| |
Welcome to the Asthma File
Patients all over the world
have used the information in The Asthma File since 1992, when
the Center for Current Researchone of the first 80 companies
on the Internetwas founded. Our highly trained researchers
(all of whom hold Ph.D.s) have searched the advanced medical
database at the National Library of Medicine and compiled a comprehensive
collection of research descriptions on Asthma and its care.
As you will see, the following research descriptions detail the
findings published in the most respected journals in the field.
Because the research descriptions are written in medical terms,
most people will bring all or parts of the Asthma File to their
doctor for further explanation and discussion. Often your doctor
will have access to full-text articles and other information
that could be useful in planning a successful course of treatment
and prevention. Note that the titles of the journals are abbreviated
according to the National Library of Medicine's format; your
doctor can provide the full title if you need it.
Thank you for accessing the Asthma File. We truly hope the information
fosters better health.
Sincerely,
Gregory A. Fraser, Ph.D.
Director of ResearchImportant Note: The following information
is provided for your education. It should not be relied upon
for personal diagnosis or treatment. If you believe that a particular
therapy applies to you or someone you care about, be sure to
consult a doctor before trying it.
On Downloading (Please
Read Carefully)
To
download or print the Asthma File, point your mouse to "File"
in the top bar of your Explorer or Netscape window, and click
once. Now click once on either "Save As" (download),
or "Print" (print), and follow the appropriate prompts.
Previous Asthma
Research: 2002-2006
The
Asthma File also contains summaries of past
research that has shown promise and may still be standard
practice among many physicians.
To
download earlier
research findings on Asthma, click
HERE.
Latest Research on Asthma
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2):267-71. Epub 2008 Jul 10.
Advances in asthma and allergy genetics in 2007.
Vercelli D.
Functional Genomics Laboratory, Arizona Respiratory Center, and the Department
of Cell Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz, USA. donata@arc.arizona.edu
This review discusses the main advances in the genetics of asthma and allergy
published in the Journal in 2007. The association studies discussed herein
addressed 3 main topics: the effect of the environment and gene-environment
interactions on asthma/allergy susceptibility, the contribution of T(H)2
immunity gene variants to allergic inflammation, and the role of filaggrin
mutations in atopic dermatitis and associated phenotypes. Other articles
revealed novel, potentially important candidate genes or confirmed known ones.
Collectively, the works published in 2007 reiterate that allergy and asthma are
typical complex diseases; that is, they are disorders in which intricate
interactions among environmental and genetic factors modify disease
susceptibility by altering the fundamental structural and functional properties
of target organs at critical developmental windows.
------
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Aug;122(2):280-5. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
Childhood eczema and asthma incidence and persistence: a cohort
study from childhood to middle age.
Burgess JA, Dharmage SC, Byrnes GB, Matheson MC, Gurrin LC, Wharton CL, Johns
DP, Abramson MJ, Hopper JL, Walters EH.
Centre for Molecular, Environmental, Genetic and Analytic Epidemiology,
University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia. j.burgess@pgrad.unimelb.edu.au
BACKGROUND: The association between eczema and asthma is well documented, but
the temporal sequence of this association has not been closely examined.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between childhood eczema and asthma
incidence from preadolescence to middle age, and between childhood eczema and
asthma persisting to middle age. A further aim was to examine any effect
modification by nonallergic childhood exposures on the association between
childhood eczema and both childhood asthma and later life incident asthma.
METHODS: Data were gathered from the 1968, 1974, and 2004 surveys of the
Tasmanian Longitudinal Health Study. Multivariable logistic regression examined
the association between childhood eczema and childhood asthma. Cox regression
examined the association between childhood eczema and asthma incidence in
preadolescence, adolescence, and adult life. Binomial regression examined the
association between childhood eczema and childhood asthma persisting to age 44
years. RESULTS: Childhood eczema was significantly associated with childhood
asthma and with incident asthma in preadolescence (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95%
CI, 1.05-2.75), adolescence (HR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.33-3.46), and adult life (HR,
1.63; 95% CI, 1.28-2.09). Although childhood eczema was significantly associated
with asthma persisting from childhood to middle age (relative risk, 1.54; 95%
CI, 1.17-2.04), this association was no longer evident when adjusted for
allergic rhinitis. CONCLUSION: Childhood eczema increased the likelihood of
childhood asthma, of new-onset asthma in later life and of asthma persisting
into middle age.
------
J Asthma. 2008 Aug;45(6):507-11.
Disease variability in asthma: how do the patients respond?—and
why?
Ulrik CS, Søes-Petersen U, Backer V, Lange P, Harving H, Plaschke P.
Department of Heart and Lung Diseases, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen.
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Asthma is a variable disease, and therapy should be tailored
accordingly. The aim of this study was to explore patterns of self-management in
response to disease variability in adult asthmatics. METHODS: Adult asthmatics
(n = 509), recruited through a web-based panel, answered a questionnaire
concerning asthma knowledge, compliance, and treatment, including specified
treatment options, through the Internet. RESULTS: Two-thirds of the patients on
inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) stepped-up and down their daily dose without prior
contact to their doctor, and more than 50% took less ICS than prescribed during
periods with fewer symptoms. In case of deterioration, 57% of the patients would
only increase their reliever medication, whereas 23% would also increase their
controller medication, although 59% were instructed by their doctor to do so.
The self-perceived severity of asthma (graded as mild, moderate or severe) was
not associated with the patients' response pattern. The preferred treatment
strategy, differing primarily with regard to dosing and timing of controller
medication, was associated with feeling safe about self-adjustment of controller
medication (p < 0.001), but not with self-reported knowledge of asthma (p >
0.5). CONCLUSION: In case of deterioration, the majority of adult asthmatics
only increase their reliever medication, although instructed by their doctors
also to increase their controller medication. Furthermore, the patients'
preferred strategy for management of disease variability seems not to be driven
by their knowledge of the disease.
------
J Asthma. 2008 Aug;45(6):495-9.
Persistent impact of cigarette smoking on asthma.
Niedoszytko M, Gruchała-Niedoszytko M, Chełminska M, Sieminska A, Jassem E.
Department of Allergology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland. mnied@amg.gda.pl
OBJECTIVE: In the present study we assessed the impact of former cigarette
smoking on asthma control and treatment effectiveness. METHODS: A total of 104
patients with uncontrolled asthma were included in the study. The group of
former smokers consisted of 33 subjects, whereas the never smokers group
consisted of 71 subjects of similar age and gender. Spirometry, classification
of asthma severity, and control were assessed according to Global Initiative for
Asthma (GINA) guidelines. Quality of life was measured with the use of the Saint
George Hospital Respiratory Questionnaire (SGHRQ). RESULTS: Asthma was more
severe in the group of former smokers both before and after treatment; p <
0.001. Severe asthma (OR 7.8 CI 2.8-21.9) and cigarette smoking (OR 3.5 CI
1.3-9.2) were associated with difficulties in asthma control achievement. Total
quality of life significantly improved in the group of non-smokers; p = 0.02,
whereas in former smokers this effect was not significant; p > 0.05. CONCLUSION:
Cigarette smoking has a persistent, dose-dependent, negative impact on the
response to treatment in patients with uncontrolled asthma even after smoking
cessation. Smoking cessation should remain the ultimate goal in treatment of
asthmatic patients. More efforts should be undertaken to decrease smoking
initiation, especially in teenagers.
------
J Asthma. 2008 Aug;45(6):429-36.
Asthma 2008: targeting immunoglobulin E to achieve disease
control.
Prenner BM.
Allergy Associates Medical Group, Inc, San Diego, California 92120, USA. prenner@aaamg.com
Traditionally, practice guidelines have recommended a step-wise approach to
treatment based on asthma severity and lung function. However, increasing
evidence suggests that asthma may not be adequately controlled in many patients
with moderate-to-severe disease despite aggressive therapy, and that regularly
evaluating the level of asthma control achieved in individual patients may be
more effective than disease severity in guiding treatment decisions. This is
reflected in updated asthma guidelines from the National Asthma Education and
Prevention Program, which advocate regular assessment of asthma control in terms
of the current impairment and future risk associated with the disease.
Guideline-recommended options for patients with persistent, moderate-to-severe
immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated asthma have recently been enhanced by the
inclusion of omalizumab. This change is based on growing evidence for the
central role of IgE in airway inflammation and asthma and the clinical
effectiveness of blocking IgE with omalizumab, a recombinant humanized
monoclonal antibody. Omalizumab significantly reduced asthma exacerbations and
improved lung function and symptoms in randomized controlled studies of patients
inadequately controlled on inhaled corticosteroids plus long-acting
beta(2)-agonist therapy; these benefits for reducing asthma impairment and risk
were maintained during steroid dose reductions. Omalizumab is well tolerated,
although patients should be monitored for possible rare anaphylactic reactions.
------
Thorax. 2008 Aug;63(8):671-6.
Weight loss and asthma: a systematic review.
Eneli IU, Skybo T, Camargo CA Jr.
Department of Pediatrics, Ohio State University, Center for Healthy Weight and
Nutrition, Columbus Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio 43205, USA. enelii@pediatrics-ohio.state.edu
Epidemiological studies first demonstrated the association between obesity and
asthma and they have begun to provide additional evidence to support causality:
a dose-effect relationship, consistency across studies (especially among women)
and the correct temporal order (ie, obesity before asthma). To date, relatively
few studies have addressed reversibility, an important but less frequently
demonstrated epidemiological criterion of causality. Reversibility suggests that
if excessive weight is a risk factor for asthma, then reducing body weight
should decrease the prevalence of asthma, or at least decrease asthma related
symptoms or health care utilisation. We performed a systematic review on weight
loss and asthma, based on searches between January 1966 and January 2007 of both
PubMed and the Cochrane Clinical Trial Database. Of the 15 relevant studies,
asthma was the primary outcome in only five. Only one study was conducted in
children. Regardless of the type of intervention (surgical vs medical), all 15
studies noted an improvement in at least one asthma outcome after weight loss.
The improvement was noted across studies that differed in sample age, gender or
country of origin. The heterogeneity of the interventions and outcomes precluded
quantitative synthesis. We briefly review the role of specific factors (eg,
gastro-oesophageal reflux) in the weight loss-asthma association, and potential
directions for future research.
------
Allergy. 2008 Jul;63(7):932-8.
Stability of asthma control with regular treatment: an analysis
of the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL (GOAL) study.
Bateman ED, Bousquet J, Busse WW, Clark TJ, Gul N, Gibbs M, Pedersen S; GOAL
Steering Committee and Investigators.
Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape
Town, South Africa.
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled asthma is characterized by variability. Current asthma
guidelines recommend focussing on the achievement and maintenance of control but
few studies have examined in detail, using composite measures of control, the
stability and potential duration of control once achieved. In this post-hoc
analysis of the results of the Gaining Optimal Asthma controL (GOAL) study, we
examine the association between the level of asthma control achieved during the
step-up phase of the study and the stability of control experienced during the
maintenance phase. METHODS: GOAL was a 1-year, randomized, stratified,
double-blind study of 3421 patients with uncontrolled asthma, which compared
salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination with fluticasone propionate in
achieving two composite, guideline-based measures of control: totally controlled
and well-controlled asthma. We analysed the proportion and duration of time
spent in control, the effect of treatment on asthma stability, and the impact of
asthma control stability on unscheduled use of healthcare resources. RESULTS: In
patients achieving well-controlled or totally controlled asthma, at least
well-controlled asthma was maintained for a median of almost 3 and 6 months, and
for more than 85% and 95% of weeks of follow-up, respectively. A high level of
stability was confirmed in a Markov analysis investigating transitional
probability of change in control status. Variability in control was associated
with increased probability of an unscheduled healthcare resource use (odds
ratio: 1.06, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most patients achieving guideline-defined
control can maintain at least a similar level of control with regular, stable
dosing, with little likelihood of losing control.
------
Allergy. 2008 Jul;63(7):917-23.
Adherence to the Mediterranean diet and fresh fruit intake are
associated with improved asthma control.
Barros R, Moreira A, Fonseca J, de Oliveira JF, Delgado L, Castel-Branco MG,
Haahtela T, Lopes C, Moreira P.
Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal,
and Department of Immunoallergology, Hospital of S. João, Porto, Portugal.
BACKGROUND: The traditional Mediterranean diet is claimed to possess antioxidant
and immune-regulatory properties in several chronic diseases. Typical
Mediterranean foods have recently been associated with improvement of symptoms
of asthma and rhinitis in children. However the effect of adherence to
Mediterranean diet on adult asthma outcomes is unknown. We aimed to investigate
the association between adherence to Mediterranean diet and asthma control.
METHODS: Cross sectional study of 174 asthmatics, mean (SD) age of 40 (15)
years. The patients were defined as controlled, in contrast to noncontrolled, if
they showed FEV1 >or= 80% of predicted, exhaled nitric oxide (NO) <or=35 ppb,
and Asthma Control Questionnaire score <1. Dietary intake was obtained by a food
frequency questionnaire, and Mediterranean diet was assessed by alternate
Mediterranean Diet (aMED) Score. Logistic regression models adjusting for
confounders were performed to estimate the association between Mediterranean
diet and asthma control. RESULTS: Controlled asthmatics (23%) had significantly
higher aMED Score, intake of fresh fruit, and lower intake of ethanol compared
to noncontrolled (77%). High adherence to Mediterranean diet reduced 78% the
risk of noncontrolled asthma after adjusting for gender, age, education, inhaled
corticosteroids and energy intake (OR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.05-0.85; P-trend =
0.028). The higher intake of fresh fruit decreased the probability of having
noncontrolled asthma (OR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.10-0.83; P-trend = 0.015), while the
higher intake of ethanol had the opposite effect (OR = 3.16; 95% CI = 1.10-9.11;
P-trend = 0.035). CONCLUSION: High adherence to traditional Mediterranean diet
increased the likelihood of asthma to be under control in adults. The study
introduces a novel link between diet and asthma control, as measured by
symptoms, lung function and exhaled NO.
------
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Jul;101(1):1-8; quiz 8-11, 50.
Asthma: a syndrome composed of heterogeneous diseases.
Borish L, Culp JA.
Asthma and Allergic Disease Center, Carter Center for Immunology Research,
University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. lb4m@virginia.edu
OBJECTIVE: To review the concept that asthma comprises distinct heterogeneous
inflammatory disorders characterized by patients showing different phenotypes
with distinct genetic components, environmental causes, and immunopathologic
signa-DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed databases from 1950 to the present
time were searched for relevant articles and references regarding the
heterogeneity of asthma. Study Selection: Articles that described the various
phenotypes of asthma were used for this review. RESULTS: Asthma is unlikely to
be a single disease but rather a series of complex, overlapping individual
diseases or phenotypes, each defined by its unique interaction between genetic
and environmental factors. These conditions include syndromes characterized by
allergen-exacerbated, nonallergic, and aspirin-exacerbated factors along with
syndromes best distinguished by their pathologic findings (eosinophilic,
neutrophilic, pauci-granulocytic), response to therapy (corticosteroid
resistant), and natural history (remodeling prone). Additional phenotypes will
almost certainly be identified as advances in genetics and other profiling
methods are made and will be accompanied by the availability of clear biomarkers
for distinguishing among them. CONCLUSIONS: Responses to asthma medications vary
considerably among patients, likely reflecting, at least in part, the differing
sensitivities of the various asthma phenotypes. Selecting the best possible
treatment course in individual patients will be aided by clearly identifying the
different phenotypes. Physicians need to recognize this when making decisions to
adjust treatment to improve asthma control.
------
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jul 1;149(1):33-42. Epub 2008 Jun 3. Comment in: Ann Intern
Med. 2008 Jul 1;149(1):56-7.
Meta-analysis: effects of adding salmeterol to inhaled
corticosteroids on serious asthma-related events.
Bateman E, Nelson H, Bousquet J, Kral K, Sutton L, Ortega H, Yancey S.
Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape
Town, South Africa. eric.bateman@uct.ac.za
BACKGROUND: Recent analyses have suggested an increased risk for serious
asthma-related adverse events in patients receiving long-acting beta-agonists.
PURPOSE: To examine whether the incidences of severe asthma-related events
(hospitalizations, intubations, deaths, and severe exacerbations) differ in
persons receiving salmeterol plus inhaled corticosteroids compared with inhaled
corticosteroids alone. DATA SOURCES: The GlaxoSmithKline (Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina) database, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane
Database of Systemic Reviews (1982 to September 2007) were searched without
language restriction. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials reported in
any language that compared inhaled corticosteroids plus salmeterol (administered
as fluticasone propionate/salmeterol by means of a single device or concomitant
administration of inhaled corticosteroids and salmeterol) versus inhaled
corticosteroids alone in participants with asthma. DATA EXTRACTION: Three
physicians independently reviewed and adjudicated blinded case narratives on
serious adverse events that were reported in the GlaxoSmithKline trials. DATA
SYNTHESIS: Data from 66 GlaxoSmithKline trials involving a total of 20 966
participants with persistent asthma were summarized quantitatively. The summary
risk difference for asthma-related hospitalizations from these trials was 0.0002
(95% CI, -0.0019 to 0.00231; P = 0.84) for participants receiving inhaled
corticosteroids plus salmeterol (n = 35 events) versus those receiving inhaled
corticosteroids alone (n = 34 events). One asthma-related intubation and 1
asthma-related death occurred among participants receiving inhaled
corticosteroids with salmeterol; no such events occurred among participants
receiving inhaled corticosteroids alone. A subset of 24 trials showed a
decreased risk for severe asthma-related exacerbations for inhaled
corticosteroids plus salmeterol versus inhaled corticosteroids alone (risk
difference, -0.025 [CI, -0.036 to -0.014]; P <0.001). LIMITATIONS: The included
trials involved selected patients who received careful follow-up. Only 26 trials
were longer than 12 weeks. Few deaths and intubations limited the ability to
measure risk for these outcomes. CONCLUSION: Salmeterol combined with inhaled
corticosteroids decreases the risk for severe exacerbations, does not seem to
alter the risk for asthma-related hospitalizations, and may not alter the risk
for asthma-related deaths or intubations compared with inhaled corticosteroids
alone.
------
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Jun;8(3):232-7.
Trends in medication use for asthma among children.
Phillips C, McDonald T.
Academic Unit of General Practice and Community Health, Medical School,
Australian National University, Canberra, Australia. christine.phillips@anu.edu.au
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review recent studies of changing medication use for
asthma among children. RECENT FINDINGS: Although many countries monitor
mortality and hospitalizations related to asthma, there is less surveillance of
medication use for asthma. Since the late 1990s, and in the United States,
Australia and the United Kingdom, there has been a change in the medications
used to prevent asthma in childhood, with an increase in inhaled
corticosteroids, and a decrease in mast cell stabilizers. Prescriptions for
montelukast have increased four-fold in the United Kingdom for children since
2000, with similar increases in the United States and in Australia. There has
been a trend in some countries to increased use of fixed dose combined
long-acting beta-agonist/inhaled corticosteroid products; in Australia and the
United Kingdom, fixed dose combinations now account for the majority of
preparations containing inhaled steroids prescribed to children with asthma.
SUMMARY: Studies in a number of countries have shown marked secular trends in
asthma medications for children since the late 1990s. Research needs to employ
serial cross-sectional studies in the same population to capture changing
medication use and to be precise about types of medication within a class. The
changes in many countries indicate a greater concordance with guidelines.
------
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 May;100(5):426-32.
Psychological triggers and hyperventilation symptoms in asthma.
Ritz T, Kullowatz A, Bobb C, Dahme B, Magnussen H, Kanniess F, Steptoe A.
Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas 75205,
USA. tritz@smu.edu
BACKGROUND: Anecdotal accounts have identified hyperventilation as one route
through which psychological factors can trigger bronchoconstriction. However,
little is known about the empirical association between psychological and other
trigger factors and hyperventilation in asthma exacerbations. OBJECTIVE: To
study the cross-sectional association between perceived triggers and
hyperventilation symptoms in 1 British and 1 German sample of patients with
asthma who were recruited from the community and from primary care clinics.
METHOD: Patients completed relevant language versions of the Asthma Trigger
Inventory and the Asthma Symptom Checklist. RESULTS: After controlling for
demographics and asthma severity, perceived asthma triggers measured by
subscales of the Asthma Trigger Inventory explained 12.5% to 37.3% of the
variance in Asthma Symptom Checklist hyperventilation-hypocapnia symptoms.
Psychological triggers accounted for 10.6% to 26.7% of the variance alone and
4.3% to 11.0% of the variance over and above other trigger factors. In contrast,
perceived animal and pollen allergen triggers did not contribute unique variance
to the hyperventilation symptom report. Psychological triggers did not explain
variance in classic airway obstruction symptoms, thus arguing against a general
bias toward inflated symptom reports in patients with psychologically induced
asthma. CONCLUSION: Differences in perceived asthma triggers are substantially
associated with hyperventilation symptoms, and patients with more frequent
psychological triggers also tend to report that they experience more
hyperventilation symptoms during their asthma symptom episodes.
------
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2008 May;8(3):255-61.
Primary asthma prevention: is it possible?
Becker A, Chan-Yeung M.
Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg,
Manitoba, Canada. becker@cc.umanitoba.ca
Asthma, which typically begins in childhood and is the most common chronic
disease of childhood, has reached epidemic proportions. Asthma is associated
with gene-environment interactions, and there is consensus that a "window of
opportunity" exists early in life when environmental factors may influence its
development. This review considers biologic and sociologic factors in the
development of allergy and asthma. Meta-analysis of studies demonstrates that
monoallergen reduction does not impact asthma prevention. However, multifaceted
allergen reduction studies have shown clinical benefit. We propose that allergic
diseases, including asthma, represent a dysfunctional interaction with our
environment and that the increasing prevalence of asthma and allergy herald
increased population risk for the development of other inflammatory and
autoimmune diseases. Better understanding of the complex factors for asthma and
allergies may provide insight into many other chronic complex diseases.
------
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Apr;8(2):163-7.
Long-term effects of asthma medications in children.
Tamesis GP, Covar RA.
Department of Pediatrics, National Jewish Medical and Research Center, Denver,
Colorado, USA.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes recent studies in children that
evaluated long-term outcomes of controller asthma medications. RECENT FINDINGS:
The literature is replete with studies demonstrating the immediate profound
effects of inhaled corticosteroids on symptom control, reduction in morbidity
and mortality rates, improvement in lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness,
and inflammatory markers. Recent evidence supports that even this most effective
class of medication does not alter the progression of recurrent wheeze to
asthma, and that its effects on decline in lung function are limited. The lack
of evidence supporting the superiority of lower dose inhaled corticosteroids
combined with a long-acting beta-agonist over a full dose inhaled corticosteroid
with respect to long-term efficacy measures and growth effects suggests that
monotherapy with acceptable inhaled corticosteroid dose is the preferred
treatment in children with mild to moderate persistent asthma. Montelukast has
been shown to significantly reduce asthma exacerbations and lower use of
supplemental inhaled corticosteroids compared with placebo. SUMMARY: There is
mounting evidence that the currently available medications for childhood asthma
have a substantial impact on multiple dimensions of asthma control. No drug in
our current armamentarium, however, has been found to alter the natural
progression of childhood asthma nor halt progressive airway damage in the more
susceptible children.
-----
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Apr;8(2):158-162.
Management of asthma in preschool children with inhaled
corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists.
Bacharier LB.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Allergy and Pulmonary Medicine, Washington
University School of Medicine and St. Louis Children's Hospital, St. Louis,
Missouri, USA.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to review the recently published
studies addressing various treatment approaches for asthma in preschool
children. RECENT FINDINGS: The heterogeneity of wheezing in the preschool years
complicates the study of asthma in this age group. Once children at highest risk
for persistence of wheezing are identified, various management strategies may be
thoroughly studied. Several recent studies have confirmed the efficacy and
safety of both inhaled corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists in
the management of early childhood asthma. In addition to examining clinical
efficacy, studies investigating the effects of these treatment modalities on the
underlying airway inflammation have recently increased in number and quality and
confirm the anti-inflammatory actions of these therapeutic strategies in the
preschool child with asthma. SUMMARY: Evidence for the preferred treatment
strategies for persistent asthma in young children remains incomplete. Based on
the current body of evidence, there is rationale for further investigation of
these management strategies, including direct comparisons between inhaled
corticosteroids and leukotriene receptor antagonists, as well as the role of
long-acting beta-agonists, potentially targeting the subpopulations of early
childhood with wheezing who are at highest risk for persistence of asthma
symptoms.
-----
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2008 Apr;34(2):205-16.
Exercise-induced Bronchospasm In Children.
Randolph C.
Center for Allergy, Asthma, Immunology, 1389 West Main Street, Suite 205,
Waterbury, CT, 06708, USA, ccrandmd@aol.com.
This review will encompass definition, history, epidemiology, pathogenesis,
diagnosis, and management of exercise -induced bronchospasm in the pediatric
individual with and without known asthma. Exercise induced asthma is the
conventional term for transient airway narrowing in a known asthma in
association with strenuous exercise usually lasting 5-10 minutes with a decline
in pulmonary function by at least 10%. Exercise induced asthma will be referred
to as exercise induced bronchospasm in an asthmatic. Exercise-induced
bronchospasm (EIB ) is the same phenomenon in an individual without known
asthma. EIB can be seen in healthy individuals including children as well as
defense recruits and competitive or elite athletes. The diagnosis with objective
exercise challenge methods in conjunction with history is delineated. Management
is characterized with pharmacotherapy and non pharmacotherapeutic measures for
underlying asthma as well as exercise induced bronchospasm and inhalant allergy.
Children can successfully participate in all sports if asthma is properly
managed.
-----
Pneumologie. 2008 Mar;62(3):170-6.
[Effects of high altitude on bronchial asthma]
[Article in German]
Schultze-Werninghaus G.
Berufsgenossenschaftliches Universitätsklinikum Bergmannsheil, Zentrum der
Inneren Medizin, Medizinische Klinik III, Pneumologie, Allergologie, Schlaf- und
Beatmungsmedizin, Bochum. gerhard.schultze-werninghaus@rub.de
Sojourns in the high mountains have been recommended to patients with asthma for
many decades. It is the aim of this contribution to summarise the published
studies about the effects of a stay at > 1500 m above sea level on asthmatic
patients. These data from 428 adolescent and adult patients indicate an
improvement of asthma symptoms and lung function during sojourns at high
altitude. In many patients a reduction of the steroid therapy was achievable.
Profound changes in the immune system have been demonstrated at high altitude,
with a reduction of B- and T-helper cell activation. Total and mite-specific
immunoglobulin E antibodies decrease significantly during longer sojourns. These
changes are associated with a reduction of airway inflammation (e. g., reduction
of eosinophil activation, NO exhalation and bronchial hyper-responsiveness). The
fact that also patients with non-allergic asthma demonstrate a reduction of
their airway inflammation at high altitude suggests that the high altitude
climate has beneficial effects on asthma beyond the effects of allergen
avoidance. High UV exposure and low humidity could be important additional
factors, to explain the reductions in asthma severity in the high mountain
climate. Larger controlled studies should be performed to prove the positive
effects of the high altitude climate on asthma.
-----
Prim Care Respir J. 2008 Mar 12 [Epub ahead of print]
Alcohol-based pressurised metered-dose inhalers for use in
asthma: a descriptive study.
Alrasbi M, Sheikh A.
Hon. Clinical Research Assistant, Allergy & Respiratory Research Group, Division
of Community Health Sciences: GP Section, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
BACKGROUND: Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) have historically served as the
propellants of choice in pressurised metered-dose asthma inhalers, but concern
has been raised in recent decades regarding their damaging effect on the ozone
layer. Among the alternative propellants being considered is alcohol, which can
be used as a co-solvent in asthma inhalers. Healthcare professionals need to be
aware of alcohol-containing inhalers, since certain populations may have
religious and/or cultural concerns regarding the use of such preparations.
OBJECTIVES: To identify pressurised metered-dose asthma inhalers which contain
alcohol-based propellants. METHODS: We searched the British National Formulary
to identify companies that manufacture asthma treatments and wrote to them to
enquire about which of their products contained alcohol and if so in what
percentage. These direct contacts were supplemented by searching medical
databases and the Internet for additional information. RESULTS: We identified 11
manufacturers of asthma inhalers, seven of which produced pressurised
metered-dose inhalers; of these, six were willing to disclose the requested
information, and information on the seventh product was obtained from an
alternative valid source of information. Most CFC preparations contain alcohol,
but CFC- and alcohol-free preparations do exist. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians need to
be aware that the majority of CFC-free inhalers contain alcohol. Alcohol-free,
and CFC- and alcohol-free, preparations are available for the delivery of both
rescue and preventative treatment and these should be considered for use in
those patients who may have concern about alcohol-based treatments.
-----
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2008 Mar 11 [Epub ahead of print]
The impact of home cleaning on quality of life for homes with
asthmatic children.
Barnes C, Kennedy K, Gard L, Forrest E, Johnson L, Pacheco F, Hu F, Amado M,
Portnoy J.
Treatment with common household bleach containing hypochlorite destroys dust
mites and denatures protein allergens. The purpose of this study was to
determine if home use of hypochlorite products results in lowered exposure to
bacteria, fungi, and protein allergens and improved quality of life (QOL) for
asthmatic persons in the home. Asthmatic and nonasthmatic households containing
at least three persons (between 2 and 17 years of age) were recruited.
Households were supplied one of three sets of cleaning products (regular
products, some containing hypochlorite; regular products plus three additional
productswith dilute hypochlorite; control, no products). Participants were
supplied with cleaning instructions and asthma education. The control group was
instructed to clean as usual. Participants completed general health and QOL
questionnaires. Asthmatic participants completed an additional asthma QOL
questionnaire. Families participated in the study for 8 weeks and completed the
full set of questions every 2 weeks. Homes were visited at the beginning of the
study and twice thereafter at monthly intervals. Samples evaluated were surface
bacteria, viable and nonviable airborne spores, and dust antigen content.
Reductions in surface bacteria, airborne fungal spores, and dust antigen levels
were achieved. Significant improvement in general health parameters was seen for
the asthmatic product groups over the control group. Significant improvement in
general QOL andasthma-specific QOL was seen in the asthmatic group. Emphasis on
cleaning and cleaning education combined with hypochlorite-based cleaning
supplies resulted in significantly improved QOL for families with asthmatic
children.
-----
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Mar;121(3):607-13.
Natural history of asthma: persistence versus progression-does
the beginning predict the end?
Panettieri RA Jr, Covar R, Grant E, Hillyer EV, Bacharier L.
Pulmonary, Allergy & Critical Care Division, University of Pennsylvania,
Philadelphia, PA 19104-3403, USA. rap@mail.med.upenn.edu
Environmental exposures during the early years and airway obstruction that
develops during this time, in conjunction with genetic susceptibility, are
important factors in the development of persistent asthma in childhood.
Established risk factors for childhood asthma include frequent wheezing during
the first 3 years, a parental history of asthma, a history of eczema, allergic
rhinitis, wheezing apart from colds, and peripheral blood eosinophilia, as well
as allergic sensitization to aeroallergens and certain foods. Risk factors for
the development of asthma in adulthood remain ill defined. Moreover, reasons for
variability in the clinical course of asthma--persistence in some individuals
and progression in others--remain an enigma. The distinction between disease
persistence and disease progression suggests that these are different entities
or phenotypes. There is currently no consensus on whether disease progression
requires either airway inflammation or airway remodeling or the combination of
the two. For patients with irreversible airway obstruction, inflammation might,
in part, be necessary but perhaps not entirely sufficient to induce the
irreversible component, some of which could be attributed to alterations in the
structure of the bronchial wall. Intervening with intermittent or daily inhaled
corticosteroids in high-risk infants and children does not prevent disease
progression or impaired lung growth. These findings, however, might not apply to
adults, and further study in adults is needed to determine the effect of inhaled
corticosteroid therapy on disease progression.
-----
Prim Care Respir J. 2008 Feb;17(1):39-45.
Does continuous use of inhaled corticosteroids improve outcomes
in mild asthma? A double-blind randomised controlled trial.
Reddel HK, Belousova EG, Marks GB, Jenkins CR.
Woolcock Institute of Medical Research and University of Sydney, Camperdown, New
South Wales, Australia.
AIM: To compare the effects of fluticasone and placebo on asthma control in
patients with mild asthma. METHOD: Adults with FEV1 >80% predicted and reliever
use <2 times/week were randomised to receive fluticasone 250 mcg/day or placebo
double-blind for 11 months. Exacerbations were treated with four weeks'
fluticasone 500 mcg/day. Primary outcomes were electronically-recorded morning
PEF and FEV1, analysed by mixed model regression. RESULTS: 44 subjects were
randomised (23-fluticasone, 21-placebo). Fluticasone led to significantly better
morning FEV1 (mean difference 5.4% predicted, p<0.0001), morning PEF, clinic
spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide levels, and airway hyperresponsiveness, but
there were no differences in reliever use, symptoms or quality of life. Fewer
patients had mild exacerbations on fluticasone (22% vs 62%, p=0.02). CONCLUSION:
The goals of asthma treatment include not only control of symptoms, but also
prevention of future adverse outcomes such as exacerbations - which can occur
even in mild asthma. This study showed that treatment with low dose inhaled
corticosteroids led to significant improvements in lung function, exacerbations,
and in pathophysiological predictors of future risk, even though symptoms were
minimal at entry. For patients with mild asthma, discussion about treatment
needs to consider not only short-term benefit, side effects and cost, but also
long-term reduction of risk. This study was completed prior to mandatory
registration for clinical trials.
-----
Free Radic Res. 2008 Jan;42(1):94-102.
Lycopene-rich treatments modify noneosinophilic airway
inflammation in asthma: proof of concept.
Wood LG, Garg ML, Powell H, Gibson PG.
Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute,
John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia. lisa.wood@newcastle.edu.au
Antioxidant-rich diets are associated with reduced asthma prevalence. However,
direct evidence that altering intake of antioxidant-rich foods affects asthma is
lacking. The objective was to investigate changes in asthma and airway
inflammation resulting from a low antioxidant diet and subsequent use of
lycopene-rich treatments. Asthmatic adults (n=32) consumed a low antioxidant
diet for 10 days, then commenced a randomized, cross-over trial involving 3 x 7
day treatment arms (placebo, tomato extract (45 mg lycopene/day) and tomato
juice (45 mg lycopene/day)). With consumption of a low antioxidant diet, plasma
carotenoid concentrations decreased, Asthma Control Score worsened, %FEV(1) and
%FVC decreased and %sputum neutrophils increased. Treatment with both tomato
juice and extract reduced airway neutrophil influx. Treatment with tomato
extract also reduced sputum neutrophil elastase activity. In conclusion, dietary
antioxidant consumption modifies clinical asthma outcomes. Changing dietary
antioxidant intake may be contributing to rising asthma prevalence. Lycopene-rich
supplements should be further investigated as a therapeutic intervention.
-----
Acta Biomed. 2007 Dec;78(3):233-45.
Inhalatory therapy training: a priority challenge for the
physician.
Melani AS.
Respiratory Physiopathology and Rehabilitation, Cardiothoracic Department,
Polyclinic Le Scotte, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy.
a.melani@ao-siena.toscana.it
Patients with asthma and COPD commonly use inhaled drugs. The 3 types of
currently available devices for inhaled therapy (Metered-dose inhaler, dry
powder inhaler, and nebulizer) are clinically equivalent. However, since many
different inhalers are available for inhaled therapy, the choice of the delivery
device is important for optimizing the results of aerosol therapy.Traditional
press-and-breathe Metered Dose Inhalers (pMDIs) have recently improved their
ecological appeal, can be used in every clinical and environmental situation,
their dosing is convenient and highly reproducible, but their efficient delivery
remains highly technique dependent. Poor inhalation technique can be minimised
by the use of add-on valved holding chambers, which are seldom used in the
clinical practice possibly because they are cumbersome. Breath Actuated devices
(BAIs), such as Dry Powder Inhalers (DPIs), which are environmental-friendly,
safe, effective, reliable, portable and self-contained, overcome problems of
handbreath co-ordination associated with pMDIs usage, but their use is also
undermined by common errors of inhalation technique in real life. Nebulizers are
cumbersome and time-comsuming for use and maintenance, but their use needs less
cooperation than inhalers. Although nebulizer practice is not always
evidence-based, some patients, mainly elderly prefer nebulizers for regular
long-term usage. Despite the introduction of newer devices, clear advantages of
a particular delivery system over other inhalers in terms of compliance,
preference, and cost-effectiveness are not currently available. The objective of
an ideal and easy-to use inhaler is far from reality. Patient education is the
critical factor in the use and misuse of delivery devices and effectiveness of
aerosol therapy. The choice of the device has to be tailored according to the
patient's needs, situation, and preference.Whatever the chosen inhaler,
education from health caregivers has a key-role for improving inhaler technique
and compliance. Differences among delivery devices represent another challenge
to patient use and caregiver instruction.
-----
J Community Health Nurs. 2007 Winter;24(4):237-51.
Development, implementation and evaluation of a new adult asthma self-management
program.
Tousman S, Zeitz H, Taylor LD, Bristol C.
Department of Health Psychology, Jefferson College of Health Sciences, Roanoke,
VA 24031, USA. stousman@jchs.edu
The purpose of the research was to develop, implement, and evaluate a new adult
asthma self-management program with a multidisciplinary perspective. Small
groups of adults met for 2 hr for 7 consecutive weekly meetings. Participants
were asked to practice asthma specific behaviors (including peak expiratory flow
monitoring, avoidance/removal of asthma triggers, and controller medication
adherence) and general lifestyle behaviors (including drinking water, practicing
relaxation, washing hands, and exercising). Learner-centered teaching techniques
such as interactive communication and social support were utilized to help
participants practice self-management behaviors including problem-solving and
goal-setting. Paired sample t-tests included statistically significant
improvements in asthma knowledge, asthma specific quality of life (QOL), asthma
specific behaviors such as peak flow monitoring and general life style behaviors
such as frequency of daily exercise. These results provide evidence that this
new adult asthma self-management program can lead to both knowledge acquisition
and behavioral changes.
-----
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2007;17(6):399-405.
Efficacy and quality of life with once-daily sublingual immunotherapy with
grasses plus olive pollen extract without updosing.
Moreno-Ancillo A, Moreno C, Ojeda P, Domínguez C, Barasona MJ, García-Cubillana
A, Martín S.
Hospital Virgen del Puerto, Plasencia, Spain.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled
study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy and tolerance of once-daily
sublingual immunotherapy without updosing. Reduction in symptoms and medication
use was the primary endpoint. METHODS: One hundred five patients with rhinitis
and/or asthma due to grass and olive sensitization were randomized to be treated
with placebo or active sublingual immunotherapy with the SLITone grass mix plus
olive pollen extract for 6 months before the 2005 pollen season. Patients
recorded symptoms and medication intake for 8 weeks during the pollen seasons in
2004 (n=37) and 2005 (n=85). RESULTS: Allergic symptoms were significantly
decreased in the active immunotherapy group (P = .004) but not in the placebo
group. There were no differences in scores between groups during the 2005 pollen
season. Subjective assessments on a visual analog scale and a quality-of-life
questionnaire indicated an improvement in actively treated patients with
significant differences in both symptoms and medication use (P = .006). The rate
of systemic adverse reactions was comparable in the 2 groups. No anaphylactic or
severe adverse reactions were reported. Local adverse reactions, which were more
common in the active immunotherapy group, were mostly immediate, were limited to
the lips and mouth, and did not require treatment. CONCLUSION: Once-daily
sublingual immunotherapy without updosing was well tolerated. The actively
treated patients showed a significant reduction in symptom and medication scores
and an improvement in their quality of life although there were no significant
differences between the groups probably due to the low allergen season in which
the study was evaluated.
-----
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Dec;115(12):1691-5.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions used to reduce exposure
to house dust and their effect on the development and severity of asthma.
MacDonald C, Sternberg A, Hunter PR.
School of Medicine, Health Policy and Practice, University of East Anglia,
Norwich, United Kingdom.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed whether any household dust reduction intervention has
the effect of increasing or decreasing the development or severity of atopic
disease. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches on household intervention and atopic
disease were conducted in January 2007 in EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane
Central Register of Controlled Trials. No date or language restriction was
placed on the literature search. DATA EXTRACTION: We included randomized
controlled trials comparing asthma outcomes in a household intervention group
with either placebo intervention or no intervention. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fourteen
studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight recruited antenatally and measured
development of atopic disease. Six recruited known atopic individuals and
measured disease status change. Meta-analyses on the prevention studies found
that the interventions made no difference to the onset of wheeze but made a
significant reduction in physician-diagnosed asthma. Meta-analysis of lung
function outcomes indicated no improvement due to the interventions but found a
reduction in symptom days. Qualitatively, health care was used less in those
receiving interventions. However, in one study that compared intervention,
placebo, and control arms, the reduction in heath care use was similar in the
placebo and intervention arms. CONCLUSIONS: This review suggests that there is
not sufficient evidence to suggest implementing hygiene measures in an attempt
to improve outcomes in existing atopic disease, but interventions from birth in
those at high risk of atopy are useful in preventing diagnosed asthma but not
parental-reported wheeze.
-----
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007 Dec 17;43(2):179-186 [Epub ahead of print]
Effects of montelukast on subjective and objective outcome measures in preschool
asthmatic children.
Moeller A, Lehmann A, Knauer N, Albisetti M, Rochat M, Johannes W.
Swiss Pediatric Respiratory Research Group, Division of Respiratory Medicine,
University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
It is well accepted that control of airway inflammation is crucial for overall
asthma control. Hence, efficient anti-inflammatory therapy is important for
disease control. Therefore, we studied the effect of a treatment with
montelukast on subjective and objective measures in preschool asthmatic children
with insufficient control of airway inflammation, illustrated by increased
fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). Thirty-one preschool children (2.5-5
years) were included in this study. Children with FeNO >/= 10 ppb at the first
visit received montelukast 4 mg as a first line therapy or an add-on therapy to
their baseline treatment (group 1). Therapy was not changed at first visit in
children with FeNO < 10 ppb (group 2). Symptom scores, FeNO, lung function
(forced oscillation, Rrs8Hz) and airway responsiveness to adenosine
5'-monophosphate (AMP) were assessed at visits 1 and 2 eight weeks apart. There
was a significant decrease in FeNO (median [interquartile range]; 12.9 [3.7] vs.
7.6 [6.85] ppb, P = 0.011), Rrs8Hz (mean +/- SD; 10.03 +/- 3.1 vs. 8.72 +/- 2.43
hPa.s/L; P = 0.047) and symptom scores (2[2] vs. 1.5[2], P = 0.034) and a
significant increase in the provocative AMP dose (2.65 +/- 2.1 vs. 4.54 +/-
1.05; P = 0.015) in group 1 but not in group 2. First line or add-on treatment
of oral montelukast in preschool children with mild to moderate asthma and
elevated FeNO, decreased levels of FeNO, improved airway responsiveness to AMP,
lung function and symptom scores. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2008; 43:179-186. (c) 2007
Wiley-Liss, Inc.
-----
Respir Med. 2007 Dec 13 [Epub ahead of print]
Effect of incorrect use of dry powder inhalers on management of patients with
asthma and COPD.
Lavorini F, Magnan A, Christophe Dubus J, Voshaar T, Corbetta L, Broeders M,
Dekhuijzen R, Sanchis J, Viejo JL, Barnes P, Corrigan C, Levy M, Crompton GK.
Unità Funzionale di Medicina Respiratoria, Università Degli Studi di Firenze,
Italy.
BACKGROUND: Incorrect usage of inhaler devices might have a major influence on
the clinical effectiveness of the delivered drug. This issue is poorly addressed
in management guidelines. METHODS: This article presents the results of a
systematic literature review of studies evaluating incorrect use of established
dry powder inhalers (DPIs) by patients with asthma or chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD). RESULTS: Overall, we found that between 4% and 94% of
patients, depending on the type of inhaler and method of assessment, do not use
their inhalers correctly. The most common errors made included failure to exhale
before actuation, failure to breath-hold after inhalation, incorrect positioning
of the inhaler, incorrect rotation sequence, and failure to execute a forceful
and deep inhalation. Inefficient DPI technique may lead to insufficient drug
delivery and hence to insufficient lung deposition. As many as 25% of patients
have never received verbal inhaler technique instruction, and for those that do,
the quality and duration of instruction is not adequate and not reinforced by
follow-up checks. CONCLUSIONS: This review demonstrates that incorrect DPI
technique with established DPIs is common among patients with asthma and COPD,
and suggests that poor inhalation technique has detrimental consequences for
clinical efficacy. Regular assessment and reinforcement of correct inhalation
technique are considered by health professionals and caregivers to be an
essential component of successful asthma management. Improvement of asthma and
COPD management could be achieved by new DPIs that are easy to use correctly and
are forgiving of poor inhalation technique, thus ensuring more successful drug
delivery.
-----
Chest. 2007 Dec;132(6):1876-81.
Effects of montelukast treatment and withdrawal on fractional exhaled nitric
oxide and lung function in children with asthma.
Montuschi P, Mondino C, Koch P, Ciabattoni G, Barnes PJ, Baviera G.
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of the
Sacred Heart, Largo F. Vito, 1, 00168 Rome, Italy. pmontuschi@rm.unicatt.it.
BACKGROUND: Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) reduce fractional exhaled
nitric oxide (Feno) concentrations in children with asthma, but the effect of
LTRA withdrawal on Feno and lung function is unknown. We aimed to study the
effect of treatment and withdrawal of montelukast, a LTRA, on airway
inflammation as reflected by Feno and lung function in children with asthma.
METHODS: A double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, parallel group study
was undertaken in 14 atopic children with mild persistent asthma who were
treated with oral montelukast (5 mg/d for 4 weeks) and 12 atopic children with
mild persistent asthma who received matching placebo. A follow-up visit was
performed 2 weeks after montelukast or placebo withdrawal. RESULTS: Montelukast
reduced Feno concentrations by 17% (p = 0.067), an effect that was more
pronounced (35%) [p = 0.0029] when children with seasonal atopy who were exposed
to relevant allergens during the treatment phase were excluded from analysis (n
= 3). Compared to those at the end of treatment, Feno concentrations were
increased 2 weeks after montelukast withdrawal (p = 0.023) concomitant with a
reduction in absolute FEV(1) values (p = 0.011), FEV(1) percentage of predicted
values (p = 0.006), FEV(1)/FVC ratio (p = 0.002), and forced expiratory flow at
25% to 75% of FVC values (p = 0.021). These changes were not observed in the
placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: LTRAs reduce Feno concentrations in children with
asthma, and withdrawal can result in increased Feno values and worsening of lung
function in children with asthma.
-----
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Dec;120(6):1269-75.
Time for a paradigm shift in asthma treatment: from relieving bronchospasm to
controlling systemic inflammation.
Bjermer L.
Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, University Hospital, Lund,
Sweden. leif.bjermer@med.lu.se
Inflammation is a key pathology in asthma. In the central airways local
inflammation leads to irreversible remodeling and airway dysfunction. Complex
inflammatory changes also occur in the nose, sinuses, and small airways. In
particular, rhinitis and asthma are linked by a common pathogenic process with
common inflammatory cells, mediators, and cytokines. Cross-communication between
the airways and bone marrow through inflammatory mediators in the circulation
leads to systemic propagation of airway inflammation. Treatment of asthma has
traditionally focused on relieving bronchospasm with beta(2)-agonists, which do
not affect inflammation. Treatment of eosinophilic inflammation in the central
airways with inhaled corticosteroids reduces local inflammation and improves
pulmonary function but does not improve the systemic manifestations of asthma.
If asthma is a systemic disease, the underlying systemic pathology should be
targeted by identifying common disease mediators, mechanisms, or both that are
triggered only during active disease. Of currently available therapies,
leukotriene receptor antagonists block the action of cysteinyl leukotrienes and
thus improve both asthma and rhinitis and other conditions systemically linked
with asthma. Other potential treatments include receptor-blocking molecules and
synthesis inhibitors related to eicosanoid inflammation. Treatment of asthma as
a systemic disease requires clinical trials that evaluate the effects of new
treatments on both lung function and the wider systemic pathology.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD001281.
Long-acting beta2-agonists versus theophylline for maintenance
treatment of asthma.
Tee A, Koh M, Gibson P, Lasserson T, Wilson A, Irving L.
BACKGROUND: Theophylline and long acting beta-2 agonists are bronchodilators
used for the management of persistent asthma symptoms, especially nocturnal
asthma. They represent different classes of drug with differing side-effect
profiles. OBJECTIVES: To assess the comparative efficacy, safety and
side-effects of long-acting beta-2 agonists and theophylline in the maintenance
treatment of adults and adolescents with asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched
the Cochrane Airways Group trials register and reference lists of articles. We
also contacted authors of identified RCTs for other relevant published and
unpublished studies and pharmaceutical manufacturers. Most recent search:
November 2006. SELECTION CRITERIA: All included studies were RCTs involving
adults and children with clinical evidence of asthma. These studies must have
compared oral sustained release and/or dose adjusted theophylline with an
inhaled long-acting beta-2 agonist. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: In original
review, two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data,
similarly in this update two reviewers undertook this. Study authors were
contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen studies with a
total of 1344 participants met the inclusion criteria of the review. They were
of varying quality. There was no significant difference between salmeterol and
theophylline in FEV(1) predicted (6.5%; 95% CI -0.84 to 13.83). However,
salmeterol treatment led to significantly better morning PEF (mean difference
16.71 L/min, 95% CI 8.91 to 24.51) and evening PEF (mean difference 15.58 L/min,
95% CI 8.33 to 22.83). Salmeterol also reduced the use of rescue medication.
Formoterol, used in two studies was reported to be as effective as theophylline.
Bitolterol, used in only one study, was reported to be less effective than
theophylline. Participants taking salmeterol experienced fewer adverse events
than those using theophylline (Parallel studies: Relative Risk 0.44; 95% CI 0.30
to 0.63, Risk Difference -0.11; 95% CI -0.16 to -0.07, Numbers Needed to Treat (NNT)
9; 95% CI 6 to 14). Significant reductions were reported for central nervous
system adverse events (Relative Risk 0.50; 95% CI 0.29 to 0.86, Risk Difference
-0.07; 95% CI -0.12 to -0.02, NNT 14; 95% CI 8 to 50) and gastrointestinal
adverse events (Relative Risk 0.30; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.55, Risk Difference -0.11;
95% CI -0.16 to -0.06, NNT 9; 95% CI 6 to 16). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Long-acting
beta-2 agonists, particularly salmeterol, are more effective than theophylline
in improving morning and evening PEF, but are not significantly different in
their effect on FEV1. There is evidence of decreased daytime and nighttime
short-acting beta-2 agonist requirement with salmeterol. Fewer adverse events
occurred in participants using long-acting beta-2 agonists (salmeterol and
formoterol) as compared to theophylline.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jul 18;(3):CD000195.
Corticosteroids for preventing relapse following acute
exacerbations of asthma.
Rowe B, Spooner Ch, Ducharme F, Bretzlaff J, Bota G.
BACKGROUND: Acute asthma is responsible for many emergency department (ED)
visits annually. Between 12 to 16% will relapse to require additional
interventions within two weeks of ED discharge. Treatment of acute asthma is
based on rapid reversal of bronchospasm and reducing airway inflammation.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the benefit of corticosteroids (oral, intramuscular, or
intravenous) for the treatment of asthmatic patients discharged from an acute
care setting (i.e. usually the emergency department) after assessment and
treatment of an acute asthmatic exacerbation. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the
Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register and reference lists of articles. In
addition, authors of all included studies were contacted to locate unpublished
studies. The most recent search was run in October 2006. SELECTION CRITERIA:
Randomized controlled trials comparing two types of corticosteroids (oral,
intra-muscular, or inhaled) with placebo for outpatient treatment of asthmatic
exacerbations in adults or children. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review
authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors
were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: Six trials involving
374 people were included. One study used intramuscular corticosteroids, five
studies used oral corticosteroids. The review was split into two reviews and
although the latest search yielded no additional placebo controlled trials an
additional IM study was included.Significantly fewer patients in the
corticosteroid group relapsed to receive additional care in the first week
(Relative risk (RR) 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.2 to 0.74). This
favourable effect was maintained over the first 21 days (RR 0.47; 95% CI 0.25 to
0.89) and there were fewer subsequent hospitalizations (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.13 to
0.95). Patients receiving corticosteroids had less need for beta(2)-agonists
(mean difference (MD) -3.3 activations/day; 95% CI -5.6 to -1.0). Changes in
pulmonary function tests (SMD 0.045; 95% CI -0.47 to 0.56) and side effects (SMD
0.03; 95% CI -0.38 to 0.44) in the first 7 to 10 days, while rarely reported,
showed no significant differences between the treatment groups. Statistically
significant heterogeneity was identified for the side effect results; all other
outcomes were homogeneous. From these results, as few as ten patients need to be
treated to prevent relapse to additional care after an exacerbation of asthma.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A short course of corticosteroids following assessment for
an asthma exacerbation significantly reduces the number of relapses to
additional care, hospitalizations and use of short-acting beta(2)-agonist
without an apparent increase in side effects. Intramuscular and oral
corticosteroids are both effective.
-----
Arch Dis Child. 2007 Jul 18; [Epub ahead of print]
Daily versus As-Needed Inhaled Corticosteroid for Mild Persistent
Asthma*
*The Helsinki Early Intervention Childhood Asthma Study.
Turpeinen MT, Nikander K, Pelkonen A, Syvänen P, Sorva R, Raitio H, Malmberg P,
Juntunen-Backman K, Haahtela T.
Department of Allergy, Helsinki University Hospital, Finland.
OBJECTIVE: To compare inhaled budesonide given daily or as-needed in mild
persistent childhood asthma. Patients, design and INTERVENTIONS: 176 children
aged 5-10 years with newly detected asthma were randomized into three treatment
groups: (1) continuous budesonide (400 microg twice daily for 1 month, 200
microg twice daily for Months 2-6, 100 microg twice daily for Months 7-18); (2)
budesonide, identical treatment to Group 1 during Months 1-6, then budesonide
for exacerbations as-needed for Months 7-18; and (3) disodium cromoglycate (DSCG)
10 mg three-times daily for Months 1-18. Exacerbations were treated with
budesonide 400 microg twice daily for 2 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Lung
function, the number of exacerbations and growth. RESULTS: Compared with DSCG
the initial regular budesonide treatment resulted in a significantly better
improvement of lung function, fewer exaxerbations and a small but significant
decline in growth velocity. After 18 months, however, the lung function
improvements did not differ between the groups. During Months 7-18 patients
receiving continuous budesonide treatment had significantly fewer exacerbations
(mean 0.97), compared with 1.69 in Group 2 and 1.58 in Group 3. The number of
asthma free days did not differ between regular and intermittent budesonide
treatment. Growth velocity was normalized during continuous low-dose budesonide
and budesonide therapy given as needed. The latter was associated with catch-up
growth. CONCLUSIONS: Regular use of budesonide afforded better asthma control
but more systemic effect than use of budesonide as needed. The dose of ICS could
be reduced as soon as asthma is controlled. A proportion of children does not
seem to need continuous ICS treatment.
-----
Eur J Med Res. 2007 Jun 27;12(6):255-63.
Efficacy of the Combination of Fluticasone Propionate and
Salmeterol in Patients with Moderate Persistent Asthma within a "Real-life"
Setting.
Trautmann M, Banik N, Tews JT, Jörres RA, Nowak D.
Institute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational and Environmental Medicine,
Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Ziemssenstr. 1, 80336 Munich, Germany.
dennis.nowak@med.uni-muenchen.de.
There are only few data on the effectiveness of recommended drug therapies in
asthma under "real-life" conditions without targeted intervention. The study
aimed at analyzing the efficacy of the fixed combination of the inhaled
corticosteroid fluticasone propionate and the long-acting beta2-agonist
salmeterol (FS) for maintenance treatment of moderate persistent asthma (GINA
stage 3) within an observational design, mimicking "real-life" as closely as
possible. The fixed combination was compared with other forms of treatment that
were in accordance with treatment guidelines (pooled comparison (PC) group).
Patients kept a diary during a 12-month observation period and routine visits
were taken for surveillance. Among 596 patients, 371 patients belonged to the FS
and 225 patients to the PC group. The proportion of symptom-free days (SFD) was
higher in the FS than PC group (median, 76 vs 67%; p=0.002). Furthermore, the
change in asthma control score (p<0.0001) and the percent increase in FEV1
(p<0.05) after 12 months were greater. There was a lower percentage of patients
with hospital stays (p<0.05). The proportions of episode-free or sick-leave days
and the number of routine or emergency visits did not significantly differ
between groups. Direct costs of treatment per SFD were lower in the FS than PC
group (median, 3.78 vs 4.41 Euro; p<0.05). We conclude that in a setup close to
clinical practice treatment of patients with moderate persistent asthma with the
fixed combination of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol has beneficial
effects compared to other forms of therapy and can improve cost-efficiency.
-----
Isr Med Assoc J. 2007 Jun;9(6):472-5.
The beneficial effects of Xolair (omalizumab) as add-on therapy
in patients with severe persistent asthma who are inadequately controlled
despite best available treatment (GINA 2002 step IV)—the Israeli arm of the
INNOVATE study.
Sthoeger ZM, Eliraz A, Asher I, Berkman N, Elbirt D.
Department of Medicine B, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
BACKGROUND: Patients with severe persistent asthma despite GINA 2002 step 4
treatment are at risk for asthma-related morbidity and mortality. This study
constitutes the Israeli arm of the international INNOVATE study. OBJECTIVES: To
determine the efficacy and safety of Xolair as an add-on treatment in patients
with severe persistent asthma. METHODS: Asthma patients (age 12-75 years) not
controlled with high dose inhaled corticosteroids and long-active beta-2
agonists were randomized to receive either Xolair or placebo for 28 weeks in a
double-blind study in two Israeli centers. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients, 20
females and 13 males, mean age 54 +/- 11.7 years, were included in the Israeli
arm of the INNOVATE study. There were neither major adverse events nor
withdrawals from the study. Xolair (omalizumab) significantly reduced the rate
of clinically significant asthma exacerbations (55% reduction) and all
asthma-related emergency visits (53% reduction). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with
severe persistent difficult-to-treat asthma, despite regular treatment with LABA
and inhaled corticosteroids (GINA 2002 step 4), Xolair is a safe and effective
treatment.
-----
Adv Ther. 2007 May-Jun;24(3):463-77.
Evaluation of Albuterol 1.25 mg and 0.62 mg for Nebulization in
6- to 12-Year-Old Children With Moderately Severe Asthma.
Kemp J, Turck CJ, York JM.
Department of Pediatrics, Division of Immunology and Allergy, University of
California at San Diego, California.
To assess the efficacy and safety of 2 different strengths of a manufactured
albuterol solution for nebulization (AccuNeb(R); DEY, L.P., Napa, Calif), 349
children with moderate to severe asthma were enrolled in this prospective,
multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. For 4 wk, children 6 to 12
y old were randomly assigned to 1.25 mg (A1) or 0.62 mg (A2) albuterol or
placebo (P), nebulized 3 times daily for 4 weeks. Pulmonary function and safety
were evaluated at weeks 0, 2, and 4 (visits 2-4). Nonparametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis
and Wilcoxon's rank-sum) were used to compare treatments. Primary endpoint (week
4, %Delta area under the curve [AUC] forced expiratory volume in 1 sec [FEV(1)])
results for A1, A2, and P were 90.3%*h*, 73.6%*h*, and 34.2%*h. Secondary
assessments for A1, A2, and P were as follows: (1) week 2, %DeltaAUC FEV1
(99.5%*h*, 104.5%*h*, and 43.6%*h(; (2) maximum FEV1 (28.6%*, 26.3%*, and
13.4%); and (3) duration of effect (116.8 min*, 115.9 min*, and 39.2 min). A2
was more effective in children 10 y of age or younger and in children 11 to 12 y
of age who weighed </=40 kg or had less severe asthma; A1 was more effective in
children 11 to 12 y of age who weighed >40 kg or had more severe asthma. Adverse
events (occurring in 47% of children) were considered unrelated to drug
treatment. Observations on electrocardiogram (notably QTc interval) were similar
to those for placebo. A1 and A2 appeared effective in improving pulmonary
function and were well tolerated in children aged 6 to 12 y.
-----
Int J Psychiatry Med. 2007;37(1):23-8.
Bupropion in the treatment of outpatients with asthma and major
depressive disorder.
Brown ES, Vornik LA, Khan DA, Rush AJ.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at
Dallas, 75390-8849, USA. Sherwood.Brown@UTSouthwestern.edu
OBJECTIVE: Depressive disorders are common in asthma. Despite the high
prevalence, antidepressant therapy in asthma patients with depression remains
under-investigated. The objective of this pilot study was to investigate the use
of bupropion for depression and anxiety in depressed asthma patients. METHOD: We
conducted a 12-week open-label study of bupropion in 18 depressed asthma
patients. Participants were assessed with the Hamilton Rating Scale for
Depression (HAM-D-17), Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), Inventory of
Depressive Symptomatology--Self-Report (IDS-SR), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ)
and spirometry at baseline and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12. RESULTS: Significant
baseline to exit improvements were observed on the HAM-D-17 (mean change = 4.72,
SD = 7.78, p = 0.02) and the HAM-A (mean change = 2.12, SD = 3.97, p = 0.04).
Based on the HAM-D-17 scores, 27.8% of the patients were responders and 16.7%
were remitters. Significant correlations were found between changes in ACQ score
and HAM-D-17 r = 0.73, p = 0.001), ACQ score and IDS-SR r = 0.58, = 0.012), and
FEV1% Predicted and HAM-D-17 r = -0.66, p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion
treatment was associated with significant improvements in depression and anxiety
symptoms in asthma patients. Improvements in asthma correlated significantly
with improvements in depression.
-----
Respir Med. 2007 Apr 4; [Epub ahead of print]
Formoterol, montelukast, and budesonide in asthmatic children:
Effect on lung function and exhaled nitric oxide.
Miraglia Del Giudice M, Piacentini GL, Capasso M, Capristo C, Maiello N, Boner
AL, Capristo AF.
Dipartimento di Pediatria, Seconda Universita di Napoli, Napoli, Italy.
BACKGROUND: It has been proposed that asthma control may be achieved in part by
minimizing airway inflammation. The simultaneous effects of inhaled steroids
associated with long-acting beta-agonists and leukotriene antagonists on
pulmonary function and airway inflammation are still largely unexplored in
children with moderate persistent asthma. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was
to investigate the effects of add-on therapy with long-acting beta-agonists and
leukotriene antagonists on FEV(1) and exhaled nitric oxide levels (FE(NO)) in
children. METHODS: Forty-eight steroid-naive atopic asthmatic children, 7-11
years of age, were randomly treated in four groups for two consecutive one-month
periods, as follows: (1) first month: budesonide 200mug twice daily; second
month: budesonide 400mug twice daily; (2) first month: budesonide 200mug twice
daily+formoterol 9mug twice daily; second month: budesonide 200mug twice
daily+montelukast 5mg once daily; (3) first month: budesonide 200mug twice
daily+montelukast 5mg once daily; second month budesonide 200mug+formoterol 9mug
twice daily; (4) first and second month: budesonide 400mug twice daily. RESULTS:
All treatments resulted in a significant increase in lung function and a
decrease in FE(NO) compared with values at baseline. Budesonide+montelukast in
combination was the most effective treatment for reducing FE(NO) levels.
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that add-on therapy with montelukast plus
low-dose budesonide is more effective than the addition of long-acting
beta-agonists or doubling the dose of budesonide for controlling FE(NO) in
asthmatic children.
-----
Mayo Clin Proc. 2007 Apr;82(4):414-21.
Asthma treatment in a population-based cohort: putting step-up
and step-down treatment changes in context.
Yawn BP, Wollan PC, Bertram SL, Lowe D, Butterfield JH, Bonde D, Li JT.
Department of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, 210 Ninth St SE, Rochester, MN
55904 USA. E-mail: Yawnx002@umn.edu.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and types of visits related to modifications
in the intensity of asthma medications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively
reviewed the medical records of adults (aged 18-40 years) and children (aged
6-17 years) living in Olmsted County, Minnesota, to evaluate changes in asthma
medications by dose and drug class and site and type of visit (routine vs
unscheduled) at the time of changes. All records from all visits were reviewed
for each patient to identify asthma-related visits at all sites of care from
January 1, 2002, through December 31, 2003. RESULTS: The study consisted of 397
adults and children. In 255 patients, 597 asthma medication changes occurred.
Step-up changes usually occurred because of an exacerbation or loss of control
of asthma and adhered to the medication hierarchy in the national asthma
guidelines. Twenty step-up changes involved skipping inhaled corticosteroid
(ICS) monotherapy and moving directly to combined ICSs plus a long-acting
beta-agonist (LABA). Lack of documentation of asthma symptom frequency or
interference with activities made it impossible to determine whether these
'skips' were appropriate. Only 78 physician-directed step-down changes were
documented, usually to a lower dose of combined ICSs and LABAs or a move from
combined ICSs and LABAs to anti-inflammatory monotherapy. Patients initiated
additional step-down changes between encounters. Step-down changes occurred at
routine or follow-up asthma visits, but the limited number of such visits
provided few opportunities for step-down care. CONCLUSION: The continuing
episodic-style treatment of asthma aimed at exacerbation management facilitates
step-up changes in asthma therapy. The dearth of asthma evaluation visits
limited opportunities to step down use of asthma medications and to provide
long-term asthma management.
-----
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr 6; [Epub ahead of print]
Severe asthma in adults: What are the important questions?
Chanez P, Wenzel SE, Anderson GP, Anto JM, Bel EH, Boulet LP, Brightling CE,
Busse WW, Castro M, Dahlen B, Dahlen SE, Fabbri LM, Holgate ST, Humbert M, Gaga
M, Joos GF, Levy B, Rabe KF, Sterk PJ, Wilson SJ, Vachier I.
>From INSERM U454 and Clinique des Maladies Respiratoires, Montpellier.
The term severe refractory asthma (SRA) in adults applies to patients who remain
difficult to control despite extensive re-evaluation of diagnosis and management
following an observational period of at least 6 months by a specialist. Factors
that influence asthma control should be recognized and adequately addressed
prior to confirming the diagnosis of SRA. This report presents statements
according to the literature defining SRA in order address the important
questions. Phenotyping SRA will improve our understanding of mechanisms, natural
history, and prognosis. Female gender, obesity, and smoking are associated with
SRA. Atopy is less frequent in SRA, but occupational sensitizers are common
inducers of new-onset SRA. Viruses contribute to severe exacerbations and can
persist in the airways for long periods. Inflammatory cells are in the airways
of the majority of patients with SRA and persist despite steroid therapy. The
T(H)2 immune process alone is inadequate to explain SRA. Reduced responsiveness
to corticosteroids is common, and epithelial cell and smooth muscle
abnormalities are found, contributing to airway narrowing. Large and small
airway wall thickening is observed, but parenchymal abnormalities may influence
airway limitation. Inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators are the mainstay
of treatment, but patients with SRA remain uncontrolled, indicating a need for
new therapies.
-----
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Apr 6; [Epub ahead of print]
Achieving and maintaining asthma control in an urban pediatric
disease management program: The Breathmobile Program.
Jones CA, Clement LT, Morphew T, Choi Kwong KY, Hanley-Lopez J, Lifson F, Opas
L, Guterman JJ.
>From the Division of Allergy and Immunology; the Department of Pediatrics at
the Los Angeles County+University of Southern California Medical Center and Keck
School of Medicine at the University of Southern California.
BACKGROUND: National guidelines suggest that, with appropriate care, most
patients can control their asthma. The probabilities of children achieving and
maintaining control with ongoing care are unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to
evaluate the degree to which children in a lower socioeconomic urban setting
achieve and maintain control of asthma with regular participation in a disease
management program that provides guideline-based care. METHODS:
Interdisciplinary teams of asthma specialists use mobile clinics to offer
ongoing care at schools and county clinics. A guideline-derived construct of
asthma control is recorded at each visit. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred
eighty-five enrollees were eligible to evaluate the time to first achieve
control, and 1591 patients were eligible to evaluate subsequent control
maintenance. Depending on severity, 70% to 87% of patients with persistent
asthma achieved control by visit 3, and 89% to 98% achieved control by visit 6.
Subsequent control maintenance was highly variable. Thirty-nine percent of
patients displayed well-controlled asthma (control at >90% of subsequent
visits), whereas 13% displayed difficult-to-control asthma (<50% of subsequent
visits). Patients from each baseline severity category were found in each group.
Maintenance of control was influenced by physician-estimated compliance with the
treatment plan, baseline severity, and the interval between clinic visits.
CONCLUSIONS: Many children can achieve asthma control with regular visit
intervals and guideline-based care; however, long-term control can be highly
variable among patients in all severity categories. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: These
findings highlight the need and feasibility for systematically tracking each
patient's clinical response to individualize therapy and guide the use of
population management strategies.
-----
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Apr;23(4):721-30.
Asthma control in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis
receiving add-on montelukast therapy for 12 months: a retrospective
observational study.
Borderias L, Mincewicz G, Paggiaro PL, Guilera M, Sazonov Kocevar V, Taylor SD,
Badia X.
Pneumology Department, San Jorge Hospital, Huesca, Spain.
BACKGROUND: Montelukast, a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist, is approved
for treatment of both asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). No studies to date have
examined whether montelukast can improve asthma control over a long period of
time in patients with seasonal AR and asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate asthma
control and use of asthma-related medical resources by patients with
inadequately controlled mild to moderate persistent asthma and seasonal AR who
required addition of montelukast as part of routine care. METHODS: This
multicenter, 24-month, pre-post retrospective observational study included
patients receiving current inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy (alone or in
combination with long-acting beta-agonist [LABA]), who received add-on treatment
with montelukast for 12 consecutive months. The incidence of asthma attacks,
defined as emergency department visit, hospitalization, or oral corticosteroid
use for asthma, was compared for the year before and the year after addition of
montelukast to therapy. RESULTS: For the 696 patients from Italy, Poland, and
Spain who were included in the analyses, the proportion of patients experiencing
an asthma attack declined from 31.5% in the year before to 10.1% (p < 0.001) the
year after addition of montelukast to therapy. Proportions of patients with an
asthma-related emergency room visit, hospitalization, and oral corticosteroid
use declined from 18.7% to 3.9%, from 5.2% to 1.4%, and from 17.5% to 5.9% (all
p < 0.01), respectively. The incidence of these outcomes declined in all three
countries, regardless of baseline asthma severity or asthma therapy (ICS alone
or ICS + LABA). Important study limitations include the possibility of selection
bias or missing medical chart data in this retrospective study design. Also
noteworthy is the inclusion of only those patients who remained persistent with
montelukast therapy. Therefore, the results of the study are relevant for
patients who remain persistent with montelukast therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Addition
of montelukast to current ICS therapy improved long-term asthma control and
resulted in substantial reductions in asthma-related resource use by patients
with mild or moderate persistent asthma and concomitant seasonal AR who were
persistent with montelukast therapy in this retrospective observational study.
-----
Paediatr Drugs. 2007;9(2):107-18.
Immunomodulatory effects of macrolide antibiotics in respiratory
disease: therapeutic implications for asthma and cystic fibrosis.
Sharma S, Jaffe A, Dixon G.
Portex Unit, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
The macrolide antibiotics are a family of related 14- or 15-membered lactone
ring antibiotics. There has been recent interest in the beneficial effects of
these drugs as immune modulators in respiratory conditions in children. Cystic
fibrosis (CF) and asthma, both of which occur in childhood, have an underlying
inflammatory component and are associated with significant morbidity. The
pathogenesis of both conditions is poorly understood but several molecular
mechanisms have been suggested.In CF, these mechanisms broadly involve altered
chloride transport and alteration of the airway surface liquid with disordered
neutrophilic inflammation. There is much evidence for a proinflammatory
propensity in CF immune effector and epithelial cells and many studies indicate
that macrolides modulate these inflammatory processes. Recent studies have
confirmed a clinical improvement in CF following treatment with macrolides, but
the exact mechanisms by which they work are unknown. Asthma is likely to
represent several different phenotypes but in all of these, airway obstruction,
bronchial hyperresponsiveness, and inflammation are central processes. Results
from trials using macrolides have suggested an improvement in clinical
outcome.The putative mechanisms of macrolide immunomodulatory action include
improvement of the primary defense mechanisms, inhibition of the
bacteria-epithelial cell interaction, modulation of the signaling pathway and
chemokine release, and direct neutrophil effects. Putative mechanisms of
phenotypic modulation have also been proposed involving interactions with nitric
oxide, endothelin-1, and bronchoconstriction, endothelial growth factors and
airway remodeling, and bioactive phospholipids in both CF and asthma.Further
characterization of these effects and development of targeted designer drugs
will further expand our therapeutic repertoire and lead to improved quality and
quantity of life for patients with CF and asthma.
-----
Chest. 2007 Mar 30; [Epub ahead of print]
Internet based self-management offers an opportunity to achieve
better asthma control in adolescents.
van der Meer V, van Stel HF, Detmar SB, Otten W, Sterk PJ, Sont JK.
Dept of Medical Decision Making and Dept of Public Health and Primary Care,
Leiden University Medical Center.
BACKGROUND: Internet and short message service are emerging tools in chronic
disease management of adolescents, but few data exist on barriers and benefits
of internet-based asthma self-management. Our objective was to reveal perceived
barriers and benefits by adolescents with well and poorly controlled asthma to
current and internet-based asthma management. Methods Ninety-seven adolescents
with mild to moderate persistent asthma monitored asthma control on a designated
website. After four weeks 35 adolescents participated in eight focus groups.
Participants were stratified on age, gender and asthma control level. We used
qualitative and quantitative methods to analyze the written focus group
transcripts. Results Limited self-efficacy to control asthma was a significant
barrier to current asthma management in adolescents with poor asthma control
(65%) compared to adolescents with good asthma control (17%) (p<0.01). The
former group revealed several benefits from internet based asthma
self-management: feasible electronic monitoring, easily accessible information,
email communication and use of an electronic action plan. Personal benefits
included the ability to react to change and to optimize asthma control. Patients
with poor asthma control were able and ready to incorporate internet based
asthma self-management for a long period of time (65%), whereas patients with
good control were not (11%) (p<0.01). Conclusions Our findings reveal a need for
support of self-management in adolescents with poorly controlled asthma that can
be met by application of novel information and communication technologies.
Internet based self-management should therefore target adolescents with poor
asthma control.
-----
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 29;356(13):1327-37. Comment in: N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar
29;356(13):1367-9.
Asthma control during the year after bronchial thermoplasty.
Cox G, Thomson NC, Rubin AS, Niven RM, Corris PA, Siersted HC, Olivenstein R,
Pavord ID, McCormack D, Chaudhuri R, Miller JD, Laviolette M; AIR Trial Study
Group.
St. Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. coxp@mcmaster.ca
BACKGROUND: Bronchial thermoplasty is a bronchoscopic procedure to reduce the
mass of airway smooth muscle and attenuate bronchoconstriction. We examined the
effect of bronchial thermoplasty on the control of moderate or severe persistent
asthma. METHODS: We randomly assigned 112 subjects who had been treated with
inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonists (LABA) and in
whom asthma control was impaired when the LABA were withdrawn to either
bronchial thermoplasty or a control group. The primary outcome was the frequency
of mild exacerbations, calculated during three scheduled 2-week periods of
abstinence from LABA at 3, 6, and 12 months. Airflow, airway responsiveness,
asthma symptoms, the number of symptom-free days, use of rescue medication, and
scores on the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) and the Asthma Control
Questionnaire (ACQ) were also assessed. RESULTS: The mean rate of mild
exacerbations, as compared with baseline, was reduced in the bronchial-thermoplasty
group but was unchanged in the control group (change in frequency per subject
per week, -0.16+/-0.37 vs. 0.04+/-0.29; P=0.005). At 12 months, there were
significantly greater improvements in the bronchial-thermoplasty group than in
the control group in the morning peak expiratory flow (39.3+/-48.7 vs.
8.5+/-44.2 liters per minute), scores on the AQLQ (1.3+/-1.0 vs. 0.6+/-1.1) and
ACQ (reduction, 1.2+/-1.0 vs. 0.5+/-1.0), the percentage of symptom-free days
(40.6+/-39.7 vs. 17.0+/-37.9), and symptom scores (reduction, 1.9+/-2.1 vs.
0.7+/-2.5) while fewer puffs of rescue medication were required. Values for
airway responsiveness and forced expiratory volume in 1 second did not differ
significantly between the two groups. Adverse events immediately after treatment
were more common in the bronchial-thermoplasty group than in the control group
but were similar during the period from 6 weeks to 12 months after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Bronchial thermoplasty in subjects with moderate or severe asthma
results in an improvement in asthma control. (ClinicalTrials.gov number,
NCT00214526 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical
Society.
-----
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2007 Jan-Feb;28(1):44-9.
Allergen immunotherapy: present and future.
Finegold I.
Institute of Allergy, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital, New York, New York 10022,
USA. drfinegold@aol.com
In this article the present and future of immunotherapy is discussed under four
general headings: (1) present understanding of mechanisms of immunotherapy, (2)
present status of clinical efficacy of immunotherapy, (3) changes/challenges of
immunotherapy on the horizon, and (4) future of immunotherapy. The mechanisms of
immunotherapy are well delineated and show that immunotherapy alters the natural
course of allergic disease. There is a reduction in inflammation, nonspecific
hyperresponsiveness, prevention of new sensitivities, and progression of
allergic rhinitis to asthma. Further efficacy continues after cessation of
immunotherapy. Complete asthma control does not occur with pharmacotherapy.
There is a need to recognize that adding treatment for asthma's allergic
component with immunotherapy may be the solution to achieving the unmet goals of
asthma therapy. There are new developments and challenges to the role of
immunotherapy on the horizon but, at present, subcutaneous immunotherapy is the
specific allergen treatment of choice in the United States.
-----
J Aerosol Med. 2007 Spring;20(1):1-6.
Formoterol turbuhaler is as effective as salbutamol diskus in
relieving adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction in children.
Amirav I, Yacobov R, Luder AS.
Department of Paediatrics, Sieff Hospital, Safed, Israel. amirav@012.net.il
Salbutamol diskus (SD) and formoterol turbuhaler (FT) are both fast-acting
beta(2) agonists delivery systems used to relieve bronchoconstriction, such as
that which accompanies acute exacerbations of asthma. Although SD (which is used
only on an as-needed basis) is flow independent, the FT (currently recommended
for regular therapy) requires a forceful deep inspiration. Thus, the efficacy of
FT in children with bronchoconstriction may be inferior to that of SD. We have
studied the bronchodilatation response induced by FT after a standard
adenosine-5-monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge, and compared it to that
induced by SD, and placebo. Seventeen children (mean age +/- SD 10.3 +/- 1.7 y)
with asthma underwent three AMP challenges, each time followed by inhalation of
either placebo, SD (200 mug) or FT (9 mug), in random order. Patterns of
bronchodilatation (forced expiratory volume in 1 second recovery) to 90% of
baseline levels were compared. Both SD and FT were significantly better than
placebo. FT was slightly better than SD, but this difference was not
statistically significant. FT and SD are both effective bronchodilators and may
be of comparable efficiency during acute bronchoconstriction in young children
with asthma.
-----
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Jan 2; [Epub ahead of print]
Air trapping in mild and moderate asthma: Effect of inhaled
corticosteroids.
Tunon-de-Lara JM, Laurent F, Giraud V, Perez T, Aguilaniu B, Meziane H,
Basset-Merle A, Chanez P.
>From Universite Bordeaux 2, F-33076 Bordeaux, Institut National de la Sante et
de la Recherche Medicale U885, F-33076 Bordeaux, Centre Hospitalier
Universitaire (CHU) de Bordeaux, F-33076 Bordeaux, Service des Maladies
Respiratoires.
BACKGROUND: Air trapping reflects small airway obstruction in asthma and can be
assessed quantitatively by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).
Hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) is deposited across all
sizes of airways, including the small ones. However, its long-term effect on air
trapping remains unknown in uncontrolled asthma. OBJECTIVES: To compare the
effect of inhaled corticosteroids of different particle size-HFA-BDP and
fluticasone propionate (FP)-on lung attenuation in mild-to-moderate uncontrolled
asthma. METHODS: A randomized study was performed to analyze the effect of
HFA-BDP (400 mug/d) or FP (500 mug/d) given over a period of 3 months to
patients with uncontrolled mild-to-moderate asthma. HRCT was performed with
spirometric gating, and lung attenuation was measured at residual volume and at
pulmonary total capacity. The difference between inspiratory and expiratory
attenuation was calculated as an air trapping index. RESULTS: Twenty-five out of
58 patients had abnormal air trapping and could be included in the study. Lung
attenuation significantly diminished in the posterior zones of the lung after a
3-month treatment with HFA-BDP or FP, but the difference between the groups was
not significant. Adjusted mean variations of the air trapping index from
baseline to treatment completion were 34.3 (11.2, 57.3) and 27.3 (6.4, 48.2) for
the HFA-BDP and FP groups, respectively. However, the reduction of air trapping
area was more pronounced in the group treated with HFA-BDP. CONCLUSION: Inhaled
corticosteroids decrease air trapping in uncontrolled asthma regardless of their
particle size. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In mild-to-moderate asthma, air trapping
assessed by HRCT may be a new outcome related to the control of the disease.
-----
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007 Jan;132(1/02):33-39.
[Safety of long acting beta2-agonists in the management of
asthma.]
[Article in German]
Gillissen A, Berdel D, Buhl R, Criee CP, Kardos P, Magnussen H, Rabe KF, Rolke
M, Vogelmeier C, Worth H, Virchow JC.
Robert Koch-Klinik, Thoraxzentrum des Klinikums St. Georg, Leipzig.
Modern drug treatment of asthma has resulted in an impressive reduction of
mortality, rates of exacerbation and the frequency of emergency treatment. This
effect is in particular the result of the introduction of long-term therapy with
inhaled corticosteroids (ICS), which have also been shown to significantly
reduce the mortality rate from asthma. By combining long-acting beta2 agonists
with ICS administration the exacerbation rate can be further reduced, even when
the ICS dosage is reduced. For this reason combination therapy with long-acting
beta2 agonists and ICS should always be prescribed in patients with unstable
asthma when on appropriately dosed ICS administration alone. The recently
published SMART study (Salmeterol Multicenter Asthma Research Trial) has again
revitalized a long-lasting discussion about the increased risk of severe asthma
exacerbations and of asthma-related death caused by beta2 agonist therapy. In
this trial there was a small but significant increase in asthma-related deaths
of patients receiving salmeterol compared with patients on placebo. Based on
previous reports and as a result of this recent findings, the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) imposed a "black box" warning for the use of the
long-acting beta2 agonist salmeterol, including the fixed combination of
salmeterol/fluticasone, as well as of formoterol. The warning appropriately
alerts doctors to findings of which they should be aware. What are the
consequences for clinicians prescribing long-acting beta2 agonists? Although
such long-acting agonists provide sustained bronchodilation and improve asthma
control, they should only be used in adults and children with stage III asthma
who have not adequately responded to other asthma controlling medications, such
as low-to-medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). They must be prescribed
only in combination with ICS.
-----
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Dec;22(12):786-93.
Single-dose oral dexamethasone in the emergency management of
children with exacerbations of mild to moderate asthma.
Altamimi S, Robertson G, Jastaniah W, Davey A, Dehghani N, Chen R, Leung K,
Colbourne M.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of British
Columbia and British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of a single dose of oral dexamethasone (Dex)
versus 5 days of twice-daily prednisolone (Pred) in the management of mild to
moderate asthma exacerbations in children. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective,
randomized, double-blinded trial of children 2 to 16 years of age who presented
to the emergency department (ED) with acute mild to moderate asthma
exacerbations. Subjects received single-dose oral Dex (0.6 mg/kg to a maximum of
18 mg) or oral Pred (1 mg/kg per dose to a maximum of 30 mg) twice daily for 5
days. After discharge, subjects were contacted by telephone at 48 h to assess
symptoms and reevaluated in the ED in 5 days. The primary outcome was the number
of days needed for Patient Self Assessment Score to return to baseline (score of
0-0.5). MAIN RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the 2 groups were similar. The
mean number of days needed for Patient Self Assessment Score to return to
baseline (0-0.5) in the Dex and Pred groups were 5.21 versus 5.22 days,
respectively (mean difference, -0.01; confidence interval, -0.70, 0.68).
Pulmonary index scores were similar in both groups at initial presentation,
initial ED discharge and at the day 5 follow-up visit. At the first visit, mean
time to discharge was 3.5 h (+/-1.93)for Dex and 4.3 h (+/-3.67) for Pred (mean
difference, -0.8; confidence interval, -1.8, 0.2). Initial admission rate was 9%
(Dex) versus 13.4% (Pred). There was no significant difference in the number of
salbutamol therapies needed in the ED nor at home after discharge. For subjects
discharged home, the admission rate after initial discharge was 4.9% (Dex)
versus 1.8% (Pred), resulting in overall hospital admission rates of 13.4% (Dex)
and 14.9% (Pred). CONCLUSION: A single dose of oral Dex (0.6 mg/kg) is no worse
than 5 days of twice-daily prednisolone (1 mg/kg per dose) in the management of
children with mild to moderate asthma.
-----
Neth J Med. 2006 Dec;64(11):417-21.
The safety of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with asthma.
Mueller PS, Schak KM, Barnes RD, Rasmussen KG.
Divisions of General Internal Medicine, Tertiary Psychiatry and Psychology, and
Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anaesthesia, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Background: Patients with depression and other psychiatric disorders being
considered for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) may also have asthma. Since ECT
requires the administration of general anaesthesia, it is assumed that extra
care should be taken with asthmatic patients before and during ECT. We sought to
investigate the safety of ECT in asthmatic patients. Methods: A retrospective
review was conducted of the medical records of all of the patients with
currently active and managed asthma who underwent ECT for severe depressive
syndromes at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, between 1 January 1998, and 30
June 2006. Results: Thirty-four patients with asthma who also underwent ECT were
identified. Of these, 27 (79%) were women. The median age was 45 years (range
23-84 years). All 34 patients were using asthma medications daily at the time of
ECT. The 34 patients underwent a total of 459 ECT sessions. Four (12%) patients
experienced exacerbation of their asthma on a total of five occasions. Each
exacerbation was successfully treated with standard asthma medications, and all
four patients completed their courses of ECT. Conclusion: ECT in patients with
asthma appears to be safe. Although exacerbation of asthma after ECT was rare in
our series, a prospective study would be needed to determine the precise risk of
pulmonary omplications of ECT in asthmatic patients.
-----
J Asthma. 2006 Dec;43(10):765-72.
The Efficacy and Safety of Mometasone Furoate Delivered via a Dry
Powder Inhaler for the Treatment of Asthma.
Meltzer EO, Wenzel S.
Allergy and Asthma Medical Group and Research Center, University of California,
San Diego, California, USA.
Inhaled corticosteroids are the gold standard of daily therapy for effective
control of all stages of persistent asthma. For this review of the new inhaled
corticosteroid mometasone furoate, a MEDLINE/PubMed search using the terms "mometasone
furoate AND asthma" found 57 articles, 17 of which presented data from efficacy
and safety studies reviewed herein. In clinical trials, once-daily evening
dosing of mometasone furoate delivered via dry powder inhaler (200 or 400 mu
g/day) was effective in patients with mild to moderate asthma previously treated
with short-acting beta2-agonists alone and in those previously maintained on
inhaled corticosteroid therapy. In patients with severe asthma, mometasone
furoate 400 mu g twice daily eliminated or reduced the need for oral prednisone
while improving lung function, asthma symptoms, and quality of life. Clinical
studies have shown that mometasone furoate is generally well tolerated and has
minimal systemic activity at recommended doses. In conclusion, mometasone
furoate provides primary care and specialty physicians with a safe, effective,
and convenient option to meet the challenges of asthma management.
-----
Crit Care. 2006 Dec 20;10(6):241 [Epub ahead of print]
Clinical review: Use of helium-oxygen in critically ill patients.
Gainnier M, Forel JM.
Service de Reanimation Medicale, CHU de Marseille, Hopital Sainte Marguerite, Bd
de Sainte Marguerite, 13274 Marseille Cedex 9, France,. marc.gainnier@ap-hm.fr.
ABSTRACT: Use of helium-oxygen (He/O2) mixtures in critically ill patients is
supported by a reliable and well understood theoretical rationale and by
numerous experimental observations. Breathing He/O2 can benefit critically ill
patients with severe respiratory compromise mainly by reducing airway resistance
in obstructive syndromes such as acute asthma and decompensated chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease. However, the benefit from He/O2 in terms of
respiratory mechanics diminishes rapidly with increasing oxygen concentration in
the gaseous mixture. Safe use of He/O2 in the intensive care unit requires
specific equipment and supervision by adequately experienced personnel. The
available clinical data on inhaled He/O2 mixtures are insufficient to prove that
this therapy has benefit with respect to outcome variables. For these reasons,
He/O2 is not currently a standard of care in critically ill patients with acute
obstructive syndromes, apart from in some, well defined situations. Its role in
critically ill patients must be more precisely defined if we are to identify
those patients who could benefit from this therapeutic approach.
Previous Asthma
Research: 2002-2006
The
Asthma File also contains summaries of past
research that has shown promise and may still be standard
practice among many physicians.
To
download earlier
research findings on Asthma, click
HERE.
©Copyright 1992-date by The Center
for Current Research. The Asthma File is a proprietary compilation
of the Center for Current Research. The information in the File
is solely for your use, and the use of your family, friends, and
doctors. The information is the property of the individual researchers
and institutions that produced it. It is an infringement of copyright
law to attempt to "resell" the information as it is
presented here.
|