| |
Welcome to the Ovarian
Cancer File
Patients all over the world
have used the information in The Ovarian Cancer File since 1992,
when the Center for Current Researchone of the first 80
companies on the Internetwas founded. Our highly trained
researchers (all of whom hold Ph.D.s) have searched the advanced
medical database at the National Library of Medicine and compiled
a comprehensive collection of research descriptions on Ovarian
Cancer and its care.
As you will see, the following research descriptions detail the
findings published in the most respected journals in the field.
Because the research descriptions are written in medical terms,
most people will bring all or parts of the Ovarian Cancer File
to their doctor for further explanation and discussion. Often
your doctor will have access to full-text articles and other
information that could be useful in planning a successful course
of treatment and prevention. Note that the titles of the journals
are abbreviated according to the National Library of Medicine's
format; your doctor can provide the full title if you need it.
Thank you for accessing the Ovarian Cancer File. We truly hope
the information fosters better health.
Sincerely,
Gregory A. Fraser, Ph.D.
Director of Research
Important Note: The following information
is provided for your education. It should not be relied upon for
personal diagnosis or treatment. If you believe that a
particular therapy applies to you or someone you care about, be
sure to consult a doctor before trying it.
On Downloading (Please Read
Carefully)
To
download or print the Ovarian
Cancer File, point your mouse to "File" in the top bar of your
Explorer or Netscape window, and click once. Now click once on either
"Save As" (download), or "Print" (print), and follow the
appropriate prompts.
Latest Research on Ovarian Cancer
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):363-8.
Role of diaphragmatic surgery in 69 patients with ovarian
carcinoma.
Devolder K, Amant F, Neven P, van Gorp T, Leunen K, Vergote I.
Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Division of Gynaecological Oncology,
University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Diaphragmatic stripping or coagulation is a technique aiming to optimally
cytoreduce ovarian cancer. We investigated the complications, the overall
survival, and the relapse rate following this procedure. Records of 69 patients
with diaphragmatic involvement who underwent debulking surgery between September
1993 and December 2001 were reviewed. A total of 69 patients underwent
diaphragmatic surgery as part of cytoreductive surgery for epithelial ovarian
cancer. In 17 cases, the diaphragmatic tumors were stripped from the muscle, in
22 cases coagulated, and in 30 cases stripped and coagulated. Postoperative
complications were pleural effusion (41 cases, 3 needed a chest drain, 7 needed
a pleural puncture, 1 needed both) and pneumothorax (4 cases, 1 needed a chest
drain). In one case of bilateral pleural effusion, the patient developed
pneumonia. In one case of pleural effusion on the right side, the patient needed
a pleural puncture and developed a partial atelectasis of the middle lobe of the
right lung. The median overall survival was 66 months in the stripping group
compared with 49 months in the coagulation group. In 56 cases (81%), the patient
developed a relapse, and the first site of relapse was the diaphragm in 11 cases
(20%). We conclude that diaphragmatic resection is an important part of optimal
debulking surgery with an acceptable morbidity.
-----
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 Mar-Apr;18(2):249-54.
A phase II, multicenter trial of weekly topotecan in patients
with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial cancers of the ovary and
peritoneum.
Brown JV 3rd, Rettenmaier MA, Lopez KL, Graham C, Micha JP, Goldstein B.
Gynecologic Oncology Associates, Hoag Cancer Center, Newport Beach, California
92663, USA. bram@gynoncology.com
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response rate and toxicity of
weekly topotecan in patients with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial
cancers of the ovary and peritoneum. Thirty-nine platinum-sensitive recurrent
ovarian cancer patients received topotecan (4 mg/m(2)) intravenously day 1, day
8, day 15, every 28 days. Colony-stimulating factors were excluded from the
study. Clinical response was assessed by clinical, serologic, and radiographic
measures at the conclusion of cycle four. Patients received 136 cycles of
topotecan (median = 3; range 1-6) and were evaluated for response and toxicity.
Median number of prior regimens was one. Grade 3/4 neutropenia developed in 3
(7.7%) patients. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was seen in one (2.6%) patient, with
no incidence of grade 4 thrombocytopenia. There was no evidence of grade 3
anemia, but one patient (2.6%) was associated with grade 4 anemia. There was no
grade 3 or 4 neuropathy. We encountered 18 dose reductions following less than
or equal to grade 2 myelosuppression, necessitating the removal of eight (20.5%)
patients prior to cycle four. Twenty-one (53.8%) patients were removed from the
study due to disease progression. Following the completion of cycle four, four
(10.3%) patients demonstrated stable disease and four (10.3%) patients exhibited
a partial response. There were no complete responses. Median disease-free
survival was 12 weeks. Weekly topotecan (4 mg/m(2)) demonstrated modest activity
and was moderately well tolerated. However, the significant number of dose
reductions and high incidence of patients who demonstrated disease progression
suggests additional modifications with this specific regimen are necessary.
-----
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Feb 29 [Epub ahead of print]
Randomized phase 3 trial of interferon gamma-1b plus standard
carboplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatin/paclitaxel alone for first-line
treatment of advanced ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinomas: Results from a
prospectively designed analysis of progression-free survival.
Alberts DS, Marth C, Alvarez RD, Johnson G, Bidzinski M, Kardatzke DR, Bradford
WZ, Loutit J, Kirn DH, Clouser MC, Markman M; GRACES Clinical Trial Consortium.
Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
OBJECTIVES: Interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) is a pleiotropic cytokine with
antiproliferative, immunostimulatory, and chemosensitization properties. This
trial was designed to evaluate IFN-gamma 1b plus carboplatin and paclitaxel in
treatment-naive ovarian cancer (OC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC)
patients. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomized to 6 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel
every 3 weeks or the same in combination with IFN-gamma 1b (100 microg 3x/wk
subcutaneously). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) time (target
hazard ratio (HR)=0.77). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival
(target HR=0.7), based on blinded review of serial imaging scans, physical
exams, and CA-125 levels. RESULTS: 847 patients were enrolled (OC 774, PPC 73)
in Europe (n=539) and North/South America (n=308) from January 29, 2002 to March
31, 2004 and stratified according to: optimal debulking (n=271) versus
suboptimal debulking with plans for interval debulking
(PID) (n=238) or no PID (n=338). The study stopped early following a
protocol-defined second interim analysis which revealed significantly shorter OS
time in patients receiving IFN-gamma 1b plus chemotherapy compared to
chemotherapy alone (1138 days vs. not estimable, HR=1.45, 95% CI=1.15-1.83). At
the time of the analysis, 169 of 426 (39.7%) patients in the IFN-gamma 1b plus
chemotherapy group had died compared to 128 of 421 (30.4%) in the chemotherapy
alone group. Serious adverse events were more common in the IFN-gamma 1b plus
chemotherapy group (48.5% vs. 35.4%), primarily due to a higher incidence of
serious hematological toxicities (34.5% vs. 22.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with
IFN-gamma 1b in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel does not have a role in
the first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer.
-----
Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2008 Feb;23(1):92-107.
Review: intracavitary radioimmunotherapy to treat solid tumors.
Aarts F, Bleichrodt RP, Oyen WJ, Boerman OC.
Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The
Netherlands.
Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) potentially is an attractive treatment for
radiosensitive early-stage solid tumors and as an adjuvant to cytoreductive
surgery. Topical administration of RIT may improve the efficacy because higher
local concentrations are achieved. We reviewed the results of locally applied
radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of solid tumors.
Intracavitary RIT in patients with ovarian cancer and glioma showed improved
targeting after local administration, as compared to the intravenous
administration. In addition, various studies showed the feasibility of locally
applied RIT in these patients. In studies that included patients with
small-volume disease, adjuvant RIT in ovarian cancer and glioma showed to be at
least as effective as standard therapy. The information about RIT for peritoneal
carcinomatosis of colorectal origin is scarce, while results from preclinical
data are promising. RIT may be applied for other, relatively unexplored
indications. Studies on the application of radiolabeled antibodies in early
urothelial cell cancer have been performed, showing that intracavitary RIT may
hold a promise. Moreover, in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma or
malignant pleural effusion, RIT may play a role in the palliative treatment.
Intracavitary RIT limits toxicity and improves tumor targeting. RIT is more
effective in patients with small-volume disease of solid cancers. RIT may have
potential for palliation in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma or
malignant pleural effusion. The future of RIT may, therefore, not only be in the
inclusion in contemporary multimodality treatment, but also in the expansion to
palliative treatment.
-----
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb 18 [Epub ahead of print]
Aggressive surgical strategies in advanced ovarian cancer: A
monocentric study of 203 stage IIIC and IV patients.
Colombo PE, Mourregot A, Fabbro M, Gutowski M, Saint-Aubert B, Quenet F, Gourgou
S, Rouanet P.
Department of Surgical Oncology, CRLC Val d'Aurelle, 208 rue des Apothicaires,
34298 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
AIMS: The standard treatment for advanced ovarian cancer consists of
cytoreductive surgery associated with a platinum/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy.
Nevertheless, there is still the question as to the extent and timing of the
surgical debulking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the place of surgery
in the therapeutic sequence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed data from all
consecutive patients with stage IIIC and IV epithelial ovarian cancer, operated
on at our institution between 1990 and 2005. Patients were divided into 2
groups, according to the position of surgery in the therapeutic sequence.
Patients in group 1 received initial debulking surgery. Group 2 consisted of
patients having received their first debulking after initial chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Two hundred and three patients were identified and frequently underwent
aggressive surgery, in particular, digestive surgery with bowel resections.
Perioperative mortality and morbidity rates were low (2% and 14%, respectively)
and there was no difference between the groups. Overall survival in group 1 for
patients with complete cytoreduction (residual disease (RD)=0), optimal surgery
(RD<1cm) or sub-optimal surgery (RD>1cm) was 50%, 30% and 14%, respectively. In
group 2, overall survival following complete surgery was 30%, and no long-term
survival was observed when surgery was not complete at the time of interval
surgery. Survival was worse for patients who had received more than 4 cycles of
neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the importance of
surgery in the prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer. Only the patient subgroup
that underwent complete initial or interval surgery was associated with a
prolonged remission. Optimal surgery with a controlled morbidity can be achieved
in many cases, even if bowel resection is needed, at the time of primary
debulking. In the interval cytoreductive surgery subgroup, the response to
initial chemotherapy and surgery was found to be essential for prognosis.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 20;26(6):890-6.
Phase III trial of gemcitabine compared with pegylated liposomal
doxorubicin in progressive or recurrent ovarian cancer.
Ferrandina G, Ludovisi M, Lorusso D, Pignata S, Breda E, Savarese A, Del Medico
P, Scaltriti L, Katsaros D, Priolo D, Scambia G.
Department of Oncology, Catholic University, Campobasso, Italy.
gabriella.ferrandina@libero.it
PURPOSE: We aimed at investigating the efficacy, tolerability, and quality of
life (QOL) of gemcitabine (GEM) compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)
in the salvage treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A
phase III randomized multicenter trial was planned to compare GEM (1,000 mg/m(2)
on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days) with PLD (40 mg/m(2) every 28 days) in
ovarian cancer patients who experienced treatment failure with only one
platinum/paclitaxel regimen and who experienced recurrence or progression within
12 months after completion of primary treatment. RESULTS: One hundred
fifty-three patients were randomly assigned to PLD (n = 76) or GEM (n = 77).
Treatment arms were well balanced for clinicopathologic characteristics. Grade 3
or 4 neutropenia was more frequent in GEM-treated patients versus PLD-treated
patients (P = .007). Grade 3 or 4 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia was
documented in a higher proportion of PLD patients (6%) versus GEM patients (0%;
P = .061). The overall response rate was 16% in the PLD arm compared with 29% in
the GEM arm (P = .056). No statistically significant difference in time to
progression (TTP) curves according to treatment allocation was documented (P =
.411). However, a trend for more favorable overall survival was documented in
the PLD arm compared with the GEM arm, although the P value was of borderline
statistical significance (P = .048). Statistically significantly higher global
QOL scores were found in PLD-treated patients at the first and second
postbaseline QOL assessments. CONCLUSION: GEM does not provide an advantage
compared with PLD in terms of TTP in ovarian cancer patients who experience
recurrence within 12 months after primary treatment but should be considered in
the spectrum of drugs to be possibly used in the salvage setting.
-----
Cancer Causes Control. 2008 Feb 9 [Epub ahead of print]
Hormone therapy and ovarian cancer: incidence and survival.
Wernli KJ, Newcomb PA, Hampton JM, Trentham-Dietz A, Egan KM.
Cancer Prevention Program, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview
Ave N, M4-B402, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA, kwernli@fhcrc.org.
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a population-based case-control study to investigate the
association between hormone therapy (HT) and ovarian cancer incidence, and
followed all these cancer cases to determine the association of HT use with
ovarian cancer mortality. METHODS: Seven hundred fifty-one incident cases of
invasive epithelial ovarian cancer aged 40-79 years were diagnosed in
Massachusetts and Wisconsin between 1993-1995 and 1998-2001 and matched to
similarly aged controls (n = 5,808). Study subjects were interviewed by
telephone, which ascertained information on HT use and specific preparation,
estrogen alone (E-alone) or estrogen plus progestin (EP). Ovarian cancer cases
were followed-up for mortality through December 2005. Multivariate logistic
regression was used to estimate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI)
for ovarian cancer incidence, and Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to
estimate hazard ratios and corresponding confidence intervals for ovarian
cancer mortality. RESULTS: Ever use of HT was significantly associated with an
increased risk of ovarian cancer (odds ratio 1.57, 95% CI 1.31-1.87). The excess
risk was confined to women who used E-alone preparations (OR 2.33, 95% CI
1.85-2.95). No significant associations were detected between pre-diagnosis HT
use and ovarian cancer survival. CONCLUSIONS: Hormone therapy increases risk of
ovarian cancer among E-alone users, but there is no substantial impact on
survival after diagnosis.
-----
Gynecol Oncol. 2008 Feb 6 [Epub ahead of print]
Improved tolerance of primary chemotherapy with reduced-dose
carboplatin and paclitaxel in elderly ovarian cancer patients.
Fader AN, Gruenigen VV, Gibbons H, Abushahin F, Starks D, Markman M, Belinson J,
Rose P.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology,
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
OBJECTIVE: Elderly cancer patients are less likely to tolerate chemotherapy. We
sought to compare the toxicity profiles and outcomes of elderly ovarian cancer
patients treated with standard versus reduced-dose IV carboplatin/paclitaxel.
METHODS: A retrospective, multi-center analysis of women >/=70 years with
papillary serous ovarian/primary peritoneal cancers diagnosed from 1994-2005 was
performed. Reduced-dose (RD) patients received carboplatin AUC 4-5 and
paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2); standard-dose (SD) patients received carboplatin AUC 5-6
and paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2). Patient variables collected included age, stage,
performance status (PS), cytoreductive status, Charlson comorbidity scores, and
growth factor administration. RESULTS: One-hundred patients met the study
criteria. RD patients (n=26) were significantly older than SD patients (n=74;
median age 77.0 versus 74.7, respectively, p=0.014). No differences were noted
in stage, comorbidity scores, cytoreductive status or growth factor
administration between cohorts. Incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was higher in
the SD group (54.1% versus 19.2%; p=0.002). SD patients were more likely to
experience cumulative toxicity (p=0.003) and required delays in therapy
(p=0.05). Although PS was poorer in SD patients (p=0.02), on multivariate
analysis, only the administration of the SD regimen predicted toxicity
(p=0.008). There were no differences in progression-free or overall survival
between cohorts (median follow-up: 34 months). On multivariate analysis, age
(p=0.004) and PS (p=0.008) had a significant impact on survival. CONCLUSION(S):
This preliminary data suggests that reduced-dose carboplatin/paclitaxel may be
better tolerated but equally effective as the standard regimen in elderly
ovarian cancer patients. Age, performance status and other geriatric parameters
should be considered when dosing chemotherapy in the elderly.
-----
BMC Cancer. 2007 Dec 19;7(1):227 [Epub ahead of print]
Adjuvant whole abdominal intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for high risk
stage FIGO III patients with ovarian cancer (OVAR-IMRT-01) - Pilot trial of a
phase I/II study: study protocol.
Rochet N, Jensen AD, Sterzing F, Munter MW, Eichbaum MH, Schneeweiss A, Sohn C,
Debus J, Harms W.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The prognosis for patients with advanced epithelial
ovarian cancer remains poor despite aggressive surgical resection and
platinum-based chemotherapy. More than 60% of patients will develop recurrent
disease, principally intraperitoneal, and die within 5 years. The use of whole
abdominal irradiation (WAI) as consolidation therapy would appear to be a
logical strategy given its ability to sterilize small tumour volumes. Despite
the clinically proven efficacy of whole abdominal irradiation, the use of
radiotherapy in ovarian cancer has profoundly decreased mainly due to high
treatment-related toxicity. Modern intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
could allow to spare kidneys, liver, and bone marrow while still adequately
covering the peritoneal cavity with a homogenous dose. Methods / design: The
OVAR-IMRT-01 study is a single center pilot trial of a phase I/II study.
Patients with advanced ovarian cancer stage FIGO III (R1 or R2< 1cm) after
surgical resection and platinum-based chemotherapy will be treated with whole
abdomen irradiation as consolidation therapy using intensity modulated radiation
therapy (IMRT) to a total dose of 30 Gy in 1.5 Gy fractions. A total of 8
patients will be included in this trial. For treatment planning bone marrow,
kidneys, liver, spinal cord, vertebral bodies and pelvic bones are defined as
organs at risk. The planning target volume includes the entire peritoneal cavity
plus pelvic and para-aortic node regions. DISCUSSION: The primary endpoint of
the study is the evaluation of the feasibility of intensity-modulated WAI and
the evaluation of the study protocol. Secondary endpoint is evaluation of the
toxicity of intensity modulated WAI before continuing with the phase I/II study.
The aim is to explore the potential of IMRT as a new method for WAI to decrease
the dose to kidneys, liver, bone marrow while covering the peritoneal cavity
with a homogenous dose, and to implement whole abdominal intensity-modulated
radiotherapy into the adjuvant multimodal treatment concept of advanced ovarian
cancer FIGO stage III.
-----
Minerva Chir. 2007 Dec;62(6):459-476.
Updated treatment of peritoneal carcinomas: a review.
Deraco M, Laterza B, Kusamura S, Baratti D.
Dipartimento di Chirurgia, Unità Tumori Peritoneali, Fondazione IRCCS, Istituto
Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano marcello.deraco@istitutotumori.mi.it.
Peritoneal surface malignancy (PSM) is a clinical entity with an unfavourable
prognosis, which characterizes the evolution of neoplastic diseases from the
abdominal and/or pelvic organs and could also be the terminal stage of
extra-abdominal tumors. Examples of diseases that can spread mainly within the
peritoneal cavity are appendiceal tumors, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer,
abdominal sarcomatosis, gastric cancer and peritoneal mesothelioma. The
locoregional therapy is defined as the combination of cytoreductive surgery
(CRS) and intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion (IPHP). The rationale of this
combined therapy for PSM is based on the natural history of this clinical entity
that remains confined in the peritoneal cavity for most of its natural history.
This pattern of spread would seem to indicate the potential usefulness of
selectively increasing drug concentration in the tumour-bearing area by direct
intraperitoneal chemotherapy instillation. This approach led to these outcomes:
the median survival of colorectal carcinoma and ovarian cancer was 32 months;
patients with peritoneal mesothelioma showed 57% survival at 5 years, while in
patients with appendiceal mucinous tumors and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) the
10 years overall survival was 78%. A significant improvement in survival was
associated with hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in patients
with gastric cancer. Considering the constant increasing of diseases treatable
with this procedure, more centres should be activated. The establishment of a
clear policy and scientific guidelines is mandatory, in order to perform the
CRS+HIPEC safely, minimizing treatment-related morbidity and mortality and
maximizing the results in terms of survival and quality of life.
-----
Cancer Imaging. 2007 Dec 17;7:210-5.
Cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer.
Pomel C, Jeyarajah A, Oram D, Shepherd J, Milliken D, Dauplat J, Reynolds K.
Department of Gynaecological Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK;
Department of Surgical Oncology, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Centre,
Clermont-Ferrand, France.
As the overall prognosis for patients with ovarian cancer is poor, the
management of this condition should be restricted to expert multi-disciplinary
teams in gynaecological oncology. Apparent early stage ovarian cancer requires
accurate and complete staging so that potential sites for metastases are not
missed. Omitting adequate staging may have significant consequences including a
negative impact on survival rates in young patients. The challenge with advanced
ovarian cancer is to obtain a detailed appreciation of the extent of disease.
This information allows treatment with primary chemotherapy if the cancer is
considered to be inoperable and/or the general condition of the patient renders
her unfit for appropriate surgery. Available data would suggest that a 5-year
survival rate of 50% is only possible for those patients who have had complete
cytoreduction of all tumour. Therefore, the best surgical option for patients
with advanced ovarian cancer is a 'complete' primary surgical procedure that
achieves complete clearance of the abdominal cavity rather than 'optimal'
surgery that leaves tumour nodules up to 1 cm in diameter in situ in the
patient.
-----
J Transl Med. 2007 Dec 12;5(1):66 [Epub ahead of print]
Phase II study of intraperitoneal recombinant interleukin-12 (rhIL-12) in
patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (residual disease <1cm) associated with
ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma.
Lenzi R, Edwards R, June C, Seiden MV, Garcia ME, Rosenblum M, Freedman RS.
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic advantages of intraperitoneal (IP)
rhIL-12, tumor response to IP delivery of other cytokines as well as its
potential anti-angiogenic effect provided the rationale for further evaluation
of IPrhIL-12 in patients with persistent ovarian or peritoneal carcinoma.
METHODS: A phase 2 multi-institutional trial (NCI Study #2251) of IP rIL-12 (300
nanogram/Kg weekly) was conducted in patients with ovarian carcinoma or primary
peritoneal carcinoma. Patients treated with primary therapy for ovarian cancer
who had no extraabdominal/parenchymal disease or bulky peritoneal disease were
eligible. Four to 8 weeks from last chemotherapy, eligible patients underwent a
laparotomy/laparoscopy. Patients with residual disease [less than or equal to] 1
cm were registered for the treatment phase 2-5 weeks post surgery. The effect of
IP rIL-12 on the expression of TNF-alpha, INF-alpha, IL-10, IP-10, IL-8, FGF,
VEGF was also studied. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were registered for the
first screening phase of the study. Median age was 56.6 years (range: 31-71) 12
completed the second phase and were evaluable for response and toxicity.
Performance scores of IL-12 treated patients were 0 (11 pts) and 1 (1 pt). There
were no treatment related deaths, peritonitis or significant catheter related
complications. Toxicities included grade 4 neutropenia (1), grade 3 fatigue (4),
headache (2), myalgia (2), non-neutropenic fever (1), drug fever (1), back pain
(1), and dizziness (1). The best response observed was SD. Two patients had SD
and 9 had PD, and 1 was evaluable for toxicity only. Peritoneal fluid cytokine
measurements demonstrated a [greater than or equal to]3 fold relative increase
post-rhIL-12: IFN-gamma, 5/5 pts; TNF-alpha, 1/5; IL-10, 4/5; IL-8, 5/5; and
VEGF, 3/5. IP10 levels were increased in 5/5 patients. Cytokine response
profiles suggest either NK or T-cell mediated effects of IP rhIL-12. Cytokine/chemokine
results also suggest a pleiotropic response since proteins with potential for
either anti-tumor (IFN-gamma, IP-10) or pro-tumor growth effects (VEGF, IL-8)
were detected. CONCLUSIONS: IP IL-12 can safely be administered at this dose and
schedule to patients after first line chemotherapy for ovarian/peritoneal
carcinoma. The maximum response was stable disease. Future IP therapies with
rhIL-12 will require better understanding and control of pleiotropic effects of
IL-12.
-----
Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Nov;9(11):787-90.
Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy in
peritoneal carcinomatosis.
Nesher E, Greenberg R, Avital S, Skornick Y, Schneebaum S.
Department of Surgery A, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.
e_nesher@bezeqint.net
BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis is an advanced form of cancer with poor
prognosis that in the past was treated mainly palliatively. Today, the
definitive approach to peritoneal surface malignancy involves peritonectomy,
visceral resection and perioperative intra-abdominal hyperthermic chemotherapy.
The anticipated results range from at least palliative to as far as intent to
cure. Proper patient selection is mandatory. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether
cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal hyperthermic chemotherapy can extend
survival, and with minor complications only, in patients with peritoneal
carcinomatosis. METHODS: Twenty-two IPHP procedures were performed in 17
patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis in our institution between 1998 and
2007: 6 had pseudomyxoma peritonei, 5 had colorectal carcinoma, 3 had ovarian
cancer and 3 had mesotheliomas. All patients underwent cytoreductive surgery,
leaving only residual metastasis < 1 cm in size. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy
was administered through four large catheters (2F) using a closed system of two
pumps, a heat exchanger and two filters. After the patient's abdominal
temperature reached 41 degrees C, 30-60 mg mitomycin C was circulated
intraperitoneally for 1 hour. RESULTS: The patients had a variety of anastomoses.
None demonstrated anastomotic leak and none experienced major complications. Six
patients had minor complications (pleural effusion, leukopenia, fever, prolonged
paralytic ileus, sepsis), two of which may be attributed to chemotherapy
toxicity (leukopenia). There was no perioperative mortality. Some patients have
survived more than 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: IPHP is a safe treatment modality for
patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. It has an acceptable complications rate
and ensures a marked improvement in survival and in the quality of life in
selected patients.
-----
Arzneimittelforschung. 2007;57(10):665-78.
Prospective controlled cohort studies on long-term therapy of ovairian cancer
patients with mistletoe (Viscum album L.) extracts iscador.
Grossarth-Maticek R, Ziegler R.
Institut für Präventive Medizin, Europäisches Zentrum für Frieden und
Entwickl]ung, Heidelberg, Germany.
BACKGROUND: Mistletoe extracts such as Iscador are commonly used as
complementary/anthroposophic medications for many cancer indications,
particularly for solid cancers. The efficacy of this complementary therapy is
still controversial. OBJECTIVE: Does long-term therapy with mistletoe extracts
Iscador show any effect on survival and psychosomatic self-regulation of
patients with ovarian cancer? Patients and methods: Prospective recruitment and
long-term follow-up in controlled cohort studies. (1) Two randomized
matched-pair studies: OvarRand (ovarian cancer patients without distant
metastases; 21 pairs) and OvarMetRand (ovarian cancer patients with distant
metastases; 20 pairs); patients having no mistletoe therapy were matched for
prognostic factors. By paired random allocation, one of the patients of each
pair was suggested therapy with mistletoe extracts Iscador to be applied by her
attending physician. (2) Two non-randomized matched-pair studies: Ovar (ovarian
cancer patients without distant metastases; 75 pairs) and OvarRand (ovarian
cancer patients with distant metastases; 62 pairs); patients that already
received therapy with mistletoe extracts Iscador were matched by the same
criteria to control patients without therapy with mistletoe extracts Iscador.
RESULTS: For overall survival in the randomized studies, the effect in favor of
therapy with mistletoe extracts Iscador was significant in OvarMetRand but not
in OvarRand; hazard ratio estimate and 95% confidence interval: 0.40 (0.15,
1.03) and 0.33 (0.12, 0.92), respectively. In the non-randomized studies Ovar
and OvarMet, the results adjusted for relevant prognostic variables were 0.47
(0.31, 0.69) and 0.62 (0.37, 1.05). Psychosomatic self-regulation in the Iscador
group increases significantly within 12 months on a scale from 1 to 6 compared
with the control group in the randomized study OvarRand as well as in the
non-randomized study Ovar on patients with ovarian cancer without distant
metastases; estimate of the median difference and 95% confidence interval: 0.58
(0.30, 0.90) and 0.30 (0.05, 0.65), respectively. CONCLUSION: Mistletoe extracts
Iscador might have the effect of prolonging overall survival of ovarian cancer
patients. In the short term, psychosomatic self-regulation increases more
markedly under Iscador therapy than under conventional therapy alone.
-----
J Chemother. 2007 Oct;19(5):577-81.
Gemcitabine combined with oxaliplatin (GEMOX) as salvage treatment in elderly
patients with advanced ovarian cancer refractory or resistant to platinum: a
single institution experience.
Germano D, Rosati G, Manzione L.
domgerm@libero.it
Both oxaliplatin (OXA) and gemcitabine (GEM) have shown single agent activity in
patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Response rates to second-line therapies
remain low and there is a need to develop more effective regimens. In view of
the synergistic effect of using GEM followed by OXA, we studied these agents in
elderly patients with recurrent ovarian cancer refractory or resistant to
first-line chemotherapy using platinum with or without paclitaxel. The aim of
the study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of combination GEM 1000
mg/m(2) Day 1 i.v. and OXA 100 mg/m(2) in 2h infusion Day 2; treatment was
repeated every 2 weeks for 6 courses or until progression of disease or
intolerable toxicity. The study was monoinstitutional and started in November
2002. 21 patients, median age 68.6 years (range 65-82) have been treated. Median
Performance Status was 0-1, all had at least 1 prior platinum based chemotherapy
and 11 had received also a taxane. Patients received a median of 6 cycles of
treatment (range 4-11). There were 2 patient (9%) with complete response, 3
patients (14%) achieved a partial response. Low profile toxicity (grade 1-2, WHO
criteria) was observed: nausea/vomiting 52%, thrombocytopenia 13%, neuropathy
28%. The GEMOX combination is well tolerated and even in this small group of
patients, encouraging responses were documented.
-----
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Jul 21; [Epub ahead of print]
A multi-institutional evaluation of factors predictive of
toxicity and efficacy of bevacizumab for recurrent ovarian cancer.
Wright JD, Secord AA, Numnum TM, Rocconi RP, Powell MA, Berchuck A, Alvarez RD,
Gibb RK, Trinkaus K, Rader JS, Mutch DG.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
While bevacizumab has shown activity in recurrent ovarian cancer, a higher than
expected incidence of bowel perforations has been reported in recent trials. We
sought to determine factors associated with toxicity and tumor response in
patients with relapsed ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab. A retrospective
review of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with bevacizumab was
undertaken. Response was determined radiographically and through CA125
measurements. Statistical analysis to determine factors associated with toxicity
and response was performed. Sixty-two eligible patients were identified. The
cohort had received a median of 5 prior chemotherapy regimens. Single-agent
bevacizumab was administered to 12 (19%), while 50 (81%) received the drug in
combination with a cytotoxic agent. Grade 3-5 toxicities occurred in 15 (24%)
patients, including grade 3-4 hypertension in 4 (7%), gastrointestinal
perforations in 7%, and chylous ascites in 5%. Development of chylous ascites
and gastrointestinal perforations appeared to correlate with tumor response. The
overall response rate was 36% (4 complete response, 17 partial response), with
stable disease in 40%. A higher objective response rate was seen in the
bevacizumab combination group compared to single-agent treatment (43% vs 10%) (P
= 0.07). However, 29 grade 3-5 toxic episodes were seen in the combination group
vs only 1 in the single-agent bevacizumab cohort (P = 0.071). We conclude that
bevacizumab demonstrates promising activity in recurrent ovarian cancer. The
addition of a cytotoxic agent to bevacizumab improved response rates at the cost
of increased toxicity. Gastrointestinal perforations occurred in 7%. The
perforations occurred in heavily pretreated patients who were responding to
therapy.
-----
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Jul 21; [Epub ahead of print]
The influence of reproductive and hormonal factors on ovarian
cancer survival.
Nagle CM, Bain CJ, Green AC, Webb PM.
Cancer and Population Studies Group, Queensland Institute of Medical Research,
Brisbane, Australia.
Reproductive and hormonal exposures are known to influence ovarian
carcinogenesis, but little is known about the effect of these factors on
survival. We have studied survival according to hormonal and reproductive
history in a population-based cohort of 676 Australian women aged 18-79, newly
diagnosed with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer in the early 1990s. In order
to place our findings in context, we have also undertaken a systematic review of
the pertinent literature. Detailed information about each woman's reproductive
and contraceptive history was obtained from pregnancy and contraceptive
calendars at the time of diagnosis. Cox regression was used to obtain
multivariate adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A
total of 419 (62%) of the 676 women died during the follow-up (giving a 5-year
survival proportion of 44%). Apart from better survival for women who had ever
breastfed (multivariate HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.55-0.98), we found no association
between survival from invasive ovarian cancer and a range of hormonal and
gynecological factors including parity, use of oral contraceptives, and
histories of tubal sterilization or hysterectomy. Systematic review of the
literature generally supported the lack of influence of these factors on
survival from ovarian cancer. We conclude that, except for a possible survival
advantage among women with a history of breastfeeding, reproductive and hormonal
exposures prior to diagnosis do not influence survival from invasive ovarian
cancer, in contrast to their substantial effects on etiology of this disease.
-----
World J Surg. 2007 Jul 15; [Epub ahead of print]
Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemohyperthermia for
Chemoresistant and Recurrent Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Prospective
Study of 81 Patients.
Cotte E, Glehen O, Mohamed F, Lamy F, Falandry C, Golfier F, Gilly FN.
Department of Oncologic Surgery, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Lyon Sud, 69495,
Pierre Bénite, Cedex, France.
PURPOSE: There is no standardized treatment for patients with chemoresistant or
recurrent advanced ovarian cancer. Locoregional treatments combining
cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (HIPEC) may improve
survival for locoregional disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective single
center study of 81 patients with recurrent or chemoresistant peritoneal
carcinomatosis from ovarian cancer was performed. Patients were treated by
maximal cytoreductive surgery combined with HIPEC (with cisplatinum at 20
mg/m(2)/L). A total of 47 patients were included for their third, fourth, fifth,
sixth, or seventh surgical look. Altogether, 54 patients presented with
extensive carcinomatosis (malignant nodules of >5 mm). RESULTS: Complete
macroscopic resection (CCR-0) was achieved in 45 patients. Mortality and
morbidity rates were 2.5% and 13.6%, respectively. With a median follow-up of
47.1 months, the overall and disease-free median survivals were 28.4 and 19.2
months, respectively. Carcinomatosis extent and completeness of cytoreduction (p
= 0.02 and p <0.001, respectively) were identified as independent prognostic
factors. For CCR-0 patients, overall and disease-free survivals were 54.9 and
26.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Salvage therapy combining optimal
cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC may achieve long-term survival in selected
patients with recurrent or chemoresistant ovarian cancer. This strategy may be
most effective in patients with limited carcinomatosis or when cytoreductive
surgery provides sufficient downstaging.
-----
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Jul 11; [Epub ahead of print]
Mucinous ovarian cancer.
Harrison ML, Jameson C, Gore ME.
Department of Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (mEOC) accounts for approximately 10% of EOCs.
Patients presenting with early-stage disease have an excellent prognosis,
however, those with advanced disease have a poor outcome with relative
resistance to standard ovarian cancer chemotherapy. Molecular and genetic
studies demonstrate differences between mucinous and serous EOC supporting the
concept that these tumors develop along separate pathways. Together with the
observed differences in clinical behavior and outcome for mEOC, there is a need
to develop specific therapeutic strategies for this histologic subtype. The
relative rarity of advanced mEOC has resulted in few patients enrolled in major
ovarian cancer trials. The results of such trials may not necessarily reflect
those specific to mEOC. Separate trials testing alternative chemotherapeutics
are required. Metastatic mucinous tumors from other sites such as the
gastrointestinal tract may present with ovarian involvement. For all mucinous
tumors of the ovary, establishing primary as opposed to metastatic cancers is
important. Clinical presentation, tumor markers, histologic, and
immunohistochemical features are helpful in distinguishing most cases.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 10;25(20):2944-51.
Management of ovarian stromal cell tumors.
Colombo N, Parma G, Zanagnolo V, Insinga A.
University of Milan Bicocca, Milan, Italy. nicoletta.colombo@ieo.it
PURPOSE: To describe the clinical management of ovarian stromal cell tumors,
which are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that develop from the sex cords and
the ovarian stroma. DESIGN: We reviewed the current evidence on the clinical
management of these relatively rare ovarian malignancies, which are typically
detected at an early stage and may recur as late as 30 years following the
initial treatment. The overall prognosis is favorable with a long-term survival
ranging from 75% to 90% for all stages. Adult granulosa cell tumor (GCT) is the
most common malignancy among these tumors. RESULTS: Surgery is the cornerstone
of initial treatment. In women of childbearing age and with disease limited to
one ovary, a fertility-sparing surgery can be a reasonable approach. Tumor stage
represents the most important clinical parameter of prognostic relevance. The
value of postoperative adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients has not been
proven by prospective randomized studies. Platinum-based chemotherapy is used
currently for patients with advanced stages or recurrent disease, with an
overall response rate of 63% to 80%. Taxane and platinum combination
chemotherapy seems to be a reasonable candidate for future trials. Little
evidence exists for the use of radiation or hormonal therapy, and these
modalities should be restricted to selected cases. Given the propensity of GCT
for late relapse, prolonged follow-up is required. CONCLUSION: Surgery remains
the most effective treatment for ovarian stromal tumors and, whenever feasible,
for relapsing disease. Platinum-based chemotherapy is currently used in
metastatic or recurrent tumors.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 10;25(20):2938-43.
Management of ovarian germ cell tumors.
Gershenson DM.
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer
Center, Houston, TX 77230-1439, USA. dgershen@mdanderson.org
PURPOSE: To review contemporary management of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors
(MOGCT). DESIGN: The literature on the topic of MOGCT is reviewed, including
pathology, prognostic factors, surgical strategies, postoperative therapy, late
effects of therapy, and treatment of recurrence. RESULTS: Prognostic factors for
MOGCT include the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging
system's stage, residual disease, histologic type, and elevation of serum tumor
markers. Fertility-sparing surgery is possible in a large proportion of
patients. The importance of comprehensive surgical staging is somewhat
controversial. For patients with advanced-stage disease, maximum cytoreductive
surgery appears to be beneficial. Although second-look surgery is not
recommended routinely, selected patients may benefit from secondary
cytoreduction. For those patients who require postoperative chemotherapy,
standard therapy consists of the combination of bleomycin, etoposide, and
cisplatin. However, there is a growing trend toward surveillance; this strategy
continues to be studied. Although premature menopause may occur in a small
proportion of patients, at least 80% of those who undergo fertility-sparing
surgery and chemotherapy may expect to preserve reproductive function. For
patients with early-stage disease, cure rates approach 100%. For those with
advanced-stage disease, cure rates are reportedly at least 75%. CONCLUSION:
MOGCT is a rare malignancy that principally affects girls and young women. With
optimal therapy, the prognosis is excellent, and most patients may retain
reproductive function.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 10;25(20):2928-37.
Management of borderline ovarian neoplasms.
Cadron I, Leunen K, Van Gorp T, Amant F, Neven P, Vergote I.
Division of Gynecological Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
University Hospitals Leuven, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Over the last decades, the management of borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) has
changed from radical surgery to more conservative therapy as a result of the
need for fertility-sparing surgery and the increasing use of laparoscopy. The
question is whether this is good clinical practice from an oncologic point of
view. Here, recent literature regarding management of borderline ovarian
neoplasms is reviewed, and oncologic concerns are discussed with emphasis on the
mode of surgery and the possibility of fertility-sparing surgery and its
consequences. Proper staging is defined as an exploration of the entire
abdominal cavity with peritoneal washings, infracolic omentectomy, and multiple
peritoneal biopsies as the cornerstone of a successful treatment, and this is
only possible through a midline incision. For stage I disease, conservative
surgery consisting of unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or cystectomy in case of
bilateral ovarian involvement or when the disease develops in the only remaining
ovary is a valuable alternative in a number of young patients who want to
preserve their fertility. Patients with advanced-stage disease or who are
finished childbearing are treated with radical surgery consisting of peritoneal
washings, total abdominal hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy,
infracolic omentectomy, complete peritoneal resection of macroscopic lesions, or
multiple peritoneal biopsies; in case of mucinous BOTs, patients also are
treated with an appendectomy.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 10;25(20):2909-20.
Adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage ovarian cancer: review of
the literature.
Tropé C, Kaern J.
Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Montebello,
Oslo, Norway. c.g.trope@medisin.uio.no
PURPOSE: This overview summarizes studies with acceptable quality and validity
and presents a synthesis of the effectiveness on adjuvant therapy after surgery
for early ovarian cancer (EOC) patients. METHODS: The literature published
between 1970 and 2006 was identified systematically by computer-based searches
in MEDLINE and Cochrane library. RESULTS: Twenty-two prospective randomized
studies were analyzed, which included 4,626 patients. No difference between
adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and radiotherapy was found. There is agreement on
that patients with stage IA, grade 1 tumors have excellent survival and do not
need postsurgical therapy. The International Collaborative Ovarian Neoplasm
1/Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Ovarian Neoplasm trials were the first to show an
effect on survival of AC, but in patients with adequate surgical staging, there
was no additional effect of AC. For patients who are staged incompletely at the
time of initial surgery, completion of the staging procedure with either
laparoscopy or laparotomy is a reasonable approach before a final decision is
made regarding the need for AC. If full staging cannot be performed due to
medical contraindication or patient refusal, consideration of AC is reasonable
in selected patients. Using prognostic variables such as grade, International
Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics substage, pretreatment of CA-125 < or =
30 U/mL, and DNA ploidy, it is possible to divide patients into risk groups to
avoid overtreatment. Gynecologic Oncology Group study 157 suggests that it may
be possible to minimize chemotherapy-induced toxicity by using three instead of
six cycles of AC, although it is not known fully whether this will compromise
effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Future randomized studies in EOC will include the
investigation of new targeted therapies and new prognostic factors in adequately
staged patients.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 10;25(20):2873-83.
Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma.
Fader AN, Rose PG.
Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Surgery plays a critical role in the optimal management of all stages of ovarian
carcinoma. In apparent early-stage ovarian cancer, a comprehensive surgical
evaluation allows stratification of patients into low- and high-risk categories.
Low-risk patients may be candidates for fertility-sparing surgery and can safely
avoid chemotherapy and be observed. Treatment of patients with high-risk early-
or advanced-stage ovarian cancer usually requires a combined modality approach.
Although it is well known that epithelial ovarian cancer is moderately
chemosensitive, what distinguishes it most from other metastatic solid tumors is
that surgical cytoreduction of tumor volume is highly correlated with
prolongation of patient survival. Procedures such as radical pelvic surgery,
bowel resection, and aggressive upper abdominal surgery are commonly required to
achieve optimal cytoreduction. Women who develop recurrent disease may be
eligible for a secondary cytoreductive surgery or may require a surgical
intervention to palliate disease-related symptoms. For women at high risk of
ovarian cancer, prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy significantly
reduces the incidence of this disease. The purpose of this article is to provide
a comprehensive review of the surgical management of ovarian carcinoma. The
roles of primary, interval, and secondary cytoreductive surgeries; second-look
procedures; and palliative surgery are reviewed. The indications for
fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery as well as the current
guidelines for prophylactic surgery in high-risk mutation carriers are also
discussed.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jul 10;25(20):2867-72.
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: overview and
perspective.
Rao G, Crispens M, Rothenberg ML.
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232-6307, USA.
Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has theoretical, pharmacologic, and clinical
advantages over intravenous (IV) chemotherapy in women with optimally debulked
epithelial ovarian cancer confined to the abdominal cavity. Consistent,
statistically significant improvements in both progression-free and overall
survival have been demonstrated in three large phase III trials conducted in the
United States during the past 10 years. Nevertheless, concerns over IP drug
distribution and systemic absorption, technical challenges of IP catheter
placement and the incidence of IP catheter-related complications, and the
clinical relevance of these studies have limited the adoption of IP therapy in
ovarian cancer. Current interest in the evaluation of molecularly targeted
therapies should build on the progress that has been made through the use of IP
chemotherapy in women with optimally debulked ovarian cancer.
-----
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Apr 8; [Epub ahead of print]
Survival and prognostic factors in early-stage epithelial ovarian
carcinoma treated with taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy.
Skirnisdottir I, Sorbe B.
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology,
University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
The present study was undertaken with the question about the outcome
(recurrence-free survival, [RFS]) after adjuvant chemotherapy with taxane and
carboplatin in the early stages of epithelial ovarian cancer after primary
surgery. Treatment-related toxicity was also evaluated. A total of 113 patients
were included in this study. The 5-year RFS rate for all 113 patients treated
with adjuvant chemotherapy including taxane and carboplatin after primary
surgery was 79%. The 5-year RFS rate for 85 patients in FIGO stage I was 85% and
for 18 patients in FIGO stage II, it was 44%. For clear-cell carcinomas, the RFS
was 87%. In univariate analysis, recurrent disease was associated with both FIGO
stage and tumor grade, but in multivariate logistic regression analysis of
prognostic factors for tumor recurrences, only FIGO stage (stage I versus stage
II) was a significant and independent prognostic factor. However, an odds ratio
(OR) of 1.9 for tumor grade (grade 3 versus grades 1-2) demonstrated two times
increased risk for recurrence in a patient with a grade 3 tumor compared with
grade 1-2 tumors. Furthermore, an OR of 0.39 for lymph node sampling versus no
sampling meant 61% reduced risk for recurrence for a patient who had undergone
lymph node sampling at surgical staging laparotomy. The major toxicities in the
present study were myelosuppression (46%) and neurotoxicity (34%). Despite the
use of prophylaxis, severe paclitaxel-related hypersensitivity occurred in three
patients (3%).
-----
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Apr 8; [Epub ahead of print]
Bulky lymph node resection in patients with recurrent epithelial
ovarian cancer: impact of surgery.
Benedetti Panici P, Perniola G, Angioli R, Zullo MA, Manci N, Palaia I, Bellati
F, Plotti F, Calcagno M, Basile S.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University "La Sapienza" of Rome, Rome,
Italy.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of systematic lymphadenectomy,
feasibility, complications rate, and outcome in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)
patients with recurrent bulky lymph node disease. A prospective observational
study of EOC patients with pelvic/aortic lymph node relapse was conducted
between January 1995 and June 2005. After a clinical and laparoscopic staging,
secondary cytoreduction, including systematic lymphadenectomy, were performed.
The eligibility criteria were as follows: disease-free interval >/=6 months,
radiographic finding suggestive of bulky lymph node recurrence, and patients'
consent to be treated with chemotherapy. Forty-eight EOC patients with lymph
node relapse were recruited. Twenty-nine patients were amenable to cytoreductive
surgery. Postoperatively, all patients received adjuvant treatment. The median
numbers of resected aortic and pelvic nodes were 15 (2-32) and 17 (8-47),
respectively. The median numbers of resected aortic and pelvic positive lymph
nodes were 4 (1-18) and 3 (1-17), respectively. The mean size of bulky nodes was
3.3 cm. Four patients (14%) experienced one severe complication. No
treatment-related deaths were observed. After a median follow-up of 26 months,
among cytoreduced patients, 18 women were alive with no evidence of disease,
nine were alive with disease. Among the 11 patients not amenable to surgery,
five women were alive with persistent disease, six patients died of disease, at
a median follow-up of 18 months. Estimated 5-year overall survival and
disease-free interval for operated women were 87% and 31%, respectively. In
conclusion, patients with bulky lymph node relapse can benefit from systematic
lymphadenectomy in terms of survival. The procedure is feasible with an
acceptable morbidity rate.
-----
Cancer. 2007 Apr 9; [Epub ahead of print]
Predictors of comprehensive surgical treatment in patients with
ovarian cancer.
Goff BA, Matthews BJ, Larson EH, Andrilla CH, Wynn M, Lishner DM, Baldwin LM.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle,
Washington.
BACKGROUND.: Providing appropriate surgical treatment for women with ovarian
cancer is one of the most effective ways to improve ovarian cancer outcomes. In
this study, the authors identified factors that were associated with a measure
of comprehensive surgery, so that interventions may be targeted appropriately to
improve surgical care. METHODS.: Using Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
hospital discharge data from 1999 to 2002 for 9 states, the authors identified
10,432 admissions of women who had an International Classification of Disease,
9th Revision (ICD-9) primary diagnosis of ovarian cancer and who had undergone
oophorectomy. Based on National Institutes of Health Consensus Panel
recommendations, surgeries were categorized as comprehensive by using ICD-9
diagnosis and procedure codes. Logistic regression analysis using data from 5
states with a full set of variables (n = 6854 patients)was used to identify
factors that were associated with the receipt of comprehensive surgical care.
RESULTS.: Overall, 66.9% of admissions (range, 46.3-80.8% of admissions)
received comprehensive surgery. Factors that were associated independently with
comprehensive surgical care included age (ages 21-50 years vs ages 71-80 years
or >/=81 years), race (Caucasian vs African American or Hispanic), payer
(private insurance vs Medicaid), cancer stage (advanced vs early), annual
surgeon volume (low/medium [2-9 surgeries per year] or high [>10 surgeries per
year] vs very low [1 surgery per year]), and surgeon specialty (gynecologic
oncologists vs obstetrician gynecologists or general surgeons). Among
nonteaching hospitals, medium-volume hospitals (10-19 ovarian cancer surgeries
per year) and high-volume hospitals (>/=20 surgeries per year) had significantly
higher comprehensive surgery rates than low-volume facilities (1-9 surgeries per
year). Volume did not influence comprehensive surgery rates in teaching
hospitals. CONCLUSIONS.: Many women with ovarian cancer, especially those in
poor, elderly, or minority groups, are not receiving recommended comprehensive
surgery. Efforts should be made to ensure that all women with ovarian cancer,
especially those in vulnerable populations, have the opportunity to receive care
from centers or surgeons with higher comprehensive surgery rates. Cancer 2007.
(c) 2007 American Cancer Society.
-----
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 1;25(10):1169-75.
Does ovarian cancer treatment and survival differ by the
specialty providing chemotherapy?
Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Polsky D, Ross RN, Even-Shoshan O, Schwartz JS,
Armstrong KA, Randall TC.
The Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia,
Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. silber@email.chop.edu
PURPOSE: Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer is usually administered by medical
oncologists (MOs) or gynecologic oncologists (GOs). GOs perform a broad spectrum
of surgical and medical activities while managing a limited number of diseases;
MOs specialize in the administration of chemotherapy but manage a broad array of
diseases. We asked whether survival, treatment, and toxicity differed according
to the type of specialist providing the chemotherapy after surgery. PATIENTS AND
METHODS: Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)--Medicare data
for patients 65 years old from 1991 through 2001 from eight SEER sites, we
identified 344 patients with ovarian cancer who were treated with chemotherapy
by a GO after surgery. Using optimal matching and propensity scores based on 36
characteristics, we matched these patients to 344 similar patients who were
operated on and staged by the same type of surgeon but who received chemotherapy
from an MO. RESULTS: MOs administered chemotherapy over more weeks than did the
GOs (16.5 v 12.1 weeks, respectively; P < .0023), and MO patients had
substantially more weeks that included chemotherapy-associated adverse events
than GO patients (16.2 v 8.9 weeks, respectively; P < .0001). However, there was
no difference in 5-year survival rate between the GO and MO groups (35% v 34%,
respectively; P = .45). CONCLUSION: GO- and MO-treated patients who were closely
matched on prognostic characteristics experienced very different rates of
chemotherapy-associated adverse events and very different chemotherapy treatment
styles by specialty type; however, their survival was virtually identical.
-----
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Mar 28; [Epub ahead of print]
Prognostic factors for complete debulking in advanced ovarian
cancer and its impact on survival. An exploratory analysis of a prospectively
randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie
Ovarian Cancer Study Group (AGO-OVAR).
Wimberger P, Lehmann N, Kimmig R, Burges A, Meier W, Du Bois A; for the AGO-OVAR.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Essen, Hufelandstr. 55,
D-45122 Essen, Germany.
BACKGROUND.: No residual tumor as result of primary surgery in advanced ovarian
cancer is known as one of the most important prognostic factors. PURPOSE.: To
evaluate the impact of different prognostic factors for surgical outcome and to
evaluate the impact of surgical outcome on survival. METHODS.: Surgical data as
well as survival data were documented throughout the multi-center prospective
randomized phase III trial (OVAR-3) of the AGO-OVAR and were used for this
exploratory analysis. In this study 798 patients with FIGO IIB-IV were first
operated then randomized and homogenously treated with cisplatin/paclitaxel or
carboplatin/paclitaxel. Only patients with complete surgical data (n=761)
entered this analysis. RESULTS.: Multivariable logistic regression analysis
showed a significant decrease of probability for complete debulking without any
macroscopic residual tumor for higher pre-operative tumor load (OR 0.32; 95% CI
0.17-0.61), higher FIGO stage (OR 0.22; 95% CI 0.13-0.39), worse performance
status (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.38-0.86), advanced age (OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.65-0.94) and
presence of peritoneal carcinomatosis (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.10-0.28). Surgery in
centers with surgeons who performed comprehensive surgical debulking including
retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy and peritoneal stripping was associated with
higher rates of complete debulking compared to surgery in other centers (32.8%
vs. 22.9%, p=0.007). This resulted in a markedly improved overall survival
(p=0.045). This effect was held true after adjustment for prognostic factors (HR
0.77, 95% CI 0.63-0.94, p=0.012). CONCLUSION.: Post-operative residual tumor is
one of the most important independent prognostic factor for survival. Our
results suggest an advantage for aggressive primary surgery and complete
debulking. This surgical goal was achieved more often in experienced centers.
-----
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007 Mar 15; [Epub ahead of print]
Treatment of FIGO stage IV ovarian carcinoma: results of primary
surgery or interval surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a retrospective
study.
Rafii A, Deval B, Geay JF, Chopin N, Paoletti X, Paraiso D, Pujade-Lauraine E.
Service de Chirurgie, Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.
The objective of the study is to determine whether surgery influences the
outcome of stage IV ovarian cancer. The study design is as follows: From May
1995 to December 2000, 129 patients with FIGO stage IV ovarian cancer, recruited
in 42 centers, were prospectively included in GINECO first-line randomized
studies of platinum-based regimens with paclitaxel administered simultaneously
or sequentially. In all, 109 were eligible for this study. Standard peritoneal
cytoreductive surgery was defined as a procedure including at least total
hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, and peritoneal
debulking. Surgery was considered optimal if residual lesions were smaller than
1 cm. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare survival. Initial
abdominopelvic cytoreductive surgery was considered standard in 55 (54%)
patients. Abdominopelvic surgery was optimal in 29 patients and nonoptimal in
26. Twenty-two (22%) patients had a simple biopsy, and 25 (24%) patients
underwent substandard surgery. Twenty-two of these 47 patients without initial
standard surgery underwent a second surgical procedure, and 17 of the 22
patients completed standard surgery. The median overall survival time in the
entire population was 24.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.5-29.1
months). Patients treated without a cytoreductive surgical procedure had
significantly worse median survival (15.1 months; 95% CI, 5.4-24.9 months) than
patients who had optimal primary surgery (22.9 months; 95% CI, 15.6-30.1
months), nonoptimal primary surgery (27.1 months; 95% CI, 21.2-32.9 months), or
neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (45.5 months; 95% CI, 23.5-67.5
months) (P= .001). In conclusion, this study shows a significant benefit of
debulking surgery in stage IV ovarian cancer patients who responded to
neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can help to select patients
for surgery.
-----
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2007 Mar 29; [Epub ahead of print]
Weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC-W) for patients with
primary advanced ovarian cancer: results of a multicenter phase-II study of the
NOGGO.
Sehouli J, Stengel D, Mustea A, Camara O, Keil E, Elling D, Ledwon P,
Christiansen B, Klare P, Gebauer G, Schwarz M, Lichtenegger W; on behalf of the
Ovarian Cancer Study Group of the Nord-Ostdeutsche Gesellschaft fur
Gynakologische Onkologie (NOGGO).
Department of Gynaecology and Gynaecologic Oncology, Charite Virchow University
Hospital, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany, Sehouli@aol.com.
OBJECTIVES: To study the toxicity and efficacy of weekly paclitaxel and
carboplatin (PC-W) in women with primary ovarian cancer METHODS: This
investigation extended a phase-I dose finding study and was approved by the
institutional review boards of all participating institutions. Between 1999 and
2003, women with radically resected ovarian cancer of FIGO stages II B to IV
were enrolled at 17 German centres. Patients received weekly paclitaxel at a
dose of 100 mg/m(2), followed by carboplatin AUC 2. After a first treatment
block consisting of six cycles of chemotherapy, patients had a treatment-free
interval of 14 days, followed by a second block of six cycles. Treatment was
completed by a 28-days break and a final block of six cycles. RESULTS:
Altogether, 129 women with a mean age of 59 +/- standard deviation 11 years
entered the study. Most patients (82.9%) had serous papillary carcinoma of FIGO
stage III (72.9%) and IV (20.9%). Participants received 1,851 cycles of
chemotherapy; averaging 14.3 +/- 4.3 cycles each patient. PC-W produced low
rates of peripheral neuropathy (grade 3: 2.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI]
0.5-6.6%), with rapid recovery after 3 months. However, 72 patients had grade
III/IV anaemia (55.8%, 95% CI 46.8-64.5%). There were 36 events of grade III/IV
leukopenia (27.9%, 95% CI 20.4-36.5%). One patient sustained neutropenic fever.
CA-125- and objective response was noted in 73.9% (95% CI 64.7-81.8%) and 55.6%
(95% CI 41.4-69.1%) of patients. Median progression free and overall survival
was 21 and 43 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PC-W is feasible; a randomized
study is warranted to compare this new regimen with conventional 3-weekly
treatment.
-----
Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Mar 16; [Epub ahead of print]
Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for patients with advanced ovarian
cancer: A review of the evidence and standards for the delivery of care.
Fung-Kee-Fung M, Provencher D, Rosen B, Hoskins P, Rambout L, Oliver T, Gotlieb
W, Covens A; IP Chemotherapy Working Group on behalf of the Society of
Gynecologic Oncologists of Canada.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
OBJECTIVES.: To evaluate the role of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy as part
of primary treatment in patients with advanced ovarian cancer and to develop
standards of care within the context of current clinical practice. METHODS.: A
multidisciplinary expert panel, convened to develop standards on the use of IP
chemotherapy, searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to
December 2006 for randomized trials or published standards on the efficacy
and/or delivery of IP chemotherapy. RESULTS.: Eight randomized trials comparing
IP chemotherapy versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy were identified. Three
trials reported statistically significant improvements in median survival of
8.0, 11.0, and 15.9 months with cisplatin-based IP chemotherapy. In one trial,
the 15.9-month improvement in median overall survival (RR=0.75, 95%
CI=0.58-0.97) represented a 25% reduction in the risk of death with IP
chemotherapy. Severe adverse events and catheter-related complications were
often dose limiting with IP chemotherapy. Using a consensus-based approach with
a nationally representative panel, multidisciplinary care standards were
developed to review medical and surgical criteria, the practice setting, volume
requirements, and the institutional criteria required to safely deliver IP
chemotherapy. CONCLUSION.: The survival benefits with cisplatin-based IP
chemotherapy may represent a significant improvement in the outlook for select
patients with advanced ovarian cancer. The delivery of IP chemotherapy is more
challenging than the IV route; however, severe adverse events and
catheter-related complications may be offset through research defining the
optimum treatment regimen, and the standardization of care. System-wide
standards for the delivery of IP chemotherapy in Canada for patients with
optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer are offered.
-----
Oncology (Williston Park). 2007 Feb;21(2):227-32; discussion 232, 235, 239-42.
The role of intraperitoneal therapy in advanced ovarian cancer.
Hess LM, Alberts DS.
Arizona Cancer Center Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Intraperitoneal (i.p.) chemotherapy is a preferred treatment option that should
be offered to all women for front-line treatment of stage III optimally debulked
ovarian cancer. Patients should be provided with information on the survival and
toxicity for both i.p. and intravenous (i.v.) therapies, as well as practical
information about the administration of each regimen, so that they may play an
active role in the decision-making process. When making a decision between i.p.
and i.v. therapeutic options, the experience and preference of the oncologist
are critical factors in determining appropriate therapy for each woman.
-----
Cancer. 2007 Jan 11; [Epub ahead of print]
Secondary cytoreductive surgery for localized, recurrent
epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of prognostic factors and survival outcome.
Salani R, Santillan A, Zahurak ML, Giuntoli RL 2nd, Gardner GJ, Armstrong DK,
Bristow RE.
The Kelly Gynecologic Oncology Service, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics,
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Johns Hopkins Medical
Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland.
BACKGROUND.: The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of secondary
cytoreductive surgery in the outcome of patients who had recurrent epithelial
ovarian carcinoma that was limited to </=5 recurrence sites within the abdomen
or pelvis on preoperative imaging studies and attempt to define selection
criteria associated with improved survival, with specific attention to the
number of lesions suspicious for recurrent disease. METHODS.: Patients who
underwent secondary surgical cytoreduction for recurrent epithelial ovarian
cancer between September 1997 and March 2005 were identified retrospectively
from tumor registry databases. Study inclusion criteria required a complete
clinical response to primary therapy, >/=12 months between initial diagnosis and
recurrence, and </=5 recurrence sites on preoperative imaging studies.
Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate
the effect of clinicopathologic variables on overall postrecurrence survival.
RESULTS.: Fifty-five patients met the study inclusion criteria. The median
patient age at recurrence was 57.7 years, and the median diagnosis-to-recurrence
interval was 32 months (range, 12-164 months). Complete cytoreduction was
achieved in 41 patients (74.5%). On multivariate analysis, the statistically
significant and independent predictors of overall survival were a
diagnosis-to-recurrence interval >/=18 months (median survival, 49 months vs 3
months; P < .01), the number of radiographic recurrence sites (median survival,
50 months for patients with 1 or 2 sites vs 12 months for patients with 3 to 5
sites; P < .03), and residual disease (median survival, 50 months for patients
with no macroscopic residual disease vs 7.2 months for patients with macroscopic
residual disease; P < .01). Age, tumor grade, histology, CA-125 level, ascites,
and tumor size were not associated significantly with survival. CONCLUSIONS.:
The current data supported the definition of localized recurrent ovarian cancer
as patients with 1 or 2 radiographic recurrence sites. In this select
population, a diagnosis-to-recurrence interval >/=18 months and complete
secondary surgical cytoreduction, which was achievable in the majority of
patients, were associated with a median postrecurrence survival of approximately
50 months. Cancer 2007. (c) 2007 American Cancer Society.
-----
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jan;109(1):12-9.
Association of lymphadenectomy and survival in stage I ovarian
cancer patients.
Chan JK, Munro EG, Cheung MK, Husain A, Teng NN, Berek JS, Osann K.
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,
Stanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA
94305, USA. johnchan@stanford.edu
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the survival impact of lymphadenectomy in women diagnosed
with clinical stage I ovarian cancer. METHODS: Demographic and clinicopathologic
information were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results
Program between 1988 and 2001. Data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods and
Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: A total of 6,686 women had
clinical stage I ovarian cancer (median age 54 years, range 1-99). Of this
total, 75.9% of patients were Caucasian, 8.3% were Hispanic, 5.8% were African
American, and 7.3% were Asian. Epithelial tumors were present in 85.8% of the
women, and 2,862 (42.8%) patients underwent lymphadenectomy. Patients aged 50
years or more were less likely to undergo lymphadenectomy compared with their
younger cohorts (39.8% compared with 60.2%, P<.001). Only 32.7% of
African-American women had lymphadenectomy compared with 42.7% of Caucasian
women, 47.2% of Hispanics, and 48.8% of Asians (P<.001). Lymphadenectomy was
associated with improved 5-year disease-specific survival of all patients from
87.0% to 92.6% (P<.001). More specifically, lymphadenectomy improved the
survival in those with non-clear cell epithelial ovarian cancer (85.9% to 93.3%,
P<.001) but not in those with clear cell carcinoma, germ cell tumors, sex cord
stromal tumors, and sarcomas. Moreover, the extent of lymphadenectomy (0 nodes,
less than 10 nodes, and 10 or more nodes) increased the survival rates from
87.0% to 91.9% to 93.8%, respectively (P<.001). On multivariable analysis, the
extent of lymphadenectomy was a significant prognostic factor for improved
survival, independently of other factors such as age, stage, histology, and
grade of disease. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that women with stage I non-clear
cell ovarian cancers who underwent lymphadenectomy had a significant improvement
in survival. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
-----
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2007 Jan;6(1):53-62.
Safety of topotecan in the treatment of recurrent small-cell lung
cancer and ovarian cancer.
Garst J.
Duke University Medical Center, Box 3198, 25176 Morris Building, Durham, NC
27710, USA. garst001@mc.duke.edu
The topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, is approved for the treatment of
recurrent small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and ovarian cancer (OC). Patients with
recurrent SCLC and OC typically experience multiple relapses and receive
multiple rounds of chemotherapy. In these settings, disease stabilisation is
considered a treatment benefit, and quality-of-life effects and cumulative
toxicities of treatments should be considered. Many patients with recurrent
cancer may be predisposed to treatment-related adverse events because of
advanced age, renal impairment or extensive prior therapy. The standard regimen
of topotecan, 1.5 mg/m(2) on days 1-5 of a 21-day cycle, has generally mild
nonhaematological toxicity and a well-defined haematological toxicity profile
characterised by reversible and noncumulative neutropenia. Alternative regimens
may lower the incidence of haematological toxicities and maintain antitumour
efficacy. Topotecan may provide physicians with a versatile therapeutic option
for the treatment of patients with relapsed SCLC or OC.
-----
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2007 Jan;7(1):103-12.
Ovarian cancer vaccine trials and tribulations.
Buckanovich RJ.
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of
Hematology-Oncology and Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1500 East Medical
Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA. ronaldbu@umich.edu
Solid tumor vaccine therapy is coming of age. After years of failures, setbacks
and negative trials, the first positive trials of antitumor vaccines in humans
are being seen. Antitumor vaccine trials have reported an improvement in
progression-free survival in breast cancer and an overall survival advantage in
prostate cancer. Although, to date no positive Phase III antitumor vaccines
trials in ovarian cancer have been reported, recent great strides have been made
in improving tumor vaccine target antigens, improving antigen presentation and
understanding the mechanisms of immunosuppression associated with tumors. In
addition, biological therapies are now being identified that may enhance the
efficacy of tumor vaccines. This review summarizes recent trials of ovarian
cancer vaccines and addresses future directions to improve vaccine efficacy.
-----
Semin Oncol. 2006 Dec;33(6 Suppl 12):18-24.
New and Emerging Intraperitoneal (IP) Drugs for Ovarian Cancer
Treatment.
Muggia FM.
Division of Medical Oncology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Chemotherapy after surgical debulking represents an essential component of
treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Three quarters of patients
respond very well to initial treatment with platinum-containing drugs used
either alone or in combination with a taxane, usually paclitaxel. With relapse
rates exceeding 50% and median survival time of 2 years for patients after
relapse, efforts are focused on treatment approaches to achieve and extend
clinical complete remissions. These approaches include consolidation and
maintenance therapy, intraperitoneal (IP) administration of cytotoxic agents,
new combination chemotherapy regimens, development of new cytotoxic agents, and
molecular-targeted therapies (beyond tumor DNA, the classical target of
cytotoxic drugs). IP chemotherapy, which involves direct instillation of
chemotherapy into the tumor site in the peritoneal cavity, is the focus of this
review article. This article discusses studies involving new and emerging IP
drugs for both first-line chemotherapy treatment of advanced ovarian cancer and
recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.
-----
Semin Oncol. 2006 Dec;33(6 Suppl 12):8-17.
Maximizing the delivery of intraperitoneal therapy while
minimizing drug toxicity and maintaining quality of life.
Alberts DS, Delforge A.
Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ.
This decade has witnessed three large randomized trials (SWOG 8501/GOG 104, GOG
114, and GOG 172) clearly showing the advantages of intraperitoneal (IP)
chemotherapy over systemic/intravenous therapy in treating selected patients
with advanced stage ovarian cancer. Despite showing an impressive increase in
median progression-free survival and median overall survival, complications in
IP chemotherapy delivery and drug-related toxicities reported in these studies
have hindered widespread acceptance and implementation of first-line IP therapy.
Some of these complications and drug-related toxicities are treatment-limiting
and need special attention. Success of IP therapy as a first-line choice of
treatment is dependent upon ideal patient selection, effective delivery of
appropriate doses of chemotherapy agents to the tumor site, and efficient
management of complications. With proper orientation and instruction in IP
catheter placement and patient management, these obstacles can be overcome,
allowing for successful administration of IP therapies. This review article
discusses clinical approaches to maximize the delivery of IP therapy while
minimizing catheter complications. Mitigating drug toxicities with the use of
cytoprotectants such as amifostine and preventing infection with the use of
agents, such as amifostine and pegfilgrastim, are discussed in detail.
-----
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Dec;31(6):512-4.
Role of ultraviolet B irradiance and vitamin D in prevention of
ovarian cancer.
Garland CF, Mohr SB, Gorham ED, Grant WB, Garland FC.
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California-San
Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-0631, USA. garlandc@nhrc.navy.mil
BACKGROUND: There is a north-south gradient in age-adjusted mortality rates of
ovarian cancer in the United States, with the highest rates in the Northeast and
the lowest in the South through Southwest. This suggests that lower levels of
solar irradiance might be associated with higher risk of ovarian cancer.
Laboratory findings also suggest that low levels of vitamin D metabolites could
play a role in the etiology of ovarian cancer. METHODS: The association of solar
ultraviolet B (UVB) irradiance, stratospheric column ozone, and fertility rates
at ages 15 to 19 years with incidence rates of ovarian cancer in 175 countries
in 2002 were examined using multiple linear regression in 2006. RESULTS:
Age-adjusted ovarian cancer incidence rates generally were highest in countries
located at higher latitudes (R(2)=0.45, p< or =0.01). According to multivariate
analysis, UVB irradiance (p< or =0.002) and fertility rates at ages 15 to 19
(p=0.01) were inversely associated with incidence rates, while stratospheric
ozone (p< or =0.0008), which reduces transmission of UVB, was positively
associated with incidence (R(2)=0.49, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Solar UVB
irradiance was inversely associated with incidence rates of ovarian cancer in
this study, adding new evidence to the theory that vitamin D might play a role
in the prevention of ovarian cancer. Cohort studies are needed to confirm this
possible association.
©Copyright 1992-date by The Center
for Current Research. The Ovarian Cancer File is a proprietary
compilation of the Center for Current Research. The information
in the File is solely for your use, and the use of your family,
friends, and doctors. The information is the property of the individual
researchers and institutions that produced it. It is an infringement
of copyright law to attempt to "resell" the information
as it is presented here.
|