita H, Inomata M, Shiraishi N, Kitano S.
Department of Surgery I, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, 1-1 Idaigaoka,
Hasama-machi, Oita 879-5593, Japan. kyasuda@med.oita-u.ac.jp
BACKGROUND: Open gastrectomy is associated with increased morbidity and a longer
hospital stay than laparoscopically assisted gastrectomy. The aim of this study
was to clarify the value of laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy (LDG)
in the elderly, in whom co-morbid disease is generally more common. METHODS:
Forty-five elderly patients (aged 70 years or more) and 57 younger patients who
underwent LDG, and 28 elderly patients who underwent open distal gastrectomy (ODG)
for early gastric cancer between January 1994 and April 2003 were studied.
Demographics and postoperative outcomes were compared. RESULTS:: Co-morbidity
was more common in elderly patients than in younger patients who underwent LDG
(25 of 45 versus 16 of 57; P = 0.004). The postoperative complication rate, time
to solid diet and postoperative hospital stay were similar in these two groups.
Elderly patients who underwent LDG had a significantly reduced medical
complication rate (two of 45 versus six of 28; P = 0.023), time to first flatus
(3.7 versus 4.2 days; P = 0.042), time to solid diet (4.6 versus 5.5 days; P =
0.011) and postoperative hospital stay (16.3 versus 23.9 days; P = 0.011) than
elderly patients who had ODG. CONCLUSION: LDG offers particular advantages to
elderly patients with early gastric cancer, including rapid return of
gastrointestinal function, fewer complications and a shorter hospital stay.
Copyright 2004 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd.
-----
Anticancer Res. 2004 Jul-Aug;24(4):2465-70.
Randomized phase II study comparing mitomycin, cisplatin plus
doxifluridine with cisplatin plus doxifluridine in advanced unresectable gastric
cancer.
Koizumi W, Fukuyama Y, Fukuda T, Akiya T, Hasegawa K, Kojima Y, Ohno N, Kurihara
M.
The Tokyo Cooperative Oncology Group, Department of Internal Medicine, Kitasato
University School of Medicine, 2-1-1 Asamozodai Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa
228-8520, Japan. Koizumi@med.kitasato-u.ac.jp
Various chemotherapies have been used to treat inoperable gastric cancer. Most
combination therapies include cisplatin (CDDP) and fluoropyrimidine (5-FUs),
which are thought of as key drugs. In the present study, we randomly compared
mitomycin (MMC) and CDDP plus doxifluridine (5'-DFUR), which is an oral 5-FU and
an intermediate metabolite of capecitabine (Xeloda), with CDDP plus 5'-DFUR in
advanced unresectable gastric cancer. Regimen A was CDDP (70 mg/m2, by 2-hour
intravenous drip infusion on day 1), MMC (7 mg/m2, injected intravenously on day
2), and oral 5'-DFUR (1200 mg/m2, on days 4 to 7, 11 to 14, 18 to 21 and 25 to
28; 3 days rest and 4 days administration). Regimen B was identical to regimen A
without MMC. RESULTS: The response rate was 25.0% (8/32 patients) in Regimen A,
17.2% (5/29) in Regimen B (p=0.541). The median survival time was 241 days in
Regimen A and 179 days in Regimen B (p=0.498). In Regimen A, although no
significant difference was observed, end points such as response rate and
suvival improved. Thus, we concluded that a randomized controlled phase III
study with more subjects should be conducted.
-----
Br J Cancer. 2004 Jul 5;91(1):18-22.
Combination chemotherapy with epirubicin, docetaxel and cisplatin
(EDP) in metastatic or recurrent, unresectable gastric cancer.
Lee SH, Kang WK, Park J, Kim HY, Kim JH, Lee SI, Park JO, Kim K, Jung CW, Park
YS, Im YH, Lee MH, Park K.
Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical
Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 50 Ilwon-dong, Kangnam-gu,
Seoul 135-710, Korea.
Based on single agent activities and the additive or synergistic effects of
three individual drugs in gastric cancer, we performed a phase II study of a new
regimen combining epirubicin, docetaxel and cisplatin (EDP) for unresectable
gastric cancer. The patients with histologically confirmed metastatic or
recurrent, unresectable gastric cancer and no history of palliative chemotherapy
were eligible for this trial. In total, 40 mg m(-2) epirubicin (reduced to 30 mg
m(-2) due to high incidence of febrile neutropaenia; 75%) intravenously (i.v.)
over 30 min, followed by 60 mg m(-2) docetaxel i.v. over 1 h, then 75 mg m(-2)
cisplatin i.v. over 1 h was administered every 3 weeks. Between January 2002 and
February 2003, 30 patients (epirubicin 40 mg m(-2), eight; 30 mg m(-2), 22) were
enrolled. The median age was 52 years (range, 33-68). The patients received a
median of four cycles (range, 1-8). One patient (3%) achieved a complete
response, 13 (43%) showed partial responses, 13 (43%) had stable diseases and
three (10%) progressed. The overall response rate was 47% (95% CI, 28-66%), and
the median duration of response was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.0-7.0). The median
time to progression was 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.4-5.9), and the median overall
survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 9.5-12.4). Grade 4 neutropaenia were observed
in 41%, and febrile neutropaenia in 32%, out of the patients receiving 30 mg
m(-2) of epirubicin. Grade 3 nonhaematological toxicities included nausea,
vomiting, anorexia and peripheral neuropathy. In conclusion, EDP is active in
gastric cancer, with a manageable and predictable toxicity profile.
-----
Ann Surg. 2004 Jul;240(1):44-50.
The role of surgery in primary gastric lymphoma: results of a
controlled clinical trial.
Aviles A, Nambo MJ, Neri N, Huerta-Guzman J, Cuadra I, Alvarado I, Castaneda C,
Fernandez R, Gonzalez M.
Oncology Research Unit, Oncology Hospital, National Medical Center, IMSS,
Mexico. agaviles@avantel.net
OBJECTIVE: We began a controlled clinical trial to assess efficacy and toxicity
of surgery (S), surgery + radiotherapy (SRT), surgery + chemotherapy (SCT), and
chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of primary gastric diffuse large cell
lymphoma in early stages: IE and II1. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Management of
primary gastric lymphoma remains controversial. No controlled clinical trials
have evaluated the different therapeutic schedules, and prognostic factors have
not been identified in a uniform population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five hundred
eighty-nine patients were randomized to be treated with S (148 patients), SR
(138 patients), SCT (153 patients), and CT (150 patients). Radiotherapy was
delivered at doses of 40 Gy; chemotherapy was CHOP (cyclophosphamide,
doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) at standard doses. International
Prognostic Index (IPI) and modified IPI (MIPI) were assessed to determine
outcome. RESULTS: Complete response rates were similar in the 4 arms. Actuarial
curves at 10 years of event-free survival (EFS) were as follows: S: 28% (95%
confidence interval [CI], 22% to 41%); SRT: 23% (95% CI, 16% to 29%); that were
statistically significant when compared with SCT: 82% (95% CI, 73% to 89%); and
CT: 92% (95% CI, 84% to 99%) (P < 0.001). Actuarial curves at 10 years showed
that overall survivals (OS) were as follows: S: 54% (95% CI, 46% to 64%); SRT:
53% (95% CI, 45% to 68%); that were statistically significant to SCT: 91% (95%
CI, 85% to 99%); CT: 96% (95% CI, 90% to 103%)(P < 0.001). Late toxicity was
more frequent and severe in patients who undergoing surgery. IPI and MIPI were
not useful in determining outcome and multivariate analysis failed to identify
other prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: In patients with primary gastric diffuse
large cell lymphoma and aggressive histology, diffuse large cell lymphoma in
early stage SCT achieved good results, but surgery was associated with some
cases of lethal complications. Thus it appears that CT should be considered the
treatment of choice in this patient setting. Current clinical classifications of
risk are not useful in defining treatment.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Jul;31(7):1047-50.
[Examination of second-line therapies following administration of
low-dose TS-1+CDDP for highly-advanced gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Kamata T, Furukawa H, Ishii K, Senda K, Yoshimoto K, Tajima H, Takeda T, Kanno
M.
Dept of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Keiju Medical Center.
Sixteen patients with highly-advanced gastric cancer were administered low-dose
TS-1 and CDDP as a first-line treatment, followed by either paclitaxel or
CPT-11/CDDP as a second-line treatment. The results of the 2 second-line
treatments are reported herein. Overall response rate for the first-line
treatment was 55.6%. For the second-line treatments, responses were noted in
both the paclitaxel group and the CPT-11/CDDP group. Overall MST was 16.3 months
and 1-year survival was 60%. The paclitaxel group, however, showed significantly
better prognoses than the CPT-11/CDDP group. Adverse reactions to the first-line
treatment were grade 3 leukopenia in 1 patient, with no other reactions over
grade 2 observed. No adverse reaction greater than grade 2 was noted during
administration of the second-line treatments. These results appear to present
ample data that a first-line treatment of low-dose TS-1/CDDP followed by a
second-line treatment of paclitaxel at 1/week in the outpatient setting yields
improved prognoses and minimal adverse reactions.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Jun;31(6):877-81.
[Usefulness of weekly administration of paclitaxel for advanced
or recurrent gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Egawa T, Kubota T, Nagashima A, Doi M, Kitano M, Hayashi S, Yoshii H, Saikawa Y,
Kitajima M.
Dept. of Surgery, Saiseikai Kanagawa-ken Hospital.
We report herein the efficacy and feasibility of weekly administration of
paclitaxel for advanced/recurrent gastric cancer retrospectively. Eleven
patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer who had received prior
chemotherapy were treated with this regimen. Seventy mg of paclitaxel per m2
dissolved in 250 ml 5% glucose was administered by 1-hour intravenous infusion
once a week for 3 weeks followed by 1 week rest. To avoid hypersensitivity
reactions, the following short premedication was given to all the patients 1
hour before paclitaxel treatment: Dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously (i.v.),
diphenhydramine 50 mg i.v., and ranitidine 50 mg i.v. Treatment cycle was 1 to
23 with an average cycle of 5.4. The response rate was 33% (2/6 with measurable
lesions), the median time to progression was 104 days, and the median survival
time was 160 days. Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in 27.2% of the patients. Weekly
paclitaxel may be a promising regimen as a second-line chemotherapy for
advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. However, special attention needs to be paid
to the neutropenic adverse effect in gastric cancer patients with poor
performance status than 2 (greater).
-----
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004 May;34(5):255-61.
A preliminary study of preoperative chemotherapy combining
irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with gastric cancer with unresectable para-aortic
lymph node metastases.
Yamao T, Ohta K, Ohyama S, Ishihara S, Chin K, Maruyama M, Takahashi T, Nakajima
T.
Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
tyamao-gi@umin.ac.jp
BACKGROUND: A high response rate has been reported for chemotherapy combining
irinotecan (CPT-11) and cisplatin (CDDP) against advanced gastric cancer. The
strong anti-tumor activity of this regimen makes it very attractive as a
preoperative chemotherapy. We conducted a preliminary study on preoperative
chemotherapy with this regimen in patients with unresectable gastric cancer with
para-aortic lymph node metastases to evaluate the feasibility of it as a
treatment strategy. METHODS: Patients with unresectable para-aortic lymph node
metastasis without distant hematogenous metastasis (H0, M0 and M1 LYM) and
peritoneal dissemination (P0) were eligible for entry. The preoperative
chemotherapy consisted of at least three cycles of CPT-11 (70 mg/m(2)) on days 1
and 15 and CDDP (80 mg/m(2)) on day 15, repeated every 4-6 weeks. Chemotherapy
was followed by surgery with extended lymph node dissection in patients who
achieved complete or partial responses and whose cancers were judged to be
resectable. RESULTS: Six patients were entered into the study. In total, 18
cycles of chemotherapy were performed and five patients received at least three
cycles. Objective partial responses were achieved in four patients. The major
toxicities in the chemotherapy were neutropenia and diarrhea, but these were
clinically acceptable. Four patients underwent surgery after the chemotherapy,
and macroscopically complete resections with extended lymph node dissection were
achieved in two patients. There were no therapy-related deaths. We found no
pathological complete responses, but observed a definite histopathological
effect caused by the chemotherapy in surgical specimens. The median survival
time of all patients was 12 months. The longest survival without relapse is >6
years from the start of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that preoperative
chemotherapy with CPT-11/CDDP therapy is feasible in patients with advanced
gastric cancer and that the regimen is safe when followed by surgery. Further
clinical studies with larger numbers of patients are warranted to evaluate the
efficacy of this strategy.
-----
Can J Gastroenterol. 2004 May;18(5):295-302.
Helicobacter pylori and the prevention of gastric cancer.
Sullivan T, Ashbury FD, Fallone CA, Naja F, Schabas R, Hebert PC, Hunt R, Jones
N.
Division of Research and Cancer Control, Cancer Care Ontario, 620 University
Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 2L7. terry.sullivan@cancercare.on.ca
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori is an important cause of stomach cancer that
infects a substantial proportion of the Canadian adult population. H pylori can
be detected by noninvasive tests and effectively eradicated by medical
treatment. Screening for and treatment of H pylori may represent a significant
opportunity for preventive oncology. METHODS: Cancer Care Ontario organized a
workshop held in Toronto, Ontario, on October 24 and 25, 2002, to: review the
current state of knowledge regarding H pylori treatment and cancer prevention;
determine if there is currently sufficient evidence to consider the promotion of
H pylori treatment for the purpose of cancer prevention; identify critical areas
for research; and advise Cancer Care Ontario on H pylori and cancer prevention.
RESULTS: Workshop participants developed a number of recommendations for
research into the relationship between H pylori and stomach cancer, including
determining the prevalence of infection in different regions of Canada, the
pathogenetic sequence of carcinogenesis from H pylori infection, and the
implementation of a prospective observational study. INTERPRETATION: Although
the rate of H pylori infection is declining in Canada and the treatment of H
pylori is generally accepted to be safe, the evidence to date may not warrant
the implementation of population screening for H pylori infection to prevent
gastric carcinoma in average-risk populations. Rather, a demonstration project
is needed to estimate prevalence, evaluate the merits of screening, measure
patient compliance and physician participation, develop education materials,
establish a registry for monitoring and evaluation, and develop a quality
assurance framework.
-----
Br J Cancer. 2004 May 4;90(9):1727-32.
Survival results of a multicentre phase II study to evaluate D2
gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Degiuli M, Sasako M, Ponti A, Calvo F.
Department of Oncology, Division of Surgery, Via Cavour 31, 10123 Turin, Italy.
mdegiuli@hotmail.com
Curative resection is the treatment of choice for potentially curable gastric
cancer. Two major Western studies in the 1990s failed to show a benefit from D2
dissection. They showed extremely high postoperative mortality after D2
dissection, and were criticised for the potential inadequacy of the pretrial
training in the new technique of D2 dissection, prior to the phase III studies
being initiated. The inclusion of pancreatectomy and splenectomy in D2
dissection was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Following
these results, we started a phase II trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy
of pancreas-preserving D2 dissection. The results of this trial regarding the
safety of pancreas preserving D2 dissection were published in 1998. In this
paper, we present the survival results of this phase II trial to confirm the
rationale of carrying out a phase III study comparing D1 vs D2 dissection for
curable gastric cancer.Italian patients with histologically proven gastric
adenocarcinoma were registered in the Italian Gastric Cancer Study Group
Multicenter trial. The study was carried out based on the General Rules of the
Japanese Research Society for Gastric Cancer. A strict quality control system
was achieved by a supervising surgeon of the reference centre who had stayed at
the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, to learn the standard D2 gastrectomy
and the postoperative management. The standard procedure entailed removal of the
first and second tier lymph nodes. During total gastrectomy, the pancreas was
preserved according to the Maruyama technique. Complete follow-up was available
to death or 5 years in 100% of patients and the median follow-up time was 4.38
years.Out of 297 consecutive patients registered, 191 patients were enrolled in
the study between May 1994 and December 1996. The overall morbidity rate was
20.9%. The postoperative in-hospital mortality was 3.1%. The overall 5-year
survival rate among all eligible patients was 55%. Survival was strictly related
to stage, depth of wall invasion, lymph node involvement and type of gastrectomy
(distal vs total).Our results suggest a survival benefit for pancreas-preserving
D2 dissection in Italian patients with gastric cancer if performed in
experienced centres. A phase III trial among exclusively experienced centres is
urgently needed.
-----
Oncology. 2004;66(4):269-74.
Chemotherapy is more active against proximal than distal gastric
carcinoma.
Higuchi K, Koizumi W, Tanabe S, Saigenji K, Ajani JA.
Department of Gastroenterology, Kitasato University East Hospital, Sagamihara,
Japan. khigu@aol.com
OBJECTIVE: Patients with localized proximal gastric carcinoma (PGC) have a
poorer outcome than those with distal gastric carcinoma (DGC) following curative
resection. However, it remains uncertain whether the location of the primary
tumor influences the effect of chemotherapy in advanced gastric carcinoma.
METHODS: We assessed 270 eligible patients with unresectable, advanced gastric
carcinoma who had received first-line chemotherapy between 1989 and 2001. We
defined PGC as carcinoma located in the upper one third, and DGC as carcinoma
located in the lower two thirds of the stomach. RESULTS: Of the 270 patients, 91
(33.7%) had PGC, and 179 (66.3%) had DGC. The response rate of the primary
lesion was 58.6% (51/87) in the PGC group and 35.1% (59/168) in the DGC group (p
< 0.01). The overall response rate for all sites was 55.6% (50/90) in the PGC
group and 39.0% (69/177) in the DGC group (p = 0.01). The median survival time
was 318 days in the PGC group and 251 days in the DGC group (p = 0.0336). A
multivariate analysis revealed that performance status, extent of disease, and
location of the primary lesion were significantly related to survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the response rate and survival time after
first-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric carcinoma are better in patients
with PGC than in those with DGC. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
-----
Bull Cancer. 2004 Mar;91(3):257-61.
[Docetaxel and gastric cancer]
[Article in French]
Ducreux M, Boige V, Roth A.
Unite de gastroenterologie, Institut Gustave-Roussy, rue Camille-Desmoulins,
94805 Villejuif. ducreux@igr.fr
There are very few active drugs in the treatment of metastatic gastric
carcinoma. Among new drugs, docetaxel has shown one of the most important
activity. With precise evaluation of objective response, this drug has
demonstrated a 20% response rate in monotherapy. The favorable toxicity profile
of this compound allowed combination therapy with other active drugs in this
disease: 5-fluorouracil (5FU), cisplatin and epiadriamycin. Two of the most
interesting combinations are: bitherapy with docetaxel cisplatin and three
therapy with docetaxel, continuous infusion of 5FU and cisplatin (TCF). Several
large phase III trials are on-going to compare these new schedules to classical
combination chemotherapies of this disease (5FU cisplatin or ECF). The potential
place of docetaxel in gastric cancer is not restricted to metastatic disease and
the same three-therapy with TCF is currently under evaluation as a neoadjuvant
or adjuvant treatment in resectable lesions. With a high activity in terms of
radiosensitization, docetaxel could also become a major drug in the design of
new radiochemotherapy protocols for neoadjuvant or adjuvant disease.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2004 Mar;31(3):361-5.
[A phase I study of combination chemotherapy using
TS-1 and pirarubicin (THP) for advanced gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Yamamura Y, Kodera Y, Tanemura H, Oshita H, Miyashita K, Fujimura
T; Tokai Hokuriku THP Study Group.
Dept. of Gastroenterological Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital.
The safety of chemotherapy combining TS-1 and pirarubicin (THP)
for treatment of recurrent or locally advanced gastric cancer
was evaluated. THP was administered by intravenous drip infusion
at a dose of 14 mg/m2 every other week. TS-1 was administered
orally at a dose of 40 mg/m2 twice a day for 2 weeks followed
by 2 weeks of rest (level 1), for 3 weeks followed by 2 weeks
of rest (level 2), and for 4 weeks followed by 2 weeks of rest
(level 3). Three patients were treated with the level 1 schedule.
One patient with peritoneal dissemination received 22 courses
of the treatment, and benefited from a long-term NC. However the
remaining 2 cases were diagnosed as PD after 4 courses and were
withdrawn from further treatment. Two patients in this group suffered
from grade 2 adverse events according to the NCI-CTC. Only 1 patient
who had liver metastasis was treated at level 2. Fourteen courses
were administered, and a PR was achieved while grade 2 adverse
events were observed. One of 3 patients who were treated with
level 3 had grade 3 adverse events. Consequently, 3 more cases
were added to this dose level, and no additional grade 3 adverse
events were observed, while grade 2 adverse events were seen in
4 cases. Urinary urgency had completely disappeared in 1 patient
with peritoneal recurrence. Myelosuppression, which was the main
observed adverse event, was well controlled and of brief duration.
The response, including alleviation of clinical symptoms, was
confirmed in 3 of 5 chemo-naive patients.
-----
An Med Interna. 2004 Mar;21(3):138-142.
Olive oil: influence and benefits on some pathologies.
[Article in Spanish, English]
Zamora Ardoy M, Banez Sanchez F, Banez Sanchez C, Alaminos Garcia
P.
Servicio de Farmacia Hospitalaria. Hospital La Inmaculada. Huercal-Overa.
Almeria, Spain.
The olive tree has been one of the agriculture bases in Mediterranean
countries with a great economic and social significance. The oil
derivative from it fruit can be clasified in diferents kinds acording
with their quality, being the highest exponent the so-called pure
olive oil that contribute in unquestionables benefits for the
maintenance of health, illness prevention as well as a better
evolution when the illness is present. There are some studies
that prove these benefits in pathologies like cancer specially
breast and stomach cancer (colon, endometrium and ovary cancer
too). Gastrointestinal pathology like peptic ulcer, cholelithiasis
and gastric mobility. Rheumatoid arthritis decreasing it development
risk and improving it evolution. Diabetes mellitus increasing
insulin sensibility and decreasing blood pressure and atherogenic
lipoprotein.
-----
Nippon Rinsho. 2004 Mar;62(3):571-6.
[The trend of the research on H. pylori eradication
and gastric cancer prevention]
[Article in Japanese]
Uemura N.
Department of Gastroenterology, International Medical Center of
Japan.
The strongest evidence for the association between H. pylori
infection and gastric cancer(GC) development in the current is
provided by the prospective study that a large number of patients
with H. pylori infection were followed with serial endoscopic
examinations. Over time, GC was not diagnosed in negative patients.
In contrast, the risk for GC was highly increased in positive
patients. It was also revealed that in patients with early GC
subjected to endoscopic mucosal resection but without eradication
therapy, new GC was found in 13% as opposed to only 1% on GC relapse
during 8 years in patients with eradication. These studies indicate
that some positive patients should be eradicated to reduce the
progression of ongoing gastric carcinogenesis.
-----
Am Fam Physician. 2004 Mar 1;69(5):1133-40.
Gastric cancer: diagnosis and treatment options.
Layke JC, Lopez PP.
University of Illinois Metropolitan Group Hospitals, Chicago,
Illinois, USA. jlayke@yahoo.com
Although the overall incidence of gastric cancer has steadily
declined in the United States, it is estimated that more than
12,000 persons died from gastric cancer in 2003. The incidence
of distal stomach tumors has greatly declined, but reported cases
of proximal gastric carcinomas, including tumors at the gastroesophageal
junction, have increased. Early diagnosis of gastric cancer is
difficult because most patients are asymptomatic in the early
stage. Weight loss and abdominal pain often are late signs of
tumor progression. Chronic atrophic gastritis, Helicobacter pylori
infection, smoking, heavy alcohol use, and several dietary factors
have been linked to increased risks for gastric cancer. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
is the preferred diagnostic modality for evaluation of patients
in whom stomach cancer is suspected. Accurate staging of gastric
wall invasion and lymph node involvement is important for determining
prognosis and appropriate treatment. Endoscopic ultrasonography,
in combination with computed tomographic scanning and operative
lymph node dissection, may be involved in staging the tumor. Treatment
with surgery alone offers a high rate of failure. Chemotherapy
and radiotherapy have not improved survival rates when used as
single modalities, but combined therapy has shown some promise.
Primary prevention, by control of modifiable risk factors and
increased surveillance of persons at increased risk, is important
in decreasing morbidity and mortality.
-----
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan;99(1):23-32.
A 50-year analysis of 562 gastric carcinoids:
small tumor or larger problem?
Modlin IM, Lye KD, Kidd M.
Gastrointestinal Surgical Pathobiology Research Group, Department
of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
06520-8062, USA.
OBJECTIVES: Interest in gastric carcinoid tumors has amplified
considerably given the biological establishment of their relationship
to gastrin and advances in the elucidation of the pathobiology
of such lesions. The recognized propensity of acid-suppressing
agents such as the proton pump inhibitor class of drugs to increase
plasma gastrin levels has been proposed as a causal relationship
in the apparent increase in the identification of such lesions
although the increased prevalence of endoscopy and the enhanced
awareness of pathologists have also been considered as contributory
factors. We sought to examine if there has been an increase in
gastric carcinoid incidence time correlative with these parameters.
METHODS: Carcinoid tumor cases from the End Results Group (1950-1969)
and the Third National Cancer Survey (TNCS) (1969-1971) databases
were combined with the most recent release of the National Cancer
Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)
registry (1973-1999); these three datasets revealed 13715 carcinoid
cases, of which 562 were gastric in origin. Age-adjusted analyses
as well as population-based gender and race correction ratios
were completed in conjunction with United States decennial census
data. To allow a finer granularity in incidence trends, the SEER
database was divided into early (1973-1991) and late (1991-1999)
subsets. RESULTS Since 1950, the percentage of gastric carcinoids
among all gastric malignancies has increased from 0.3% to 1.77%.
Since 1969, the proportion of gastric carcinoids among all enteric
carcinoid lesions has increased from 2.4% to 8.7%. Age-adjusted
incidence rates among male, female, black, and white population
subsets have all increased since the TNCS time period, with the
greatest increase (800%) noted in white females. The male:female
ratio has fallen from 0.90 to 0.54. The occurrence of synchronous
or metachronous noncarcinoid tumors with gastric carcinoid tumors
has decreased by 26% during the course of SEER data collection.
The 5-yr survival rate for gastric carcinoids overall has risen
from 51% to 63% during the same time period. CONCLUSIONS: Gastric
carcinoids have increased in incidence over the last 50 yr. Differential
increases in predominance across gender and race subdivisions
may reflect genetic-based propensities (or protection) for gastric
carcinoid tumors among certain ethnic populations. Increased endoscopic
surveillance and associated sophisticated pathological evaluation
of gastric biopsies undoubtedly are responsible for some of the
observed increase in the incidence of gastric carcinoid tumors.
These data allow no specific role to be assigned to the effects
of acid-suppressive medications. Nevertheless the role of such
agents cannot be discounted at this time since the time frame
of the increased incidence is somewhat comparable to the introduction
of these agents as is the known biological effect of gastrin on
ECL cell proliferation.
-----
Acta Oncol. 2003;42(7):693-700.
Docetaxel in advanced gastric cancer--review of
the main clinical trials.
Di Cosimo S, Ferretti G, Fazio N, Silvestris N, Carlini
P, Alimonti A, Gelibter A, Felici A, Papaldo P, Cognetti F.
Division of Medical Oncology A, Regina Elena Cancer Institute,
Rome, Italy.
The aim was to investigate the activity of docetaxel in advanced
gastric cancer either as single agent or in combination with other
drugs. A systematic review was carried out using the databases
of Medline, Embase and CancerLit. Results from ASCO and ESMO meetings
during 2002 were also included. Eight phase II trials focused
on docetaxel as a single agent. Considering collectively the 262
evaluable patients enrolled in these studies, the mean response
rate (RR) was 19% (CI 95% 14-24%). Docetaxel was well tolerated
with a dose-limiting myelosuppression (grade 3-4 neutropenia in
36-95% of cases). Adding fluorouracil, an RR ranging from 22%
to 86% was registered, due to differences in populations studied
(young vs elderly) and modalities of drug administration (continuous
vs. bolus infusion). RRs for docetaxel-cisplatin combination were
56%, 37% and 36% in three phase II trials and 35% in a phase III
trial. The addition of both cisplatin and fluorouracil to docetaxel
did not increase toxicity. Randomized trials comparing docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil
with ciplatin-fluorouoracil or epirubicin-cisplatin-fluorouracil,
the most commonly used regimens, are ongoing. The future results
of the above phase III studies could indicate docetaxel as a key
drug to improve treatment of patients with advanced gastric cancer.
-----
Cancer Invest. 2003;21(6):887-96.
Paclitaxel and concurrent radiation in upper gastrointestinal
cancers.
Constantinou M, Tsai JY, Safran H.
Brown University Oncology Group, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Effective locoregional treatments are needed for adenocarcinomas
of the esophagus, stomach, and pancreas. Paclitaxel has been investigated
as a radiation sensitizer for upper gastrointestinal malignancies.
In esophageal cancer, the combination of low-dose weekly paclitaxel,
platinum, and concurrent radiation therapy (RT) has substantial
activity and is well tolerated. Regimens that add fluorouracil
(5-FU) to paclitaxel and platinum or incorporate hyperfractionation
radiation have a higher incidence of severe esophagitis. In gastric
cancer, adjuvant concurrent paclitaxel, 5-FU, and radiation is
being investigated in the cooperative group setting. In pancreatic
cancer, paclitaxel may be a radiation sensitizer even to tumor
cells that are resistant to paclitaxel as a single agent. The
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) demonstrated a 43% 1-year
survival with paclitaxel/RT for patients with locally advanced
pancreatic cancer. This represented a 40% improvement in survival
compared to the previous RTOG 92-09 study of 5-FU-based chemoradiation.
Ongoing trials in pancreatic cancer are investigating the addition
of gemcitabine to paclitaxel and radiation and incorporating molecular
targeting agents.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Dec;30(13):2107-13.
[Concurrent chemoradiation experience of recurrent
gastric cancers resistant to TS-1]
[Article in Japanese]
Akagi Y, Hashimoto Y, Murakami Y, Ito K.
Dept. of Radiology, Hiroshima Asa City Hospital.
We report our experience with concurrent chemoradiation for
recurrent gastric cancers resistant to TS-1. From April 2000 to
March 2003, we treated 10 consecutive patients with radiation
and the concurrent single chemotherapy agent of TS-1 or CPT-11.
Of the 10 patients, 3 (30%) had a complete response, 4 (40%) a
partial response, and 3 (30%) stable disease, yielding an overall
response rate of 70% (7/10). Three patients are alive and cancer-free,
5 patients died with cancers, and 2 patients are living with cancers
as outpatients. The clinical benefit response was 90% (9/10).
No patient has had either acute or late complication. Concurrent
chemoradiation is feasible and seems to offer good results for
recurrent gastric cancers resistant to TS-1.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Nov;30(12):1933-40.
[Evaluation of TS-1 combined with cisplatin for
neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Yabusaki H, Nashimoto A, Tanaka O.
Division of Surgery, Niigata Cancer Center Hospital.
We performed a critical evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
(NAC) with TS-1 and cisplatin (CDDP) for advanced gastric cancer
patients. Since October 2000, 37 patients with far advanced or
non-curative resectable gastric cancer received NAC, together
with TS-1 and CDDP after informed consent was obtained. TS-1 (80
mg/m2/day) was administrated for 21 consecutive days followed
by 14 days rest as one course, and CDDP (50 mg/m2) was infused
over 2 hours on day 8. After at least 2 courses of treatment,
the patients underwent gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy. The median
number of courses administered was 3 (range 2-7), and 6 cases
were treated on an outpatient basis only. The overall response
rate was 62.2% (no CR, but 23 PR), and the individual response
rates were 67.6% for the primary lesion, 90.5% for lymph node
metastasis including para-aortic region, 50.0% for liver metastasis
and 14.3% for peritoneal dissemination, respectively. Toxicities
were generally mild, no treatment-related death and no serious
adverse reactions were observed. There were only 2 grade 4 anemia
(5.4%), and leucopenia, neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia
of grade 3 were observed in one (2.7%), 3 (8.1%), 6 (16.2%), and
2 (5.4%) patients respectively at hematological toxicity. Appetite
loss and diarrhea of grade 3 were observed in only one (2.7%)
patient at nonhematological toxicity. Twenty-four cases had undergone
surgical treatment, and resection was performed in all cases.
Seventeen of the 24 (70.8%) patients underwent curative resection.
There was no major morbidity following surgery. The patients were
favorable both for operation time (229 min) and bleeding volume
(365 ml). The mean duration of hospitalization after surgery was
23.5 days and the only complications were one leakage, ileus and
2 pancreatitis. Two-year survival rate was 46.8% and MST was 523
days. In conclusion, a combination of TS-1 and CDDP for NAC appears
to be an effective treatment modality for far advanced gastric
cancer patients in view of toxicities, antitumor effects and QOL
of the patients.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Nov;30(12):1927-32.
[Weekly docetaxel therapy is useful for gastric
carcinoma as a second-line chemotherapy]
[Article in Japanese]
Yoshida K, Ohta K, Hihara J, Tanabe K, Minami K, Yamaguchi Y,
Toge T.
Dept. of Surgical Oncology Research Institute for Radiation Biology
and Medicine, Hiroshima University.
In the present study, we demonstrate the results of weekly
administered docetaxel treatments as a second-line chemotherapy
after TS-1 treatment in 4 gastric cancer patients. Twenty-five
mg/m2 of docetaxel was administered once a week for 3 weeks followed
by a 1-week rest period as one cycle. The treatment was continued
for 2 to 16 weeks. In case 1, a 60% reduction of the primary tumor
was observed for 20 weeks. In cases 2 and 3, the decrease of tumor
marker was observed. In one case, progression of the tumor was
observed and the treatment was not performed. As for adverse effects,
no hematological toxicity was observed; however, in one case,
grade 2 hair loss, pleural effusion and grade 2 nail changes were
observed. These results indicate that the weekly docetaxel therapy
is useful for gastric carcinoma patients, as it reduces the hematologic
toxicities and improves the quality of life of the patients in
the outpatient setting.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Nov;30(12):1881-8.
[Chemotherapy for gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Baba H, Kakeji Y, Oki E, Tokunaga E, Ushiro S, Watanabe M, Maehara
Y.
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical
Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka
812-8582, Japan.
5-FU has been a key chemotherapeutic agent in the treatment
of advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. In order to enhance the
effect of 5-FU, biochemical modulation or combined chemotherapy
has been developed. Although several phase III studies have been
reported in 1990's, a standard chemotherapeutic regimen has not
been established worldwide. Recently, newly developed anticancer
agents such as CPT-11, TS-1, Paclitaxel, or Docetaxel can be clinically
used for advanced gastric cancer either single agent or in combination
that may further improve the quality of life and prolong the survival
of patients with gastric cancer. In Japan, postoperative adjuvant
chemotherapy has been actively developed to enhance survival benefit
of surgery for patients with gastric cancer. There were a few
positive single randomized controlled study showing benefit of
adjuvant chemotherapy with a high evidence level. However, all
reports of meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric
cancer indicated the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy.
At present, a nation-wide randomized controlled study in the postoperative
adjuvant setting for gastric cancer using TS-1 (ACTS-GC) is under
way that may clarify the effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy
in gastric cancer.
-----
Oncology. 2003;65(3):211-7.
Effective combination chemotherapy with bimonthly
docetaxel and cisplatin with or without hematopoietic growth factor
support in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer.
Schull B, Kornek GV, Schmid K, Raderer M, Hejna M, Lenauer
A, Depisch D, Lang F, Scheithauer W.
Department of Internal Medicine I, Vienna University Medical School,
Vienna, Austria.
PURPOSE: A phase II trial was performed to determine the antitumor
efficacy and tolerance of combined docetaxel and cisplatin with
or without hematopoietic growth factor support in patients with
advanced gastroesophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven
patients with histologically confirmed metastatic gastroesophageal
cancer were entered in this trial. Treatment consisted of 4-weekly
courses of docetaxel 50 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) both
given on day 1 and 15. Depending on absolute neutrophil counts
on the days of scheduled chemotherapeutic drug administration
(1,000-2,000/microl), a 5-day course of human granulocyte colony-stimulating
factor (G-CSF) 5 microg/kg/day was given subcutaneously; in addition,
if hemoglobin was <12.0 mg/dl, erythropoietin 10,000 IU was
administered subcutaneously 3 times per week. RESULTS: The confirmed
overall response rate (intent-to-treat) was 46%, including 4 complete
responses (11%) and 13 partial responses (35%). Eleven patients
(30%) had stable disease and 9 (24%) progressed while on treatment.
The median time to response was 3 months, the median time to progression
was 7 months and the median overall survival time was 11.5 months
with 16 (43%) patients currently alive. Hematologic toxicity was
common, though WHO grade 4 neutropenia occurred only in 3 patients.
Nonhematologic adverse reaction were usually mild to moderate;
grade 3 toxicities included alopecia in 5 patients (14%), infection
in 1 (3%), neutrotoxicity in 2 (5%) and anaphylaxis in 1 patient.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the combination of docetaxel
and cisplatin with or without G-CSF and/or erythropoietin has
a promising therapeutic index in patients with advanced gastroesophageal
cancer. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
-----
Anticancer Res. 2003 Sep-Oct;23(5b):4219-22.
Docetaxel as salvage therapy in advanced gastric
cancer: a phase II study of the Gruppo Oncologico Italia Meridionale
(G.O.I.M.).
Giuliani F, Gebbia V, De Vita F, Maiello E, Di Bisceglie
M, Catalano G, Gebbia N, Colucci G.
Medical and Experimental Oncology Unit, Oncology Institute, Bari,
Italy.
BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (DCT), a semisynthetic taxoid, has demonstrated
cytotoxic activity against gastric cancer in early phase II studies
producing an overall response rate of 17-24%. The Gruppo Oncologico
Italia Meridionale (G.O.I.M.) started a confirmatory multicenter
phase II trial to evaluate the clinical activity and toxicity
of single agent TXT in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer
patients who had failed a first-line chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND
METHODS: Thirty patients with advanced gastric carcinoma refractory
to first-line ECF or PELF chemotherapy were treated with DCT administered
at the dosage of 100 mg/mq given as a 1-hour i.v. infusion every
three weeks. All patients received a premedication with dexamethasone
8 mg i.v. 12 hours and 1 hour before, and 12 hours after DCT administration.
Granulocyte colony stimulating factor was employed in case of
febrile neutropenia as needed. The first evaluation of disease
status was planned after three cycles. RESULTS: We observed 5
partial responses without any complete response for an overall
response rate of 17% (95% CI = 6-36%, intent-to-treat analysis).
Nine patients showed stable disease and 14 patients progressed.
The duration of objective partial responses were 5, 6, 6, 9 and
12 months, respectively. The median overall survival was 6 months
and the 1-year survival rate was 20.6%. No chemotherapy-related
toxic death was observed. Haematological grade 3-4 side-effects
were respectively: anemia (7%), leucopenia (7%) and neutropenia
(18%); in 13 patients (45%) G-CSF was employed to avoid severe
leukopenia. CONCLUSION: This multinstitutional single-step phase
II study confirms that single-agent docetaxel is active in advanced
gastric cancer progressing after first-line chemotherapy. The
most frequent toxicity is neutropenia, which may be managed by
G-CSF and/or dose adjustments. Docetaxel is therefore worthy of
further study in combination with other active drugs.
-----
Suppl Tumori. 2003 Sep-Oct;2(5):S58-62.
Combined modality treatment for locally advanced
gastric cancer.
De Paoli A, Buonadonna A, Boz G, Lombardi D, Innocente
R, Tumolo S, Tosolini G, Rossi C, Trovo MG, Frustaci S.
Radiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico
(CRO), Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Pedemontana Occidentale
12, 33081 Aviano, PN, Italy. adepaoli@cro.it
The positive results recently reported by the Intergroup 0116
Study with adjuvant chemoradiation have stimulated an increasing
interest in the combined modality treatment of gastric cancer.
The significant improvement in disease-free and overall survival
reported in this study was related mainly to an improvement in
local control rather than to a decrease in the incidence of metastatic
disease. Therefore, new and potentially more effective chemotherapy
regimens could be considered and the feasibility of their integration
with radiation therapy needs to be explored to further improve
the treatment in gastric cancer. Our experience with combined
radiation therapy and 5-FU-with or without 5-FU based chemotherapy--in
unresectable and in partially or radically resected gastric cancer
is retrospectively reviewed. In addition, an initial prospective
evaluation of the feasibility and toxicity of radiation and 5-FU
following adjuvant chemotherapy with modern platinum containing
regimens is reported. Our data and the current available experiences
with investigational approaches in gastric cancer involving preoperative
chemotherapy and intraoperative radiotherapy will be considered
in exploring a new combined modality treatment program.
-----
Suppl Tumori. 2003 Sep-Oct;2(5):S45-7.
Adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer. The Italian
experience and review of the literature.
Berardi R, Scartozzi M, Galizia E, Cascinu S.
Medical Oncology Department, University of Ancona, Azienda Ospedaliera
Umberto I, Ancona, Italy.
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Surgery is the treatment of choice for
locally advanced gastric cancer, but the 5-year survival rate
is still disappointing. The aim of the present review is to summarize
the results of previously performed randomized trials to evaluate
the effects of adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer. METHODS: We
searched the Medline database for the following items: randomized
trial, adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer, stomach neoplasms
and adjuvant chemotherapy, meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy
for gastric cancer. We also searched the bibliographies of all
papers, as well as review articles, to identify other studies.
RESULTS: The results of chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting are
disappointing and, although some randomized controlled trials
have reported positive results, none of them provides strong evidence
that adjuvant chemotherapy really works. Therefore, surgery remains
the mainstay of therapy of gastric cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Further
studies are warranted to identify more satisfactory strategies
as well as to identify patients who are more likely to benefit
from an adjuvant treatment.
-----
Suppl Tumori. 2003 Sep-Oct;2(5):S39-44.
Combined treatments in gastric cancer: radiotherapy.
Valentini V, Cellini F, D'Angelillo RM.
Cattedra Radioterapia, Istituto di Radiologia, Policlinico Universita
A Gemelli Universita Cattolica S Cuore, Largo F Vito 1, 00168
Roma, Italy. vvalentini@rm.unicatt.it
In the past decades radiation oncologists have not had a major
interest in the treatment of gastric cancer. The concern on major
toxicity related to an extended irradiation of the upper abdomen
limited the experience in the treatment of this disease; therefore
few data were available to evaluate any advantage of the use of
radiation therapy. The results of the Gastrointestinal Intergroup
Study promoted a new interest in the irradiation of gastric cancer.
The analysis of the outcomes of the Intergroup Study supported
the role of locoregional control in promoting better survival
for patients treated with adjuvant chemoradiation vs resected
patients (81% vs 71%). The studies reported in the last years
on the use of radiotherapy in gastric carcinoma are reviewed.
-----
Suppl Tumori. 2003 Sep-Oct;2(5):S35-8.
Lymphadenectomy in patients with gastric cancer.
A critical review.
Nitti D, Marchet A, Olivieri M, Ambrosi A, Mencarelli R,
Farinati F, Belluco C, Lise M.
Department of Oncological and Surgical Sciences, Clinica Chirurgica
II, University of Padua, Italy. donato.nitti@unipd.it
BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is still the main treatment
for patients with gastric cancer. However, while surgical procedures
for the treatment of the primary tumor have been standardized,
there has been no worldwide consensus as yet on the extent of
lymphadenectomy. The aim of the present study was therefore to
evaluate the outcome following extended lymphadenectomy, and the
prognostic significance of lymph node status, in a group of patients
who underwent radical resection for gastric cancer. METHODS: Among
445 consecutive patients operated on for gastric adenocarcinoma
between 1980 and 2000 at Clinica Chirurgica II of the Padua University,
314 underwent radical resection (R0). A D2 lymphadenectomy was
performed in 293/314 cases (93.3%), and a D1 in 21/314 (6.7%).
The rate of postoperative morbidity was 22% (69/314 patients),
and the postoperative mortality (within 30 days of surgery), 4.1%
(13/314 patients). Survival was determined using the Kaplan Meier
method and differences were assessed by the log-rank test. Multivariate
analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model
in forward stepwise regression. RESULTS: Of 301 valuable patients,
a total of 7991 lymph nodes were examined (mean, 27.18; range,
9-62) and the total number of metastatic lymph nodes was 1343
(mean, 4.5; range, 1-47). After a median follow-up of 49 months
(range, 2-251), the overall 5-year survival was 57%. At multivariate
analysis of all 301 patients, factors retained were depth of invasion
(P < 0.001), age (P = 0.027), number of lymph node metastasis
(P = 0.029), and metastatic/examined lymph node ratio (P <
0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: D2 dissection can be performed without incurring
high mortality and morbidity rates. At least 15 lymph nodes must
be removed to achieve an accurate disease staging. As confirmed
at multivariate analysis, a metastatic/examined lymph node ratio
greater than 25% is an independent negative prognostic factor.
-----
Suppl Tumori. 2003 Sep-Oct;2(5):S27-30.
Blood transfusions and results after curative
resection for gastric cancer.
Bortul M, Calligaris L, Roseano M, Leggeri A.
Surgical Science Department, Clinica Chirurgica Generale, University
of Trieste, Italy. m.bortul@fmc.units.it
On the basis of an analysis of our experience and a review
of the literature, this report discusses the effects of perioperative
blood transfusions on postoperative morbidity, mortality and 5-year
survival in a series of patients who underwent curative surgical
treatment of gastric cancer. The authors analyze a consecutive
series of 137 patients who underwent curative total or subtotal
gastrectomy D2 or D3. Ninety-nine patients (72.2%) received perioperative
transfusions. The data examined included the number and timing
of transfusions (pre-, intra-, or postoperative), the type of
operation (total or subtotal gastrectomy with or without splenectomy),
tumor stage (pTNM), and the correlation between transfusions,
mortality, morbidity and survival. Advanced T-stage (P = 0.01)
and total gastrectomy (P = 0.009) were associated with a higher
transfusion rate. No cases of operative mortality were recorded
after 1988. Specific morbidity was 10.5% in non-transfused patients
and 20.1% in transfused. Five-year survival rate in the transfused
patients (28.3%) was significantly lower than in the non-transfused
group (53.5%) (P = 0.03). Univariate analysis showed that T-stage
(P = 0.001) and N-stage (P = 0.04) were associated with a lower
survival. By multivariate analysis (Cox regression model) only
T-stage (P = 0.001) and N-stage (P = 0.04) were independent prognostic
factors, whereas transfusions were not an independent variable
(P = 0.27). To conclude, the issue of the real impact of transfusions
on the prognosis of gastric cancer is far from being settled,
although the T and N parameters are known to be strictly correlated
to prognosis. This study further confirms the importance of limiting
homologous transfusions as well as of transfusing, whenever possible,
autologous or leukodepleted blood; this, however, without losing
sight of the primary goal of minimizing operative blood loss.
-----
Suppl Tumori. 2003 Sep-Oct;2(5):S23-6.
Early gastric cancer: a single-institution experience
on 60 cases.
Sigon R, Canzonieri V, Rossi C.
Surgical Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico
(CRO), Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via Pedemontana Occidentale
12, 33081 Aviano PN, Italy. rsigon.@cro.it
AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The 5-year survival rate of early gastric
cancer (EGC) is 85-100% after "curative" resection,
as compared to 20-30% in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Because
of this relatively high cure rate, the interest in the diagnosis
and therapy of EGC has been steadily increasing. The present study,
based on 60 EGCs, in a single-institution, is aimed at critical
evaluating the diagnostic procedures and surgical options. METHODS
AND RESULTS: Sixty patients with early gastric cancer (36 men
and 24 women; median age, 61 years; range, 28-84) were diagnosed
and operated on. They represented 21% of all patients with gastric
cancer (281) treated in the period January 1987 to December 2001.
The most frequent symptom was epigastric pain (84%). Barium upper
gastrointestinal radiography findings were strongly suggestive
of malignancy in 56 cases (93%). Preoperative histopathological
diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was performed in 57 cases (95%). In
3 cases (5%) severe epithelial dysplasia (associated with ulcer)
was the first diagnosis, but the final diagnosis, on the basis
of resected specimens, was well differentiated adenocarcinoma.
The primary surgical procedure included: a) subtotal distal resection
(49 cases); b) total gastrectomy (6) for proximal neoplastic extension;
c) proximal gastric resection (2) for cardial cancer; d) degastro-total
gastrectomy (3) for cancer of the stump. Two patients, previously
treated with conservative surgery, underwent degastro-total gastrectomy
for neoplastic microfocal extension to the resection margin and
for early anastomotic recurrence, respectively. Mural infiltration
was limited to the mucosa and submucosa in 36 and 24 cases, respectively.
Lymph node metastases were found in 3 mucosal and 9 submucosal
tumor cases, involving either the first and second echelon. No
operative deaths or postsurgical complications occurred in this
series. In the follow-up period (median, 63 months; range, 3-178)
7 patients died due to other causes; 1 developed liver metastases,
another developed oropharyngeal cancer and 2 died of biopsy-proven
lung cancer without evidence of recurrent or metastatic gastric
cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical presentation of EGC is aspecific.
Preoperative endoscopy with multiple biopsies remains the most
sensitive diagnostic procedure. For treatment, subtotal distal
gastric resection with lymphadenectomy is the gold standard, but
in some instances total gastrectomy may be indicated. Accurate
pathological examination establishes the depth of infiltration,
as well as the superficial extension of tumors and lymph node
status. Although the prognosis of EGC is favorable, a medium-term
follow-up should be planned.
-----
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Sep;197(3):372-8.
Laparoscopic gastric surgery in a Japanese institution:
analysis of the initial 100 procedures.
Shimizu S, Noshiro H, Nagai E, Uchiyama A, Tanaka M.
Department of Endoscopic Diagnostics and Therapeutics, Kyushu
University Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
BACKGROUND: Although endoscopic surgical procedures are popular
in various fields, reports on its use in gastric surgical procedures
are limited. This study was designed to review our initial experience
with laparoscopic gastric surgical techniques to evaluate indications
and surgical results. STUDY DESIGN: We undertook a retrospective
analysis of 100 patients (66 men and 34 women, mean age 63 years)
who underwent laparoscopic gastric surgical procedures between
1995 and 2001. Procedures performed were distal gastrectomy (n
= 76), wedge resection (n = 20), and intragastric surgical procedures
(n = 4). Patients were divided into two groups according to the
date of the procedure, from the earliest to the most recent. RESULTS:
There were 85 patients with gastric cancers, 14 submucosal tumors,
and 1 duodenal ulcer. In 8 cases conversion was made to an open
surgical procedure. Operation times required for distal gastrectomy,
wedge resection, and intragastric surgical procedures were 330
+/- 69, 144 +/- 34, and 298 +/- 106 min, and blood loss was 354
+/- 251, 56 +/- 94, and 33 +/- 58 g, respectively. Complications
included transient anastomotic stenosis (n = 5), leakage (n =
4), and bleeding (n = 1) after distal gastrectomy, and bleeding
(n = 1) after intragastric surgical procedures. There were no
complications after wedge resection. Comparing the first and second
halves of the series, the percentage of distal gastrectomy significantly
increased from 66% to 86% (p = 0.02) and the number of dissected
lymph nodes at this procedure increased from 20 +/- 13 to 33 +/-
17 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic gastric surgical procedures
are safe and feasible for early gastric cancers and submucosal
tumors. Technical advances in lymph node dissection have made
distal gastrectomy a leading and increasingly popular laparoscopic
procedure for early gastric cancer.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Sep;30(9):1297-301.
[Efficacy and safety of novel oral fluoropyrimidine
anticancer drug, TS-1 for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer
patients]
[Article in Japanese]
Arai K, Iwasaki Y, Kimura Y, Takahashi K, Yamaguchi T, Honma S,
Takahashi T.
Dept. of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital.
The efficacy and safety of the oral fluoropyrimidine TS-1,
which contains a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitor,
were examined in fifty-five patients with gastric cancer. The
patients were divided into 28 with measurable cancer lesions (TUM
group) and 27 without them (ADJ group). The total number of courses
was 164 (mean: 5.9 courses) in the TUM group and 146 (mean; 5.4
courses) in the ADJ group. The response rate in the TUM group,
excluding three patients who could not be evaluated because of
incomplete administration, was 40% (CR: 4, PR: 6, NC: 6, PD: 9).
Among responders, the mean number of courses to response was 2.2
and the median survival time (MST) was 21.7 months. In terms of
safety, adverse reactions appeared in forty-five patients (82%)
and the incidence was higher in the ADJ group. Major toxicities
were leukopenia (38%), anorexia (27%), increased total bilirubin
concentration (25%) and diarrhea (24%). Adverse reaction of grade
3 was found in only three patients (5.5%) and there were no drug-related
deaths. In conclusion, TS-1 is safe and effective if attention
is given to biweekly examinations for the development of adverse
reactions.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Sep;30(9):1289-96.
[Pilot study of TS-1 combined with lentinan in
patients with unresectable or recurrent
advanced gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Nimura H, Mitsumori N, Tsukagoshi S, Nakajima M, Atomi Y, Suzuki
S, Kusano M, Yoshiyuki T, Tokunaga A.
Dept. of Surgery, Jikei University School of Medicine.
TS-1, an anticancer, antimetabolis agent, has shown clinically
superior antitumor activity against unresectable advanced or recurrent
gastric cancer (UARG). A biological response modifier, lentinan
(LNT) prolonged the survival period of patients with UARG when
combined with tegafur (FT). To assess the efficacy, the safety
and prognostic factors of chemo-immunotherapy using TS-1, a FT
derivative, and LNT, we conducted a multi-institutional pilot
study in patients with UARG. Patients were treated with TS-1 at
80 mg/m2/day (bid) for 4-weeks, and LNT was given at 2 mg/body
(i.v.) in a week, followed by a 2-week rest for 4 cycles. Twenty-two
patients were entered from 4 institutes and 19 patients were eligible.
The median survival time in eligible patients was 400 days. The
incidence of hematological toxicity (grade 2 leukopenia), and
non-hematological toxicity (grade 3 nausea or fatigue) was 5.3%
(1/19) and no grade 4 toxicity was observed. The response ratio
was 37.5% in 8 patients who had been administered the planned
dose of TS-1. In subset analyses, the survival period of the patients
with normal (< 500 micrograms/ml) serum immunosuppressive acidic
protein level was significantly (p < 0.0001) better than that
of the higher one. The survival period for those patients whose
granulocytes/lymphocytes ratio was not more than 2 tended to be
better. From the prolonged survival periods, chemo-immunotherapy
using TS-1 combined with LNT would seem to have a benefit against
UARG, and reduced toxicity. Future clinical trials are warranted
to confirm its potency.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Sep;30(9):1238-48.
[Controversies in surgical treatment of gastric
cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Yonemura Y.
Dept. of Gastric Surgery, Periotoneal Dissemination, Shizuoka
Cancer Center.
Conservative surgery is performed for patients with early gastric
cancer, according to the guideline proposed from Japanese Gastric
Cancer Society. There are many kinds of operations, such as ordinary
open surgery, laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy, laparoscopic
intragastric surgery, pyrolus preserving gastrectomy, hand-assisted
laparoscopic surgery. Indications of the operations are various,
but it is necessary to have standard indication for each procedure.
Standard operation for advanced gastric cancer in Japan is D2
gastrectomy. Surgeons in Eastern world believed that D1 + alpha
or D1 + adjuvant radio-chemotherapy are the standard treatments,
because of high incidence of mortality and morbidity after D2
dissection. In Japan, D4 dissection has been performed for patients
with nodal involvement, and the validity of D4 dissection is now
studied by two randomized trials. Combined resection for T4 tumor
is believed to be mandatory. However, the validity of pancreato-splenectomy
to yield a complete clearance of No. 10 or No. 11 lymph node station
is in controversial, because of high incidence of the postoperative
development of pancreatic fistula, anastomotic insufficiency and
abscess. There was no prospective study to confirm the effect
of omentectomy. Patients with advanced gastric cancer showing
a serosal invasion-diameter less than 2.5 cm have less risk of
peritoneal recurrence. It may be valuable to perform randomized
controlled study consisting of omentum-preserving gastrectomy
and gastrectomy with omentectomy. Prognosis of patients with peritoneal
dissemination was improved by intraperitoneal chomo hyporthormia
and peritonectomy, and prospective studies should be done to compare
the effects of systemic chemotherapy and regional chemotherapy
combined with peritonectomy. Furthermore, effects of neoadjuvant
chemotherapy with cytoreduction with R0 resection should be confirmed
by prospective studies.
-----
Semin Oncol. 2003 Aug;30(4 Suppl 11):19-25.
Adjuvant therapy for gastric cancer.
Macdonald JS.
Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, St. Vincent's Comprehensive
Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
The curative management of gastric adenocarcinoma depends on
complete resection of the primary tumor. In patients with lymph
node metastases in the resected specimen, the relapse and death
rates from recurrent cancer are 70% to 80%. There is continued
debate over whether more extensive lymph node dissection (D2)
improves survival when compared with less extensive operations.
Until recently, attempts at preventing recurrence, usually using
adjuvant chemotherapy, have been ineffective. A large United States
Intergroup study (INT-0116) showed that combined chemoradiation
following gastric resection improves median time to relapse (30
months v 19 months, P <.0001) and overall survival (35 months
v 28 months, P =.01). This treatment has become a standard of
care. Future advances in the therapy for resectable gastric cancer
may come from studies of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiation
and the application of targeted therapies such as growth receptor
antagonists and anti-angiogenesis agents.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Aug;30(8):1125-30.
[Usefulness of TS-1 and lentinan combination immunochemotherapy
in advanced or recurrent gastric cancer--pilot study aiming at
a randomized trial]
[Article in Japanese]
Kimura Y, Iijima S, Kato T, Tsujie M, Naoi Y, Hayashi T, Tanigawa
T, Yamamoto H, Kurokawa E, Kikkawa N, Matsuura N.
Gastrointestinal Research Center, Dept. of Surgery, Minoh City
Hospital.
The quality of life (QOL) of patients with advanced or recurrent
gastric cancer is poor and their immunocompetence is low, making
it important to conduct chemotherapy while at the same time improving
their QOL and maintaining their immunocompetence. To improve QOL
and increase compliance by reducing the side effects but not the
antitumor effect of TS-1, a 2-week regime with 2-week administration
of TS-1, and a 1-week drug-free interval in combination with the
immunotherapeutic agent lentinan (LNT) was started in 5 patients
with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Toxicity, efficacy,
QOL, and immunological parameters were investigated preliminarily
to examine whether or not usefulness of lentinan could be evaluated.
QOL scores for appetite, nausea/vomiting, and abdominal pain/diarrhea
showed improvement, although not in statistically significant
values. The Th2 (CD4-positive, IL4-positive T cells) response
in peripheral blood decreased significantly. TS-1 and lentinan
combination immunotherapy was carried out safely with advanced
recurrent gastric cancer. In order to examine the usefulness of
LNT combined use, it was thought that a randomised trial using
toxicity with not only efficacy but QOL and immunological parameters
as indicators would be beneficial.
-----
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 Aug;29(6):511-4.
Treatment and prognosis of early multiple gastric
cancer.
Borie F, Plaisant N, Millat B, Hay JM, Fagniez PL, De Saxce
B; French Associations for Surgical Research.
Service Chirurgie A, Hopital St Eloi, 34295, Montpellier, France.
fborie@yahoo.com
AIM: Early gastric cancer (EGC) may have a 5-year survival
rate of over 90% following surgery. Early multifocal gastric cancer
(EMGC) accounts for between 8.3 and 17% of all EGCs. A multicenter
retrospective study is reported of prevalence, characteristics,
prognosis and type of resection for EMGC patients. METHOD: 333
patients with EGC were operated on, between January 1979 and December
1988, and followed to June 1996. RESULTS: 33 EGC patients had
EMGC. There was no significant difference in clinico-pathological
features between EGC and EMGC. 21 cases of EMGC underwent a subtotal
gastrectomy and 12 underwent a total gastrectomy. Recurrences
after subtotal gastrectomy were, respectively, 10 and 18% for
EGC and EMGC patients (p=0.2). The cumulative 5 years specific
survival rate for 298 EGC and 34 EMGC were 94 and 90%, respectively
(p=0.9). Five-year survival rates after subtotal gastrectomy were
92 and 90% for EGC and EMGC patients, respectively (p=0.8). CONCLUSION:
EGC and EMGC had the same clinico-pathological features and prognosis.
A careful follow up of the stomach remnant is essential.
-----
Lancet Oncol. 2003 Aug;4(8):498-505.
Chemoradiation for resectable gastric cancer.
Xiong HQ, Gunderson LL, Yao J, Ajani JA.
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology at The University
of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, TX 77030, USA.
The incidence of gastric cancer has been declining in recent
years, however, the disease continues to be a worldwide public
health problem. About two thirds of patients with gastric cancer
undergo surgical resection with curative intent. R0 resection--complete
local-regional tumour removal with negative resection margins--is
the only curative modality. The optimum extent of lymph-node dissection
(D1 vs D2) is controversial. Disease relapse, both local and distant,
is common and the 5-year survival rate is disappointing. Adjuvant
chemotherapy has been studied extensively in this setting but
an effective regimen has not yet been identified. A recent intergroup
study has shown that postoperative chemoradiation is effective
in improving both disease-free survival (3-year, 48% vs 31%, p<0.001)
and overall survival (3-year, 50% vs 41%, p=0.005) compared with
surgery alone. Preoperative radiation as a single adjuvant therapy
has also yielded improvements in local-regional control, disease-free
survival, and overall survival compared with surgery alone. Preoperative
chemotherapy or chemoradiation has been accepted to have a theoretical
advantage over postoperative therapy and has now been shown to
be a feasible option. Its efficacy, however, remains to be tested.
-----
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2003 Aug;3(4):457-70.
Individualizing therapy in gastric cancer.
Sendler A, Siewert JR.
Chirurgische Klinik und Poliklinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar,
Munchen, Germany. sendler@nt1.chir.med.tu-muenchen.de
Although its incidence in developed countries has declined,
gastric cancer remains one of the most common human malignancies.
In western countries a shift from distal to proximal tumors has
been noted during the past 15 years. Today, surgery is no longer
the only treatment modality of gastric cancer, with the help of
modern and sophisticated staging procedures it becomes increasingly
possible to individually tailor therapy. Operative morbidity and
mortality has markedly decreased. The importance of surgical expertise
for short- as well as long-term outcome is emphasized. The knowledge
of adequate surgery together with the use of combined modalities
opens the door to the amelioration of the still dismal prognosis
for patients with gastric cancer. This paper reviews the modern
approach to gastric cancer using an individualized treatment concept.
-----
Br J Cancer. 2003 Sep 15;89(6):997-1001.
Irinotecan is active in chemonaive patients with
metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II multicentric trial.
Kohne CH, Catane R, Klein B, Ducreux M, Thuss-Patience
P, Niederle N, Gips M, Preusser P, Knuth A, Clemens M, Bugat R,
Figer I, Shani A, Fages B, Di Betta D, Jacques C, Wilke HJ.
Robert Rossle Klinik, Charite University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Claus-Henning.KOEHNE@UMKLIMKUM-DRESDEN.DE
To assess the response rate and the tolerance of irinotecan
as first-line therapy, 40 patients with metastatic gastric cancer
received irinotecan 350 mg m(-2) every 3 weeks administered as
a 30 min infusion. Among the 35 patients evaluable for response,
two complete and five partial responses were recorded (response
rate: 20.0% (95% CI:8.4-36.9%)). In total, 16 patients achieved
stable disease and 12 progressive disease. In all, 66 percent
of the patients benefited from tumour growth control. The median
time to progression was 3.0 months (95% CI: 2.3-4.4%). The median
overall survival was 7.1 months (95% CI: 5.2-9.0%). The probability
of being alive at 6 months and 9 months was 61.0 and 32.4%, respectively.
The median number of cycles per patient was 3 (range 1-14), and
the relative dose intensity was 0.98. The most common grade 3-4
toxicities by patients were diarrhoea 20%, asthenia 10%, nausea
7.5%, vomiting 5.0%, abdominal pain 5%, neutropenia 38.5%, leucopenia
28.2%, anaemia 12.8% and thrombocytopenia 5.1%. Febrile neutropenia
occurred in 12.5% of patients. These findings indicate that irinotecan
is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic gastric
adenocarcinoma and warrants further evaluation in this clinical
setting.
-----
Lancet. 2003 Jul 26;362(9380):305-15.
Gastric cancer.
Hohenberger P, Gretschel S.
Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Robert Roessle Hospital
at the Max Delbruck Center for Molecular Medicine, Charite, Humboldt
University at Berlin, Germany. hohenberger@rrk-berlin.de <hohenberger@rrk-berlin.de>
The past decade has seen many advances in knowledge about gastric
cancer. Notably, tumour biology and lymphatic spread are now better
understood, and treatment by surgical and medical oncologists
has become more standardised. Since refrigerators have replaced
other methods of food conservation, Helicobacter pylori has become
a factor in the cause of gastric cancer. Cancers that arise at
the oesophagogastric junction might be further examples of wealth-associated
disease. To tailor treatment better, the western hemisphere needs
to borrow from the East by establishing screening programmes for
early diagnosis, through careful surgical resection, and through
detailed analysis of tumour spread. In Europe and the USA, most
patients reach treatment with cancers already at an advanced stage.
For these patients, three important randomised trials are underway
that evaluate combined therapy. Cytostatic drugs, especially angiogenesis
inhibitors have proved disappointing; however, basic research
efforts to detect familial gastric cancers and to assess minimally
residual disease look more hopeful.
-----
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2003 Jul;4(7):1083-96.
Pathological staging and therapy of oesophageal
and gastric cancer.
Debruyne PR, Waldman SA, Schulz S.
Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Jefferson
Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
19107, USA.
Oesophageal and gastric cancers are a significant cause of
morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite improvements in surgical
techniques, radiation and chemotherapy, the prognosis of both
cancers remains poor. Immunohistochemical and experimental studies
indicate that the concept of micrometastasis is applicable to
oesophageal and gastric cancer. New staging approaches, including
immunohistochemistry and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase
chain reaction (RT-PCR) of various markers, have been proposed
for a more accurate staging of oesophageal and gastric cancer.
Preliminary results suggest that real-time RT-PCR of markers for
intestinal differentiation, such as guanylyl cyclase C (GC-C),
might be useful for both the detection of premalignant conditions,
such as intestinal metaplasia and the detection of micrometastasis
from adenocarcinoma of the upper intestinal tract. Standard curative
treatment options for oesophageal cancer include surgery or chemoradiotherapy.
Chemotherapy is an option for the treatment of advanced and recurrent
oesophageal cancer. Standard curative treatment for gastro-oesophageal
junction and gastric cancer includes surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Chemotherapy is an option for the treatment of advanced and recurrent
gastric cancer.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Jul;30(7):963-70.
[A clinical results of TS-1 in advanced and recurrent
gastric cancer in our hospital]
[Article in Japanese]
Abe S, Kojima M, Tamura H, Kurihara H, Kitago M, Kobayashi T,
Nakamura T, Ogihara T.
Dept. of Surgery, Haga Red Cross Hospital.
A total of 40 patients with advanced and recurrent gastric
cancer in our hospital were treated with TS-1 alone, and the efficacy
of treatment, survival time, and adverse effects were examined.
TS-1 was administered with the usual dosage and dose regimen.
Response to treatment included a complete response (CR) in 3 cases,
partial response (PR) in 8 cases, no change (NC) in 10 cases,
and progressive disease (PD) in 7 cases. The response rate was
39.3%, and among the 28 patients with evaluable lesions TS-1 produced
a high response rate of 56.3% in 16 patients who had undergone
prior therapy. The median survival time (MST) was 478 days in
the 28 patients with evaluable lesions, excluding patients with
peritoneal dissemination, and 283 days in the 12 patients with
peritoneal dissemination. The outcome was markedly poorer in the
patients with peritoneal dissemination than in the patients with
evaluable lesions. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse
effects was 20%, including two cases in which decreased dihydropyrimidine
dehydrogenase (DPD) activity was suspected, and one case in which
decreased dihydropyrimidinase (DHP) was suspected. Although the
effect of TS-1 alone on gastric cancer is significantly superior
to that of any conventional cancer drugs, the results of this
study suggest that the antitumor effect varies with the site of
the target lesions and according to whether the lesion is a remnant
or recurrence.
-----
Chang Gung Med J. 2003 Jun;26(6):433-9.
Mitomycin C (MMC) with weekly 24-hour infusions
of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced
gastric cancer.
Chen JS, Lin YC, Liau CT, Wang CH, Liaw CC.
Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine,
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei. fong0301@ms18.hinet.net
BACKGROUND: We have reported a 33% response rate with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin
(5-FU/LV) treatment along with a median survival of 7 months in
patients with advanced gastric cancer. Subsequently, mitomycin
C (MMC) became our target agent for the combination because of
its activity towards gastric cancer. METHODS: From May 1998 to
December 2000, a total of 37 chemo-naive patients with advanced
gastric cancer were included. There were 20 men and 17 women with
a median age of 58 (range, 21-73) years. The regimen consisted
of 2600 mg/m2 5-FU and 100 mg/m2 LV admixed in an outpatient infusion
pump administered for 24 hours every week for 6 weeks, followed
by a 2-week break; then 10 mg/m2 MMC was given once every 8 weeks.
The treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable
toxicity was noted, or the patient refused. RESULTS: In total,
404 treatments of 5-FU/LV were given. The mean number of treatments
was 10 (range, 1 to 24). The intent to treat response rate was
40.5% (15/37) with 5.4% (2/37) showing a complete response. The
median time to disease progression was 4.5 months. The median
survival time was 8.0 months. All of the patients were evaluated
for toxicity. Less than 10% of the patients developed grade III/IV
toxicity. CONCLUSION: MMC with weekly 24-hour infusions of high-dose
5-FU and LV produced moderate activity in patients with advanced
gastric cancer, and patients showed acceptable toxicity.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2003 Jun;30(6):809-15.
[Clinical study of weekly administration of paclitaxel
for advanced and metastatic gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Emoto T, Yoshikawa K, Fujii M, Nezu R, Dousei T, Fujikawa M, Yoshioka
Y, Naka Y, Komaki T.
Dept. of Surgery, Osaka Prefectural Habikino Hospital.
Ten cases of advanced and metastatic gastric cancer treated
by weekly administration of paclitaxel were studied. The patients
were 50-72 years of age, including 9 men and 1 woman. In this
study, paclitaxel was administered by 1 hour intravenous infusion
at a dose of 50-80 mg/m2 every week. Administration was continued
for 3 weeks with 1 week rest. One to four cycles were performed
at minimum. Paclitaxel was administered in 5 cases as 1st line
treatment, 4 cases as 2nd line treatment and 1 case as 3rd line
treatment. There were 2 partial responders and no complete responders,
and the overall response rate was 20%. The response rate was 100%
in liver, 100% in lung, 16% in lymphnodes, and 0% in peritonial
dissemination. The clinical symptoms of pain and jaundice abated
in one case, the size of the tumor decreased in one case, and
a temporary decrease of ascites due to peritonial dissemination
was seen in two cases. The level of tumor marker was decreased
in 3 out of 10 cases. Side effects included grade 3/4 leukopenia
in 10% of patients, and alopecia in 50%, but peripheral neuropathy
was not observed. Weekly administration of paclitaxel appears
to be well-tolerated and effective against advanced and metastatic
gastric cancer.
-----
J Chemother. 2003 Jun;15(3):275-81.
Phase II study of irinotecan and mitomycin C in
5-fluorouracil-pretreated patients with advanced colorectal and
gastric cancer.
Bamias A, Papamichael D, Syrigos K, Pavlidis N.
Oncology Dept, Ioannina University Hospital, Ioannina, Greece.
abamias@med.uoa.gr
The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the tolerance
and efficacy of a second-line irinotecan/mitomycin C combination
in patients with advanced gastric or colorectal cancer, pretreated
with 5-fluorouracil. Forty patients who had received 5-fluorouracil-based
chemotherapy for advanced disease or adjuvant 5-fluorouracil treatment
were enrolled. Chemotherapy consisted of irinotecan 125 mg/m2
and mitomycin C 5 mg/m2, given every 2 weeks. Treatment was continued
until progression or limiting toxicity occurred. Five partial
responses (12.5%), 22 cases of stable disease (55%) and 13 of
progression (32.5%) were registered, giving an overall response
rate of 12.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.2-26.8%] and an
overall control of tumor growth in 67.5% (95% CI, 50.8-81.4%)
of patients. Median progression-free survival was 5 months, median
survival time 8 months, and 1-year probability of survival was
21.6%. Diarrhea and neutropenia affected 25% and 12.5% of patients
respectively, with only 7.5% experiencing grade 3-4 toxicity.
There were no chemotherapy-related deaths or hospitalizations.
This combination regimen was shown to be moderately effective
with substantially lower toxicity than irinotecan monotherapy
in 5-fluorouracil-pretreated patients with advanced gastric or
colorectal cancer. It may represent an attractive option in patients
at high risk for developing specific irinotecan toxicity.
-----
Hepatogastroenterology. 2003 May-Jun;50(51):883-5.
Minilaparotomy for early gastric cancer.
Onitsuka A, Katagiri Y, Miyauchi T, Yasunaga H, Mimoto
H, Ozeki Y.
Department of Surgery, Gifu Red Cross Hospital, 3-36, Iwakura-cho,
Gifu 502-8511, Japan. oni-ak@ocn.aitia.ne.jp
BACKGROUND/AIMS: From the experience of laparoscopic-assisted
distal gastrectomy, it was considered that a gastrectomy with
lymph node dissection could be performed through a minilaparotomy,
placed as for gastroduodenostomy in laparoscopic-assisted distal
gastrectomy. METHODOLOGY: Ten patients with early gastric cancer
underwent gastrectomy with lymph node dissection via minilaparotomy.
Minilaparotomy was performed via a seven-centimeter midline incision
placed at the mid-upper abdomen. Two six-centimeter-wide Kent
retractors were used to suspend the abdominal wall on each side,
and a multipurpose surgical arm to retract the liver. The abdominal
wound could be moved horizontally by pulling these retractors
to the right or left. This movable wound allowed direct visualization
of almost all the operative field for gastrectomy. RESULTS: No
operation was converted to a standard open gastrectomy. The patients
who had a tumor in the lower third of the stomach underwent complete
D2 lymph node dissection. In the patients who underwent pylorus-preserving
gastrectomy, near complete D2 lymph node dissection was performed.
Mean operation time was 175 minutes. No significant complication
was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that minilaparotomy
could be used as an alteration to the standard open gastrectomy.
-----
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2003 May;15(3):92-7.
Mitomycin C, carboplatin and protracted venous
infusion 5-fluorouracil in advanced oesophago-gastric and pancreatic
cancer: results of two phase II studies.
Kelleher M, Tebbutt NC, Cunningham D, Andreyev J, Allen
M, Hill M, Norman A.
Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Cisplatin is an active palliative chemotherapy agent in advanced
upper gastrointestinal cancer, but it is associated with significant
non-haematological toxicity. Substitution of cisplatin by carboplatin
in combination chemotherapy regimens may reduce these adverse
effects. These two phase II studies evaluated the efficacy and
toxicity of the combination of mitomycin C (MMC) 7 mg/m2 q 6 weekly,
carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve 5 mg/ml/min
q 3 weekly and protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5FU)
300 mg/m2/day (McarboF) in advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer.
Between October 1998 and June 2000, 31 patients were enrolled
in the studies, 23 patients in the oesophago-gastric study and
eight patients in the pancreatic study. Although non-haematological
toxicity was modest, both protocols were closed prematurely because
of excessive haematological toxicity and frequent treatment delays.
The overall incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia
was 39 and 52%, respectively. The McarboF combination showed significant
activity with an overall response rate of 52% in advanced oesophago-gastric
cancer. Palliative benefit was also evident with improvement in
symptoms of pain and weight loss in over 79 and 50% of patients
in the oesophago-gastric study and pancreatic study, respectively.
Median overall survival times were 10.6 and 6.6 months for patients
with oesophago-gastric and pancreatic cancer, respectively. The
McarboF regimen showed promising activity in advanced upper gastrointestinal
cancer, with modest non-haematological side-effects. This combination
merits further evaluation with modification of the dose and schedule
of carboplatin and MMC in order to reduce the severity of haematological
toxicity.
-----
Oncology (Huntingt). 2003 May;17(5):714-21, 728; discussion
728-9, 732-3.
Adjuvant therapy in gastric cancer: can we prevent
recurrences?
Meyerhardt JA, Fuchs CS.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Channing Laboratory, Brigham and
Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. jeffrey_meyerhardt@dfci.harvard.edu
Despite a dramatic decline in the incidence of gastric carcinoma
in the United States during the past century, treatment remains
a challenging problem for oncologists. Surgery continues to be
the primary modality for managing early-stage gastric cancer,
but up to 80% of patients who undergo a "curative" resection
develop locoregional or distant recurrence. Given these sobering
statistics, there has been great interest in developing strategies
to prevent recurrences after surgery and improve overall mortality.
In this article, we review data on adjuvant treatment modalities
for this disease, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, combination
chemotherapy and radiation, intraperitoneal treatment, and immunotherapy.
We focus attention on the recent widespread acceptance of adjuvant
chemoradiotherapy, based on the results of Intergroup trial 0116.
Future strategies incorporating different modalities of treatment
will be outlined.
-----
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2003 May;33(5):238-40.
A phase II clinical trial to evaluate the effect
of paclitaxel in patients with ascites caused by advanced or recurrent
gastric carcinoma: a new concept of clinical benefit response
for non-measurable type of gastric cancer.
Sakamoto J, Morita S, Yumiba T, Narahara H, Kinoshita K,
Nakane Y, Imamoto H, Shiozaki H; Ascitic Gastric Cancer Study
Group of the Japan South West Oncology Group.
Department of Epidemiological and Clinical Research Information
Management, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. sakamoto@pbh.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp
A phase II clinical trial has started in the South West region
of Japan to investigate the efficacy and safety of weekly paclitaxel
chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with ascites-forming
advanced gastric cancer. A novel trial design was created to assess
more effectively prospective changes in symptomatology. The study
design focuses on the typical features seen in patients with ascites-forming
advanced gastric cancer, including girth of the abdomen and impaired
performance status, which is evaluated in the endpoint of 'Clinical
Benefit Response - Gastric Cancer'. The more traditional endpoints,
objective tumor response and survival, are also included. As nearly
40% of patients with this disease are excluded from traditional
phase II trials owing to the absence of 'measurable' disease,
this study should more precisely illustrate the disease entity
affecting patients with advanced gastric cancer.
-----
Rozhl Chir. 2003 May;82(5):278-84.
[Lymphadenectomy in gastric carcinoma--present
status, new trends and personal experience]
[Article in Czech]
Simsa J, Leffler J, Hoch J, Schwarz J, Pospisil R, Bavor P.
Chirurgicka klinika 2. LF UK a FN Motol, Praha.
The only hope for long time survival in gastric cancer is radical
surgery with complete tumour removal. Lymphadenectomy as a part
of surgical procedure helps to remove tumour completely. The value
of lymphadenectomy for staging is clear and surgeons have no doubt
about it. Therapeutic effect of lymphadenectomy with improvement
of the prognosis remains uncertain. In this work we would like
to discuss current trends in lymphadenectomy in gastric cancer,
especially evaluating the value and extent of the procedure.
-----
Cas Lek Cesk. 2003;142 Suppl 1:26-8.
[Role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the treatment
of gastric carcinoma]
[Article in Czech]
Kocakova I, Vetcha H, Soumarova R, Vyzula R.
Klinika komplexni onkologicke pece-oddeleni radiacni onkologie,
Masarykuv onkologicky ustav, Brno. kocakova@mou.cz
Gastric carcinoma is often diagnosed at the advanced stage.
Approximately 50% of patients with locoregional disease cannot
undergo any curative resection. 5-year survival rate in patients
who undergo a curative resection (R0) ranges from 30-40%. In patients
with curatively resected gastric carcinoma who are at high risk
of relapse the adjuvant postoperative chemotherapy with 5-FU/leucovorin
is recommended. It should be followed by radiotherapy with concomitant
5-FU/leucovorin, and then two more courses of 5-FU/leukovorin
(INT-0116 trial) should be added. For the surgery alone group,
the overall survival was 27 months; in the chemoradiotherapy group
it was 36 months. The recommended therapy for inoperable or medically
unsuitable patients with locoregional carcinoma is the combined
radiation therapy (45 to 50.4 Gy) with concurrent 5-fluorouracil
or cisplatin based chemotherapy.
-----
J Am Coll Surg 2003 Jan;196(1):75-81
Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic
lymph node dissection for early gastric carcinoma: a review of
43 cases.
Fujiwara M, Kodera Y, Kasai Y, Kanyama Y, Hibi K, Ito K, Akiyama
S, Nakao A.
Department of Surgery II, Nagoya University School of Medicine,
Nagoya/Aichi, Japan.
BACKGROUND: Recently, laparoscopy and laparoscopy-assisted
surgery have been used increasingly as less-invasive alternatives
to conventional open surgery. But the use of this approach in
gastric carcinoma has received little attention, possibly from
the low incidence of early-stage disease in the West and the relative
complexity of the surgical procedure. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective
feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy was
performed in patients with histologically confirmed gastric carcinoma
located in the lower or middle third of the stomach. Patients
whose preoperative evaluations, including endoscopic ultrasonography
and computerized tomography, led to a diagnosis of T1 N0 stage
disease, and who had no advanced disease discovered during laparoscopy,
were eligible. Intraoperative blood loss, time of operation, mortality,
and morbidity were assessed, along with the number of lymph nodes
retrieved and shortterm survival. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 1999,
43 patients were enrolled. Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy
was converted to an open procedure in one patient. There were
no operative or in-hospital deaths, but the incidence of anastomotic
leakage was 14% (6 of 43). The mean blood loss was 239 mL, the
time of operation was 225 minutes, and lymph node retrieval was
20.2 nodes. These results are comparable with a series of conventional
open operations. One patient died of recurrent disease, and all
other patients remain disease-free to date. Port-site recurrence
was not observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although laparoscopy-assisted distal
gastrectomy was equivalent to open surgery in several clinical
parameters, the relatively high morbidity was a drawback. Its
appropriateness to gastric cancer surgery must be verified by
further studies. Copyright 2003 by the American College of Surgeons
-----
Am J Surg 2003 Mar;185(3):285-7
Endoscopic mucosal resection for early cardia
cancer by minimum laparotomy.
Endo K, Kawamoto K, Baba H, Yamamoto M, Ikeda Y, Toh Y, Kohnoe
S, Okamura T.
Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery, National Kyushu Cancer
Center, 3-1-1 Notame, Minami-ku, Fukuoka 811-1395, Japan. kendo@nk-cc.go.jp
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) has been widely accepted
as a minimally invasive and standard treatment for early gastric
cancers without ulceration or signs of submucosal invasion and
meeting the criteria for diameter, macroscopic appearance, and
well- or moderately differentiated histology. However, EMR cannot
be applied to some cases owing to technical difficulties relating
to the intragastric location of the cancers even when the above
criteria are satisfied. We report here a new approach to EMR for
early cancers of the cardia located close to the esophagocardia
junction that are outside the indications for ordinary EMR.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2003 Feb;30(2):283-7
Am J Clin Oncol 2003 Feb;26(1):37-41
Phase II study of paclitaxel and carboplatin in
patients with advanced gastric cancer.
Gadgeel SM, Shields AF, Heilbrun LK, Labadidi S, Zalupski M, Chaplen
R, Philip PA.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute
and Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.
5-Fluorouracil-based combination chemotherapy is commonly used
in patients with advanced gastric cancer, but results with such
therapy are fairly modest. Evaluation of newer agents is therefore
required in this disease. Paclitaxel has shown promising activity
as a single agent in gastric cancer. In vitro, paclitaxel exhibits
sequence-dependent synergy with platinum compounds against gastric
cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and
toxicity of combination carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients
with advanced gastric cancer. Twenty-seven patients with measurable
or evaluable advanced gastric cancer were enrolled on the study
from April 1996 to July 2000. Patients were treated with paclitaxel
200 mg/m intravenously during 3 hours followed by carboplatin
at projected area under the curve 5 mg x h x ml (as per the Calvert
formula). Twenty-six patients were assessable for toxicity, and
25 patients were assessable for objective response. Nine of the
27 enrolled patients had a major response for an objective response
rate of 33% (95% CI 0.17-0.54) by intention-to-treat analysis.
The median response duration was 4.9 months (95% CI 2.8-7.3),
and median survival was 7.5 months. The 1-year survival rate was
23%. One hundred seventeen courses were administered with a median
of four courses per patient administered. The major toxicity was
neutropenia, with grade III to IV neutropenia observed in 9 patients
(33%) and neutropenic fever in only 1 patient. Grade III peripheral
neuropathy developed in two patients, and grade III myalgia and
grade III fatigue developed in one patient each. There were no
treatment-related deaths. The combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel
is a highly tolerable, regimen with activity comparable to that
of other regimens in advanced gastric cancer. This regimen needs
to be further evaluated in combination with other agents and as
a component of multimodality therapy in gastric cancer.
-----
Oncology 2003;64(2):111-5
Pharmacokinetic study of two infusion schedules
of irinotecan combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced
gastric cancer.
Fujitani K, Tsujinaka T, Hirao M.
Department of Surgery, Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
fujitani@onh.go.jp
OBJECTIVE: Irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with cisplatin
(CDDP) has shown promising antitumor activity for advanced gastric
cancer, but the optimal administration schedule of CPT-11 is still
controversial. To clarify the pharmacokinetic effects of different
CPT-11 administration schedules, we compared two different regimens
(continuous infusion of CPT-11 for 24 h and CPT-11 infusion for
90 min) combined with CDDP in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Five patients were treated with CPT-11 at
a dose of 60 mg/m(2) delivered by continuous infusion for 24 h
on day 1 and by a 90-min infusion on day 15, together with CDDP
daily administered at a dose of 10 mg/m(2) on days 1-3 and days
15-17 for 4 weeks. The pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 and its metabolites,
SN-38 and SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G), were investigated, as well
as the toxicity of therapy. RESULTS: Grade 3 leukopenia was observed
in 1 patient after 24-hour infusion and in 1 patient after 90-min
infusion of CPT-11. In addition, grade 3 thrombocytopenia was
observed in 1 patient after the 90-min infusion. Other adverse
reactions were mild, and the planned dose was delivered to all
patients. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve of
SN-38, the active metabolite from CPT-11, was increased by 24-hour
infusion when compared with the 90-min infusion, and there was
no increase in toxicity. CONCLUSION: Protracted infusional CPT-11
combined with CDDP is a practical regimen, and may be appropriate
for a future phase II trial. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
-----
Surgery 2003 Jan;133(1):68-73
Feasibility of central gastrectomy for gastric
cancer.
Iseki J, Takagi M, Touyama K, Sano K, Nakagami K, Ori T, Ooba
N, Kin H, Kojima H, Kojima K.
BACKGROUND: Central gastrectomy (CG) for gastric cancer was
developed to preserve pyloric function and maintain a large gastric
volume. Whether this procedure is feasible for limited cases of
gastric cancer is unclear. METHODS: On the basis of Union Internationale
Contre le Cancer TNM classification, pathologic characteristics,
perioperative parameters, and long-term results, we analyzed 100
patients who underwent CG. RESULTS: Pathologic findings included
T1 (tumor depth, mucosal or submucosal) in 82 patients and T2
(muscularis propria or subserosal) in 18 patients. Mean number
of dissected lymph nodes was 17.3, and pathologic N1 (node metastasis,
6 or less) was found in 14 patients. There were no operative deaths,
but 5 patients had postoperative complications: anastomotic leakage
in 1, severe gastric stasis in 2, ischemic gastric ulcer in 1,
and intra-abdominal bleeding in 1. No patient had a cancer recurrence
in a mean follow-up of 49 months. New early gastric cancer was
detected in 3 patients during follow-up endoscopic examination.
The 5-year cumulative survival was 0.97. One year after CG, 63
patients had early satiety after food intake. Mean ratio of 1-year
postoperative/preoperative body weight was 95%. CONCLUSIONS: Central
gastrectomy with sufficient node dissection resulted in good long-term
survival and minimal postoperative weight loss. CG is a safe and
useful procedure for selected patients with gastric cancer, although
close follow-up for recurrence and a more precise analysis on
physiologic states is needed.
-----
Am J Surg 2003 Feb;185(2):150-4
Improved quality of life with jejunal pouch reconstruction
after total gastrectomy.
Kono K, Iizuka H, Sekikawa T, Sugai H, Takahashi A, Fujii H, Matsumoto
Y.
First Department of Surgery, Yamanashi Medical University, 1110
Tamaho, 409-3898, Yamanashi, Japan. kojikono@res.yamanashi-med.ac.jp
BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that the effect of
jejunal pouch reconstruction is satisfactory for reservoir function
in several randomized control studies. However, these studies
were performed in patients with advanced gastric cancer, where
significant numbers of the patients died of disease recurrence.
In order to exclude the influence of disease recurrence, we performed
jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy in patients
with early gastric cancer in a randomized controlled study and
investigated whether or not an improved quality of life (QOL)
was observed with jejunal pouch reconstruction. METHODS: Fifty
consecutive patients receiving total gastrectomy for early gastric
cancer were prospectively divided into the Roux-en-Y reconstruction
group without pouch (RY group) or the jejunal pouch reconstruction
group (pouch group). Body weight, eating capacity, QOL assessment
by gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), nutritional parameters,
endoscopical examination, 24-hour pH monitoring and Bilitec monitoring
were evaluated at 3, 12, and 48 months after surgery. RESULTS:
Jejunal pouch reconstruction provided the better QOL than Roux-en-Y
reconstruction without pouch both at short-term and long-term
periods in a randomized control study. Moreover, as a new finding,
pouch reconstruction provided less bile reflux into the esophagus
compared with Roux-en-Y reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Jejunal pouch
reconstruction provided improvement of QOL in patients receiving
total gastrectomy.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2003 Jan;30(1):133-9
[Treatment outcomes with paclitaxel for advanced
gastric cancer patients previously treated with TS-1]
[Article in Japanese]
Suzuki T, Iwabuchi M, Matsuda Y, Imai G, Yokoyama H, Mochida A,
Takahashi H, Shiina M, Yamada K, Ishibashi J, Suzuki S, Chida
N, Tadokoro K.
Dept. of Gastroenterology, Sendai National Hospital.
In the present report, we describe the treatment results of
paclitaxel in patients with metastatic gastric cancer previously
treated with TS-1 or combination chemotherapy of TS-1 and CDDP.
Paclitaxel was administered to 4 patients at a weekly dose of
80 mg/m2/day for three weeks followed by a one week interval.
Remarkable tumor reduction was observed in 2 patients. Case 1:
A 52-year-old male patient with gastric cancer and multiple liver
metastases was treated by weekly infusion of paclitaxel as a 2nd
line chemotherapy. After 1 course, the tumor was remarkably reduced,
and the reduction was judged PR. Case 2: A 31-year-old male patient
presented with lymphoangitis carcinomatosa and obstructive jaundice
resulting from cancerous lymphoadenopathy. After 1 course, chest
radiographs and abdominal CT scan showed remarkable reduction
of these lesions. The adverse effects observed with this drug
were leucocytopenia and liver dysfunction, both of which improved
soon. These results indicate paclitaxel is effective for advanced
gastric cancer pretreated with TS-1.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2003 Jan;30(1):67-71
[Weekly administration of paclitaxel with a short
course of premedication for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Yamamoto S, Tanaka Y, Ito T, Nakai S, Morimoto Y, Kitagawa T,
Kurihara Y, Nishimura J.
Dept. of Surgery, Osaka Prefectural General Hospital.
Weekly administration of paclitaxel with a short course of
premedication was performed for 8 patients with advanced or recurrent
gastric cancer. In this regimen, 500 ml of physiological saline
with vitamins was administered in a 3-hour infusion. After 30
minutes of infusion, dexamethasone 10 mg, chlorpheniramine maleate
5 mg, famotidine 20 mg and ramosetron hydrochloride 0.3 mg were
administered intravenously. After 30 more minutes of infusion,
paclitaxel at a dose of 65 mg/m2 was admixed in the residual normal
physiological saline and administered over 2 hours. Administration
was continued for 3 weeks with a 1 week rest. Though the partial
response rate was 25%, clinical symptoms improved in all patients.
Moreover, both hematological and non-hematological toxicities
were mild. Weekly administration of paclitaxel with a short course
of premedication is an effective and well-tolerated method for
patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.
-----
Nippon Rinsho 2003 Jan;61(1):97-101
[Indication of H. pylori eradication therapy]
[Article in Japanese]
Ohtaka K, Miwa H, Sato N.
Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University, School of
Medicine.
In the guideline, for H. pylori the Japanese Society of Helicobacter
published diagnosis and treatment in July 2000. Only peptic ulcers
and low grade MALT lymphomas are recommended as an indication
of H. pylori eradication and other diseases such as atrophic gastritis,
post EMR state for early gastric cancer and post-operated stomach
due to gastric cancer, hyperplastic polyps and non-ulcer dyspepsia,
were not included. In addition, Japanese social security foundation
approves only peptic ulcers for indication of H. pylori eradication
treatment. However, eradication therapy for atrophic gastritis
should be considered in aspect of decreasing gastric cancer risk.
Since accumulated epidemiological, experimental and clinical data
strongly support its positive correlation with cancer risk, patients
in high risk group for gastric cancer should be included for a
target eradication therapy. Indication of the treatment should
be expanded to histological gastritis caused by H. pylori in our
country, where prevalence of gastric cancer is very high.
-----
Chang Gung Med J 2002 Dec;25(12):792-802
Benefits of palliative surgery for far-advanced
gastric cancer.
Wang CS, Chao TC, Jan YY, Jeng LB, Hwang TL, Chen MF.
Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei,
Taiwan, ROC. wangcs@cgmh.org.tw
BACKGROUND: The optimum strategy for palliative surgery in
gastric cancer patients remains undetermined. METHODS: In total,
525 patients who had undergone palliative surgery between 1994
and 2000 were evaluated in terms of operative mortality, survival,
and palliative effect. Patients were grouped according to the
UICC's classification of residual tumors (R) after the operation:
microscopic residual tumor (R1) (N = 104) and macroscopic residual
tumor (R2) (N = 421). Gastric resection was performed in all R1
patients and in 257 of the R2 patients. Non-resection procedures
were performed in 164 of the R2 patients, including gastrojejunostomies
in 64, gastrostomies in 17, jejunostomies in 60, and laparotomies
only in 23. RESULTS: The operative mortality did not significantly
differ among R1 distal gastrectomies (4.5%), R2 distal gastrectomies
(3.3%), and R1 total gastrectomies (2.9%) (p = 0.919). R2 total
gastrectomies showed a particularly higher operative mortality
(10.9%) than did the other resection procedures. The survival
time and palliative duration were significantly longer in patients
after palliative resection than after non-resection operations.
Postoperative chemotherapy prolonged the survival time of patients
after palliative surgery. CONCLUSION: R1 or R2 distal gastrectomies
and R1 total gastrectomies have benefits of survival prolongation
and symptomatic palliation. However, the use of a total gastrectomy
in R2 patients must be selectively reserved for far-advanced cases,
otherwise it should be replaced with less-invasive procedures
to avoid a high operative mortality rate. Postoperative chemotherapy
is useful for prolonging survival time.
-----
Trop Gastroenterol 2002 Apr-Jun;23(2):94-6
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancerresults
of a pilot study.
Shukla NK, Deo SV, Asthana S, Raina V, Dronamaraju SS.
Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital (IRCH), All India Institute of
Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi-110 029, India. nkshukla2@yahoo.com
INTRODUCTION: Adenocarcinoma of the stomach is usually advanced
at presentation, and local or distant spread may preclude the
option of primary curative resection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
(NAC) has shown promise in downstaging initially unresectable
disease. This pilot study was planned to assess the utility of
NAC using Cisplatin and 5-Fluoro uracil in the management of initially
unresectable gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten patients
with unresectable gastric adnocarcinoma were included. They received
two cycles of cisplatin, 30 mg/m2 intravenously in combination
with 5-Fluoro Uracil, 1000 mg/m2. They were restaged using Endoscopy
and CT scan and taken up for exploratory laparotomy. RESULTS:
Eight of 10 patients (80%) had an objective response to chemotherapy.
Six patients (60%) with initially unresectable disease could be
offered curative surgery. The median survival was 10 months (range
1-60 months). There were two long term survivors (48 and 60 months
respectively). CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an
effective option in downstaging initially unresectable gastric
carcinoma. Complete response to chemotherapy also predicts long
term survival.
-----
Cancer Radiother 2002 Nov;6 Suppl 1:13s-23s
[Chemoradiotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of
gastric adenocarcinomas: real progress?]
[Article in French]
Mineur L, Lacaine F, Ychou M, Bosset JF, Daban A.
Institut Sainte-Catherine, chemin du Lavarin, 84082 Avignon, France.
laurent.mineur@caramail.com
Frequency of local and distant failures after gastrectomy has
led to extended lymph nodes dissection to obtain a better locoregional
control. However, five year survival rates were not significantly
different between patients undergoing D2 and D1 lymphadenectomy,
and higher morbidity and post operative deaths were reported in
large randomised trials (respectively 25% vs 48% and 4 vs 13%).
Additionally, several metanalysis failed to demonstrate a significant
survival advantage with adjuvant chemotherapy. The results of
the first trial demonstrating one advantage to adjuvant post-operative
chemoradiotherapy should modify the standard care. Disease free
and overall survival after surgery alone and after surgery and
concurrent chemoradiotherapy were respectively 31% vs 48% and
41% vs 50%. The intergroup trial demonstrate that better local
control improve survival if radiation fields include stamps, tumour
bed, proximal nodal chains and nodes corresponding to D2 extended
lymph nodes dissection. Treatment was feasible with few severe
toxic effects (1%). Of the 281 patients, 17% stopped treatment
because toxic effects. Technical modalities of radiotherapy and
post-operative nutrition support, which are critical points of
interest for this treatment, are also discussed.
-----
Bratisl Lek Listy 2002;103(11):424-7
Radical D2 surgery for patients with gastric cancer.
Palaj J, Konecny J, Petras L, Babiak L, Kukla K, Ciganak J, Moravekova
E.
Surgical Department, Hospital Bojnice, Slovakia. bll@fmed.uniba.sk
The authors analyzed and prepared a report concerning 18 radical
surgeries for gastric cancer that were performed between 1999-2001.
Overall, 55 operation were performed, 32 radical, 18 palliative
and 5 explorative laparatomies. D2 resections were performed 18
times, while D1 type 14 times. The group undergoing D2 surgery
comprised of 10 men and 8 women with average age of 64.3. D2 resection
included partial (8 times), or total (10) gastrectomy and lymfadenectomy
of perigastric nodes, supra and infrapyloric nodes and nodes along
common hepatic artery, truncus coeliacus, lienal artery, left
paracardial nodes and removing capsula of pancreas. Splenectomy
was performed twice. On average, 37.5 lymphnodes were removed
for every operation (25-69). Operative mortality was none (0%)
and morbidity was 22%. As of January 1, 2002 relaps was noted
in six patients, and 5 patients died. CONCLUSION: D2 resection
surgeries performed by an experienced surgeon show low morbidity
as well as better outcome and higher perspective for long-term
survival in patients with gastric cancer. (Tab. 1, Ref. 19.).
-----
Semin Oncol 2002 Dec;29(6 Suppl 18):63-8
Pemetrexed in gastric cancer: clinical experience
and future perspectives.
Celio L, Buzzoni R, Longarini R, Marchiano A, Bajetta E.
Medical Oncology Unit B and Department of Radiology, Istituto
Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
The development of more effective and convenient chemotherapy
regimens for the treatment of gastric cancer that incorporate
novel agents remains an exciting area of research. A phase II
study was conducted to assess the response rate and toxicity profile
of pemetrexed, a novel multitargeted antifolate, in previously
untreated patients with measurable, advanced, or metastatic adenocarcinoma
of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. In this study, pemetrexed-induced
toxicity at the starting dose of 500 mg/m(2) intravenously once
every 21 days was considerable with each of the first six patients
who experienced at least one episode of grade 3/4 toxicity. Two
patients discontinued from study, and two patients died. All deaths
were caused by drug-related toxicity. No responses were seen in
this briefly treated group. These observations led to an amended
study protocol designed to improve tolerability of pemetrexed
with folic acid supplementation. Supplementation with folic acid
5 mg was given orally once daily for 2 days before pemetrexed
on the day of treatment, and for 2 days following treatment. Tumor
evaluation was performed after every two cycles of therapy. The
trial was recently closed to accrual and preliminary clinical
results are reported here. Thirty-two patients were enrolled and
30 patients were evaluable for efficacy. A total of 129 courses
of pemetrexed were administered, and the median number of courses
received per patient was four (range, one to eight courses). Two
complete and five partial responses were observed, with four patients
experiencing stable disease. In an intent-to-treat analysis, the
overall response rate was 22%, and 23% for the evaluable patients.
Median duration of response was 4.4 months (range, 3 to 11 months)
and median time to treatment failure was 2.6 months (range, 0.5
to 12 months). Of the 32 patients treated, eight experienced grade
4 neutropenia and one had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. The most common
nonhematologic toxicities were diarrhea, fatigue, mucositis, nausea
and vomiting, skin rash, and reversible abnormalities in liver
function. There was no case of nonhematologic grade 4 toxicity.
Although the clinical experience with pemetrexed in advanced gastric
cancer remains limited, the promising activity observed in this
study indicates that combination studies are warranted. In addition,
high-dose intermittent oral folic acid given in this study allowed
administration of pemetrexed at the dose and schedule explored
with a highly satisfactory safety profile and with no apparent
compromise in efficacy. This article discusses how pemetrexed
may be investigated in future clinical trials in gastric cancer.
Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
-----
Anticancer Res 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6B):3633-6
Phase II study of mitomycin C, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil
for advanced and recurrent gastric cancer.
Kikuyama S, Inada T, Oyama R, Ogata Y.
Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Central Hospital, 1-4-17, Mita,
Tokyo 108-0073, Japan. kikuyama@hh.iij4u.or.jp
In this study, we assessed the efficacy and feasibility of
a 5-FU, MMC and cisplatin combination in patients with advanced
or recurrent gastric cancer. 5-FU was administered at a dose of
360 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5 and days 8 through 12. CDDP was
administered at a dose of 7 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5 and days
8 through 12. MMC was given at a dose of 13 mg/m2 on day 1. Twenty-seven
patients with non-resectable or recurrent gastric cancer were
entered. The most common toxicity was leukopenia. Nausea/vomiting
was generally mild and no patient suffered severe diarrhea, mucositis
or renal insufficiency. While a complete response was not observed,
13 patients showed a PR giving an overall response rate of 48.1%
(95%CI, 28.0 to 68.3%). Our regimen may have advantages in terms
of reduced toxicity with moderate efficacy that is comparable
with results using the ECF regimen.
-----
Anticancer Res 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6B):3605-10
Independent antitumor spectrum of UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine)
against gastric and colorectal cancers as detected by MTT assay.
Abe S, Kubota T, Saikawa Y, Otani Y, Furukawa T, Watanabe M, Kumai
K, Kitajima M.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35
Shinanomachi, Shihjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
To evaluate the clinical usefulness of 7-hydroxystaurosporine
(UCN-01), we compared the antitumor spectrum of UCN-01 with those
of conventional antitumor agents against 40 fresh gastric and
40 fresh colorectal cancer specimens using the MTT assay. At a
cut-off concentration of 30 micrograms/ml, UCN-01 showed a higher
efficacy rate than mitomycin C (MMC), cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil
(5-FU) against both gastric and colorectal cancers. With respect
to the gastric cancer specimens, the antitumor spectrum of UCN-01
was independent from those of the other agents, while the patterns
of antitumor effects of the conventional agents all correlated
significantly with each other. For the colorectal cancer specimens,
the pattern of UCN-01-sensitivity did not correlate with the patterns
for 5-FU or MMC. In conclusion, UCN-01 may be useful for clinical
application against gastric and colorectal cancer due to its different
antitumor spectrum from conventionally available agents.
-----
Anticancer Res 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6B):3513-7
Which patients with advanced, proximal gastric
cancer benefit from complete clearance of spleno-pancreatic lymph
nodes?
Kikuchi S, Nemoto Y, Natsuya K, Sakuramoto S, Kobayashi N, Shimao
H, Sakakibara Y, Kakita A.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Kitasato University,
1-15-1, Kitasato, Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa 228, Japan.
BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of dissecting spleno-pancreatic
nodes remains unclear in patients with advanced proximal gastric
cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a total of 104 patients
(74 males and 30 females; age range, 21 to 76 years; mean, 56.0
years), who had undergone curative total gastrectomy combined
with spleno-pancreatectomy for advanced proximal gastric cancer,
were analyzed with respect to clinicopathological features and
patient survival. RESULTS: Metastases to spleno-pancreatic nodes
were found in 24 patients (23.1%). Tumor size > 40 mm (p =
0.0218), histologically-undifferentiated type (p = 0.0346) and
both Japanese and TNM node-stages (p < 0.0001) were associated
with metastases to these nodes. The 5-year survival rate of patients
with a T2 tumor was 65.4% in patients with no metastases to the
spleno-pancreatic nodes and 45.5% in patients with metastases
to these nodes (p = 0.0699). No patients with a T3 tumor and metastases
to the spleno-pancreatic nodes survived more than 4 years. CONCLUSION:
Complete clearance of SP-nodes for patients with advanced proximal
gastric cancer is beneficial for patients with a T2 tumor but
not for patients with a T3 tumor. Metastases to these nodes appear
to be rare in tumors less than 40 mm. Thus, this treatment should
not be routinely performed in patients with proximal advanced
gastric cancer. It should not be considered in patients with T3
tumors or with tumors < or = 40 mm.
-----
Anticancer Res 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6A):3245-52
A potential important role for thymidylate synthetase
inhibition on antitumor activity of fluoropyrimidine and raltitexed.
Kabeshima Y, Kubota T, Watanabe M, Saikawa Y, Nishibori H, Hasegawa
H, Kitajima M.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35
Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan.
BACKGROUND: Because thymidylate synthetase (TS) is a key enzyme
in DNA synthesis, it has been used as a target for cancer chemotherapy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the combined antitumor
activity of raltitexed, 5-FU and UFT on human tumor xenografts
in nude mice and examined changes in TS activity and 5-FU-bound
RNA (F-RNA) levels. Human gastric (SC-1-NU) or colon (HT-29) carcinoma
xenografts were transplanted subcutaneously into nude mice, and
drugs administered intraperitoneally (raltitexed and 5-FU) or
perorally (UFT) daily for 5 days, and repeated once after a 2-day
interval. RESULTS: The antitumor effects were mostly equivalent
between the treatment groups despite the different drugs and sequence
orders. TS inhibition rates correlated with the tumor inhibition
rate, which was statistically significant, while F-RNA levels
did not correlate with antitumor activity. CONCLUSION: Our results
indicated that the combination of fluoropyrimidine-related agents
should be directed towards increased TS inhibition rather than
increased F-RNA levels.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2002 Dec;29(13):2499-507
[Interim report of JFMC study no. 23phase
III randomized clinical trial on the effectiveness of low-dose
cisplatin plus 5-FU as a postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for
advanced gastric cancer]
[Article in Japanese]
Saji S, Toge T, Kurosu Y, Hirata K, Gochi A, Tominaga S, Inokuchi
K.
Second Dept. of Surgery, Gifu University School of Medicine.
The interim analysis of the JFMC study as of May, 2001 covers
190 gastrectomized patients with advanced gastric cancer from
82 institutions between May, 1996 and March, 2000. Patients were
randomly assigned to the following two regimens. Group-CD: cisplatin
(CDDP) 5 mg/body/day (i.v.) plus 5-FU 300 mg/body/day (cvi) day
1-5, given for 6 weeks, followed by UFT 200 mg (as tegafur) x
2/day for as long as possible. Group-UF: UFT only was administered
after surgery as long as possible. The primary endpoint was survival
and the secondary endpoint was disease-free survival. The 4-year
survival rates were 47.6% in CD and 41.3% in UF, and the hazard
ratio of CD versus UF was 0.74 (95% CL: 0.47-1.16, p = 0.189)
according to a stratified (with stage) logrank analysis. The 4-year
disease-free survival rates were 50.1% in CD and 39.3% in UF,
and the hazard ratio of CD versus UF was 0.65 (95% CL: 0.42-1.00,
p = 0.049). Cox's regression analysis using time-dependent dummy
variables, revealed that the effect on the survival was accentuated
within 9 months, that on disease-free survival within 6 months.
The quality of life (QOL) of patients for one year after surgery
in CD was significantly lower than that of patient in UF, as assessed
using a QOL questionnaire. Although the present interim analysis
does not statistically confirm the efficacy of the "low-dose
CDDP plus 5-FU" regimen, an expectation for better results
is suggested if this regimen is administered for a longer period
of time. The JFMC Clinical Trial Committee permitted the release
of this report on the condition that further study to verify the
present study will be conducted.
-----
Can J Surg 2002 Dec;45(6):438-46
Comment in: Can J Surg. 2002 Dec;45(6):410.
Neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy for resectable
gastric cancer? A practice guideline.
Earle CC, Maroun J, Zuraw L; Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines
Initiative Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Mass, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations on the use of neoadjuvant
or adjuvant therapy in addition to surgery in patients with resectable
gastric cancer (T1-4, N1-2, M0). OPTIONS: Neoadjuvant or adjuvant
treatments compared with "curative" surgery alone. OUTCOMES:
Overall survival, disease-free survival, and adverse effects.
EVIDENCE: The MEDLINE, CANCERLIT and Cochrane Library databases
and relevant conference proceedings were searched to identify
randomized trials. VALUES: Evidence was selected and reviewed
by one member of the Cancer Care Ontario Practice Guidelines Initiative
(CCOPGI) Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group and methodologists.
A systematic review of the published literature was combined with
a consensus process around the interpretation of the evidence
in the context of conventional practice, to develop an evidence-based
practice guideline. This report has been reviewed and approved
by the Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group, comprising
medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, surgeons, a pathologist
and 2 community representatives. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: When
compared with surgery alone, at 3 years adjuvant chemoradiotherapy
has been shown to increase overall survival by 9% (50% v. 41%,
p = 0.005) and to improve relapse-free survival from 31% to 48%
(p = 0.001). At 5 years, it has been shown to increase overall
survival by 11.6% (40% v. 28.4%) and to improve relapse-free survival
from 25% to 38% (p < 0.001). Treatment has been associated
with toxic deaths in 1% of patients. The most frequent adverse
effects (> grade 3 [Southwest Oncology Group toxicity scale]
are hematologic (54%), gastrointestinal (33%), influenza-like
(9%), infectious (6%) and neurologic (4%). The radiation fields
used can possibly damage the left kidney, resulting in hypertension
and other renal problems. Furthermore, this therapy could increase
the demand on radiation resources. Physicians and patients should
understand the tradeoffs between survival benefit and toxicity
and cost before making treatment decisions. RECOMMENDATIONS: After
surgical resection, patients whose tumours have penetrated the
muscularis propria or involve regional lymph nodes should be considered
for adjuvant combined chemoradiotherapy. The current standard
protocol consists of 1 cycle of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (425 mg/m2
daily) and leucovorin (20 mg/m2 daily) administered daily for
5 days, followed 1 month later by 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/d) of radiation
given with 5-FU (400 mg/m2 daily) and leucovorin (20 mg/m2 daily)
on days 1 through 4 and the last 3 days of radiation.One month
after completion of radiation, 2 cycles of 5-FU (425 mg/m2 daily)
and leucovorin (20 mg/m2 daily) in a daily regimen for 5 days
are given at monthly intervals. There is no evidence on which
to make a recommendation for patients with node-negative tumours
that have not penetrated the muscularis propria. For patients
unable to undergo radiation, adjuvant chemotherapy alone may be
of benefit, particularly for those with lymph-node metastases.
The optimal regimen remains to be defined. There is insufficient
evidence from randomized trials to recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy,
or neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy or immunotherapy, either
alone or in combination, outside a clinical trial. VALIDATION:
A draft version of this document was circulated to 166 clinicians
using a 21-item feedback questionnaire. Ninety-nine (63%) returned
the questionnaire, and 74 of these indicated that the guideline
was relevant to their clinical practice and completed the survey.
Of the 74 clinicians, 52 (70%) agreed that the document should
be approved as a practice guideline. SPONSORS: The CCOPGI is supported
by Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health and
Long-Term Care.
-----
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2002 Nov;29(12):2342-5
[Combination chemotherapy with intra-perioneal
infusion of CDDP and continuous intravenous infusion of 5-FU for
peritoneal metastasis in gastric canceranalysis of long-term
survivors]
[Article in Japanese]
Fujiwara H, Terashima M, Takagane A, Abe K, Irinoda T, Yonezawa
H, Nakaya T, Oyama K, Takahashi M, Saito K.
Dept. of Surgery 1, Iwate Medical University.
In order to evaluate the utility of combination chemotherapy
with intra-peritoneal infusion of CDDP and continuous intravenous
infusion of 5-FU, we performed this therapy in 23 primary gastric
cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis. CDDP was administered
intraperitoneally at a dose of 70 mg/m2 over 2 hours on day 1,
and 5-FU was continuously administered intravenously at a dose
of 700 mg/m2 for 5 consecutive days from day 1, respectively.
This treatment was given twice. Median survival time with this
treatment was 343 days, and the depth of invasion was selected
as an independent prognostic factor according to multivariate
analysis. Five patients (21.7%) have survived more than 3 years.
Major toxicities were less than Grade 2 except for two patients
with each anemia (Grade 3) and venous thrombosis (Grade 3), respectively.
This regimen appears to be feasible and effective for gastric
cancer patients with peritoneal metastases. Long term survival
may be obtained in patients without adjacent organ invasion.
-----
Am J Clin Oncol 2002 Dec;25(6):619-24
Adjuvant intraperitoneal chemotherapy with cisplatinum,
mitoxantrone, 5-fluorouracil, and calcium folinate in patients
with gastric cancer: a phase II study.
Topuz E, Basaran M, Saip P, Aydiner A, Argon A, Sakar B, Tas F,
Uygun K, Bugra D, Aykan NF.
Medical Oncology Department, Institute of Oncology, Istanbul Medical
Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gastric carcinoma remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related
death in the world. Clinical studies have revealed that approximately
two thirds of the patients seek treatment for early recurrence
within the abdominal cavity. The aim of this phase II study was
to evaluate the toxicity, feasibility, and efficacy of adjuvant
intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPCT) with cisplatin, mitoxantrone,
5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid in patients with stage
II-III gastric cancer. Patients with stage II and III gastric
cancer aged between 15 and 70 years, after curative resection,
with adequate liver, renal, and cardiac function were included
in the study. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of cisplatin
60 mg/m2, mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2, 5-FU 600 mg/m2, and folinic acid
60 mg/m2, delivered intraperitoneally, diluted in 2 l normal saline.
Intraperitoneal fluid was not drained. Each course of IPCT was
repeated every 4 weeks for a total 6 cycles. Thirty-nine patients
were enrolled in the study. Twenty-eight of the 39 patients (71.8%)
completed six courses of the planned schedule. One patient (2.6%)
died after a fourth cycle of IPCT from an undetermined reason.
The major nonhematologic toxicity from IPCT was grade I-III nausea
and/or vomiting experienced by 27 patients (69.2%). Twenty-four
(61.5%) patients reported abdominal discomfort. Median follow-up
was 23 (range: 3-105) months. Twenty-five patients (64.1%) were
dead. Median disease-free survival and overall survival were 12
(CI 95%; 8.3-15.7 months) and 19 months (CI 95%; 10.5-27.5 months),
respectively. The cumulative 5-year disease-free survival and
overall survival were 24.7% and 30.7%, respectively. The regimen
was generally associated with acceptable toxicity. However, adjuvant
IPCT has similar survival rates in comparison to no adjuvant treatment;
thus, it cannot be currently recommended outside the context of
a clinical trial.
-----
J Clin Oncol 2002 Dec 1;20(23):4543-8
Phase II study of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and
folinic acid in locally advanced or metastatic gastric
cancer patients.
Louvet C, Andre T, Tigaud JM, Gamelin E, Douillard JY, Brunet
R, Francois E, Jacob JH, Levoir D, Taamma A, Rougier P, Cvitkovic
E, de Gramont A.
Service d' Oncologie-Medecine Interne, Hopital Saint-Antoine,
Paris, France. christophe.louvet@sat.ap-hop-paris.fr
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oxaliplatin,
fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) combination in patients
with metastatic or advanced gastric cancer (M/AGC). PATIENTS AND
METHODS: Of the 54 eligible patients with measurable or assessable
M/AGC, 53 received oxaliplatin 100 mg/m(2) and FA 400 mg/m(2)
(2-hour intravenous infusion) followed by 5-FU bolus 400 mg/m(2)
(10-minute infusion) and then 5-FU 3,000 mg/m(2) (46-hour continuous
infusion) every 14 days. RESULTS: Patients (69% male, 31% female)
had a median age of 61 years (range, 31 to 75 years), 89% had
a performance status of 0 or 1, 70% had newly diagnosed disease,
and 87% had metastatic disease. All had histologically confirmed
adenocarcinoma. With a median of three involved organs, disease
sites included the lymph nodes (67%), stomach (65%), and liver
(61%). A median of 10 cycles per patient and 468 complete cycles
were administered. Best responses in the 49 assessable patients
were two complete responses and 20 partial responses, giving an
overall best response rate of 44.9%. Eight patients underwent
complementary treatment with curative intent (six with surgery
and two with chemoradiotherapy). Median follow-up, time to progression,
and overall survival were 18.6 months, 6.2 months, and 8.6 months,
respectively. Grade 3/4 neutropenia, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia,
and anemia occurred in 38%, 19%, 4%, and 11% of patients, respectively,
and febrile neutropenia occurred in six patients (one episode
each). Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy occurred in 21% of patients
(oxaliplatin-specific scale). Seven patients withdrew because
of treatment-related toxicity. CONCLUSION: This oxaliplatin/5-FU/FA
regimen shows good efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in
M/AGC patients, and may prove to be a suitable alternative regimen
in this indication.
-----
Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2002 Apr;11(2):387-403
Is there a role for nontraditional resection of
early gastric cancer?
Noguchi Y, Morinaga S, Yamamoto Y, Yoshikawa T.
Department of Surgery, Yokohama City Kowan Hospital, 3-2-3 Shinyamashita,
Naka-ku, Yokohama 232-0801, Japan. yn831522@city.yokohama.jp
Current trends in the treatment of gastric cancer indicate
the emergence of a more sophisticated approach, with tailored
therapy applied to individual cases. Treatment includes a broader
spectrum of therapeutic options (Fig. 3), including EMR, laparoscopic
or laparoscopy-assisted surgery, modified radical surgery, and
typical radical surgery with lymph node dissections. Precise characterization
of the lesions, especially the depth of invasion in the gastric
wall, its size, histology and whether there is ulceration, is
the key to successful treatment of N0 mucosal cancer. Micrometastasis
and metastasis at the molecular level are issues that require
further investigation. Laparoscopic surgery may be more widely
accepted. The limitations of nodal dissection based on the concept
of a sentinel node should be carefully evaluated in future studies.
[figure: see text] Many treatment options, ranging from minimally
invasive surgery to D2 node dissection, are available to the surgical
oncologist who is treating EGC. As more information is gathered,
surgeons will be better able to select patients who are good candidates
for minimal surgical procedures.
-----
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002 Nov 15;54(4):1069-75
Postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation in completely
resected locally advanced gastric cancer.
Arcangeli G, Saracino B, Arcangeli G, Angelini F, Marchetti P,
Tirindelli Danesi D.
Division of Radiation Oncology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute,
Via E. Chianesi 53, 00144 Rome, Italy. arcangeli@ifo.it
BACKGROUND: The 5-year survival of patients with completely
resected node-positive gastric cancer ranges from 15% to 25%.
We explored the feasibility of a chemoradiation regime consisting
of concomitant hyperfractionated radiotherapy and 5-fluorouracil
protracted venous infusion (5-FU PVI). MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Forty patients received a total or partial gastrectomy operation
and D2 nodal resection for Stage III gastric cancer; they were
then irradiated by linac with 6-15-MV photons. The target included
the gastric bed, the anastomosis, stumps, and regional nodes.
A total dose of 55 Gy was given in 50 fractions using 1.1 Gy b.i.d.
All patients received a concomitant 200 mg/m2/day 5-FU PVI. Patients
were examined during the follow-up period as programmed. Toxicity
was recorded according to RTOG criteria. RESULTS: After a median
follow-up of 75.6 months (range: 22-136 months), 24 (60%) patients
had died, and 16 (40%) were alive and free of disease. The 5-year
actuarial incidence of relapse was 39%, 22%, and 2% for distant
metastases, out-field peritoneal seeding, and in-field local regional
recurrences, respectively. The 5-year actuarial cause-specific
survival was 43%. Three patients survived more than 11 years.
Acute > or = Grade 3 toxicity consisted of hematologic (22.5%)
and gastrointestinal toxicity (nausea and vomiting 22.5%, diarrhea
2.8%, and abdominal pain 2.6%). No late toxicity was observed.
CONCLUSION: This regime of concomitant 5-FU PVI and hyperfractionated
radiotherapy was well tolerated and resulted in successful locoregional
control and satisfactory survival.
©Copyright 1992-date by The Center
for Current Research. The Stomach Cancer File is a proprietary
compilation of the Center for Current Research. The information
in the File is solely for your use, and the use of your family,
friends, and doctors. The information is the property of the individual
researchers and institutions that produced it. It is an infringement
of copyright law to attempt to "resell" the information
as it is presented here.
|