| |
Welcome to the Menstrual
Cramps File
Patients all over the world
have used the information in The Menstrual Cramps File since
1992, when the Center for Current Researchone of the first
80 companies on the Internetwas founded. Our highly trained
researchers (all of whom hold Ph.D.s) have searched the advanced
medical database at the National Library of Medicine and compiled
a comprehensive collection of research descriptions on Menstrual
Cramps and its care.
As you will see, the following research descriptions detail the
findings published in the most respected journals in the field.
Because the research descriptions are written in medical terms,
most people will bring all or parts of the Menstrual Cramps File
to their doctor for further explanation and discussion. Often
your doctor will have access to full-text articles and other
information that could be useful in planning a successful course
of treatment and prevention. Note that the titles of the journals
are abbreviated according to the National Library of Medicine's
format; your doctor can provide the full title if you need it.
Thank you for accessing the Menstrual Cramps File. We truly hope
the information fosters better health.
Sincerely,
Gregory A. Fraser, Ph.D.
Director of Research
Important Note: The following information
is provided for your education. It should not be relied upon for
personal diagnosis or treatment. If you believe that a
particular therapy applies to you or someone you care about, be
sure to consult a doctor before trying it.
On Downloading (Please Read
Carefully)
To
download or print the Menstrual
Cramps File, point your mouse to "File" in the top bar of your
Explorer or Netscape window, and click once. Now click once on either
"Save As" (download), or "Print" (print), and follow the
appropriate prompts.
Previous Menstrual Cramps
Research:
2002-2006
The
Menstrual Cramps File also contains summaries of past
research that has shown promise and may still be standard
practice among many physicians.
To
download earlier
research findings on
Menstrual Cramps, click
HERE.
Latest Research on
Menstrual Cramps
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;51(2):257-67.
Evaluation and management of dysmenorrhea in
adolescents.
Sanfilippo J, Erb T.
The University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Magee Women's
Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. jsanfilippo@mail.magee.edu
Chronic pelvic pain is defined by the American College of
Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) as noncyclic pelvic pain
of at least 3 months duration or cyclic pain of 6-month
duration, either of which interferes with one's normal
activities of daily living. Dysmenorrhea, or painful menses, is
the most common gynecologic complaint among adolescent and young
adult females and is the leading cause of recurrent short-term
school or work absenteeism. This chapter reviews the assessment,
diagnosis, and treatment of some of the most common causes of
pelvic pain in adolescents.
------
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2008 May;28(5):349-52.
[Comparison between western trigger point of
acupuncture and traditional acupoints]
[Article in Chinese]
Peng ZF.
Institute of Acupuncture and Moxibustion, China Academy of
Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing 100700, China. peng.zengfu@gmail.com
Trigger point theory as the soul of western acupuncture is very
similar to acupoint theory of traditional acupuncture and
moxibustion science. After comparison, it is found that over 92%
of trigger points (235/255) is corresponding to acupoints in
anatomy, and the local pain treated by 79.5% acupoints are
similar to corresponding myofascial trigger point. Both of them
can induce similar linear propagation of needling response, with
complete uniform or basically complete uniform of 76%, and a
part uniform of 14%; next, both of them can treat symptoms of
internal organs such as diarrhea, constipation, dysmenorrhea,
etc. Therefore, they are very similar in anatomic location,
clinical indications, and the linear propagation of needling
response induced by acupuncture.
------
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;(2):CD005288. Update of:
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;(4):CD005288.
Chinese herbal medicine for primary dysmenorrhoea.
Zhu X, Proctor M, Bensoussan A, Wu E, Smith CA.
Chinese Medicine Program, University of Western Sydney, Center
for Complementary Medicine Research, Bldg 3, Bankstown Campus,
Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, Sydney, New South Wales,
Australia, 2750. x.zhu@uws.edu.au
BACKGROUND: Conventional treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea has
a failure rate of 20% to 25% and may be contraindicated or not
tolerated by some women. Chinese herbal medicine may be a
suitable alternative. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and
safety of Chinese herbal medicine for primary dysmenorrhoea when
compared with placebo, no treatment, and other treatment. SEARCH
STRATEGY: The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility
Group Trials Register (to 2006), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2007),
EMBASE (1980 to January 2007), CINAHL (1982 to January 2007),
AMED (1985 to January 2007), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library issue
4, 2006), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1990 to
January 2007), Traditional Chinese Medicine Database System (TCMDS,
1990 to December 2006), and the Chinese BioMedicine Database (CBM,
1990 to December 2006) were searched. Citation lists of included
trials were also reviewed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any randomised
controlled trials involving Chinese herbal medicine versus
placebo, no treatment, conventional therapy, heat compression,
another type of Chinese herbal medicine, acupuncture or massage.
Exclusion criteria were identifiable pelvic pathology and
dysmenorrhoea resulting from the use of an intra-uterine
contraceptive device. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Quality
assessment, data extraction and data translation were performed
independently by two review authors. Attempts were made to
contact study authors for additional information and data. Data
were combined for meta-analysis using either Peto odds ratios or
relative risk (RR) for dichotomous data or weighted mean
difference for continuous data. A fixed-effect statistical model
was used, where suitable. If data were not suitable for
meta-analysis, any available data from the trial were extracted
and presented as descriptive data. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-nine
randomised controlled trials involving a total of 3475 women
were included in the review. A number of the trials were of
small sample size and poor methodological quality. Results for
Chinese herbal medicine compared to placebo were unclear as data
could not be combined (3 RCTs). Chinese herbal medicine resulted
in significant improvements in pain relief (14 RCTs; RR 1.99,
95% CI 1.52 to 2.60), overall symptoms (6 RCTs; RR 2.17, 95% CI
1.73 to 2.73) and use of additional medication (2 RCTs; RR 1.58,
95% CI 1.30 to 1.93) when compared to use of pharmaceutical
drugs. Self-designed Chinese herbal formulae resulted in
significant improvements in pain relief (18 RCTs; RR 2.06, 95%
CI 1.80 to 2.36), overall symptoms (14 RCTs; RR 1.99, 95% CI
1.65 to 2.40) and use of additional medication (5 RCTs; RR 1.58,
95% CI 1.34 to 1.87) after up to three months of follow-up when
compared to commonly used Chinese herbal health products.
Chinese herbal medicine also resulted in better pain relief than
acupuncture (2 RCTs; RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.82) and heat
compression (1 RCT; RR 2.08, 95% CI 2.06 to 499.18). AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: The review found promising evidence supporting the
use of Chinese herbal medicine for primary dysmenorrhoea;
however, results are limited by the poor methodological quality
of the included trials.
------
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2008 Apr;17(3):423-37.
Efficacy and tolerability of lumiracoxib 200 mg
once daily for treatment of primary dysmenorrhea: results from
two randomized controlled trials.
Daniels S, Gitton X, Zhou W, Stricker K, Barton S.
Scirex Clinical Research Centers, Austin, TX 78705, USA.
Stephen.Daniels@premier-research.com
BACKGROUND: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are
established as treatment for managing pain associated with
primary dysmenorrhea. However, the efficacy and tolerability of
lumiracoxib 200 mg once daily (q.d.) has not previously been
examined in primary dysmenorrhea. METHODS: Two randomized,
multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover studies
of similar design have assessed the efficacy and tolerability of
two regimens of lumiracoxib compared with placebo (Study 1) or
naproxen and placebo (Study 2) in women (aged 18-45 years) with
moderate to severe primary dysmenorrhea. In Study 1 (n = 132),
patients received lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d., lumiracoxib 200 mg
with a 200 mg redose (p.r.n.) on day 1, or placebo. In Study 2
(n = 144), patients received lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d.,
lumiracoxib 200 mg with a 200 mg redose p.r.n. on day 1,
naproxen 500 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), or placebo. Patients
recorded study medication use, efficacy assessments, and rescue
medication use. RESULTS: The primary efficacy variable, summed
(time-weighted) pain intensity difference (categorical scale)
over the first 8 hours (SPID-8), was similar between all active
treatments (e.g., p = 0.939 for naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. vs.
lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d. in Study 2), and all active treatments
were superior to placebo (p < 0.001). Median time-to-onset of
analgesia was similar between lumiracoxib 200 mg q.d. and
naproxen 500 mg b.i.d. Similar trends were observed for all
other secondary efficacy variables. All treatments were well
tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Short-term administration of lumiracoxib
200 mg q.d. is effective and well tolerated and provides an
alternative treatment option for the management of moderate to
severe pain associated with primary dysmenorrhea.
------
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2008 Mar;31(3):237-46.
Prospective case series on the effects of
lumbosacral manipulation on dysmenorrhea.
Holtzman DA, Petrocco-Napuli KL, Burke JR.
Clinical Sciences Department, New York Chiropractic College,
Seneca Falls, NY 13148, USA. dholtzman@nycc.edu
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this prospective case series was to
collect preliminary data as to the effectiveness of a specific
chiropractic technique, drop table method, in the treatment of
primary dysmenorrhea. METHODS: Over a 4-week period, 16 females
were screened for symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea and motion
restrictions of the lumbosacral spine. Thirteen subjects were
enrolled into the study. Bilateral and unilateral lumbosacral
flexion and extension restrictions were treated using drop table
manipulations 3 times during each of the 2 consecutive menstrual
cycles. Before entering the study and at the end of each
menstrual cycle, the subjects self-reported ratings of menstrual
pain (abdominal, pelvic, and low back pain) and associated
symptoms of primary dysmenorrhea using Numeric Pain Scale.
Numeric Pain Scale ratings for menstrual pain were the primary
outcome measures. RESULTS: The median age was 26 years, and the
median self-reported duration of the symptoms was 12 years. At
baseline, all subjects reported pain severity scores of 5 or
higher for at least 2 of 3 anatomical sites: lower or general
abdominal pain and/or lower back pain. Using the 95% confidence
interval (CI) as an estimate, clinically meaningful changes (<5)
in general abdominal pain and lower back pain were evident for
most patients during the treatment phase, whereas for lower
abdominal pain, the improvements were subject and cycle
dependent. CONCLUSIONS: Menstrual pain associated with primary
dysmenorrhea may be alleviated with treatment of motion segment
restrictions of the lumbosacral spine with drop table technique.
------
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2008 Mar;28(3):187-90.
[Acupuncture at Siguan points for treatment of
primary dysmenorrhea]
[Article in Chinese]
Li CH, Wang YZ, Guo XY.
Luohe High Medical Training School, Henan, China. lhwxlchong@126.com
OBJECTIVE: To observe the therapeutic effect of acupuncture at
Siguan points with Qinglong Baizei method on primary
dysmenorrhea (PD) and to study the mechanism. METHODS: One
hundred and eighty cases of PD were zandomly divided into group
A, group B and group C, 60 cases in each group. Group A were
treated by acupuncture at Hegu (LI 4) and Taichong (LR 3) with
Qinglong Baiwei method; group B were treated by routine
acupuncture with Sanyinjiao (SP 6), Ciliao (BL 32) selected as
main points; and group C were treated by oral administration of
Yueyueshu Decoction. After treatment of 3 months, the
therapeutic effects were analyzed, and changes of
hemorrheological indexes and prostaglandin level were observed.
RESULTS: The cured rate and the total effective rate were 75.0%
and 100.0% in group A, 60.0% and 95.0% in group B, and 25.0% and
90.0% in group C, respec tively, group A and B being
significantly better than group C (P < 0.01). And the analgesic
effects within 30 min of treatment in both group A and group B
were significantly better than that in group C (P < 0.01), and
that in group A was significantly better than that in group B (P
< 0.01). CONCLUSION: Acupuncture at Siguan points with Qinglong
Baiwei method has a significant therapeutic effect on primary
dysmenorrhea. The possible mechanism is to relieve pain by
improving blood circulation and inhibiting production of
prostaglandin.
------
Paediatr Drugs. 2008;10(1):1-7.
Dysmenorrhea in adolescents: diagnosis and treatment.
French L.
Department of Family Medicine, University of Toledo, College of
Medicine, Toledo, Ohio, USA.
Dysmenorrhea occurs in the majority of adolescent girls and is
the leading cause of recurrent short-term school absence in this
group. In the vast majority of cases, a presumptive diagnosis of
primary dysmenorrhea can be made based on a typical history of
low anterior pelvic pain coinciding with the onset of menses and
lasting 1-3 days with a negative physical examination. Risk
factors for primary dysmenorrhea include nulliparity, heavy
menstrual flow, and smoking. Poor mental health and social
supports are other associations. Empiric therapy for primary
dysmenorrhea can be initiated without diagnostic testing.
Effective therapies include NSAIDs, oral contraceptives, and
pharmacologic suppression of menstrual cycles. In atypical,
severe, or refractory cases, imaging and/or laparoscopy should
be performed to investigate secondary causes of dysmenorrhea.
The most common cause of secondary dysmenorrhea is
endometriosis, the treatment of which may include medical and
surgical approaches. Pharmacologic treatment of young women with pain
related to endometriosis is similar to treatment of primary
dysmenorrhea but may infrequently include gonadotropin-releasing
hormone agonists in severe refractory cases.
-----
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Feb;198(2):166.e1-8.
Acupuncture in patients with dysmenorrhea: a randomized study on
clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in usual care.
Witt CM, Reinhold T, Brinkhaus B, Roll S, Jena S, Willich SN.
Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health
Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.
claudia.witt@charite.de
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effectiveness and
cost-effectiveness of acupuncture in patients with dysmenorrhea.
STUDY DESIGN: In a randomized controlled trial plus
non-randomized cohort, patients with dysmenorrhea were
randomized to acupuncture (15 sessions over three months) or to
a control group (no acupuncture). Patients who declined
randomization received acupuncture treatment. All subjects were
allowed to receive usual medical care. RESULTS: Of 649 women
(mean age 36.1 +/- 7.1 years), 201 were randomized. After three
months, the average pain intensity (NRS 0-10) was lower in the
acupuncture compared to the control group: 3.1 (95% CI 2.7; 3.6)
vs. 5.4 (4.9; 5.9), difference -2.3 (-2.9; -1.6); P<.001. The
acupuncture group had better quality of life and higher costs.
(overall ICER 3,011 euros per QALY). CONCLUSION: Additional
acupuncture in patients with dysmenorrhea was associated with
improvements in pain and quality of life as compared to
treatment with usual
care alone and was cost-effective within usual thresholds.
-----
J Psychiatr Pract. 2008 Jan;14(1):13-21.
Symptoms related to the menstrual cycle: diagnosis, prevalence,
and treatment.
Clayton AH.
Department of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences,
University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908,
USA. ahc8v@virginia.edu
Menstrual cycle-related symptoms are associated with the
intrinsic hormonal fluctuations of the menstrual cycle. These
symptoms can be physical, behavioral, or emotional and include
problems such as dysmenorrhea, premenstrual syndrome (PMS), and
premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Because of the emotional
and behavioral aspects of menstrual cycle-related symptoms, it
is likely that clinical psychiatrists will encounter these
symptoms in their daily practice and should therefore be
familiar with their diagnosis, prevalence, etiology, and
treatment. As many as 2.5 million women are affected by
menstrual disorders each year, which can have a profound impact
on their quality of life. Although a definitive etiology has yet
to be established, fluctuations in estrogen and progesterone as
well as genetic factors are thought to contribute to the
occurrence of menstrual disorders. Current treatment options
include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (for
dysmenorrhea), lifestyle changes, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs),
and ovulation suppression (e.g., with oral contraceptives).
Treatment with oral contraceptives (OCs), particularly extended
or continuous use, may significantly reduce the incidence of
menstrual cycle-related symptoms.
-----
Drugs. 2007;67(16):2433-72.
Celecoxib: a review of its use in the management of arthritis
and acute pain.
Frampton JE, Keating GM.
Wolters Kluwer Health | Adis, Auckland, New Zealand. demail@adis.co.nz
Celecoxib (Celebrex), the first cyclo-oxygenase (COX)
2-selective inhibitor (coxib) to be introduced into clinical
practice, has been available for almost a decade. It is approved
in one or more countries worldwide for the relief of the signs
and symptoms of osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA),
juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (in patients aged > or =2 years)
and ankylosing spondylitis (AS), the management of acute pain in
adults, the treatment of primary dysmenorrhoea and the reduction
in the number of adenomatous colorectal polyps in familial
adenomatous polyposis.Celecoxib remains an effective and useful
altenative to nonselective NSAIDs in the treatment of acute or
chronic musculoskeletal pain. In the latter setting, it offers
the prospect of improved gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and,
in patients not taking aspirin for cardioprophylaxis, a GI
safety advantage. Currently available evidence of an increase in
cardiovascular (CV) risk with celecoxib is inconsistent; any increase in risk is likely to be small and similar to
that with nonselective NSAIDs. As with all NSAIDs, the potential
GI, CV and renal risks of celecoxib must be weighed against the
potential benefits in each individual; it is a rational choice
for patients at low CV risk who require NSAID therapy,
especially those at increased risk of NSAID-induced GI toxicity,
but also those unresponsive to, or intolerant of, other NSAIDs.
If selected, celecoxib, like all NSAIDs, should be used at the
lowest effective dose for the shortest possible duration.
-----
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;50(4):907-917.
The Contraceptive Implant.
Hohmann H, Creinin MD.
*Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive
Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
†Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate
School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Contraceptive implants provide long-acting, highly effective
reversible contraception. Currently, the only subdermal implant
available to women in the United States is the single rod
etonogestrel implant, Implanon (N.V. Organon, Oss, the
Netherlands) approved by the Food and Drug Administration in
July 2006. Implanon is currently approved for 3 years of use,
provides excellent efficacy throughout its use, and is easy to
insert and remove. Similar to other progestin-only
contraceptives, Implanon can cause irregular vaginal bleeding.
Implanon has been shown to be safe to use during lactation, may
improve dysmenorrhea, and does not significantly affect bone
mineral density, lipid profile, or liver enzymes.
-----
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007 Oct;27(7):726-8.
Treatment of dysmenorrhoea with a new TENS device
(OVA).
Schiøtz HA, Jettestad M, Al-Heeti D.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital of Vestfold,
Tønsberg, Norway.
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is an
established method for pain relief in dysmenorrhoea, which does
not involve the use of medication. This prospective study
evaluated the clinical utility of a new, very small and light,
high frequency TENS device in 21 menstruating women during four
menstrual cycles. The efficacy measures were pain relief
evaluated on a VAS scale and reduction in use of analgesic
tablets. All the participants subjectively found the device
useful. There was a statistically significant drop in mean pain
score from 6.73 to 5.18 points (p = 0.0009). Concurrent use of
analgesic tablets was also significantly reduced (p = 0.03) and
seven women stopped taking analgesics while using the device (p
= 0.02). There were no adverse events. On follow-up 6 - 8 months
post study, 14 of the women were still using the device
regularly. This TENS device appears to be a useful treatment
alternative for dysmenorrhoea.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD005288.
Chinese herbal medicine for primary dysmenorrhoea.
Zhu X, Proctor M, Bensoussan A, Smith CA, Wu E.
Chinese Medicine Program, University of Western Sydney, Center
for Complementary Medicine Research, Bldg 3, Bankstown Campus,
Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, Sydney, New South Wales,
Australia, 2750. x.zhu@uws.edu.au
BACKGROUND: Conventional treatment for primary dysmenorrhoea
(PD) has a failure rate of 20% to 25% and may be contraindicated
or not tolerated by some women. Chinese herbal medicine (CHM)
may be a suitable alternative. OBJECTIVES: To determine the
efficacy and safety of CHM for PD when compared with placebo, no
treatment, and other treatment. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane
Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group Trials Register (to
2006), MEDLINE (1950 to January 2007), EMBASE (1980 to January
2007), CINAHL (1982 to January 2007), AMED (1985 to January
2007), CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library issue 4, 2006), China
National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1990 to January 2007),
Traditional Chinese Medicine Database System (TCMDS, 1990 to Dec
2006), and the Chinese BioMedicine Database (CBM, 1990 to Dec
2006) were searched. Citation lists of included trials were also
reviewed. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
involving CHM versus placebo, no treatment, conventional
therapy, heat compression, another type of CHM, acupuncture or
massage. Exclusion criteria were identifiable pelvic pathology
and dysmenorrhoea resulting from the use of an intra-uterine
contraceptive device (IUD). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
Quality assessment, data extraction and data translation were
performed independently by two review authors. Attempts were
made to contact study authors for additional information and
data. Data were combined for meta-analysis using either Peto
odds ratios or relative risk (RR) for dichotomous data or
weighted mean difference for continuous data. A fixed-effect
statistical model was used, where suitable. If data were not
suitable for meta-analysis, any available data from the trial
were extracted and presented as descriptive data. MAIN RESULTS:
Thirty-nine RCTs involving a total of 3475 women were included
in the review. A number of the trials were of small sample size
and poor methodological quality. Results for CHM compared to
placebo were unclear as data could not be combined (3 RCTs). CHM
resulted in significant improvements in pain relief (14 RCTs; RR
1.99, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.60), overall symptoms (6 RCTs; RR 2.17,
95% CI 1.73 to 2.73) and use of additional medication (2 RCTs;
RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.93) when compared to use of
pharmaceutical drugs. Self-designed CHM resulted in significant
improvements in pain relief (18 RCTs; RR 2.06, 95% CI 1.80 to
2.36), overall symptoms (14 RCTs; RR 1.99, 95% CI 1.65 to 2.40)
and use of additional medication (5 RCTs; RR 1.58, 95% CI 1.34
to 1.87) after up to three months follow up when compared to
commonly used Chinese herbal health products. CHM also resulted
in better pain relief than acupuncture (2 RCTs; RR 1.75, 95% CI
1.09 to 2.82) and heat compression (1 RCT; RR 2.08, 95% CI 2.06
to 499.18). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The review found promising
evidence supporting the use of CHM for primary dysmenorrhoea;
however, results are limited by the poor methodological quality
of the included trials.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD000400.
Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for heavy
menstrual bleeding.
Lethaby A, Augood C, Duckitt K, Farquhar C.
University of Auckland, O&G FMHS, Grafton Rd, Private Bag 92019,
Auckland, New Zealand, 1142. a.lethaby@auckland.ac.nz
BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) is an important cause
of ill health in premenopausal women. Although surgery is often
used as a treatment, a range of medical therapies are also
available. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs reduce
prostaglandin levels which are elevated in women with excessive
menstrual bleeding and also may have a beneficial effect on
dysmenorrhoea. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this review
was to investigate the effectiveness of non-steroidal
anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in achieving a reduction in
menstrual blood loss in women of reproductive years HMB. SEARCH
STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders &
Subfertility Group trials register (searched April 2007), the
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The
Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2007), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2007),
EMBASE (1985 to April 2007), CINAHL (1982 to April 2007),
Current Contents (1993 to April 2007) and reference lists of
articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the
field. SELECTION CRITERIA: The inclusion criteria were
randomised comparisons of individual NSAIDs with either each
other, placebo or other medical treatments in women with regular
heavy periods measured either objectively or subjectively and
with no pathological or iatrogenic (treatment induced) causes
for their heavy menstrual blood loss. DATA COLLECTION AND
ANALYSIS: Seventeen RCTs were identified that fulfilled the
inclusion criteria for this review and data were extracted
independently. Odds ratios for dichotomous outcomes and weighted
mean differences for continuous outcomes were estimated from the
data of nine trials. The results of the remaining seven
crossover trials with data unsuitable for pooling and one trial
with skewed data were described in the Other Data section. MAIN
RESULTS: As a group, NSAIDs were more effective than placebo at
reducing heavy menstrual bleeding but less effective than either
tranexamic acid, danazol or the levonorgestrel releasing
intrauterine system (LNG IUS). Treatment with danazol caused a
shorter duration of menstruation and more adverse events than
NSAIDs but this did not appear to affect the acceptability of
treatment. There were no statistically significant differences
between NSAIDs and the other treatments (oral luteal progestogen,
ethamsylate, an older progesterone releasing intra-uterine
system (Progestasert), oral contraceptive pill (OCC)) but most
studies were underpowered. There was no evidence of a difference
between the individual NSAIDs (naproxen and mefenamic acid) in
reducing HMB. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: NSAIDs reduce HMB when
compared with placebo but are less effective than either
tranexamic acid, danazol or LNG IUS. However, adverse events are
more severe with danazol therapy. In the limited number of small
studies suitable for evaluation, no significant difference in
efficacy was demonstrated between NSAIDs and other medical
treatments such as oral luteal progestogen, ethamsylate, OCC or
another type of IUS, Progestasert.
-----
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007 Sep;12(3):240-7.
Clinical experience with NuvaRing in daily
practice in Switzerland: cycle control and acceptability among
women of all reproductive ages.
Merki-Feld GS, Hund M.
Clinic for Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Gynaecology
and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.
OBJECTIVES: To assess clinical experience with NuvaRing in daily
practice in Switzerland, including a large subgroup of young
women (aged < or = 22 years). METHODS: Open, prospective,
multicentre, observational clinical experience study to
investigate cycle control, acceptability and usage of NuvaRing.
RESULTS: Altogether, 2642 women participated in the programme
and were included in the analysis, of which 658 were aged < or =
22 years (25% of the total group). A total of 744 women (28% of
the total group) discontinued NuvaRing use; the main reason was
adverse events (11% of all users). In younger women, there was a
shift from moderate (-18%) and heavy (-45%) bleeding to mild
bleeding (+71%) and dysmenorrhoea decreased by 60%, despite
previous hormonal contraception use by 83% of women. Most women
found ring insertion and removal to be straightforward (>95%),
and were satisfied with its use (85%), primarily for the ring's
once-a-month application (81%). Data were very similar for the
total group. Cycle control and satisfaction were further
improved with duration of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In daily
practice, NuvaRing improved cycle control and was highly
acceptable to women, including young women. Switchers from other
hormonal methods also showed improved cycle control and high
satisfaction.
-----
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007 Aug 28;:1-8 [Epub
ahead of print]
Cycle control, tolerability, efficacy and
acceptability of the vaginal contraceptive ring, NuvaRing(R):
Results of clinical experience in Germany.
Brucker C, Karck U, Merkle E.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nuernberg Hospital,
Nuernberg.
Objectives To investigate the real-life clinical experience of
NuvaRing(R) users in Germany. Methods An open-label,
prospective, uncontrolled, non-randomized, multicentre
post-marketing surveillance study was conducted by 1204
gynaecologists amongst 5823 women requesting contraception. The
women underwent routine examinations and contraceptive
counselling, and were assessed after three and six cycles of
NuvaRing(R) use. Results: Good cycle control was observed and
there was a reduction in cycle irregularity and inter-menstrual
bleeding, bleeding duration and intensity, and dysmenorrhoea.
NuvaRing(R) was well tolerated, and had no significant effect on
body weight or blood pressure. Nine women became pregnant
unintentionally (two had conceived before they started to use
NuvaRing(R), three due to non-compliance, one because of
repeated ring expulsion/loss and three during treatment in spite
of having applied this latter as instructed). Most women
expressed their satisfaction with NuvaRing(R); 82% were 'very
satisfied/satisfied', 72% planned to continue using it and 82%
would recommend it to others. More than 90% of women found
NuvaRing(R)'without problems/easy' to insert and to remove, and
more than 80% of the women and their partners were not disturbed
by its presence during intercourse. Conclusion: NuvaRing(R) is a
highly effective and acceptable method of once-monthly
contraception that is safe and well tolerated.
-----
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2007 Aug 16;:1-8 [Epub
ahead of print]
The effects of an oestrogen-free, desogestrel-containing
oral contraceptive in women with cyclical symptoms: Results from
two studies on oestrogen-related symptoms and dysmenorrhoea.
Ahrendt HJ, Karck U, Pichl T, Mueller T, Ernst U.
Private Practice, Magdeburg.
Objectives To evaluate the effects of an oestrogen-free oral
contraceptive (Cerazette(R); 75 mcg/day desogestrel) in women
with oestrogen-related symptoms during previous combined oral
contraceptive (COC) use (ERS study) and in women with
dysmenorrhoea (DYS study). Methods Two similarly designed
prospective, non-comparative multicentre observational studies
were carried out in Germany. Altogether, 403 women with
oestrogen-related symptoms during previous COC use and 406 women
with dysmenorrhoea took Cerazette(R) continuously.
Symptom-related assessments were made at baseline and after 3-4
months, along with bleeding pattern and treatment satisfaction.
Results In the ERS study, the four oestrogen-related symptoms
studied resolved or improved in over 70% of women. Nausea
improved/resolved most (92% of women), followed by breast
tenderness (90%), oestrogen-related headache (84%) and oedema
(74%). In the DYS study, dysmenorrhoea resolved or considerably
improved in 93% of the study population. Correspondingly, use of
analgesics dropped from 70% of women at baseline to 8% at study
end. Adverse events were reported by 7-8% of both study
populations and were mainly bleeding irregularities. Most women
in both studies were satisfied with treatment ( approximately
90%) and wished to continue treatment after study completion (
approximately 85%). Conclusions Cerazette(R) in this study
set-up improved oestrogen-related symptoms and dysmenorrhoea in
women affected and treatment was well accepted.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD002248.
Behavioural interventions for primary and
secondary dysmenorrhoea.
Proctor M, Murphy P, Pattison H, Suckling J, Farquhar C.
BACKGROUND: Dysmenorrhoea refers to the occurrence of painful
menstrual cramps of uterine origin and is a common
gynaecological condition with considerable morbidity. The
behavioural approach assumes that psychological and
environmental factors interact with, and influence,
physiological processes. Behavioural interventions for
dysmenorrhoea may include both physical and cognitive procedures
and focus on both physical and psychological coping strategies
for dysmenorrhoeic symptoms rather than modification of any
underlying organic pathology. OBJECTIVES: To determine the
effectiveness of any behavioural interventions for the treatment
of primary or secondary dysmenorrhoea when compared to each
other, placebo, no treatment, or conventional medical treatments
for example non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders
and Subfertility Group Trials Register (searched April 2005),
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL on The
Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1966 to April 2005),
EMBASE (1980 to April 2005), Social Sciences Index (1980 to
April 2005), PsycINFO (1972 to April 2005) and CINAHL (1982 to
April 2005) and reference lists of articles. SELECTION CRITERIA:
Randomised controlled trials comparing behavioural interventions
with placebo or other interventions in women with dysmenorrhoea.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed
trial quality and extracted data. MAIN RESULTS: Five trials
involving 213 women were included.Behavioural intervention vs
control: One trial of pain management training reported
reduction in pain and symptoms compared to a control. Three
trials of relaxation compared to control reported varied
results, two trials showed no difference in symptom severity
scores however one trial reported relaxation was effective for
reducing symptoms in menstrual sufferers with spasmodic
symptoms. Two trials reported less restriction in daily
activities following treatment with either relaxation of pain
management training compared to a control. One trial also
reported less time absent from school following treatment wit
pain management training compared to a control.Behavioural
intervention vs other behavioural interventions: Three trials
showed no difference between behavioural interventions for the
outcome of improvement in symptoms. One trial showed that
relaxation resulted in a decrease in the need for resting time
compared to the relaxation and imagery. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS:
There is some evidence from five RCTs that behavioural
interventions may be effective for dysmenorrhoea however results
should be viewed with caution as they varied greatly between
trials due to inconsistency in the reporting of data, small
trial size, poor methodological quality and age of the trials.
-----
Drugs Today (Barc). 2007 Mar;43(3):137-47.
Lumiracoxib.
Buvanendran A, Barkin R.
Department of Anesthesiology, Rush University Medical Center,
Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA. Asokumar@aol.com
Lumiracoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor that
possesses a carboxylic acid group that makes it weakly acidic.
It has good oral bioavailability; maximum plasma concentrations
are reached two hours after oral administration. Despite its
short elimination half-life of four hours from the plasma, the
drug is distributed to inflamed tissues and is retained for up
to 24 hours. This unique property suggests that lumiracoxib,
while having reduced systemic exposure, can still reach sites
where COX-2 inhibition is required for pain relief. Lumiracoxib
is metabolized extensively with only a small amount excreted in
the urine. Selectivity for COX-2 is high compared to all other
similar agents. It is indicated for the relief of pain in
osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, acute pain and primary
dysmenorrhea. Lumiracoxib has been found to be effective at
doses of 100-400 mg once a day for chronic pain and 400 mg/day
for acute pain. Large clinical trials where lumiracoxib was
administered to patients with osteoarthritis have demonstrated
that this drug is equally effective as other COX-2 inhibitors
and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In comparison
to NSAIDs, patients taking lumiracoxib experience significantly
fewer adverse events and greater tolerability. It has also been
shown to be effective in acute pain states, like the dental pain
model and postoperative pain after orthopedic surgery. A large
clinical study (TARGET) has demonstrated the gastrointestinal
safety of lumiracoxib over one year. The study also showed that
there was no increase in cardiovascular events in non-high-risk
patients. However, a black box warning similar to those
accompanying other COX-2 inhibitors has been placed by
regulatory agencies that have approved this drug for clinical
use. When lumiracoxib is coadministered with warfarin or
aspirin, no dosage adjustment is required. (c) 2007 Prous
Science.
-----
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Apr;23(4):841-51.
Efficacy of a paracetamol and caffeine
combination in the treatment of the key symptoms of primary
dysmenorrhoea.
Ali Z, Burnett I, Eccles R, North M, Jawad M, Jawad S, Clarke G,
Milsom I.
GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, St George's Avenue,
Weybridge, Surrey, UK. ali@gsk.com <ali@gsk.com>
OBJECTIVE: Primary dysmenorrhoea is characterised by pain,
cramping and backache at the time of menses. Despite the high
prevalence of dysmenorrhoea, few sufficiently powered,
placebo-controlled studies have examined the efficacy of over
the counter analgesics in this condition. Furthermore, even
fewer studies have directly examined the efficacy of analgesics
on specific dysmenorrhoea symptoms. Research design and main
outcome measures: This was a single-dose, placebo-controlled,
double blind, crossover study carried out in 320 women with
moderate-to-severe dysmenorrhoea pain. At 2 h following dosing,
1 g paracetamol plus 130 mg caffeine led to significantly
greater pain relief compared to 1 g paracetamol alone (p <
0.05), 130 mg caffeine alone (p < 0.01) or placebo (p < 0.01).
The combination was also significantly more effective in
relieving abdominal cramping and backache compared to the other
treatment arms. No major treatment related adverse events were
reported during this study. CONCLUSIONS: When taken at
recommended doses, both paracetamol and the combination of
paracetamol and caffeine are safe and effective treatments for
primary dysmenorrhoea. Consistent with results from other acute
pain states, caffeine acts as an analgesic adjuvant and enhances
the efficacy of paracetamol.
-----
Med Hypotheses. 2007;69(2):297-301. Epub 2007 Feb 7.
Zinc treatment prevents dysmenorrhea.
Eby GA.
George Eby Research, 14909-C Fitzhugh Road, Austin, TX 78736,
United States.
Primary dysmenorrhea, menstrual cramps in otherwise well women,
produces mild to debilitating cramping of the uterus. More than
half, and by some estimates 90% of all American women experience
menstrual cramps during the first several days of menstruation.
About one in ten women are unable to perform their normal
routine for one to three days each menstrual cycle due to severe
uterine cramping. Although the uterus contracts and relaxes
routinely, during menstruation the contractions are much
stronger producing pain and "cramps". Women with dysmenorrhea
have high levels of prostaglandins, hormones believed to cause
menstrual cramping. Prostaglandins are believed to temporarily
reduce or stop blood supply to the uterus, thus depriving the
uterus of oxygen resulting in contractions and pain. One would
expect zinc, like the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs used
to treat cramping, to reduce the production of prostaglandins.
Zinc inhibits the metabolism of prostaglandins ruling out this
mechanism of action, suggesting erroneously that zinc deficiency
would prevent cramping. However, it is shown by case histories
that zinc, in 1-3 30-mg doses given daily for one to four days
prior to onset of menses, prevents essentially all to all
warning of menses and all menstrual cramping. One hypothesis for
a mechanism of action is that a precursor (COX-2) or metabolite
of prostaglandins causes menstrual cramping and not
prostaglandins themselves. Another hypothesis is that zinc has
antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions in the uterus.
Improvement in micro-vessel circulation by zinc may help prevent
cramping and pain. In patients consuming 31 mg of zinc per day,
premenstrual tension (PMT) symptoms did not occur, while in
patients consuming 15 mg of zinc, PMT symptoms did occur
(P<0.001). Protocols using 30 mg of zinc once to three times a
day for one to four days immediately prior to menses to prevent
dysmenorrhea are described and they are recommended for
additional study. The side effect from the absence of all
warning of pending menses due to zinc treatment was concern of
possible pregnancy. The United States RDA for zinc appears to be
too low to optimize women's health and prevent menstrual cramps.
-----
Med Hypotheses. 2007 Feb 6; [Epub ahead of print]
Zinc treatment prevents dysmenorrhea.
Eby GA.
George Eby Research, 14909-C Fitzhugh Road, Austin, TX 78736,
United States.
Primary dysmenorrhea, menstrual cramps in otherwise well women,
produces mild to debilitating cramping of the uterus. More than
half, and by some estimates 90% of all American women experience
menstrual cramps during the first several days of menstruation.
About one in ten women are unable to perform their normal
routine for one to three days each menstrual cycle due to severe
uterine cramping. Although the uterus contracts and relaxes
routinely, during menstruation the contractions are much
stronger producing pain and "cramps". Women with dysmenorrhea
have high levels of prostaglandins, hormones believed to cause
menstrual cramping. Prostaglandins are believed to temporarily
reduce or stop blood supply to the uterus, thus depriving the
uterus of oxygen resulting in contractions and pain. One would
expect zinc, like the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs used
to treat cramping, to reduce the production of prostaglandins.
Zinc inhibits the metabolism of prostaglandins ruling out this
mechanism of action, suggesting erroneously that zinc deficiency
would prevent cramping. However, it is shown by case histories
that zinc, in 1-3 30-mg doses given daily for one to four days
prior to onset of menses, prevents essentially all to all
warning of menses and all menstrual cramping. One hypothesis for
a mechanism of action is that a precursor (COX-2) or metabolite
of prostaglandins causes menstrual cramping and not
prostaglandins themselves. Another hypothesis is that zinc has
antioxidant and anti-inflammatory actions in the uterus.
Improvement in micro-vessel circulation by zinc may help prevent
cramping and pain. In patients consuming 31mg of zinc per day,
premenstrual tension (PMT) symptoms did not occur, while in
patients consuming 15mg of zinc, PMT symptoms did occur
(P<0.001). Protocols using 30mg of zinc once to three times a
day for one to four days immediately prior to menses to prevent
dysmenorrhea are described and they are recommended for
additional study. The side effect from the absence of all
warning of pending menses due to zinc treatment was concern of
possible pregnancy. The United States RDA for zinc appears to be
too low to optimize women's health and prevent menstrual cramps.
-----
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007;86(1):4-15.
Surgical interruption of pelvic nerve pathways in
dysmenorrhea: a systematic review of effectiveness.
Latthe PM, Proctor ML, Farquhar CM, Johnson N, Khan KS.
Academic Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, University of
Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. pallavi@doctors.org
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of surgical interruption
of pelvic nerve pathways in primary and secondary dysmenorrhea.
Data sources. The Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility
Group Trials Register (9 June 2004), CENTRAL (The Cochrane
Library, Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to Nov. 2003), EMBASE
(1980 to Nov. 2003), CINAHL (1982 to Oct. 2003), MetaRegister of
Controlled Trials, the citation lists of review articles and
included trials, and contact with the corresponding author of
each included trial. REVIEW METHODS: The inclusion criteria were
randomized controlled trials of uterosacral nerve ablation or
presacral neurectomy (both open and laparoscopic procedures) for
the treatment of dysmenorrhea. The main outcome measures were
pain relief and adverse effects. Two reviewers extracted data on
characteristics of the study quality and the population,
intervention, and outcome independently. RESULTS: Nine
randomized controlled trials were included in the systematic
review. There were two trials with open presacral neurectomy;
all other trials used laparoscopic techniques. For the treatment
of primary dysmenorrhea, laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation
at 12 months was better when compared to a control or no
treatment (OR 6.12; 95% CI 1.78-21.03). The comparison of
laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation with presacral
neurectomy for primary dysmenorrhea showed that at 12 months
follow-up, presacral neurectomy was more effective (OR 0.10; 95%
CI 0.03-0.32). In secondary dysmenorrhea, along with
laparoscopic surgical treatment of endometriosis, the addition
of laparoscopic uterosacral nerve ablation did not improve the
pain relief (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.43-1.39), while presacral
neurectomy did (OR 3.14; 95% CI 1.59-6.21). Adverse events were
more common for presacral neurectomy than procedures without
presacral neurectomy (OR 14.6; 95% CI 5-42.5). CONCLUSION: The
evidence for nerve interruption in the management of
dysmenorrhea is limited. Methodologically sound and sufficiently
powered randomized controlled trials are needed.
-----
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007 Jan 6; [Epub ahead of
print]
Endometriosis, dysmenorrhea and diet—What is the
evidence?
Fjerbaek A, Knudsen UB.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Odense University
Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, DK-5000 Odense C,
Denmark.
The objective of this study is to assess the literature
concerning the effect of diet on endometriosis and dysmenorrhea
and to elucidate evidential support, to give dietary
recommendations to women suffering from these conditions. A
systematic search in electronic databases on a relationship
between diet and endometriosis/dysmenorrhea was performed. Data
on diet and endometriosis were limited to four trials of which
two were animal studies. The articles concerning human
consumption found some relation between disease and low intake
of vegetable and fruit and high intake of vegetarian
polyunsaturated fat, ham, beef and other red meat. Results
concerning fish intake were not consistent. Eight trials of
different design, with a total of 1097 women, investigated the
relationship between diet and dysmenorrhea. Intake of fish oil
seemed to have a positive effect on pain symptoms. This study
concludes that literature on diet and endometriosis is sparse,
whereas eight studies have looked at diet and dysmenorrhea. No
clear recommendations on what diet to eat or refrain from to
reduce the symptoms of endometriosis can be given, while a few
studies indicate that fish oil can reduce dysmenorrhea. Further
research is recommended on both subjects.
-----
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2006 Dec;19(6):363-71.
Dysmenorrhea in adolescents and young adults:
etiology and management.
Harel Z.
Associate Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Adolescent
Medicine/Hasbro Children's Hospital and Department of
Pediatrics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02903,
USA. Zharel@Lifespan.org
Dysmenorrhea is the most common gynecologic complaint among
adolescent and young adult females. Dysmenorrhea in adolescents
and young adults is usually primary (functional), and is
associated with normal ovulatory cycles and with no pelvic
pathology. In approximately 10% of adolescents and young adults
with severe dysmenorrhea symptoms, pelvic abnormalities such as
endometriosis or uterine anomalies may be found. Potent
prostaglandins and potent leukotrienes play an important role in
generating dysmenorrhea symptoms. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs (NSAID) are the most common pharmacologic treatment for
dysmenorrhea. Adolescents and young adults with symptoms that do
not respond to treatment with NSAIDs for 3 menstrual periods
should be offered combined estrogen/progestin oral contraceptive
pills for 3 menstrual cycles. Adolescents and young adults with
dysmenorrhea who do not respond to this treatment should be
evaluated for secondary causes of dysmenorrhea. The care
provider's role is to explain about pathophysiology of
dysmenorrhea to every adolescent and young adult female, address
any concern that the patient has about her menstrual period, and
review effective treatment options for dysmenorrhea with the
patient.
Previous Menstrual Cramps
Research:
2002-2006
The
Menstrual Cramps File also contains summaries of past
research that has shown promise and may still be standard
practice among many physicians.
To
download earlier
research findings on
Menstrual Cramps, click
HERE.
©Copyright 1992-date by The Center
for Current Research. The Menstrual Cramps File is a proprietary
compilation of the Center for Current Research. The information
in the File is solely for your use, and the use of your family,
friends, and doctors. The information is the property of the individual
researchers and institutions that produced it. It is an infringement
of copyright law to attempt to "resell" the information
as it is presented here.
|