| |
Important Note: The following information
is provided for your education. It should not be relied upon
for personal diagnosis or treatment. If you believe that a particular
therapy applies to you or someone you care about, be sure to
consult a doctor before trying it.
Amblyopia Research: 2002-2006
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Oct 18; [Epub ahead of print]
Factors affecting the stability of visual function following
cessation of occlusion therapy for amblyopia.
Tacagni DJ, Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR.
Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
AIM: To identify factors that predict which children with amblyopia are at
greatest risk of regression of visual acuity (VA) following the cessation of
occlusion therapy. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was performed of 182
children (mean age at cessation of treatment; 5.9+/-1.6 years) who had undergone
occlusion therapy for unilateral amblyopia, and had been followed up at least
once within 15 months of cessation. Statistical analysis was used to identify
whether change in VA following treatment cessation had any association with
various factors, including the child's age, type of amblyopia, degree of
anisometropia, initial severity of amblyopia, binocular vision status, length
and dose of occlusion therapy, and VA response to treatment. RESULTS: At 1 year,
follow-up from treatment cessation, children with "mixed" amblyopia (both
anisometropia and strabismus) demonstrated significantly (p=0.03) greater
deterioration in VA (0.11+/-0.11 log units) than children with only
anisometropia (0.02+/-0.08 log units) or only strabismus (0.05+/-0.10 log
units). However, none of the other factors investigated were found to be
significant predictors. CONCLUSION: This study supports previous research that
it is possible to identify those children most at risk of deterioration in VA
following cessation of occlusion therapy. The presence of mixed amblyopia was
the only risk factor identified in this study. Management of amblyopia should
take this into account, with a more intensive follow-up recommended for those
with both anisometropia and strabismus (mixed) amblyopia.
-----
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2006 Jul-Aug;43(4):207-11; quiz 231-2.
Treatment options for anisohyperopia.
Granet DB, Christian W, Gomi CE, Banuelos L, Castro E.
Department of Ophthalmology, UCSD/Ratner Children's Eye Center, University of
California, San Diego, California 92093-0946, USA.
PURPOSE: To investigate the success of conventional methods in the treatment of
anisohyperopic amblyopia. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients
with anisohyperopic amblyopia seen at the UCSD/ Ratner Children's Eye Center
during a 42-month period was performed. The charts of 35 patients aged 3 to 14
years (mean age, 6.8 years) with 1.5 to 6.5 diopters of anisohyperopia were
reviewed. Main outcome measures were the difference in refractive error and the
pre- and post-treatment Snellen equivalent distance acuities. Treatment
consisted of one or a combination of the following: spectacles, contact lenses,
patching, and atropine. Binocularity was determined using the Titmus test.
Compliance to treatment also was rated. RESULTS: Thirteen (37.1%) patients were
treated with spectacles alone, 11 (31.5%) were treated with a combination of
atropine and patching, 8 (22.8%) were treated with patching alone, 2 (5.7%)
received blurring contact lenses, and 1 (2.9%) patient was treated with atropine
alone. The average pretreatment visual acuity was 20/108, with an improvement to
an average of 20/27 at the termination of treatment. Ninety-four percent of the
patients obtained a visual acuity of 20/40 or better. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional
methods of treatment are effective in improving vision and binocular status in
anisohyperopia. Depending on the patient, only spectacles may be required.
-----
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jul;142(1):132-140.
Relationship between anisometropia, patient age, and the
development of amblyopia.
Donahue SP.
Departments of Ophthalmology, Pediatrics, and Neurology, Vanderbilt University
School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, USA. sean.donahue@vanderbilt.edu
PURPOSE: Previous studies evaluating the effect of anisometropia on amblyopia
development have been biased because subject selection occurred as a result of
decreased acuity. Photoscreening identifies anisometropic children in a manner
that is not biased by acuity, and allows an opportunity to evaluate how patient
age influences the prevalence and depth of amblyopia. DESIGN: Retrospective
observational study of preschool children with anisometropia. METHODS: A
statewide preschool photoscreening program screened 119,311 children and
identified 792 with anisometropia >1.0 diopters. We correlated age with visual
acuity and amblyopia depth. Results were compared with 562 strabismic children
similarly identified. RESULTS: Only 14% (six of 44) of anisometropic children
aged 1 year or younger had amblyopia. Amblyopia was detected in 40% (32 of 80)
of 2-year-olds, 65% (119 of 182) of 3-year-olds, and 76% of 5-year-olds.
Amblyopia depth also increased with age. Moderate amblyopia prevalence was 2%
(ages 0 to 1), 17% (age 2), and rose steadily to 45% (ages 6 to 7). Severe
amblyopia was rare for children aged 0 to 3, 9% at age 4, and 14% at age 5.
Children with strabismus had a relatively stable prevalence (30% ages 0 to 2;
42% ages 3 to 4; and 44% ages 5 to 7) and depth of amblyopia. CONCLUSIONS:
Younger children with anisometropia have a lower prevalence and depth of
amblyopia than older children. By age 3, when most children undergo traditional
screening, amblyopia has usually already developed. New vision screening
technologies that allow early detection of anisometropia provide
ophthalmologists an opportunity to intervene early, perhaps retarding or even
preventing the development of amblyopia.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;3:CD005136.
Interventions for stimulus deprivation amblyopia.
Hatt S, Antonio-Santos A, Powell C, Vedula SS.
International Centre for Eye Health, c/o Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group, London
School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK WC1E 7HT.
sarahrhatt@gmail.com
BACKGROUND: Stimulus deprivation amblyopia (SDA) develops due to an obstruction
to the clear passage of light, preventing clear formation of an image on the
retina for example, cataract, ptosis (droopy eyelid). It is particularly severe
and can be resistant to treatment and the visual prognosis is often poor.
Stimulus deprivation amblyopia is rare and precise estimates of prevalence
difficult to come by; it probably constitutes less than 3% of all cases of
amblyopia. In developed countries most patients present under the age of one; in
less developed parts of the world presentation is likely to be significantly
later than this.The mainstay of treatment is patching of the better-seeing eye
but regimes vary, treatment is difficult to execute and results are often
disappointing. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this review were to evaluate the
effectiveness of occlusion treatment for SDA, determine the optimum treatment
regime and factors that may affect outcome. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials - CENTRAL (which contains the
Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register) on The Cochrane Library (2006,
Issue 1), MEDLINE (1996 to April 2006), EMBASE (1980 to April 2006) and LILACS
(Latin American and Caribbean Literature on Health Sciences) (to November 2004).
There were no date or language restrictions. SELECTION CRITERIA: We aimed to
include randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of subjects with
unilateral SDA defined as worse than 0.2 LogMAR or equivalent. There were no
restrictions with respect to age, gender, ethnicity, co-morbidities, medication
use, and the number of participants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors
independently assessed study abstracts identified by the electronic searches.
MAIN RESULTS: No trials were identified that met the inclusion criteria.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: It is not possible to conclude how effective treatment for
SDA is or which treatment regime produces the best results. There is a need for
further study in this area.
-----
Strabismus. 2006 Jun;14(2):71-3.
Medical treatment of amblyopia: present state and perspectives.
Campos EC, Fresina M.
Ophthalmology Service, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. campos@alma.unibo.it
A brief review is provided on the role of experimental modulation of the visual
system during its plastic period. The importance of several substances has been
demonstrated. Potential clinical applications of available studies on the
treatment of amblyopia are summarized. The role of the dopaminergic system and
particularly of dopamine in amblyopia are also discussed. The results of the use
of cytidine-5'-diphosphocholine (citicoline) in amblyopia are evaluated in
detail. The advantages of and indications for an association of citicoline with
part-time occlusion are also discussed. Finally, new administration modalities
of citicoline, more detailed evaluation of its efficacy, and the use of new
substances are briefly analyzed.
-----
J AAPOS. 2006 Jun;10(3):193-7.
Strabismus and amblyopia in bilateral Peters anomaly.
Najjar DM, Christiansen SP, Bothun ED, Summers CG.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
55455, USA.
BACKGROUND: Peters anomaly is a rare form of anterior segment dysgenesis in
which abnormal cleavage of the anterior chamber occurs at the end of the third
week of gestation. We examined the prevalence of strabismus and amblyopia and
analyzed predictive factors for their development, as well as the visual outcome
and associated anomalies in patients with bilateral Peters anomaly. METHODS:
Using a retrospective review, we identified 25 consecutive patients with
bilateral Peters anomaly who were observed between August 1995 and February
2005. Ocular structural and systemic anomalies, amblyopia therapy, visual
acuity, and binocular alignment at last visit were recorded. Fisher's exact test
was used to identify any association between defined predictive factors and the
development of strabismus. RESULTS: Mean follow-up time was 5.1 year (range,
0.5-21 years). Median age at presentation was 2.5 months (range, 1 day to 13
years). Penetrating keratoplasties were performed on 34 eyes in 20 patients.
Final best-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/25 to no light perception.
Thirteen of 18 patients with recorded motility (72%) developed strabismus:
esotropia (n = 7), exotropia (n = 5), and variable (n = 1); one also had
dissociated vertical deviation. Patients with equal vision were either
orthophoric (n = 4) or had intermittent esotropia (n = 1), whereas strabismus
occurred in 100% of patients whose vision was asymmetric by more than 1.5
octaves. Asymmetric vision was the only statistically significant predictive
factor for the development of strabismus (P = 0.002). Amblyopia treatment
resulted in improved vision in 3 of 5 patients. CONCLUSION: Strabismus occurs
frequently in bilateral Peters anomaly. Asymmetric vision, (because of ocular
structural anomalies) postoperative complications, and amblyopia may predispose
to strabismus. Despite ocular structural limitations, amblyopia therapy is
recommended in the aggressive rehabilitation of these eyes.
-----
J AAPOS. 2006 Jun;10(3):193-7.
Strabismus and amblyopia in bilateral peters anomaly.
Najjar DM, Christiansen SP, Bothun ED, Summers CG.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Background: Peters anomaly is a rare form of anterior segment dysgenesis in
which abnormal cleavage of the anterior chamber occurs at the end of the third
week of gestation. We examined the prevalence of strabismus and amblyopia and
analyzed predictive factors for their development, as well as the visual outcome
and associated anomalies in patients with bilateral Peters anomaly. Methods:
Using a retrospective review, we identified 25 consecutive patients with
bilateral Peters anomaly who were observed between August 1995 and February
2005. Ocular structural and systemic anomalies, amblyopia therapy, visual
acuity, and binocular alignment at last visit were recorded. Fisher's exact test
was used to identify any association between defined predictive factors and the
development of strabismus. Results: Mean follow-up time was 5.1 year (range,
0.5-21 years). Median age at presentation was 2.5 months (range, 1 day to 13
years). Penetrating keratoplasties were performed on 34 eyes in 20 patients.
Final best-corrected visual acuity ranged from 20/25 to no light perception.
Thirteen of 18 patients with recorded motility (72%) developed strabismus:
esotropia (n = 7), exotropia (n = 5), and variable (n = 1); one also had
dissociated vertical deviation. Patients with equal vision were either
orthophoric (n = 4) or had intermittent esotropia (n = 1), whereas strabismus
occurred in 100% of patients whose vision was asymmetric by more than 1.5
octaves. Asymmetric vision was the only statistically significant predictive
factor for the development of strabismus (P = 0.002). Amblyopia treatment
resulted in improved vision in 3 of 5 patients. Conclusion: Strabismus occurs
frequently in bilateral Peters anomaly. Asymmetric vision, (because of ocular
structural anomalies) postoperative complications, and amblyopia may predispose
to strabismus. Despite ocular structural limitations, amblyopia therapy is
recommended in the aggressive rehabilitation of these eyes.
-----
Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):904-12. Comment in: Ophthalmology. 2006
Jun;113(6):893.
A randomized trial to evaluate 2 hours of daily patching for
strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia in children.
Wallace DK; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Edwards AR, Cotter SA,
Beck RW, Arnold RW, Astle WF, Barnhardt CN, Birch EE, Donahue SP, Everett DF,
Felius J, Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Melia M, Repka MX, Sala NA, Silbert DI, Weise KK.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Drive, Suite 350, Tampa, FL
33647, USA. pedig@jaeb.org
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 hours of daily patching (combined with 1 hour of
concurrent near visual activities) with a control group of spectacle wear alone
(if needed) for treatment of moderate to severe amblyopia in children 3 to 7
years old. DESIGN: Prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial (46 sites).
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty children 3 to 7 years old with best-corrected
amblyopic-eye visual acuity (VA) of 20/40 to 20/400 associated with strabismus,
anisometropia, or both who had worn optimal refractive correction (if needed)
for at least 16 weeks or for 2 consecutive visits without improvement.
INTERVENTION: Randomization either to 2 hours of daily patching with 1 hour of
near visual activities or to spectacles alone (if needed). Patients were
continued on the randomized treatment (or no treatment) until no further
improvement was noted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Best-corrected VA in the amblyopic
eye after 5 weeks. RESULTS: Improvement in VA of the amblyopic eye from baseline
to 5 weeks averaged 1.1 lines in the patching group and 0.5 lines in the control
group (P = 0.006), and improvement from baseline to best measured VA at any
visit averaged 2.2 lines in the patching group and 1.3 lines in the control
group (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: After a period of treatment with spectacles, 2
hours of daily patching combined with 1 hour of near visual activities modestly
improves moderate to severe amblyopia in children 3 to 7 years old.
-----
Ophthalmology. 2006 Jun;113(6):895-903. Comment in: Ophthalmology. 2006
Jun;113(6):893.
Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia in children with refractive
correction.
Cotter SA; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group; Edwards AR, Wallace DK,
Beck RW, Arnold RW, Astle WF, Barnhardt CN, Birch EE, Donahue SP, Everett DF,
Felius J, Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Melia M, Repka MX, Sala NA, Silbert DI, Weise KK.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Drive, Suite 350, Tampa, FL
33647, USA. pedig@jaeb.org
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of refractive correction alone for the
treatment of untreated anisometropic amblyopia in children 3 to <7 years old.
DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, noncomparative intervention. PARTICIPANTS:
Eighty-four children 3 to <7 years old with untreated anisometropic amblyopia
ranging from 20/40 to 20/250. METHODS: Optimal refractive correction was
provided, and visual acuity (VA) was measured with the new spectacle correction
at baseline and at 5-week intervals until VA stabilized or amblyopia resolved.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maximum improvement in best-corrected VA in the amblyopic
eye and proportion of children whose amblyopia resolved (interocular difference
of < or =1 line) with refractive correction alone. RESULTS: Amblyopia improved
with optical correction by > or =2 lines in 77% of the patients and resolved in
27%. Improvement took up to 30 weeks for stabilization criteria to be met. After
stabilization, additional improvement occurred with spectacles alone in 21 of 34
patients observed in a control group of a subsequent randomized trial, with
amblyopia resolving in 6. Treatment outcome was not related to age, but was
related to better baseline VA and lesser amounts of anisometropia. CONCLUSION:
Refractive correction alone improves VA in many cases and results in resolution
of amblyopia in at least one third of 3- to <7-year-old children with untreated
anisometropic amblyopia. Although most cases of resolution occur with moderate
(20/40-20/100) amblyopia, the average 3-line improvement in VA resulting from
treatment with spectacles may lessen the burden of subsequent amblyopia therapy
for those with denser levels of amblyopia.
-----
Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2006 May 16; [Epub ahead of print]
Orthoptic indications for contact lens wear.
Evans BJ.
Institute of Optometry, 56-62 Newington Causeway, London SE1 6DS, UK; Department
of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, Northampton Square, London
EC1V 0HB, UK.
Orthoptic anomalies are prevalent: they are encountered in at least 5% of
patients seen in a typical primary eyecare practice. Several cases are reviewed
that highlight the role of contact lenses in treating orthoptic anomalies. In
particular, contact lenses are the preferred optical approach to the correction
of anisometropia, and it is often argued that anisometropia should be corrected
as young as possible. However, fitting contact lenses to patients, particularly
children, with anisometropic amblyopia has been problematic because there is no
immediate binocular acuity improvement when the contact lenses are inserted
which reduces patient motivation. Continuous wear with silicone hydrogels
represents a breakthrough for these cases and some illustrative case studies are
given. The visual deficit in amblyopia can be reduced in some cases solely by
fitting contact lenses, without the need for occlusion therapy. Other orthoptic
uses of contact lenses are reviewed including: correcting motor deviations,
occlusion, and infantile onset nystagmus. It is concluded that there are
orthoptic anomalies where contact lenses are the preferred mode of correction.
It is in patients' best interest for practitioners to discuss contact lenses in
these cases.
-----
Lancet. 2006 Apr 22;367(9519):1343-51.
Amblyopia.
Holmes JM, Clarke MP.
Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
55905, USA. holmes.jonathan@mayo.edu
Results from recent randomised clinical trials in amblyopia should change our
approach to screening for and treatment of amblyopia. Based on the current
evidence, if one screening session is used, screening at school entry could be
the most reasonable time. Clinicians should preferably use age-appropriate
LogMAR acuity tests, and treatment should only be considered for children who
are clearly not in the typical range for their age. Any substantial refractive
error should be corrected before further treatment is considered and the child
should be followed in spectacles until no further improvement is recorded, which
can take up to 6 months. Parents and carers should then be offered an informed
choice between patching and atropine drops. Successful patching regimens can
last as little as 1 h or 2 h a day, and successful atropine regimens as little
as one drop twice a week. Intense and extended regimens might not be needed in
initial therapy.
-----
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar-Apr;16(2):214-8.
Visual outcome after excimer laser refractive surgery in adult
patients with amblyopia.
Roszkowska AM, Biondi S, Chisari G, Messina A, Ferreri FM, Meduri A.
Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Surgical Specialities, Univ. of Messina,
Messina, Italy. anrosz@tiscali.it
PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive outcome in adult patients wi th
refractive and anisometropic amblyopia treated with photorefractive keratectomy.
METHODS: An interventional non-comparative study was performed on 50 consecutive
patients with amblyopia treated with photorefractive keratectomy. Sixty-eight
eyes of 18 participants with bilateral refractive amblyopia and 32 participants
with unilateral anisometropic amblyopia were studied. The photorefractive
keratectomy was performed with MEL 70 G-Scan excimer laser. Follow-up was 1, 3,
6, and 12 months after the treatment. The mean outcome measures were uncorrected
visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refraction,
and corneal transparency. RESULTS: In 64.7% of eyes, the UCVA at 12 months after
the treatment was better than or equal to their preoperative BCVA. A total of
82.4% of eyes improved their BCVA one or more lines. No eye lost lines of BCVA,
17.6% remained unvaried, 50% gained one line, 20.6 % gained two lines, and 11.8%
gained three lines of BCVA. The number of lines gained correlated strongly with
diopters of anisometropia between eyes (p<0.01). The mean sphere changed from
-5.62+/-3.37 D to -0.47+/-1 D, mean cylinder varied from -2.36+/-1.57 to
-0.18+/-0.41 D, and the spherical equivalent varied from -6.82+/-3.1 to
-0.45+/-1.08 D. No clinically significant haze was observed. CONCLUSIONS:
Excimer laser refractive surgery appears to be a safe and efficient procedure in
the treatment of ametropic and anisometropic amblyopia in adults. Adult patients
with anisometropic and refractive amblyopia could benefit from the refractive
treatment with significant improvement of the visual acuity.
-----
Strabismus. 2006 Mar;14(1):43-50.
Amblyopia: contemporary clinical issues.
Williams C, Harrad R.
Bristol Eye Hospital, Bristol, UK.
Research into the clinical management of amblyopia has, most recently, focussed
on the effectiveness of amblyopia treatment. Given the mounting evidence that
the condition is treatable, an important priority is the detection of
individuals with the condition. Here, we review critically the means by which
this can be achieved. We conclude that intensive early screening can produce
improved outcomes but that the effectiveness of real-life screening programmes
is very dependent on the coverage they obtain. An almost entirely neglected
subfield of amblyopia treatment research is the identification of reasons why
parents and children often fail to comply with occlusion therapy. Here, we
examine a psychological approach to this problem and find it to be informative
in predicting compliance. Lastly, we consider the disability arising from
strabismus, again from a psychological perspective, and find that on a range of
psychosocial well-being indicators, strabismus surgery results in significant
gains.
-----
Strabismus. 2006 Mar;14(1):37-42.
The treatment of amblyopia.
Holmes JM, Repka MX, Kraker RT, Clarke MP.
Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
Recent studies suggest that children with amblyopia associated with
anisometropia, strabismus, or both should be treated initially with best
refractive correction until visual acuity is stable. This may take several
months, and a proportion of children will achieve equal visual acuity with
glasses alone. For residual anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia, the initial
choice of patching or atropine should involve the parent and the child. The dose
of prescribed patching or atropine may initially be quite modest, such as 2
hours of patching a day or twice weekly atropine. Treatment should be offered to
children until at least 12 years of age and possibly to teenagers. Ongoing
studies are addressing the role of undertaking near activities while patched and
the role of atropine for severe amblyopia and for older amblyopic children.
Future studies are needed to investigate the best treatment strategies for
residual amblyopia, whether weaning treatment is needed at the end of a course,
and how compliance can be enhanced.
-----
J AAPOS. 2006 Feb;10(1):37-43.
Successful treatment of anisometropic amblyopia with spectacles
alone.
Steele AL, Bradfield YS, Kushner BJ, France TD, Struck MC, Gangnon RE.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Background: The efficacy of treating anisometropic amblyopia with occlusion
therapy is well known. However, this form of treatment can be associated with
risks. Spectacle correction alone may be a successful and underutilized form of
treatment. Methods The records of 28 patients treated successfully for
anisometropic amblyopia with glasses alone were reviewed. Age, initial visual
acuity and stereoacuity, and nature of anisometropia were analyzed to assess
associations with time required for resolution, final visual acuity, and
stereoacuity. Incidence of amblyopia recurrence and results of subsequent
treatment, including patching, were also studied. Results: Mean time to
amblyopia resolution (interocular acuity difference </=1 line) was 5.8 months
(range 2 to 15 months). Worse best corrected initial visual acuity was
associated with longer time to resolution (Spearman's rho = 0.37, P = 0.05),
while age, initial stereoacuity, amount, and type of anisometropia were not (P =
0.43, 0.68, 0.26, 0.47, respectively). None of the astigmatic or myopic patients
achieved visual acuity of 20/20 in the amblyopic eye, while seven (39%) of the
hyperopic patients did. This difference was significant (P = 0.03). Better
initial stereoacuity predicted good final stereoacuity (P = 0.01). Only four
(14%) patients developed amblyopia recurrence over an average follow-up period
of 1.7 years. All were successfully treated with updated spectacles or patching.
Conclusions: Treatment of anisometropic amblyopia with spectacles alone can be a
successful option. Patients treated with spectacles alone may experience a lower
amblyopia recurrence rate than those treated with occlusion therapy.
-----
Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):169-76. Epub 2005 Dec 19. Comment in:
Ophthalmology. 2006 Feb;113(2):167-8.
Long-term outcomes of photorefractive keratectomy for
anisometropic amblyopia in children.
Paysse EA, Coats DK, Hussein MA, Hamill MB, Koch DD.
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas 77030,
USA. epaysse@bcm.tmc.edu
PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term visual acuity (VA) and refractive error
responses to excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for treatment of
anisometropic amblyopia in children. DESIGN: Prospective interventional
case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven children, 2 to 11 years old, with
anisometropic amblyopia who were noncompliant with conventional therapy with
glasses or contact lenses and occlusion therapy were treated with PRK. A cohort
derived retrospectively of 13 compliant and 10 noncompliant children with
refractive errors similar to those of the PRK group who were treated with
traditional anisometropic amblyopia therapy served as control groups.
INTERVENTION: Photorefractive keratectomy for the eye with the higher refractive
error. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (1) Refractive error reduction and stability in
the treated eye, (2) cycloplegic refraction, (3) VA, (4) stereoacuity, and (5)
corneal haze up to 3 years after PRK. Compliant and noncompliant children with
anisometropia amblyopia were analyzed as controls for refractive error and VA.
RESULTS: Preoperative refractive errors were -13.70 diopters (D) (+/-3.77) for
the myopic group and +4.75 D (+/-0.50) for the hyperopic group. Mean
postoperative refractive errors at last follow-up (mean, 31 months) were -3.55 D
(+/-2.2.5) and +1.41 D (+/-1.07) for the myopic and hyperopic groups,
respectively. At last follow-up, cycloplegic refractions in 4 (50%) of 8 myopes
and all hyperopes (100%) were within 3 D of that of the fellow eye. Five (63%)
of 8 myopic children achieved a refraction within 2 D of the target refraction.
Two (67%) of 3 hyperopic patients maintained their refractions within 2 D of the
target. Refractive regressions (from 1 year after surgery to last follow-up)
were 0.50+/-1.41 D (myopes) and 0.60+/-0.57 D (hyperopes). Seven children (77%)
were able to perform psychophysical VA testing preoperatively and
postoperatively. Five (71%) of the 7 children had uncorrected VA improvement of
at least 2 lines, and 4 (57%) of 7 had best spectacle-corrected VA improvement
of at least 2 lines, with 1 improving 7 lines. Five (55%) of 9 children had
improvement of their stereoacuity at last follow-up. Subepithelial corneal haze
remained negligible. The mean final VA of the PRK group was significantly better
than that of the noncompliant control group (P = 0.003). The mean final
refractive error for both myopic and hyperopic groups was also significantly
better that that of the control groups (P = 0.007 and P<0.0001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy for severe anisometropic amblyopia in
children resulted in long-term stable reduction in refractive error and
improvement in VA and stereopsis, with negligible persistent corneal haze.
-----
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006 Jan;32(1):103-8.
Refractive laser surgery in children with coexisting medical and
ocular pathology.
Astle WF, Papp A, Huang PT, Ingram A.
>From the Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Division of
Ophthalmology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
PURPOSE: To report the visual, refractive, and functional outcomes of
photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and of laser-assisted subepithelial
keratectomy in a group of children with significant refractive error and
underlying medical conditions or ocular pathology who were noncompliant with
traditional management. SETTING: Nonhospital surgical facility and a hospital
clinic. METHODS: This case series comprised 5 individual cases of anisometropic
amblyopia and/or high myopia. Underlying medical and ocular conditions were as
follows: upper eyelid hemangioma with oblique myopic astigmatism,
Pelizaeus-Merzbacher leukodystrophy with nystagmus, Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber
syndrome with glaucoma, incontinentia pigmenti with unilateral optic nerve
atrophy, and Goldenhar syndrome with unilateral optic nerve hypoplasia.
Photorefractive keratectomy or LASEK was performed in 6 eyes of 5 patients. Age
range at the time of surgery was 1.0 to 7.0 years. All procedures were performed
under general anesthesia. RESULTS: Best corrected visual acuity improved by 2
lines in 2 patients and 1 line in 2 patients by 6 months after surgery.
Stereopsis and/or fusional status improved in 3 patients. Amblyopia treatment
compliance improved in 1 patient. Alignment improved without strabismus surgery
in 2 cases. A functional vision survey demonstrated a positive effect on the
ability of all 5 children to function in their environment. CONCLUSION: During
the period of visual cortical plasticity, refractive surgery, by eliminating the
refractive component of amblyopia and by promoting fusional ability, provides
considerable improvement in children, even those with underlying medical
conditions associated with ocular pathology.
-----
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jan;141(1):175-184.
Amblyopia: diagnostic and therapeutic options.
Wu C, Hunter DG.
Department of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School,
300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA. carolyn.wu@childrens.harvard.edu
PURPOSE: To provide an overview of the current state of knowledge of amblyopia
and highlight recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. DESIGN: Review of
literature and perspective. METHODS: MEDLINE search for amblyopia, with a review
of all recent literature adding authors' personal perspectives on the findings.
RESULTS: Increased awareness of amblyopia and better screening techniques are
required to identify children who are at risk for amblyopia at a younger age.
Randomized, controlled trials have established atropine penalization as a viable
alternative to occlusion therapy, have suggested that less treatment may be
better tolerated and as effective as more traditionally used dosages, and have
found no compelling evidence that treatment is beneficial clinically for older
(over age 10) children with amblyopia. CONCLUSION: Early detection and treatment
of amblyopia can improve the chances for a successful visual outcome.
Considering that the conditions that place a patient at risk for amblyopia can
be identified, that amblyopia responds to treatment, and that well-tolerated
treatments for the condition are now recognized, it is not unreasonable to
imagine that, in the near future, severe amblyopia could be eliminated as a
public health problem.
-----
Indian J Med Res. 2005 Dec;122:497-505.
Factors influencing visual rehabilitation after occlusion therapy
in unilateral amblyopia in children.
Menon V, Chaudhuri Z, Saxena R, Gill K, Sachdeva MM.
Dr R.P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences,
New Delhi, India.
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Amblyopia is one of the most common causes of visual
impairment in adults and children, and visual loss may be permanent if not
treated in time. Though many studies have been done on occlusion therapy which
is the mainstay in the treatment of unilateral amblyopia, discrepancies exist in
literature about quantification of treatment and follow up measures. The present
study was undertaken to evaluate the factors responsible for the successful
outcome of treatment and the optimum time required for the same in children with
unilateral amblyopia. METHODS: Baseline characteristics of 63 verbal patients
with unilateral amblyopia (strabismic, anisometropic, mixed) referred to the
Strabismus and Amblyopia Clinic at the Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic
Sciences, New Delhi between September 2001 to December 2002 who improved to the
desired level of visual acuity after treatment for amblyopia in the mentioned
time period, were analyzed to assess for factors that directly or indirectly
influenced the optimum visual rehabilitation and the average duration of therapy
required for the same. The evaluation included assessment of the baseline
best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and refractive status in both eyes, the age
at presentation, the type of amblyopia present, fixation pattern in the
amblyopic eye, inter-eye visual acuity difference, and evaluation of compliance
through a parental diary system. RESULTS: Baseline BCVA in the amblyopic eye was
similar in all the three groups. Patients with anisometropic amblyopia showed a
quicker response to therapy. Compliance to treatment was the major factor
affecting the overall time required for a successful outcome in most cases. The
overall time required for the treatment to be successful (including the period
of maintenance) was about 1089 h. INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSION: This
hospital-based study showed that the average duration of occlusion therapy to
achieve stable isoacuity was 7.2 months with an average occlusion of 6-7 h/day.
Compliance to therapy was the most important factor affecting the duration of
therapy. With increasing emphasis on paediatric eye diseases, amblyopia is at
last getting its due importance as a cause of treatable correctable paediatric
visual impairment which can have lifelong repercussions, both in terms of
individual disability and financial burden to the society if not treated in
time. As the therapy is simple and effective if started early, mass awareness,
visual screening, and counselling would go a long way in treating the patients,
thus decreasing the prevalence of amblyopia in the country.
-----
Clin Exp Optom. 2005 Nov;88(6):365-75.
Amblyopia: prevalence, natural history, functional effects and
treatment.
Webber AL, Wood J.
School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
webbopt@ozemail.com.au
Amblyopia, defined as poor vision due to abnormal visual experience early in
life, affects approximately three per cent of the population and carries a
projected lifetime risk of visual loss of at least 1.2 per cent. The presence of
amblyopia or its risk factors, mainly strabismus or refractive error, have been
primary conditions targeted in childhood vision screenings. Continued support
for such screenings requires evidence-based understanding of the prevalence and
natural history of amblyopia and its predisposing conditions, and proof that
treatment is effective in the long term with minimal negative impact on the
patient and family. This review summarises recent research relevant to the
clinical understanding of amblyopia, including prevalence data, risk factors,
the functional impact of amblyopia and optimum treatment regimes and their
justification from a vision and life skills perspective. Collectively, these
studies indicate that treatment for amblyopia is effective in reducing the
overall prevalence and severity of visual loss from amblyopia. Correction of
refractive error alone has been shown to significantly reduce amblyopia and less
frequent occlusion can be just as effective as more extensive occlusion.
Occlusion or penalisation in amblyopia treatment can create negative changes in
behaviour in children and impact on family life, and these factors should be
considered in prescribing treatment, particularly because of their influence on
compliance. Ongoing treatment trials are being undertaken to determine both the
maximum age at which treatment of amblyopia can still be effective and the
importance of near activities during occlusion. This review highlights the
expansion of current knowledge regarding amblyopia and its treatment to help
clinicians provide the best level of care for their amblyopic patients that
current knowledge allows. -----
Optometry. 2005 Oct;76(10):570-8.
Contemporary issues in amblyopia treatment.
Rutstein RP.
School of Optometry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 University
Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. rrutstein@icare.opt.uab.edu
PURPOSE: The aim of this report is to review the contemporary research in
amblyopia treatment and how it will affect clinical practice patterns. METHODS:
Topics addressed include prescribing the optimal refractive correction, the most
effective treatment, duration and intensity of treatment, regression after
treatment, the upper age for treatment, and the chance of the amblyope losing
his or her sound eye. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The optimal refractive correction
is best determined with cycloplegic retinoscopy; pharmacologic penalization can
be as effective as patching in children with moderate amblyopia; less-intense
treatment regimens have been found to be as effective as more-intense treatment
regimens; regression can occur in as many as 25% of all treated patients; some
older amblyopes can be treated successfully; and the amblyope has a higher
chance of becoming blind than the nonamblyope.
-----
J AAPOS. 2005 Oct;9(5):449-54.
Visual outcome and success of amblyopia treatment in unilateral
small posterior lens opacities and lenticonus initially treated nonsurgically.
Travi GM, Schnall BM, Lehman SS, Kelly CJ, Hug D, Hirakata VN, Calhoun JH.
Wills Eye Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. gmtravi@uol.com.br
PURPOSE: We sought to assess the success of amblyopia treatment in patients with
small posterior lens opacities as well as the factors associated with a good
visual outcome. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with
posterior lens opacities that initially were thought to be too small in size to
warrant cataract surgery. The following variables were examined: cataract type,
location, diameter, persistent hyaloid vessel, anisometropia, strabismus, and
age of detection. Success of treatment of amblyopia was defined as improvement
by at least 0.3 logMAR units. Good visual outcome was defined as 20/40 or
better. Amblyopia was treated by glasses, patching, and/or atropine. Patients
who failed with conservative treatment or had an increase in cataract size
underwent surgery. RESULTS: Forty-eight (91%) of 53 eyes were amblyopic. Thirty
amblyopic eyes had pre- and post-treatment Snellen acuities. Twenty (67%) had
their visual acuity (VA) improved by 0.3 logMAR units or greater. None of the
measured variables were associated with successful amblyopia treatment.
Twenty-five (49%) of 51 patients had a final VA of 20/40 or better. The only
variable associated with good visual outcome was cataract type: 18 of 25 (72%)
posterior subcapsular cataract and 6 of 23 (32%) posterior lenticonus eyes
achieved VA of 20/40 or better (P = 0.008). Six patients who went on to have
cataract surgery experienced a larger improvement in BCVA (4.50 logMar units +/-
2.52 lines) compared with patients treated without cataract surgery (2.36 logMar
units +/- 3.11 lines). DISCUSSION: Amblyopia treatment was successful in most
cases. A small group of patients who underwent cataract surgery experienced a
greater VA improvement; however, it was not statistically significant. Further
studies are needed to determine which patients would benefit from cataract
surgery.
-----
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3161-8.
Perceptual learning improves visual performance in juvenile
amblyopia.
Li RW, Young KG, Hoenig P, Levi DM.
PURPOSE: To determine whether practicing a position-discrimination task improves
visual performance in children with amblyopia and to determine the mechanism(s)
of improvement. METHODS: Five children (age range, 7-10 years) with amblyopia
practiced a positional acuity task in which they had to judge which of three
pairs of lines was misaligned. Positional noise was produced by distributing the
individual patches of each line segment according to a Gaussian probability
function. Observers were trained at three noise levels (including 0), with each
observer performing between 3000 and 4000 responses in 7 to 10 sessions.
Trial-by-trial feedback was provided. RESULTS: Four of the five observers showed
significant improvement in positional acuity. In those four observers, on
average, positional acuity with no noise improved by approximately 32% and with
high noise by approximately 26%. A position-averaging model was used to parse
the improvement into an increase in efficiency or a decrease in equivalent input
noise. Two observers showed increased efficiency (51% and 117% improvements)
with no significant change in equivalent input noise across sessions. The other
two observers showed both a decrease in equivalent input noise (18% and 29%) and
an increase in efficiency (17% and 71%). All five observers showed substantial
improvement in Snellen acuity (approximately 26%) after practice. CONCLUSIONS:
Perceptual learning can improve visual performance in amblyopic children. The
improvement can be parsed into two important factors: decreased equivalent input
noise and increased efficiency. Perceptual learning techniques may add an
effective new method to the armamentarium of amblyopia treatments.
-----
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Sep;46(9):3152-60.
Treatment of unilateral amblyopia: factors influencing visual
outcome.
Stewart CE, Fielder AR, Stephens DA, Moseley MJ.
Department of Optometry and Visual Science, City University, London, United
Kingdom.
PURPOSE: To identify factors that influence the outcome of treatment for
unilateral amblyopia, as a part of the Monitored Occlusion Treatment of
Amblyopia Study (MOTAS). METHODS: This was an intervention study consisting of
three nonoverlapping phases: "Baseline", "refractive adaptation" (18 weeks of
full-time spectacle wear), and "occlusion" (6 hours of patching per day,
objectively monitored). Condition factors: type of amblyopia, age of
participant, initial severity of amblyopia, fixation, and binocular vision
status; treatment factors: refractive adaptation and occlusion (total dose
[hours] and dose rate [hours per day]) were assessed for their influence on
visual outcome. Visual outcome was expressed in three ways: logMAR (logarithm of
the minimum angle of resolution) change, residual amblyopia, and proportion of
the deficit corrected. RESULTS: The study included 85 participants (mean age,
5.1 +/- 1.4 years) with amblyopia associated with strabismus (n = 32) or
anisometropia (n = 20) or associated with both anisometropia and strabismus (n =
33). Treatment factors: cumulative occlusion dose exceeding 50 hours, and dose
rates >/=1 hour per day resulted in (P </= 0.01) lower residual amblyopia and a
greater proportion of the deficit corrected. Condition factors associated with
poor outcome (high residual amblyopia) were presence of eccentric fixation,
severe initial amblyopia, and no binocular vision. CONCLUSIONS: Factors
influencing outcome with treatment for amblyopia are occlusion dose (the rate of
delivery and cumulative dose worn), the initial severity of the amblyopia,
binocular vision status, fixation of the amblyopic eye, and the age of the
subject at the start of treatment.
-----
Eye. 2005 Jun 3; [Epub ahead of print]
Resolution in partially accomodative esotropia during occlusion
treatment for amblyopia.
Koc F, Ozal H, Yasar H, Firat E.
1Strabismus, SSK Ankara Eye Disease Hospital, Ulucanlar, Ankara, Turkey.
PURPOSE: To evaluate alignment changes in partially accommodative esotropia
during occlusion treatment for amblyopia. METHOD: Changes at the deviation
angles of 63 partially accommodative esotropia patients, who had occlusion
treatment for amblyopia, were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Mean deviation
angle at the start of therapy without glasses was 45 PD (10-90 PD) and became 27
PD (5-70 PD) after at least 2 months with glasses. During 12 (2-36) months of
occlusion period, mean manifest deviation angle with glasses decreased to 11 PD
(0-50) (P<0.001) and amblyopia resolved in 71.5% of the cases. After termination
of amblyopia treatment 24 (38%) cases had surgery for the residual deviation but
if we had planned surgery before amblyopia treatment, 81% of the patients would
have had surgery. DISCUSSION: Should amblyopia be treated initially or should we
operate first in patients with strabismus and amblyopia together? Our research
suggests that we should not hurry to operate in high hypermetropic partially
accommodative cases, which have amblyopia and a long-term history of strabismus.
Initial amblyopia treatment in these cases allows time for resolution of the
nonaccomodative component in strabismus and can significantly decrease the
necessity for surgery.Eye advance online publication, 3 June 2005;
doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701874.
-----
Strabismus. 2005 Jun;13(2):63-9.
Efficacy of occlusion treatment in amblyopia and clinical risk
factors affecting the results of treatment.
Arikan G, Yaman A, Berk AT.
Department of Ophthalmology, Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Unit, Dokuz
Eylul University, 35320 Narlidere, Izmir, Turkey. gulozden@hotmail.com
PURPOSE: To evaluate the factors influencing visual outcome in strabismic,
strabismic-anisometropic and anisometropic amblyopia following occlusion
treatment. METHODS: Records of 128 pediatric patients who had been treated for
amblyopia by occlusion of the fellow eye between March 1992 and March 2003 were
reviewed retrospectively. Age and level of visual acuity at initiation of
treatment, occlusion time (full-time, part-time or minimal) and type of
amblyopia were analyzed for the effect on visual outcome. RESULTS: The mean age
of the patients was 5.69 +/- 2.01 years (3 to 12 years). Mean follow-up time was
3 years 2 months (6 months to 10 years). Mean visual acuity improvements were
similar for the subtypes of amblyopia (strabismic amblyopia 0.38 +/- 0.29 logMAR
units, strabismic-anisometropic amblyopia 0.46 +/- 0.40 logMAR units,
anisometropic amblyopia 0.35 +/- 0.24 logMAR units). Level of initial visual
acuity, age at initiation of treatment and type of occlusion correlated with the
final visual acuity (p = 0.000, p = 0.035, p = 0.012, respectively). When the
analysis was performed according to the subtypes of amblyopia, initial visual
acuity was the only factor associated with the final visual acuity in all types
of amblyopia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The level of initial visual acuity is the
most significant factor determining the success of treatment in amblyopia.
------
J AAPOS. 2005 Apr;9(2):129-36.
A randomized pilot study of near activities versus non-near
activities during patching therapy for amblyopia.
Holmes JM, Edwards AR, Beck RW, Arnold RW, Johnson DA, Klimek DL, Kraker RT, Lee
KA, Lyon DW, Nosel ER, Repka MX, Sala NA, Silbert DI, Tamkins S; Pediatric Eye
Disease Investigator Group.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Drive, Tampa, FL 33647, USA.
pedig@jaeb.org
BACKGROUND: To plan a future randomized clinical trial, we conducted a pilot
study to determine whether children randomized to near or non-near activities
would perform prescribed activities. A secondary aim was to obtain a preliminary
estimate of the effect of near versus non-near activities on amblyopic eye
visual acuity, when combined with 2 hours of daily patching. METHODS: Sixty-four
children, 3 to less than 7 years of age, with anisometropic, strabismic, or
combined amblyopia (20/40 to 20/400) were randomly assigned to receive either 2
hours of daily patching with near activities or 2 hours of daily patching
without near activities. Parents completed daily calendars for 4 weeks recording
the activities performed while patched and received a weekly telephone call in
which they were asked to describe the activities performed during the previous 2
hours of patching. Visual acuity was assessed at 4 weeks. RESULTS: The children
assigned to near visual activities performed more near activities than those
assigned to non-near activities (by calendars, mean 1.6 +/- 0.5 hours versus 0.2
+/- 0.2 hours daily, P < 0.001; by telephone interviews, 1.6 +/- 0.4 hours
versus 0.4 +/- 0.5 hours daily, P < 0.001). After 4 weeks of treatment, there
was a suggestion of greater improvement in amblyopic eye visual acuity in those
assigned to near visual activities (mean 2.6 lines versus 1.6 lines, P = 0.07).
The treatment group difference in visual acuity was present for patients with
severe amblyopia but not moderate amblyopia. CONCLUSIONS: Children patched and
instructed to perform near activities for amblyopia spent more time performing
those near activities than children who were instructed to perform non-near
activities. Our results suggest that performing near activities while patched
may be beneficial in treating amblyopia. Based on our data, a formal randomized
amblyopia treatment trial of patching with and without near activities is both
feasible and desirable.
-----
J AAPOS. 2005 Apr;9(2):107-11.
Amblyopia treatment outcomes.
Scott WE, Kutschke PJ, Keech RV, Pfeifer WL, Nichols B, Zhang L.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Iowa Health Care,
Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
PURPOSE: To determine the effectiveness and side effects of full-time occlusion
for the treatment of amblyopia. METHODS: Patients with unilateral amblyopia
secondary to strabismus, anisometropia, or a combination of the two were
retrospective reviewed. All patients had full-time occlusion encompassing 24
hours per day or all waking hours, followed to a defined endpoint. Success was
defined as 20/30 or better or equal visual acuity by fixation pattern between
the two eyes. The ultimate goal was equal visual acuity. RESULTS: Six hundred
patients fit the inclusion criteria. Mean follow-up after the cessation of
full-time patching was 7.2 years. Eighty-nine percent were followed for more
than 1 year. Mean age at last follow-up visit was 10.82 years. Ninety-six
percent of patients attained a successful visual result. Sixty percent attained
equal visual acuity. Younger patients required less occlusion time to endpoint
and had a better visual outcome ( P < 0.0001). Initial visual acuity was
significantly related to best visual acuity attained ( P < 0.0001). The
incidence of occlusion amblyopia was 25.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Full-time occlusion
produces excellent visual acuity results. It was shown to be effective with no
long-term complications if patients proceed as directed.
-----
Eye. 2005 Apr 15; [Epub ahead of print]
Preliminary results from the use of the novel Interactive
Binocular Treatment (I-BiTtrade mark) system, in the treatment of strabismic and
anisometropic amblyopia.
Waddingham PE, Butler TK, Cobb SV, Moody AD, Comaish IF, Haworth SM, Gregson RM,
Ash IM, Brown SM, Eastgate RM, Griffiths GD.
[1] 1Directorate of Ophthalmology, 'A' Floor, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Centre,
Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK [2] 2Virtual Reality Applications
Research Team (VIRART), University of Nottingham, School of 4 M, University
Park, Nottingham, UK.
BACKGROUND: We have developed a novel application of adapted virtual reality (VR)
technology, for the binocular treatment of amblyopia. We describe the use of the
system in six children. METHODS: Subjects consisted of three conventional
treatment 'failures' and three conventional treatment 'refusers', with a mean
age of 6.25 years (5.42-7.75 years). Treatment consisted of watching video clips
and playing interactive games with specifically designed software to allow
streamed binocular image presentation. RESULTS: Initial vision in the amblyopic
eye ranged from 6/12 to 6/120 and post-treatment 6/7.5 to 6/24-1. Total
treatment time was a mean of 4.4 h. Five out of six children have shown an
improvement in their vision (average increase of 10 letters), including those
who had previously failed to comply with conventional occlusion. CONCLUSIONS:
Improvements in vision were demonstrable within a short period of time, in some
children after 1 h of treatment. This system is an exciting and promising
application of VR technology as a new treatment for amblyopia.Eye advance online
publication, 15 April 2005; doi:10.1038/sj.eye.6701883.
-----
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;123(4):437-47.
Randomized trial of treatment of amblyopia in children aged 7 to
17 years.
Scheiman MM, Hertle RW, Beck RW, Edwards AR, Birch E, Cotter SA, Crouch ER Jr,
Cruz OA, Davitt BV, Donahue S, Holmes JM, Lyon DW, Repka MX, Sala NA, Silbert
DI, Suh DW, Tamkins SM; Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL 33647, USA. pedig@jaeb.org
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of amblyopia in children
aged 7 to 17 years. METHODS: At 49 clinical sites, 507 patients with amblyopic
eye visual acuity ranging from 20/40 to 20/400 were provided with optimal
optical correction and then randomized to a treatment group (2-6 hours per day
of prescribed patching combined with near visual activities for all patients
plus atropine sulfate for children aged 7 to 12 years) or an optical correction
group (optical correction alone). Patients whose amblyopic eye acuity improved
10 or more letters (> or =2 lines) by 24 weeks were considered responders.
RESULTS: In the 7- to 12-year-olds (n = 404), 53% of the treatment group were
responders compared with 25% of the optical correction group (P<.001). In the
13- to 17-year-olds (n = 103), the responder rates were 25% and 23%,
respectively, overall (adjusted P = .22) but 47% and 20%, respectively, among
patients not previously treated with patching and/or atropine for amblyopia
(adjusted P = .03). Most patients, including responders, were left with a
residual visual acuity deficit. CONCLUSIONS: Amblyopia improves with optical
correction alone in about one fourth of patients aged 7 to 17 years, although
most patients who are initially treated with optical correction alone will
require additional treatment for amblyopia. For patients aged 7 to 12 years,
prescribing 2 to 6 hours per day of patching with near visual activities and
atropine can improve visual acuity even if the amblyopia has been previously
treated. For patients 13 to 17 years, prescribing patching 2 to 6 hours per day
with near visual activities may improve visual acuity when amblyopia has not
been previously treated but appears to be of little benefit if amblyopia was
previously treated with patching. We do not yet know whether visual acuity
improvement will be sustained once treatment is discontinued; therefore,
conclusions regarding the long-term benefit of treatment and the development of
treatment recommendations for amblyopia in children 7 years and older await the
results of a follow-up study we are conducting on the patients who responded to
treatment.
-----
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2005 Mar-Apr;42(2):82-8.
A systematic review of the applicability and efficacy of eye
exercises.
Rawstron JA, Burley CD, Elder MJ.
Ophthalmology Department, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.
PURPOSE: To examine the current scientific evidence base regarding the efficacy
of eye exercises as used in optometric vision therapy. METHODS: A search was
performed of the following databases: Allied and Complementary Medicine
Database, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Register of
Controlled Trials, EMBASE, and MEDLINE. Relevant articles were reviewed and
analyzed for strengths and weaknesses. Pertinent sections of classic texts were
studied to provide a historical basis and to serve as a source for additional
early references. RESULTS: Forty-three refereed studies were obtained. Of these,
14 were clinical trials (10 controlled studies), 18 review articles, 2
historical articles, 1 case report, 6 editorials or letters, and 2 position
statements from professional colleges. Many of the references listed by the
larger reviews were unpublished or published in obscure or nonrefereed sources
and therefore were not accessible. CONCLUSIONS: Eye exercises have been
purported to improve a wide range of conditions including vergence problems,
ocular motility disorders, accommodative dysfunction, amblyopia, learning
disabilities, dyslexia, asthenopia, myopia, motion sickness, sports performance,
stereopsis, visual field defects, visual acuity, and general well-being. Small
controlled trials and a large number of cases support the treatment of
convergence insufficiency. Less robust, but believable, evidence indicates
visual training may be useful in developing fine stereoscopic skills and
improving visual field remnants after brain damage. As yet there is no clear
scientific evidence published in the mainstream literature supporting the use of
eye exercises in the remainder of the areas reviewed, and their use therefore
remains controversial.
-----
Surv Ophthalmol. 2005 Mar-Apr;50(2):123-66.
Amblyopia characterization, treatment, and prophylaxis.
Simons K.
Pediatric Vision Laboratory, Krieger Children's Eye Center, Wilmer Institute,
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-9028,
USA.
Amblyopia has a 1.6-3.6% prevalence, higher in the medically underserved. It is
more complex than simply visual acuity loss and the better eye has sub-clinical
deficits. Functional limitations appear more extensive and loss of vision in the
better eye of amblyopes more prevalent than previously thought. Amblyopia
screening and treatment are efficacious, but cost-effectiveness concerns remain.
Refractive correction alone may successfully treat anisometropic amblyopia and
it, minimal occlusion, and/or catecholamine treatment can provide initial vision
improvement that may improve compliance with subsequent long-duration treatment.
Atropine penalization appears as effective as occlusion for moderate amblyopia,
with limited-day penalization as effective as full-time.
Cytidin-5'-diphosphocholine may hold promise as a medical treatment.
Interpretation of much of the amblyopia literature is made difficult by:
inaccurate visual acuity measurement at initial visit, lack of adequate
refractive correction prior to and during treatment, and lack of long-term
follow-up results. Successful treatment can be achieved in at most 63-83% of
patients. Treatment outcome is a function of initial visual acuity and type of
amblyopia, and a reciprocal product of treatment efficacy, duration, and
compliance. Age at treatment onset is not predictive of outcome in many studies
but detection under versus over 2-3 years of age may be. Multiple screenings
prior to that age, and prompt treatment, reduce prevalence. Would a single early
cycloplegic photoscreening be as, or more, successful at detection or prediction
than the multiple screenings, and more cost-effective? Penalization and
occlusion have minimal incidence of reverse amblyopia and/or side-effects, no
significant influence on emmetropization, and no consistent effect on sign or
size of post-treatment changes in strabismic deviation. There may be a
physiologic basis for better age-indifferent outcome than tapped by current
treatment methodologies. Infant refractive correction substantially reduces
accommodative esotropia and amblyopia incidence without interference with
emmetropization. Compensatory prism, alone or post-operatively, and/or minus
lens treatment, and/or wide-field fusional amplitude training, may reduce risk
of early onset esotropia. Multivariate screening using continuous-scale
measurements may be more effective than traditional single-test dichotomous
pass/fail measures. Pigmentation may be one parameter because Caucasians are at
higher risk for esotropia than non-whites.
-----
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Feb;123(2):149-57.
Two-year follow-up of a 6-month randomized trial of atropine vs
patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.
Repka MX, Wallace DK, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Birch EE, Cotter SA, Donahue S,
Everett DF, Hertle RW, Holmes JM, Quinn GE, Scheiman MM, Weakley DR; Pediatric
Eye Disease Investigator Group.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL 33647, USA. pedig@jaeb.org
OBJECTIVE: To compare patching and atropine sulfate as treatments for moderate
amblyopia in children 18 months after completion of a 6-month randomized trial.
METHODS: In a randomized, multicenter (47 sites) clinical trial, 419 children
younger than 7 years with amblyopia (20/40 to 20/100 in the affected eye) were
assigned to receive either patching or atropine eye drops for 6 months. Between
6 months and 2 years, treatment was at the discretion of the investigator.Main
Outcome Measure Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye and sound eye after 2 years.
RESULTS: At 2 years, visual acuity in the amblyopic eye improved from baseline a
mean of 3.7 lines in the patching group and 3.6 lines in the atropine group. The
difference in visual acuity between treatment groups was small: 0.01 logMAR (95%
confidence interval, -0.02 to 0.04). In both treatment groups, the mean
amblyopic eye acuity was approximately 20/32, 1.8 lines worse than the mean
sound eye acuity, which was approximately 20/20. CONCLUSIONS: Atropine or
patching for 6 months followed by best clinical care until 2 years produced
similar improvement of moderate amblyopia in children between 3 and 7 years of
age at enrollment. However, on average the amblyopic eye acuity was still
approximately 2 lines worse than the sound eye.
-----
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Jan;115(1):22-30.
Periorbital lymphatic malformation: clinical course and
management in 42 patients.
Greene AK, Burrows PE, Smith L, Mulliken JB.
Vascular Anomalies Center, Division of Plastic Surgery, and the Department of
Radiology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 02115, USA.
Lymphatic malformation in the orbital cavity and surrounding region often causes
disfigurement and visual problems. To better clarify the evolution and treatment
of this condition, the authors studied a retrospective cohort of 42 consecutive
patients seen between 1971 and 2003 and analyzed anatomic features,
complications, and management. The ratio of female to male patients was 1:1.
Most periorbital lymphatic malformations were noted at birth (59 percent),
presenting as either unilateral swelling (60 percent) or a periorbital mass (24
percent). Sixty-two percent of lesions were on the left side. The ipsilateral
cheek, temple, and forehead also were involved in 57 percent of patients.
Twenty-two percent of lesions were intraconal, 30 percent were extraconal, and
48 percent were in both spaces. Forty-five percent of children had an associated
cerebral developmental venous anomaly. Periorbital lymphatic malformation caused
major morbidity; 52 percent of patients had intralesional bleeding and 26
percent of patients had a history of infection. Other common complications
included intermittent swelling (76 percent), blepharoptosis (52 percent),
proptosis (45 percent), pain (21 percent), amblyopia (33 percent), chemosis (19
percent), astigmatism (17 percent), and strabismus (7 percent). Ultimately, 40
percent of children had diminished vision and 7 percent became blind in the
affected eye. Management of periorbital lymphatic malformation involved an
interdisciplinary team that included an interventional radiologist, a
craniofacial surgeon, and an ophthalmologist. The two therapeutic strategies
were sclerotherapy (40 percent) and resection (57 percent); most patients
required several interventions. A coronal approach was used for subtotal
excision of fronto-temporal-orbital lymphatic malformation in 13 patients,
whereas a tarsal incision was used for lesions isolated to the eyelid (n = 14).
Ocular proptosis was temporarily managed by tarsorrhaphy (n = 9), but expansion
of the bony orbit was needed to correct persistent proptosis (n = 8). Orbital
exenteration was necessary in two patients.
-----
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Dec;30(12):2529-35.
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy in children.
Astle WF, Huang PT, Ingram AD, Farran RP.
Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary Division of Ophthalmology,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK)
achieves effective targeted myopic correction with less post-treatment corneal
haze than observed with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in children who fail
traditional forms of treatment for myopic anisometropic amblyopia and high
myopia. SETTING: Nonhospital surgical facility with follow-up in a hospital
clinic setting. METHODS: This prospective study comprised 36 eyes of 25
patients. The mean patient age at treatment was 8.27 years (range 1.0 to 17.4
years). Patients were divided into 3 groups: those with myopic anisometropic
amblyopia (13 patients/13 eyes), those with bilateral high myopia (11
patients/22 eyes), and those with high myopia post-penetrating keratoplasty (1
patient/1 eye). All patients were treated with LASEK under general anesthesia
using the Visx 20/20 B excimer laser and a multizone, multipass ablation
technique. Although the myopia was as high as -22.00 diopters (D) spherical
equivalent (SE) in some eyes, no eye was treated for more than -19.00 D SE.
RESULTS: At 1 year, the mean SE decreased from -8.03 D to -1.19 D. Forty-four
percent of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of the targeted correction; 78% of eyes had
clear corneas with no haze. In the entire group, the mean best corrected visual
acuity improved from 20/80 to 20/50. A functional-vision survey demonstrated a
positive effect on the patients' ability to function in their environments after
LASEK. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy in children
represents another method of providing long-term resolution of bilateral high
myopia and myopic anisometropic amblyopia with minimal post-laser haze. The
reduction in post-laser haze with LASEK compared to that with the standard PRK
technique may represent an advantage in treating these complex patients.
-----
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Dec;30(12):2517-21.
Improvement in best corrected visual acuity in amblyopic adult
eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Sakatani K, Jabbur NS, O'Brien TP.
Refractive Eye Surgery Service, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University
School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21093, USA.
PURPOSE: To evaluate improvement in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA)
after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in adult patients with amblyopia.
SETTING: Refractive Eye Surgery Center, Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins
University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. METHODS: The charts of
consecutive patients with a diagnosis of amblyopia at the time of refractive
evaluation who had LASIK were reviewed retrospectively. The preoperative and
postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and BSCVA were analyzed. RESULTS:
Twenty-one eyes of 19 patients were identified as having amblyopia and LASIK
surgery. Eight patients (42.1%) were diagnosed with amblyopia only, 6 patients
(31.6%) had anisometropic amblyopia, 4 patients (21.1%) had strabismic amblyopia,
and 1 patient (5.2%) had anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia. Eleven eyes
(52.4%) had myopic astigmatism, 7 eyes (33.3%) were hyperopic, and 3 eyes
(14.3%) had mixed astigmatism. Seven eyes (33.3 %) experienced more than a
1-line improvement in postoperative UCVA compared with the preoperative BSCVA.
Nine eyes (42.8%) experienced more than a 1-line improvement in postoperative
BSCVA compared with the preoperative BSCVA. The BSCVA was unchanged in 11 eyes
(52.4%) and was worse by 2 lines in 1 eye (4.8%). CONCLUSION: After LASIK, the
postoperative BSCVA was better than preoperatively in 42.8% of eyes with a
history of amblyopia and the postoperative UCVA was better than the preoperative
BSCVA in 33.3%.
-----
J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004 Dec;30(12):2522-8.
Laser in situ keratomileusis for treated anisometropic amblyopia
in awake, autofixating pediatric and adolescent patients.
Phillips CB, Prager TC, McClellan G, Mintz-Hittner HA.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of Texas-Houston
Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA.
PURPOSE: To establish the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK)
in pediatric and adolescent patients with anisometropic amblyopia who completed
amblyopia therapy and had a visual acuity of 20/30 or better bilaterally.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, University of
Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas, USA. METHODS: From August 2000 to
March 2002, LASIK was performed in 21 eyes of 19 consecutive patients meeting
eligibility requirements. The procedure was performed with the Summit Autonomous
LADARVision 4000 excimer laser (Alcon Laboratories, Inc.) in the amblyopic eye
for the correction of anisometropia or in both eyes. All patients were awake and
autofixating during the procedure. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 13.14 years
(range 8 to 19 years). Seventeen patients were treated in the amblyopic eye only
to correct anisometropia; treatment was performed in both eyes of 2 patients who
were older than 18 years. Patients were followed for a mean of 18.0 months
(range 8.6 to 26.5 months). Anisometropia was greater than 2.00 diopters (D) in
all cases (mean 4.43 D, range 13.25 to 2.25 D). The percentage deviation from
the attempted correction in the myopic group was 4.0% +/- 4.0% (SD) (range 2.0%
to 10.0%) and 38.0% +/- 13.0% (range 5.0% to 58.0%) in the hyperopic group.
Anisometropia decreased uniformly to less than 2.00 D in all patients (mean 1.52
D). The percentage of patients with stereo acuity increased from 63.0%
preoperatively to 84.0% postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ
keratomileusis safely and effectively reduced anisometropia in these patients.
If stereo acuity is not possible preoperatively, it may be obtained
postoperatively.
-----
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Dec;88(12):1552-6.
Refractive adaptation in amblyopia: quantification of effect and
implications for practice.
Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Fielder AR, Stephens DA.
Department of Visual Neuroscience, Imperial College London, Charing Cross
Campus, Margravine Road, London W6 8RP, UK. c.stewart@imperial.ac.uk.
AIM: To describe the visual response to spectacle correction ("refractive
adaptation") for children with unilateral amblyopia as a function of age, type
of amblyopia, and category of refractive error. METHOD: Measurement of corrected
amblyopic and fellow eye logMAR visual acuity in newly diagnosed children.
Measurements repeated at 6 weekly intervals for a total 18 weeks. RESULTS: Data
were collected from 65 children of mean (SD) age 5.1 (1.4) years with previously
untreated amblyopia and significant refractive error. Amblyopia was associated
with anisometropia in 18 (5.5 (1.4) years), strabismus in 16 (4.2 (0.98) years),
and mixed in 31 (5.2 (1.5) years) of the study participants. Mean (SD) corrected
visual acuity of amblyopic eyes improved significantly (p<0.001) from 0.67
(0.38) to 0.43 (0.37) logMAR: a mean improvement of 0.24 (0.18), range 0.0-0.6
log units. Change in logMAR visual acuity did not significantly differ as a
function of amblyopia type (p = 0.29) (anisometropia 0.22 (0.13); mixed 0.18
(0.14); strabismic 0.30 (0.24)) or for age (p = 0.38) ("under 4 years" 0.23
(0.18); "4-6 years" 0.24 (0.20); "over 6 years" 0.16 (0.23)). CONCLUSION:
Refractive adaptation is a distinct component of amblyopia treatment. To
appropriately evaluate mainstream therapies such as occlusion and penalisation,
the beneficial effects of refractive adaptation need to be fully differentiated.
A consequence for clinical practice is that children may start occlusion with
improved visual acuity, possibly enhancing compliance, and in some cases
unnecessary patching will be avoided.
-----
Ophthalmology. 2004 Nov;111(11):2076-85.
A randomized trial of atropine regimens for treatment of moderate
amblyopia in children.
Repka MX, Cotter SA, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Birch EE, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Holmes
JM, Quinn GE, Sala NA, Scheiman MM, Stager DR Sr, Wallace DK; Pediatric Eye
Disease Investigator Group.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, 15310 Amberly Drive, Suite 350, Tampa, FL
33647, USA. rbeck@jaeb.org
OBJECTIVE: To compare daily atropine to weekend atropine as prescribed
treatments for moderate amblyopia in children younger than 7 years. DESIGN:
Prospective, randomized multicenter clinical trial (30 sites). PARTICIPANTS: One
hundred sixty-eight children younger than 7 years with amblyopia in the range of
20/40 to 20/80 associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or both. INTERVENTION:
Randomization either to daily atropine or to weekend atropine for 4 months.
Partial responders were continued on the randomized treatment until no further
improvement was noted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Visual acuity (VA) in the amblyopic
eye after 4 months. RESULTS: The improvement in VA of the amblyopic eye from
baseline to 4 months averaged 2.3 lines in each group. The VA of the amblyopic
eye at study completion was either (1) at least 20/25 or (2) better than or
equal to that of the sound eye in 39 children (47%) in the daily group and 45
children (53%) in the weekend group. The VA of the sound eye at the end of
follow-up was reduced by 2 lines in one patient in each group. Stereoacuity
outcomes were similar in the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Weekend atropine provides an
improvement in VA of a magnitude similar to that of the improvement provided by
daily atropine in treating moderate amblyopia in children 3 to 7 years old. This
article contains additional online-only material available at http://www.ophsource.com/periodicals/ophtha.
-----
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2004 Nov;27(9 Pt 1):1017-24.
[Importance of occlusion therapy for amblyopia in partial
unilateral congenital cataracts that are discovered late.]
[Article in French]
Denion E, Dedes V, Bonne M, Labalette P, Berger C, Guilbert F, Bouckehove S,
Rouland JF.
Service d'Ophtalmologie, Hopital Huriez, CHRU de Lille, avenue Michel Polonovski,
59037 Lille cedex.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate the importance of occlusion
therapy for amblyopia in patients with partial unilateral congenital cataracts
that were discovered after 24 months of age. MATERIAL: and methods: A
retrospective study was conducted on 11 patients, each of whom underwent a
clinical examination including a cycloplegic refraction with atropine. The
average age when the cataract was diagnosed was 35 months. The average distance
visual acuity was 6/78 and the average near visual acuity was 35/175. Occlusion
therapy using adhesive patches was started after refractive error correction. In
two cases, observance was mediocre. RESULTS: Ametropia was found in every
patient, with anisometropia in nine patients (alpha<0.02). This anisometropia
included an astigmatism that was always greater on the side with the cataract
(alpha<0.001), averaging 2.7 diopters. After occlusion therapy for amblyopia,
the average visual acuity significantly improved to 6/22 in distance vision
(alpha<0.02) and 35/45 in near vision (alpha<0.01). The average follow-up period
was 28 months (5-60 months). CONCLUSION: Amblyopia is related to lens opacities
as well as frequently associated anisometropia. Functional improvement is
greater in near vision than in distance vision. With occlusion therapy for
amblyopia, accommodation is preserved. This factor is of utmost importance as
near vision is preferential in young children. This study provides an
opportunity to recall the importance of refraction and occlusion therapy for
amblyopia, which must be systematically attempted in cases of partial unilateral
congenital cataracts before considering a surgical procedure.
-----
J AAPOS. 2004 Oct;8(5):420-8.
Risk of amblyopia recurrence after cessation of treatment.
Holmes JM, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Astle WF, Birch EE, Cole SR, Cotter SA, Donahue
S, Everett DF, Hertle RW, Keech RV, Paysse E, Quinn GF, Repka MX, Scheiman MM;
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL 33647, USA. holmes.jonathan@mayo.edu
BACKGROUND: Although amblyopia can be successfully treated with patching or
atropine, there have been few prospective studies of amblyopia recurrence once
treatment is discontinued. METHODS: We enrolled 156 children with successfully
treated anisometropic or strabismic amblyopia (145 completed follow-up), who
were younger than 8 years of age and who received continuous amblyopia treatment
for the previous 3 months (prescribed at least 2 hours of daily patching or
prescribed at least one drop of atropine per week) and who had improved at least
3 logMAR levels during the period of continuous treatment. Patients were
followed off treatment for 52 weeks to assess recurrence of amblyopia, defined
as a 2 or more logMAR level reduction of visual acuity from enrollment,
confirmed by a second examination. Recurrence was also considered to have
occurred if treatment was restarted because of a nonreplicated 2 or more logMAR
level reduction of visual acuity. RESULTS: Recurrence occurred in 35 (24%) of
145 cases (95% confidence interval 17% to 32%) and was similar in patients who
stopped patching (25%) and in patients who stopped atropine (21%). In patients
treated with moderately intense patching (6 to 8 hours per day), recurrence was
more common (11 of 26; 42%) when treatment was not reduced prior to cessation
than when treatment was reduced to 2 hours per day prior to cessation (3 of 22;
14%, odds ratio 4.4, 95% confidence interval 1.0 to 18.7). CONCLUSIONS:
Approximately one fourth of successfully treated amblyopic children experience a
recurrence within the first year off treatment. For patients treated with 6 or
more hours of daily patching, our data suggest that the risk of recurrence is
greater when patching is stopped abruptly rather than when it is reduced to 2
hours per day prior to cessation. A randomized clinical trial of no weaning
versus weaning in successfully-treated amblyopia is warranted to confirm these
observational findings.
-----
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3048-54.
Treatment dose-response in amblyopia therapy: the Monitored
Occlusion Treatment of Amblyopia Study (MOTAS).
Stewart CE, Moseley MJ, Stephens DA, Fielder AR.
Department of Visual Neuroscience, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.
c.stewart@imperial.ac.uk
PURPOSE: Amblyopia is the commonest visual disorder of childhood. Yet the
contributions of the two principal treatments (spectacle wear and occlusion) to
outcome are unknown. This study was undertaken to investigate the dose-response
relationship of amblyopia therapy. METHODS: The study comprised three distinct
phases: baseline, in which repeat measures of visual function were undertaken to
confirm the initial visual deficit; refractive adaptation: an 18-week period of
spectacle wear with six weekly measurements of logarithm of the minimum angle of
resolution (logMAR) visual acuity; occlusion: in which participants were
prescribed 6 hours of "patching" per day. In the latter phase, occlusion was
objectively monitored and logMAR visual acuity recorded at 2-week intervals
until any observed gains had ceased. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 94
participants (mean age, 5.1 +/- 1.4 years) with amblyopia associated with
strabismus (n = 34), anisometropia (n = 23), and both anisometropia and
strabismus (n = 37). Eighty-six underwent refractive adaptation. Average
concordance with patching was 48%. The relationship between logMAR visual acuity
gain and total occlusion dose was monotonic and linear. Increasing dose rate
beyond 2 h/d hastened the response but did not improve outcome. More than 80% of
the improvement during occlusion occurred within 6 weeks. Treatment outcome was
significantly better for children younger than 4 years (n = 17) than in those
older than 6 years (n = 24; P = 0.0014). CONCLUSIONS: Continuous objective
monitoring of the amount of patching therapy received has provided insight into
the dose-response relationship of occlusion therapy for amblyopia. Patching is
most effective within the first few weeks of treatment, even for those in
receipt of a relatively small dose. Further studies are needed to elucidate the
neural basis for the dose-response functions. Copyright Association for Research
in Vision and Ophthalmology
-----
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004 Aug;15(4):350-7.
Advances in phakic intraocular lenses: indications, efficacy,
safety, and new designs.
Alio JL.
VISSUM/Instituto Oftalmologico de Alicante. Universidad Miguel Hernandez,
Alicante, Spain. jlalio@oftalio.com
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The recent evolution of phakic intraocular lenses (PIOLs) has
made this refractive surgical technique safer, very predictable, and effective.
Due to these reasons, PIOLs have been expanding the horizon of their
indications. The aim of this review is to update the reader in the recent
advances reported on the topic during the year 2003. RECENT FINDINGS: The most
recent progress has been made towards decreasing the incision size down to 3 mm
or less for all PIOLs models to avoid pupil ovalling in angle-supported designs
with new biomaterials or exchangeable haptics, and to decrease the incidence of
cataract induction in posterior chamber models with modified designs and better
sizing. High-order aberrations and the quality of vision are improved with PIOLs.
The main limitation for the further development of PIOLs is the lack of adequate
diagnostic imaging techniques to perform a precise preoperative study of the
anterior segment anatomy. Emerging diagnostic technologies based on the use of
very high frequency (100 MHz) ultrasound and optical coherence tomography seem
to have a most important role in the future development of PIOLs defining
preoperatively the most adequate anatomic conditions for each design. PIOLs
offer today an excellent alternative for the correction of high and moderate
myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. Emerging indications, still under
investigation, include presbyopia and pediatric anisometropic amblyopia.
SUMMARY: Due to their advantages for quality of vision and the increased
knowledge on their safety, as well as the evidence of their predictability,
PIOLs are expected to largely increase their clinical use as a refractive
surgical technique in the coming years.
-----
J AAPOS. 2004 Aug;8(4):318-24.
Pediatric transscleral sutured intraocular lenses: Efficacy and
safety in 43 eyes followed an average of 3 years.
Bardorf Cm C, Epley Kd K, Lueder Gt G, Tychsen L.
PURPOSE: To report longer term results of transscleral sutured intraocular lens
(TSSIOL) implantation in a sizable cohort of aphakic children, who were not
suitable for contact lens wear and lacked adequate capsular support for sulcus
fixation of an intraocular lens. METHODS: Clinical outcome data were collated by
retrospective review after surgery on 43 consecutive eyes in 32 aphakic children
(mean age at implantation = 10 years; 33% </= age 7 years). Outcome measures
included visual acuity, postoperative refractive error, postoperative
complications, and rate of reoperation. Follow-up averaged 37 months. RESULTS:
Visual acuity improved after surgery in 70% (30) of operated eyes (in 69% or
22/32 children). Fifty-one percent (22/43 eyes) improved by two lines or more.
No patient suffered a loss of acuity or exacerbation of preexisting amblyopia.
Postoperative refraction was within +/-2.0 D of the predicted refraction in 93%
(40/43) of eyes. Complications, with the exception of one eye (2%), were
minor/transient and resolved in the first week after surgery. Complications
included small hyphemas (7%, 3/43 eyes), vitreous hemorrhage (5%, 2/43 eyes),
and ocular hypertension or hypotony (5%). Two eyes (5%) exhibited episodes of
iris capture of the IOL optic, one of which (2%, 1/43) eventually necessitated
reoperation for IOL exchange. No retinal detachments or other retinal
complications were encountered. CONCLUSION: TSSIOL implantation appears to be a
safe and effective method for correcting aphakia in pediatric eyes that lack
adequate capsular support. Safety over a follow-up period longer than the
average 3 years reported here remains to be determined. The surgery is more
difficult to perform than capsular-bag or sulcus implantation and potentially
carries greater risks.
-----
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jul;138(1):70-8.
Photorefractive keratectomy for pediatric anisometropia: safety
and impact on refractive error, visual acuity, and stereopsis.
Paysse EA, Hamill MB, Hussein MA, Koch DD.
Cullen Eye Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology,
Texas Children's Hospital, 6621 Fannin Street, CC 640.00, Houston, Texas 77030,
USA. epaysse@bcm.tmc.edu
PURPOSE: To establish the safety and possible efficacy of excimer laser
photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for treatment of pediatric anisometropia.
DESIGN: Interventional case series METHODS: This is a prospective,
noncomparative interventional case series at an individual university practice
of photorefractive keratectomy in 11 children aged 2 and 11 years with
anisometropic amblyopia who were unable or unwilling to use contact lens,
glasses, and occlusion therapy to treat the amblyopia. The eye with the higher
refractive error was treated with PRK using a standard adult nomogram. The
refractive treatment goal was to decrease the anisometropia to 3 diopters or
less. Main outcome measures were cycloplegic refraction, refractive correction,
degree of corneal haze, uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity,
and stereopsis over 12 months. RESULTS: All patients tolerated the procedure
well. The mean refractive target reduction was -10.10 +/- 1.39 diopters for
myopia and +4.75 +/- 0.50 diopters for hyperopia. The mean achieved refractive
error reduction at 12 months for myopia was -10.56 +/- 3.00 diopters and for
hyperopia was +4.08 +/- 0.8 diopters. Corneal haze at 12 months was minimal.
Uncorrected visual acuity improved by 2 or more lines in 6 (75%) of the eight
children able to perform psychophysical acuity tests. Best spectacle-corrected
visual acuity improved by 2 lines in 3 (38%) of patients. Stereopsis improved in
3 (33%) of nine patients. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric PRK can be safely performed for
anisometropia. The refractive error response in children appears to be similar
to that of adults with comparable refractive errors. Visual acuity and
stereopsis improved despite several children being outside the standard age of
visual plasticity. Photorefractive keratectomy may play a role in the management
of anisometropia in selected pediatric patients.
-----
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Jun;45(6):1817-22.
Binocular visual field changes after surgery in esotropic
amblyopia.
Quah SA, Kaye SB.
Royal Liverpool University Hospital and Royal Liverpool Childrens Hospital,
Liverpool, United Kingdom.
PURPOSE: To determine binocular visual field (BVF) changes after strabismus
surgery in children with large angle esotropia, and whether these changes can be
predicted, using a prism to correct the preoperative angle of deviation.
METHODS: Monocular visual field (MVF) and BVF were measured by Goldmann
perimetry in healthy adults (n = 6) using a range of prisms. Visual fields were
then measured in normal children (n = 19) and in children with large angle
esotropic amblyopia (n = 28). The visual field was measured preoperatively with
and without a prism equal to the angle of esotropia. A further evaluation was
made at 2 and 18 months postoperatively. RESULTS: In healthy adults, prisms had
no significant effect on the extent of MVF or BVF. There was no significant
difference in the MVF in children with and without strabismus. There was a
significant reduction in the BVF and in the ratio of the BVF to MVF between
normal children (138 degrees, 0.59; P = 0.01) and children with esotropic
amblyopia (120 degrees, 0.57; P = 0.02). Postoperatively, there was a
significant improvement in the BVF (P = 0.02), which was maintained at 18
months. The increase in BVF was significantly greater than the variation in
repeat fields (P = 0.04), with 8 of 13 children showing an increase in the BVF
above the 95% CI of the repeatability measurements. There was a good linear
correlation between the size of the preoperative BVF in the presence of a prism
and the postoperative BVF (r = 0.90 P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Children with
esotropic amblyopia demonstrate a significant reduction in their BVF. Prisms
correcting the preoperative angle could be used to predict the potential
increase in the BVF after surgery. Patients with a BVF/MVF approaching that
found in normal children, however, may not show an improvement in the size of
their BVF after surgery.
-----
Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2004 May;221(5):386-9.
[Does amblyopia therapy make sense in eyes with severe organic
defects?]
[Article in German]
Lengyel D, Klainguti G, Mojon DS.
Augenklinik, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, Schweiz.
BACKGROUND: In eyes with severe organic defects the question arises if amblyopia
therapy makes sense. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three children are presented in whom
despite severe organic eye diseases amblyopia therapy was tried. The first child
had a unilateral large macular scar secondary to retinoblastoma treatment, the
second a unilateral severe optic nerve atrophy secondary to an orbital
hemangioma, and the third a unilateral large optic nerve coloboma. RESULTS: In
the first case a reading visual acuity of 0.9 was achieved by occlusion therapy
and in the second a reading visual acuity of 0.5. In the third case occlusion
lead to alternation of the divergent strabismus (child too strongly retarded for
reliable visual acuity measurements). CONCLUSIONS: During the sensitive phase,
amblyopia therapy is also indicated in eyes with severe organic defects since
good visual acuities can be achieved.
-----
Vision Res. 2004;44(14):1623-34.
Treatment of astigmatism-related amblyopia in 3- to 5-year-old
children.
Harvey EM, Dobson V, Miller JM, Sherrill DL.
Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Arizona, 655 N. Alvernon, Suite
108, Tucson, AZ 85711, USA. emharvey@u.arizona.edu
Best-corrected acuity was measured for vertical and horizontal gratings and for
Lea Symbols recognition acuity in 3- to 5-year-old children with high
astigmatism and in non-astigmatic children. There was significant amblyopia
among astigmatic children at baseline. There was no evidence that eyeglass
correction of astigmatism resulted in a reduction in amblyopia over a 4-month
average treatment duration (although vision in astigmatic children was
significantly improved immediately upon eyeglass correction, indicating that
eyeglass correction did provide a visual benefit). Treatment outcome results are
discussed in terms of both methodological issues and theoretical implications.
-----
Optometry. 2004 Apr;75(4):241-4.
Full-time occlusion compared to part-time occlusion for the
treatment of amblyopia.
Hug T.
The Children's Mercy Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Kansas City,
Missouri 64108, USA. thug@cmh.edu
BACKGROUND: Occlusion of the better-seeing eye as a method of treatment for
amblyopia has long been a standard of care. A difference exists between
practitioners on using either full-time occlusion or part-time occlusion.
METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients (ages 3 to 7 years) with
amblyopia was performed. The patients were prescribed either full-time occlusion
or part-time occlusion for the primary treatment of their amblyopia. Exclusions
were made for patients with an organic or structural component of their
amblyopia. Twenty-one patients were included in the full-time occlusion group
and 24 patients were included in the part-time occlusion group. RESULTS:
Seventy-six percent of patients who completed full-time occlusion achieved 20/40
acuity or better and 67% achieved 20/30 or better, with an average treatment
time of six weeks. Fifty-eight percent of patients who completed part-time
occlusion achieved 20/40 acuity or better and only 46% achieved 20/30 or better,
with an average treatment time of 26 weeks. For patients with 20/80 or worse
amblyopia, 82% achieved 20/40 or better with full-time occlusion. Only 40% of
part-time occluders with 20/80 or worse achieved 20/40. Occlusion amblyopia did
not develop in any patient. CONCLUSION: A higher percentage of amblyopic
patients treated with full-time occlusion achieved 20/30 acuity in the amblyopic
eye over a shorter duration of treatment.
-----
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 27;101(17):6692-7. Epub 2004 Apr 19.
Improving vision in adult amblyopia by perceptual learning.
Polat U, Ma-Naim T, Belkin M, Sagi D.
Goldschleger Eye Research Institute, Tel-Aviv University, Sheba Medical Center,
52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel. upolat@sheba.health.gov.il
Practicing certain visual tasks leads, as a result of a process termed
"perceptual learning," to a significant improvement in performance. Learning is
specific for basic stimulus features such as local orientation, retinal
location, and eye of presentation, suggesting modification of neuronal processes
at the primary visual cortex in adults. It is not known, however, whether such
low-level learning affects higher-level visual tasks such as recognition. By
systematic low-level training of an adult visual system malfunctioning as a
result of abnormal development (leading to amblyopia) of the primary visual
cortex during the "critical period," we show here that induction of low-level
changes might yield significant perceptual benefits that transfer to higher
visual tasks. The training procedure resulted in a 2-fold improvement in
contrast sensitivity and in letter-recognition tasks. These findings demonstrate
that perceptual learning can improve basic representations within an adult
visual system that did not develop during the critical period.
-----
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2004 Mar-Apr;41(2):89-95.
Successful occlusion therapy for amblyopia in 11- to 15-year-old
children.
Mohan K, Saroha V, Sharma A.
Squint Clinic, Grewal Eye Institute, Chandigarh, India.
PURPOSE: To investigate the effectiveness of full-time occlusion therapy in
treating amblyopia in 11- to 15-year-old children and to determine its lasting
results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-five compliant children 11 to 15 years old
who had amblyopia were treated with full-time (during all waking hours)
occlusion of their good eye until no further improvement in the visual acuity of
their amblyopic eye was observed on 3 consecutive monthly follow-up
examinations. After this, part-time (4 hours per day) occlusion therapy was used
randomly in 24 of 55 patients for 3 to 6 months for maintenance of the final
visual acuity. Snellen visual acuity and its logMAR equivalent were recorded
before treatment, at the cessation of full-time occlusion therapy, and on the
most recent examination. RESULTS: All 55 of the patients had improved visual
acuity after treatment. The mean improvement was 0.46 logMAR unit (4.6 Snellen
lines). Thirty-two of the patients had a mean follow-up of 17.6 months after the
cessation of full-time and maintenance occlusion therapy. Twenty-nine (91%) of
the 32 patients maintained improved visual acuity, whereas 3 (9%) exhibited a
regression in visual acuity. Maintenance occlusion therapy did not have a
significant stabilizing effect on the improved visual acuity. CONCLUSION:
Compliant, full-time occlusion effectively improves acuity in children 11 to 15
years old who have amblyopia due to strabismus, anisometropia, or both. Most
older patients have lasting improvement with or without maintenance patching.
-----
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Mar;137(3):581-3.
A prospective, pilot study of treatment of amblyopia
in children 10 to <18 years old.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.
PURPOSE: To determine whether amblyopia can be successfully
treated in older children and adolescents. DESIGN: Prospective,
single group treatment trial. METHODS: Sixty-six amblyopic patients
aged 10 to <18 years with amblyopic eye acuity of 20/40 to
20/160 were treated with daily patching (> or =2 hours a day)
combined with at least 1 hour of near activities. Visual acuity
was measured before and after 2 months of prescribed treatment.
RESULTS: Visual acuity improved 2 or more lines from baseline
in 18 (27%) of the 66 patients (95% confidence interval, 17%-40%),
and the improvement appeared similar in 10- to <14-year-olds
and 14- to <18-year-olds. CONCLUSIONS: Amblyopia treatment
can improve visual acuity in older children and adolescents. A
randomized controlled trial is needed to determine if there is
an upper age limit for which amblyopia treatment is successful.
-----
J Refract Surg. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):25-8.
Laser in situ keratomileusis improves visual acuity
in some adult eyes with amblyopia.
Barequet IS, Wygnanski-Jaffe T, Hirsh A.
The Refractive Surgery Center, Herzliya, Israel. barequet@cs.technion.ac.il
PURPOSE: To report the results of laser in situ keratomileusis
(LASIK) in a series of adult patients with amblyopia. METHODS:
A retrospective noncomparative review was performed on patients
with amblyopia who underwent LASIK for correction of ametropia,
using the Summit Krumeich Barraquer microkeratome and the Nidek
EC-5000 excimer laser. Data were collected on uncorrected visual
acuity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, manifest refraction,
anterior segment evaluation, intraocular pressure, corneal topography,
and dilated fundus examination (preoperative and postoperatively
on day 1, months 2 and 6). RESULTS: Eight eyes of seven patients
were included, with a mean patient age of 30 +/- 10 years (range
21 to 49 yr). Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction
was -4.70 D (range -12.62 to +4.71 D) and the best spectacle-corrected
visual acuity varied from 20/32 to 20/80. At 2 months after LASIK,
mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.37 +/- 0.60 D (range
-1.37 to + 0.60 D), uncorrected visual acuity ranged between 20/20
to 20/30, and a mean gain of 3 Snellen lines (range 2 to 4 lines)
was observed. All patients reported significant subjective improvement
in their perception of vision. The visual acuity and subjective
improvement were maintained throughout 6 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: LASIK with the Nidek EC-5000 laser for correction
of ametropia in adult amblyopic eyes provided encouraging results
for visual acuity improvement beyond correction of the refractive
error.
-----
Br J Ophthalmol. 2004 Jan;88(1):19-21.
LASIK surgery in children.
O'Keefe M, Nolan L.
Mater Private Hospital and Children's University Hospital, Temple
Street, Dublin 1, Ireland. lchopth@indio.ie
AIMS: To report success in the treatment of high myopia in
children with LASIK. To report the visual results, complications
and postoperative management of children with high myopia. METHODS:
Six children (seven eyes) with high myopia were included in this
series. Preoperative and postoperative refraction, visual acuity,
and pachymetry were compared. RESULTS: Six children with high
myopia ranging from -5.00DS to -16DS were treated. There were
three males and three females. Five children had improved refraction
and visual acuity post-LASIK. Age ranged from 2 to 12 years. Five
of the children had unilateral amblyopia preoperatively. One had
bilateral high myopia. CONCLUSION: High myopia in children may
be treated safely and effectively with LASIK.
-----
Retina. 2003 Dec;23(6):792-5.
Lens-sparing vitreous surgery for infantile amblyogenic
vitreous hemorrhage.
Capone A Jr.
Associated Retinal Consultants, P.C., Royal Oak, Michigan 48073,
USA. acaponejr@yahoo.com
PURPOSE: To report on a series of infants with amblyogenic
vitreous and/or subinternal limiting membrane hemorrhage managed
by lens-sparing vitrectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective case series
studying retinal attachment status and visual acuity. RESULTS:
Eleven eyes sustained vitreous hemorrhage as a consequence of
shaken baby syndrome, 1 due to hyaloidal canal hemorrhage extending
into the vitreous, 1 due to Terson syndrome, 1 due to birth trauma,
and 2 due to a presumed coagulation disorder. Age of the patients
at the time of surgery ranged from 2 to 23 months (age adjusted
for prematurity). Follow-up ranged from 7 to 81 months (mean,
28 months). Ten eyes had visual improvement. Two infants with
shaken baby syndrome had bilateral nonrecordable flash visual
evoked potential before surgery; one eye of one infant had a better
than expected visual outcome after surgery. One eye sustained
a retinal tear without detachment. One eye in an infant with severe
shaken baby syndrome and traumatic retinopathy developed a total
rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
CONCLUSIONS: Infantile amblyogenic vitreous hemorrhage may be
effectively managed by lens-sparing vitreous surgery. Visual outcome
of shaken baby syndrome may be limited as a consequence of structural
damage to the retina, optic nerve, or posterior visual pathways.
-----
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Nov;121(11):1625-32.
Impact of patching and atropine treatment on the
child and family in the amblyopia treatment study.
Holmes JM, Beck RW, Kraker RT, Cole SR, Repka MX, Birch
EE, Felius J, Christiansen SP, Coats DK, Kulp MT; Pediatric Eye
Disease Investigator Group.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the psychosocial impact on the child and
family of patching and atropine as treatments for moderate amblyopia
in children younger than 7 years. METHODS: In a randomized, controlled
clinical trial, 419 children younger than 7 years with amblyopic
eye visual acuity in the range of 20/40 to 20/100 were assigned
to receive treatment with either patching or atropine at 47 clinical
sites. After 5 weeks of treatment, a parental quality-of-life
questionnaire was completed for 364 (87%) of the 419 patients.Main
Outcome Measure Overall and subscale scores on the Amblyopia Treatment
Index. RESULTS: High internal validity and reliability were demonstrated
for the Amblyopia Treatment Index questionnaire. The overall Amblyopia
Treatment Index scores and the 3 subscale scores were consistently
higher (worse) in the patching group compared with the atropine-treated
group (overall mean, 2.52 vs 2.02, P<.001; adverse effects
of treatment: mean, 2.35 vs 2.11, P =.002; difficulty with compliance:
mean, 2.46 vs 1.99, P<.001; and social stigma: mean, 3.09 vs
1.84, P<.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Although the Amblyopia
Treatment Index questionnaire results indicated that both atropine
and patching treatments were well tolerated by the child and family,
atropine received more favorable scores overall and on all 3 questionnaire
subscales.
-----
Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2088-92.
The relationship between stereopsis and visual
acuity after occlusion therapy for amblyopia.
Lee SY, Isenberg SJ.
Department of Ophthalmology, Jules Stein Eye Institute, University
of California Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California
90095, USA.
PURPOSE: To investigate the relationship between visual acuity
(VA) and stereoacuity after occlusion therapy in patients with
various types of amblyopia. DESIGN: Retrospective noncomparative
case series. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one children with amblyopia caused
by anisometropia with no strabismus (26 children), small angle
(</=8 prism diopters) or intermittent strabismus (20), or both
(15). METHODS: All were treated with occlusion therapy. Visual
acuity and near stereopsis using the Titmus test (Stereo Optical
Inc., Chicago, IL) were measured at each clinic visit. MAIN OUTCOME
MEASURE: The change in near stereopsis relative to distance VA
after occlusion therapy. RESULTS: Mean age at initiation of therapy
was 5.1 years (range = 3.5-8) and mean follow-up 52.3 weeks (range
= 13-192). Mean duration of occlusion was 36 weeks (range = 12-102).
After occlusion treatment, mean VA of all children improved from
0.43 to 0.78 (P<0.0001), whereas mean stereoacuity improved
from 1167.4 seconds of arc to 101 (P<0.0001). By the last visit,
85.2% (52 of 61) of patients demonstrated at least 2 lines of
improvement in VA. There was a significant linear relationship
between VA and stereoacuity (P<0.001). The 26 anisometropic
patients without strabismus enjoyed improvement in VA and stereopsis
(P<0.0001) similar to that of the 35 with small-angle or intermittent
strabismus (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: When employing occlusion
therapy for amblyopia (due to anisometropia, small-angle or intermittent
strabismus, or a combination), as VA improves, stereopsis generally
also improves.
-----
J Med Assoc Thai. 2003 Aug;86 Suppl 3:S556-62.
Successful amblyopia therapy by using synoptophore.
Subharngkasen I.
Department of Ophthalmology, Queen Sirikit National Institute
of Child Health, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
BACKGROUND: Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular
visual impairment in children. Even though occlusion therapy is
the treatment of choice, the success rate has not been well achieved
due to poor compliance. Other alternative treatments have been
tried for a better outcome. OBJECTIVE: To report successful therapy
for amblyopia using synoptophore. METHOD: A retrospective study
of 25 amblyopic children enrolled in the amblyopic treatment program,
from September 18, 1996 to October 14, 2002. The program included
patching of the good eye, stimulating the amblyopic eye with synoptophore,
and recording the visual acuity of both eyes each time. All children
were regularly examined every 3 months by the same ophthalmologist.
The compliance of each individual was reassessed and adjusted.
At the end of the training program, visual acuity of the amblyopic
and the good eyes were measured, plus the binocularity of both
eyes were recorded as the main outcome measurement. RESULT: Final
(best) visual acuities were between 20/20 and 20/30 for 19 cases
of 21 cases (90%). Final best binocularity was maintained in 15
of 25 patients (60%), including 4 anisometropic patients (100%),
2 ptosis patients (50%), 4 pseudophakic patients (80%), 2 strabismic
patients (40%), and 3 combined group patients (100%) CONCLUSION:
By using synoptophore to stimulate the amblyopic eye, while occluding
the good eye, it improved the level of vision to a certain acceptable
degree. Thus, compliance of the treatment can be well achieved.
However, the understanding and good cooperation of the parents
were also a must for successful amblyopia therapy.
-----
Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2075-87.
A randomized trial of prescribed patching regimens
for treatment of severe amblyopia in children.
Holmes JM, Kraker RT, Beck RW, Birch EE, Cotter SA, Everett
DF, Hertle RW, Quinn GE, Repka MX, Scheiman MM, Wallace DK; Pediatric
Eye Disease Investigator Group.
OBJECTIVE: To compare full-time patching (all hours or all
but 1 hour per day) to 6 hours of patching per day, as prescribed
treatments for severe amblyopia in children younger than 7 years.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized multicenter clinical trial (32
sites). PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-five children younger
than 7 years with amblyopia in the range of 20/100 to 20/400.
INTERVENTION: Randomization either to full-time patching or to
6 hours of patching per day, each combined with at least 1 hour
of near-visual activities during patching. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE:
Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye after 4 months. RESULTS: Visual
acuity in the amblyopic eye improved a similar amount in both
groups. The improvement in the amblyopic eye acuity from baseline
to 4 months averaged 4.8 lines in the 6-hour group and 4.7 lines
in the full-time group (P = 0.45). CONCLUSION: Six hours of prescribed
daily patching produces an improvement in visual acuity that is
of similar magnitude to the improvement produced by prescribed
full-time patching in treating severe amblyopia in children 3
to less than 7 years of age.
-----
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;136(4):630-9.
The course of moderate amblyopia treated with
atropine in children: experience of the amblyopia treatment study.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.
PURPOSE: To assess the course of the response to atropine treatment
of moderate amblyopia and to assess factors predictive of the
treatment response in children 3 years old to younger than 7 years
old. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing
atropine and patching (one of the amblyopia treatment studies).
METHODS: A total of 195 children 3 years old to younger than 7
years of age with amblyopia in the range of 20/40 to 20/100 from
the atropine treatment arm of this trial were enrolled and included
in this analysis. At baseline, daily topical atropine was prescribed
for the sound eye. During follow-up, a plano spectacle lens was
prescribed for the sound eye for patients whose amblyopia had
not been successfully treated with atropine alone. Follow-up examinations
were performed at 5 weeks, 16 weeks, and 6 months. The primary
outcome measure was visual acuity in the amblyopic eye at 6 months.
RESULTS: Mean visual acuity improved from baseline by 1.3 lines
after 5 weeks of treatment, by 2.4 lines after 16 weeks, and by
2.8 lines at 6 months. Visual acuity of 20/30 or better and/or
3 or more lines of improvement from baseline was achieved by 75%
of the patients. Improvement occurred over the entire range of
baseline acuities (20/40 to 20/100) and was not related to patient
age (P =.36). Among the 134 patients improving 3 or more lines
from baseline, 7% achieved their maximum improvement by 5 weeks
and 46% by 16 weeks. Among the 55 patients who did not respond
adequately to atropine alone and were prescribed a plano lens
for the sound eye, the mean improvement before the use of the
plano lens was 1.0 lines, compared with 1.6 lines after prescribing
the plano lens (P =.11). None of the demographic or clinical factors
assessed was predictive of the response to treatment. A shift
in fixation preference at/near from the atropinized sound eye
to the amblyopic eye was not required for the amblyopic eye to
improve; amblyopic eye acuity improved 3 or more lines in 29 (60%)
of the 48 patients who were found to be using the atropinized
sound eye on fixation preference testing. A 2 or more line decrease
in sound eye visual acuity occurred more frequently when a plano
lens was prescribed in addition to atropine (7 of 43, 16%) compared
with treatment with atropine alone (4 of 123, 3%; P =.01). CONCLUSIONS:
A beneficial effect of atropine is present throughout the age
range of 3 years old to younger than 7 years old, and with an
acuity range of 20/40 to 20/100. A shift in near fixation to the
amblyopic eye is not essential for atropine to be effective in
all cases. Sound eye acuity should be monitored when a plano spectacle
lens is prescribed for the sound eye to augment the treatment
effect of atropine.
-----
Am J Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;136(4):620-9.
The course of moderate amblyopia treated with
patching in children: experience of the amblyopia treatment study.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.
PURPOSE: To assess the course of the response to patching treatment
of moderate amblyopia and to assess factors predictive of the
response in children 3 years old to younger than 7 years old.
DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing patching
and atropine (one of the amblyopia treatment studies). METHODS:
A total of 209 children 3 years old to younger than 7 years of
age with amblyopia in the range of 20/40 to 20/100 from the patching
treatment arm of this trial were treated with patching of the
sound eye from 6 hours per day up to all waking hours. Follow-up
examinations were performed at 5 weeks, 16 weeks, and 6 months.
The primary outcome measure was visual acuity in the amblyopic
eye at 6 months. RESULTS: After 5 weeks of treatment, mean amblyopic
eye acuity improved from baseline by 2.2 lines. For patients with
baseline acuity of 20/80 or 20/100, a greater number of hours
of prescribed patching was associated with greater improvement
in the first 5 weeks (P =.05). However, this relationship was
not present when baseline acuity was 20/40 to 20/60 (P =.57).
At 6 months, visual acuity was improved from baseline by a mean
of 3.1 lines, with the amount of improvement no longer related
to the number of hours patching prescribed at baseline (P =.93).
Among the 157 patients improving at least 3 lines from baseline,
15% achieved their maximum improvement by 5 weeks and 52% by 16
weeks. None of the demographic or clinical factors assessed was
predictive of the response to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment
of moderate amblyopia, a beneficial effect of patching is present
throughout the age range of 3 years old to younger than 7 years
old and the acuity range of 20/40 to 20/100. At 6 months, the
amount of improvement appears to be similar when 6 hours of daily
patching are initially prescribed vs a greater number of hours.
However, when the baseline acuity is 20/80 to 20/100, a greater
number of hours of prescribed patching may improve acuity faster.
-----
Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2003 Oct;31(5):418-23.
Early surgical intervention as definitive treatment
for ocular adnexal capillary haemangioma.
Slaughter K, Sullivan T, Boulton J, O'Reagan P, Gole G.
Eyelid, Lacrimal and Orbital Clinic, Royal Children's Hospital,
Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Background: Capillary haemangioma is the most common orbital
and eyelid tumour of childhood, with a prevalence ranging from
1 to 3%. Periorbital haemangiomas can cause amblyopia secondary
to anisometropia, induced astigmatism, strabismus or occlusion
of the visual axis. Oral and intralesional steroids are considered
to be the most accepted form of primary treatment. The authors
have been performing early surgery as definitive treatment in
selected lesions and believe it has an important role. Methods:
A retrospective chart review of 17 infants (2-20 months old) seen
between 1996 and 2002 was carried out. Indications for surgery
in the present series were astigmatism, rapid growth, anisometropic
amblyopia and obscuration of the visual axis. Thirteen were treated
primarily with surgery and the other four were treated with other
methods prior to considering surgery. Preoperative computed tomography
scans were obtained when indicated. Results: Fourteen lesions
were completely excised; residual tissue was deliberately left
in order to preserve vital structures in three cases. No major
surgical complications were noted. One child with residual tissue
after surgery, who had proliferation of the remaining tissue,
developed anisometropic amblyopia and ptosis. One child had a
mild ptosis postoperatively that resolved after 6 months. Follow
up was for an average 11.1 months. Conclusions: Early surgical
intervention should be considered in a multidisciplinary team
approach as a primary treatment option with selected, isolated
haemangiomas, without a significant cutaneous component. Surgery
is a safe, effective treatment for selected lesions, provides
a definitive early treatment, and prevents astigmatism and occlusion-related
amblyopia.
-----
Ophthalmology. 2003 Aug;110(8):1632-7; discussion 1637-8.
A comparison of atropine and patching treatments
for moderate amblyopia by patient age, cause of amblyopia, depth
of amblyopia, and other factors.
Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the relative treatment effect
of patching compared with atropine for moderate amblyopia varies
according to patient age, cause of amblyopia or depth of amblyopia,
and initial number of patching hours prescribed. DESIGN: Multicenter,
randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Four hundred nineteen
children younger than 7 years of age with amblyopia in the range
of 20/40 to 20/100. METHODS: Patients were assigned randomly to
receive treatment with either patching or atropine and followed
up for 6 months. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Single-surrounded HOTV
optotype visual acuity in the amblyopic eye after 6 months. RESULTS:
Improvement in the amblyopic eye visual acuity was slightly greater
in the patching group compared with the atropine group in all
subgroups based on patient characteristics. The relative treatment
effect did not vary with age (P = 0.84), cause of amblyopia (P
= 0.68), or baseline amblyopic eye acuity (P = 0.59). Patients
with acuity of 20/80 to 20/100 who were prescribed 10 or more
hours a day of patching showed a more rapid improvement in acuity
than did patients prescribed a lesser amount of patching (P =
0.01) or than did patients in the atropine group (P < 0.001),
but by 6 months, the differences were not significant (P = 0.47
and 0.15, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A beneficial effect of both
patching and atropine is present throughout the age range of 3
to younger than 7 years old and the acuity range of 20/40 to 20/100.
Patients with acuity of 20/80 to 20/100 improve faster when a
greater number of hours of patching is prescribed, but by 6 months,
the amount of improvement is not related to the number of hours
of patching initially prescribed.
-----
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003 Jun;81(3):294-8.
Capillary haemangioma of the eyelids and orbit:
a clinical review of the safety and efficacy of
intralesional steroid.
O'Keefe M, Lanigan B, Byrne SA.
National Children's Eye Centre, The Children's University Hospital,
Dublin, Ireland. tchopth@indigo.ie
PURPOSE: To describe the presenting features, investigations,
treatment and outcome of a series of patients with capillary haemangioma
of the eyelids and orbit. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of
21 patients, presenting between the years 1985 and 2000. Effectiveness
of treatment was determined by final visual acuity and cosmetic
result. RESULTS: Lesions were more common in females and the upper
eyelid was a definite site of predilection. A total of 87.5% of
lesions presented within 6 weeks of birth. Intralesional steroid
injections were received by 79% of patients. Amblyopia was a definite
complication. No local or systemic complications were associated
with intralesional steroid injection. Surgery and laser treatment
were reserved for persistent lesions. CONCLUSION: Early recognition
and prompt treatment with intralesional steroid prevents early
occlusion amblyopia, but follow-up and management of refractive
amblyopia with glasses and patching is necessary in the longer
term. In this series, intralesional steroid proved to be a safe
effective treatment.
-----
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 May;121(5):603-11.
A randomized trial of patching regimens for treatment
of moderate amblyopia in children.
Repka MX, Beck RW, Holmes JM, Birch EE, Chandler DL, Cotter
SA, Hertle RW, Kraker RT, Moke PS, Quinn GE, Scheiman MM; Pediatric
Eye Disease Investigator Group.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL 33613, USA. rbeck@jaeb.org
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 hours vs 6 hours of daily patching
as treatments for moderate amblyopia in children younger than
7 years. METHODS: In a randomized multicenter (35 sites) clinical
trial, 189 children younger than 7 years with amblyopia in the
range of 20/40 to 20/80 were assigned to receive either 2 hours
or 6 hours of daily patching combined with at least 1 hour per
day of near visual activities during patching.Main Outcome Measure
Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye after 4 months. RESULTS: Visual
acuity in the amblyopic eye improved a similar amount in both
groups. The improvement in the visual acuity of the amblyopic
eye from baseline to 4 months averaged 2.40 lines in each group
(P =.98). The 4-month visual acuity was at least 20/32 and/or
improved from baseline by 3 or more lines in 62% of patients in
each group (P>.99). CONCLUSION: When combined with prescribing
1 hour of near visual activities, 2 hours of daily patching produces
an improvement in visual acuity that is of similar magnitude to
the improvement produced by 6 hours of daily patching in treating
moderate amblyopia in children aged 3 to 7 years.
-----
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2003 May;26(5):485-8.
[Use of contact lenses for correction of amblyopia
in high unilateral myopia in children]
[Article in French]
Gianoli F, Klainguti G.
Unite de Strabologie, Hopital Ophtalmique Universitaire Jules
Gonin, 15, avenue de France, CH-1004 Lausanne, Suisse.
Persistent amblyopia in high unilateral myopia (anisometropia
higher than or equal to - 3.5 diopters) has different causes:
missed early diagnosis or therapeutic strategy error. With the
intention of preventing the latter, we investigated the use of
contact lenses. With occlusion treatment, we obtained substantial
improvement of visual acuity of the amblyopic eye. Exophoric and
exotropic patients retained all binocular vision and binocular
union, as did most (3/4) of the microesotropic patients. This
treatment has the advantages of being permanent, esthetic, and
well accepted by parents.
-----
Ophthalmol Clin North Am. 2003 Mar;16(1):119-25.
New developments in corneal and external diseaseLASIK.
Dhaliwal DK, Mather R.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh School of
Medicine, Eye & Ear Institute, 203 Lothrop Street, Room 759,
Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. dhaliwaldk@msx.upmc.edu
Lamellar refractive surgery has evolved into LASIK, which is
a widely performed, versatile procedure with a high patient acceptance.
In this chapter, the two main components of LASIK were discussed:
flap creation and stromal ablation. In each of these areas, the
authors explored current technology and new advances, including
the femtosecond laser and wavefront-guided ablations. Expanded
indications and therapeutic application of LASIK also have come
to the forefront. The treatment of anisomyopic amblyopia in the
pediatric population is a prime example and was discussed fully
in this chapter. The field of refractive surgery has never been
stagnant. Surgeons and scientists continue to explore new modalities
to increase safety, to improve results, and to broaden applications
that benefit the patient population.
-----
Neurosci Lett. 2003 Mar 13;339(1):49-52.
Functional MRI of amblyopia before and after levodopa.
Yang CI, Yang ML, Huang JC, Wan YL, Jui-Fang Tsai R, Wai
YY, Liu HL.
Department of Ophthalmology, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan,
Taiwan.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was applied to
five older amblyopes with monocular amblyopia before and after
levodopa treatment. During the experiment, images were acquired
in two runs with visual stimulation delivered through the sound
and the amblyopic eyes, respectively. The experiment was performed
on each of the subjects, before and after their oral administration
of levodopa/carbidopa (0.5/0.12 mg/kg) three times per day for
7 weeks. Our study demonstrated that there was no effect on the
spatial extent of the visual cortical activation during the sound
eye stimulation (P=0.17), but some improvement during the amblyopic
eye stimulation (P=0.06). The volume ratio between the amblyopic
and sound eye stimulation significantly increased after the treatment
(P<0.05). This finding supports the previous studies of levodopa
effect on amblyopia at the visual cortical level, and suggests
that fMRI can be a useful tool in assessing changes of visual
cortical activity after the treatment
-----
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2003 Feb;50(1):189-96.
Amblyopia.
Mittelman D.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Illinois at Chicago,
UIC Eye Center, 1855 W. Taylor, Chicago, IL, USA. mittelmd@yahoo.com
Amblyopia is a serious medical condition affecting tens of
millions of individuals around the world. For the most part it
is correctable, assuming that it is promptly recognized and vigorously
treated. Amblyopia may result from form deprivation, anisometropia,
or strabismus in infants and young children. Basic research in
animal models has shown that the major pathologic changes in amblyopia
occur in the visual cortex of the brain. The mainstay of treatment
remains patching, although penalization has a role to play in
the management of moderate degrees of amblyopia. Better methods
for early identification of patients with amblyopia are being
developed, along with newer novel methods of treatment.
-----
J Pediatr Ophthalmol
Strabismus 2002 Nov-Dec;39(6):326-30; quiz 345-6
Long-term
follow-up of L-dopa treatment in children with amblyopia.
Leguire LE, Komaromy KL, Nairus TM, Rogers GL.
Department of Ophthalmology, Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
43205-2696, USA.
PURPOSE: To assess
regression of visual acuity in children who previously participated
in three longitudinal studies of therapy with levodopa-carbidopa
(L-dopa) plus occlusion for amblyopia. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty
(91%) of 33 subjects contacted who participated in three similar
7-week, longitudinal dosing studies returned for follow-up. The
three previous studies were undertaken approximately 27 (study
1), 21 (study 2), and 9 (study 3) months prior to this follow-up
test session. All subjects received L-dopa for 7 weeks combined
with part-time occlusion of the dominant eye after the termination
of standard, occlusion only, therapy. Some subjects in study 2
received L-dopa without occlusion. Sixteen subjects with amblyopia
who received occlusion only served as a control group. RESULTS:
Subjects who received L-dopa plus occlusion demonstrated significant,
but similar, amounts of regression of visual acuity from the end
of their respective L-dopa studies to the follow-up test session.
Subjects in study 1 regressed 1.3 lines, subjects in study 2 regressed
1.5 lines, and subjects in study 3 regressed 1.4 lines. The control
group regressed, on average, 1.1 lines. This was similar to the
overall regression found in the groups receiving L-dopa plus occlusion.
Subjects in study 2 who received L-dopa without occlusion regressed
2.1 lines, significantly more than the occlusion only group or
the L-dopa plus occlusion group. CONCLUSIONS: Children with amblyopia
show similar amounts of regression of visual acuity after therapy
with L-dopa plus occlusion and after therapy with occlusion only.
Given that therapy with L-dopa plus occlusion initially improved
visual acuity by approximately 1.7 lines following the termination
of standard therapy, L-dopa plus occlusion may reset baseline
visual acuity and lead to long-term improvement in visual acuity
after recidivism.
-----
Ophthalmologica
2002 Nov-Dec;216(6):426-9
Occlusion
therapy for the treatment of amblyopia: letting the parents decide.
Tripathi A, O'Donnell NP, Holden R, Kaye L, Kaye SB.
Birmingham and Midland Eye Centre, City Hospital, Birmingham,
UK. ajtrip@hotmail.com
BACKGROUND: Compliance
with prescribed occlusion therapy is a significant problem in
the treatment of amblyopia. Parental preference for a particular
type of occlusion treatment has not been previously addressed.
Unless parental views are taken into account when planning therapy,
compliance may be poor and treatment may fail. SUBJECTS AND METHODS:
Parents of children with strabismic and/or anisometropic amblyopia
who were due to start or had already had occlusion treatment were
included in this study. Group A comprised parents of children
who had no previous experience of occlusion, and group B comprised
parents of children who had previous experience of occlusion therapy.
Parental preferences regarding occlusion therapy were investigated
by way of a questionnaire, in which they were asked whether they
would prefer part-day/full-week occlusion or all-day/part-week
occlusion so that the total number of hours of occlusion per week
was the same. RESULTS: One hundred parents completed the questionnaire,
47 from group A and 53 from group B. A significant number of parents
in group A (95.3%) who had no previous experience with occlusion
preferred part-day/full-week occlusion (p < 0.001), whereas
there was no such preference among parents who had experience
with occlusion, that is only 54.3% of parents in group B showed
a preference for part-day/full-week occlusion (p = 0.1). The reasons
given by the parents for their preferences varied but were in
keeping with their lifestyles so that the type of occlusion regimen
chosen by the parents was in accordance with the reasons given
for their choice. CONCLUSION: Parental preferences should be considered
when occlusion therapy is planned if compliance is to be improved.
For maintenance occlusion, it would be reasonable to prescribe
the number of hours of occlusion required per week and allow parents
the responsibility to implement the pattern of occlusion according
to their circumstances--the implied restriction ensuring that
the number of hours of occlusion per week is met. Although parents
appeared to have preconceived ideas before the commencement of
treatment, their preferences changed once treatment had begun.
Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
-----
J AAPOS 2002 Dec;6(6):368-72
Levodopa-carbidopa
with occlusion in older children with amblyopia.
Bhartiya P, Sharma P, Biswas NR, Tandon R, Khokhar SK.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi.
PURPOSE: To study
the role of levodopa-carbidopa in supplementing occlusion therapy
in older children with strabismic or anisometropic amblyopia.
Methods: A clinical study was performed on 40 amblyopic children
(19 strabismic and 21 anisometropic), 6 to 18 years old (mean
age, 10.9 years). They received an average dose of 1.86 mg/kg/day
(1.33-2.36 mg/kg/day) of levodopa and carbidopa (4:1 ratio) or
a placebo in 3 divided doses over a 4-week period, combined with
full-time occlusion. The occlusion was continued for the study
duration of 3 months. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study
visual acuity charts and Cambridge low-contrast gratings for contrast
sensitivity (CS) were used to assess visual functions. Tolerance
and compliance with occlusion and capsule consumption were assessed.
RESULTS: Visual acuity of the nonamblyopic eye did not deteriorate
during the study in either group. CS decreased by 22 units in
the levodopa group and increased in the placebo group by 53 units
at the first month. The CS in the levodopa group recovered later
by the third month of follow-up. Both the levodopa and the placebo
groups showed significant improvement in visual function in the
amblyopic eye (P <.001). Overall changes in logarithm of minimum
angle of resolution values and CS in the amblyopic eyes were similar
in both groups (P >.05). Strabismic and anisometropic amblyopes
did not behave differently. Drug tolerance, occlusion compliance,
and capsule ingestion compliance were similar between the groups,
with no significant side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, levodopa
supplementation does not offer any advantage over occlusion alone.
Moreover, the risk of occlusion amblyopia could increase with
the use of drugs like levodopa that might affect the plasticity
of the visual cortex.
-----
Ophthalmology
2002 Dec;109(12):2261-4
The minimum
occlusion trial for the treatment of amblyopia.
Keech RV, Ottar W, Zhang L.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Shandong Medical University, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
ronald-keech@uiowa.edu
OBJECTIVE: To
determine whether the traditional regimen of three intervals of
full-time occlusion (FTO) for amblyopia without any measurable
improvement in visual acuity constitutes an adequate trial. DESIGN:
Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS:
Sixty-four children younger than 10 years of age with unilateral
amblyopia. METHODS: The medical records of patients treated for
amblyopia in a university outpatient clinic were reviewed. Patients
who underwent one FTO interval without an improvement in visual
acuity followed by at least one additional FTO interval were included
in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in visual acuity.
RESULTS: Sixty-four patients underwent 81 occlusion trials consisting
of one FTO interval without improvement followed by one or more
FTO intervals. Visual acuity improved after the second FTO interval
in 25 (31%) of the trials. Of the 44 occlusion trials consisting
of two FTO intervals without improvement, visual acuity improved
after the third FTO interval in 12 (27%) of the trials. Of the
11 occlusion trials consisting of three FTO intervals without
improvement followed by one or more additional FTO intervals,
acuity did not improve with any of the trials. CONCLUSIONS: A
minimum of three intervals of FTO is necessary to determine whether
an amblyopia patient will be unresponsive to occlusion therapy.
After three FTO intervals without improvement, additional FTO
is unlikely to result in an improvement in visual acuity.
-----
J AAPOS 2002 Oct;6(5):289-93
Combined optical
and atropine penalization for the treatment of strabismic and
anisometropic amblyopia.
Kaye SB, Chen SI, Price G, Kaye LC, Noonan C, Tripathi A, Ashwin
P, Cota N, Clark D, Butcher J.
Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital, United Kingdom.
INTRODUCTION:
The treatment of amblyopia by occlusion of the fellow eye is beset
by problems related to compliance, stigmatization, and regression
of visual acuity (VA). Atropine or optical penalization has been
used as an alternative treatment for amblyopia and might be synergistic
as a combination therapy. Combined optical and atropine penalization
treatment (COAT) was therefore assessed in patients with anisometropic
and strabismic amblyopia. METHODS: Patients with a hypermetropic
refractive error in whom occlusion had failed were prescribed
daily atropine 1% and a plano spectacle lens to the fellow eye.
Outcome measures included VA (LogMAR units), interocular VA difference,
adverse events, and adverse reactions. COAT was continued until
VA failed to improve after 2 consecutive visits, and then patients
were offered occlusion treatment again. RESULTS: Forty-two patients
(mean age, 4.73 yrs) were treated with COAT. Patients had attempted
occlusion for a mean period of 36 weeks before commencement of
COAT. The mean VA of the amblyopic eyes improved after 10 weeks
of COAT, from 0.85 (20/113) to 0.28 (20/37) (P <.001), an overall
success (doubling of VA) rate of 76%. There was no significant
change in the mean VA of the fellow eye as a result of COAT (P
=.13). Twenty-two patients recommenced occlusion after COAT for
regression (10), lack of further improvement (2), or parental
choice (10). The remaining 20 patients maintained their VA without
treatment at 93% of post-COAT levels, at a mean follow-up 6.4
months. Overall regression rate was 36%, adverse reaction rate
was 2%, adverse event rate was 21%, and presumed compliance rate
was 83%. DISCUSSION: COAT is an effective treatment method when
occlusion therapy initially fails. COAT is well tolerated and
should be considered as an alternative and/or supportive therapy
in the management of amblyopia.
-----
Optometry 2002
Mar;73(3):153-9
Maintenance
of improvement gains in refractive amblyopia: a comparison of
treatment modalities.
FitzGerald DE, Krumholtz I.
State University of New York, State College of Optometry, New
York 10036, USA. difitzgerald@sunnyopt.edu
BACKGROUND: In
June of 1999, an initial study reported on the effect of differing
treatment modalities in improving visual acuity and stereoacuity
in patients with unilateral refractive amblyopia. This study reports
on the patients' visual maintenance of acuity gains for each specified
treatment modality. Patients were re-evaluated over a 1- to 2-year
period after cessation of treatment. METHODS: Records of patients
who participated in the initial study were retrospectively reviewed
1 to 2 years after cessation of therapy to determine whether visual
acuity gains were maintained. RESULTS: Patients were divided according
to treatment modalities. Results for the three patient groups
were as follows: 50% of patients with optical correction alone
maintained visual acuity improvement; 60% of patients with optical
correction and occlusion maintained visual acuity gains; and 100%
of patients with optical correction, occlusion, and vision therapy
had maintained visual acuity gains. Of the three age groups--4
years to 6 years, 11 months; 7 years to 9 years, 11 months; and
10 to 14 years--the oldest age group maintained the highest percentage
of visual acuity gains. CONCLUSIONS: In our sample, at least 50%
of the unilateral anisometropic amblyopic patients, who initially
experienced visual acuity gains after treatment (regardless of
treatment modality or age) maintained those acuity gains at 1-
to 2-year followup. One hundred percent of those patients who
received the vision therapy modality of treatment retained the
improvement at followup-a statistically significant difference
when compared with the other two groups.
-----
J Refract Surg
2002 Sep-Oct;18(5):519-23
Phakic intraocular
lens to correct high myopic amblyopia in children.
Lesueur LC, Arne JL.
Department of Ophthalmology, Purpan Hospital, University of Toulouse,
France. lesueur.l@chu-toulouse.fr
PURPOSE: In a
clinical investigation, we evaluated anatomical and functional
outcomes of posterior phakic chamber lens (ICL) implantation for
correction of high myopia with amblyopia in children. METHODS:
Twelve eyes of 11 children, age 3 to 16 years, with high myopic
amblyopia were operated with implantation of a Staar Surgical
ICL. In these patients, conventional therapy with spectacles or
contact lenses was unsuccessful. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent
refraction was -12.70 D (range -8.00 to -18.00 D) and best spectacle-corrected
visual acuity ranged from count fingers to 20/63. Mean follow-up
was 20.5 months (range 3 to 48 mo) Preoperative and postoperative
anatomical and functional outcomes were compared. RESULTS: We
noted good tolerance of ICLs without inflammatory reactions or
secondary capsular opacity, stable intraocular pressure, and good
ICL position in all eyes. Predictability was +0.71 D (range -0.75
to +2.00 D). Mean postoperative best spectacle-corrected visual
acuity was 20/63. Recovery of binocular vision was achieved in
six patients and orthotropic position in seven patients. Quality
of life was improved in all patients. CONCLUSION: The Staar Surgical
phakic ICL appeared to be an effective method to treat high myopia
in children with amblyopia. Good results with high satisfaction
were noted.
-----
Strabismus 2002
Jun;10(2):79-82
A preliminary
report about the relation between visual acuity increase and compliance
in patching therapy for amblyopia.
Loudon SE, Polling JR, Simonsz HJ.
Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The
Netherlands. seloudon@yahoo.com
PURPOSE: The aim
of this study was to establish a relation between visual acuity
increase and compliance in children who have been prescribed patching
therapy for their amblyopic eye. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In 14
new amblyopic children (mean age 4.3 +/- 1.9 years) compliance
was measured electronically during one week, six months after
starting patching therapy, with an Occlusion Dose Monitor (ODM),
distributed through house visits. The children were diagnosed
with anisometropia (5), strabismus (4) and anisometropia and strabismus
(5). The degree of amblyopia was expressed as the ratio between
the acuity of the amblyopic eye and the acuity of the good eye.
Satisfactory increase in acuity was assessed by means of the following
three criteria: acuity amblyopic eye / acuity good eye >75%,
acuity exceeding 0.5 E-chart, three lines LogMAR acuity increase.
RESULTS: Fourteen reliable recordings were obtained, which showed
that children who did not patch, or were patched inconsistently,
did not reach satisfactory acuity increase. CONCLUSION: There
is indeed a statistically significant relation between acuity
increase and measured compliance.
-----
Eye 2002 Sep;16(5):577-9
Contact lenses
in the management of high anisometropic amblyopia.
Roberts CJ, Adams GG.
Strabismus Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London,
UK. clare_roberts@doctors.org.uk
Poster at College
Congress, Birmingham 2001.Oral presentation at European Strabismus
Association, Florence 2001. PURPOSE: Anisometropia of more than
one dioptre during the sensitive visual period may cause amblyopia.
Its management requires refractive correction, and occlusion.
Compliance with treatment is critical if visual improvement is
to obtained. High anisometropia, poor initial acuity and mixed
strabismic/anisometropia amblyopia are predictive factors for
a poor outcome. We evaluated contact lens use in the management
of high anisometropic amblyopia. METHODS: Retrospective analysis
of anisometropic amblyopia managed in a paediatric contact lens
clinic (July 1996-July 2000), after standard amblyopia therapy
of spectacles and occlusion therapy had been tried. Presenting
age, acuity and refraction, duration of lens wear and occlusion,
and final visual outcomes were noted. RESULTS: Seven children
(four male, three female) presented at age 3.5-6 years (mean 4.5).
Six had myopic anisometropia 6.0-18.4 dioptres (mean 10.4 dioptres)
and one 6.75 dioptres hypermetropic anisometropia. The initial
corrected acuities of the amblyopic eyes were 6/18 to 1/60. Five
patients used contact lenses with a range from 5 months to 4 years.
Final acuities were 6/12-1/60. Two myopes with 6 dioptres anisometropia
improved three to four Snellen lines, one with 8.8 dioptres improved
one line. Three with >10 dioptres anisometropia did not improve.
The hypermetropic patient improved part of one Snellen line. CONCLUSIONS:
High anisometropic amblyopia is challenging to treat. In our study
contact lenses improved visual acuity in myopic anisometropia
of up to 9 dioptres.
-----
Strabismus 2002
Mar;10(1):23-30
Non-concordance
in amblyopia treatment: the effective use of 'smileys'.
Oto S, Pelit A, Aydin P.
Department of Ophthalmology, Baskent University School of Medicine,
Ankara, Turkey. motility2000@hotmail.com
PURPOSE: The success
of any specific occlusion regimen is limited by the level of concordance,
which is difficult to measure accurately in patching treatment.
The aim of this study was to investigate prospectively the concordance
rate of a group of children with strabismic and/or anisometropic
amblyopia using a schematic diary based on completing 'smiley'
images, filled in by the child under parental supervision, and
to assess the effect of correlates such as initial visual acuity,
age, and total and daily occlusion time on concordance. METHODS:
We recruited 51 amblyopic children aged 13 months to 12 years
(mean 6.57 +/- 2.82). The median duration of treatment was 16
weeks. Non-concordance was defined as occluding less than 75%
of the prescribed time and was analyzed using a concordance index
calculated from occlusion time recorded in the diary/prescribed
occlusion time. RESULTS: Of the 51 patients followed prospectively,
12 (23.5%) failed to return their diaries (Group 1); 27 (52.9%)
complied with occlusion (Group 2); and 12 (23.5%) failed to comply
with occlusion completely (Group 3). The total proportion of non-concordance
was 47.1% (Group 1 + Group 3). Concordance was not significantly
related to initial visual acuity (r = -0.22, p = 0.19), patient
age (F = 1.0787, p = 0.349) or total occlusion time (X2 = 2.779,
p = 0.249), but the number of daily occlusion hours showed significant
difference in Group 1 (X2 = 15.894, p = 0.000). When the three
groups were compared for change in visual acuity, a significant
difference was found between group 1 and group 2 (X2 = 6.125,
p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: The substantial proportion of non-concordance
in our study suggests that, although useful for recording purposes,
parental diaries may not be stimulating enough to increase the
overall level of concordance. Therefore, other forms of monitoring
need to be explored.
-----
Ophthalmic Physiol
Opt 2002 Jul;22(4):296-9
Remediation
of refractive amblyopia by optical correction alone.
Moseley MJ, Neufeld M, McCarry B, Charnock A, McNamara R, Rice
T, Fielder A.
Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College
of Science, Technology and Medicine, London, UK. m.j.moseley@ic.ac.uk
Amblyopia--the
commonest vision abnormality of childhood--is characterized by
a loss of visual acuity usually of one eye only. Treatment aims
to promote function of the amblyopic eye and does this by restricting,
usually through occlusion, the competitive advantage of the fellow
eye. Recent experimental evidence demonstrates that the recovery
of vision following early deprivation is facilitated by increasing
visually evoked activity. An analogous approach in humans is to
minimise image blur by correcting refractive error prior to treatment--a
practice which may account for the poorly quantified improvements
in visual acuity sometimes attributed to 'spectacle adaptation'.
Here we describe clinically significant gains in visual acuity
obtained over a period of 4-24 weeks in a group of amblyopic children
arising solely in response to the correction of refractive error.
Consequences for the clinical management of refractive amblyopia
are discussed.
-----
BMJ 2002 Jun 29;324(7353):1549
Amblyopia
treatment outcomes after screening before or at age 3 years: follow
up from randomised trial.
Williams C, Northstone K, Harrad RA, Sparrow JM, Harvey I; ALSPAC
Study Team.
Division of Child Health, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TQ.
Cathy.Williams@bristol.ac.uk
OBJECTIVE: To
assess the effectiveness of early treatment for amblyopia in children.
DESIGN: Follow up of outcomes of treatment for amblyopia in a
randomised controlled trial comparing intensive orthoptic screening
at 8, 12, 18, 25, 31, and 37 months (intensive group) with orthoptic
screening at 37 months only (control group). SETTING: Avon, southwest
England. PARTICIPANTS: 3490 children who were part of a birth
cohort study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of amblyopia and
visual acuity of the worse seeing eye at 7.5 years of age. RESULTS:
Amblyopia at 7.5 years was less prevalent in the intensive group
than in the control group (0.6% v 1.8%; P=0.02). Mean visual acuities
in the worse seeing eye were better for children who had been
treated for amblyopia in the intensive group than for similar
children in the control group (0.15 v 0.26 LogMAR units; P<0.001).
A higher proportion of the children who were treated for amblyopia
had been seen in a hospital eye clinic before 3 years of age in
the intensive group than in the control group (48% v 13%; P=0.0002).
CONCLUSIONS: The intensive screening protocol was associated with
better acuity in the amblyopic eye and a lower prevalence of amblyopia
at 7.5 years of age, in comparison with screening at 37 months
only. These data support the hypothesis that early treatment for
amblyopia leads to a better outcome than later treatment and may
act as a stimulus for research into feasible screening programmes.
-----
Optom Vis Sci
2002 Jun;79(6):376-80
The effectiveness
of occluder contact lenses in improving occlusion compliance in
patients that have failed traditional occlusion therapy.
Joslin CE, McMahon TT, Kaufman LM.
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of
Illinois at Chicago, College of Medicine, 60612, USA. charjosl@uic.edu
PURPOSE: Management
of infants and young children with dense amblyopia, including
that which results from unilateral congenital cataracts, is challenging
because of noncompliance with occlusion therapy. Occluder contact
lenses (OCLs) have been described to successfully improve visual
acuity in patients with amblyopia. The purpose of this study was
to evaluate the effectiveness of OCLs in improving occlusion compliance
in infants and young children with dense amblyopia who had failed
traditional occlusion therapy. METHODS: Thirteen patients were
fit in their nonamblyopic eye with OCLs provided by Wesley Jessen
(Des Plaines, IL). All patients had dense amblyopia as diagnosed
by a pediatric ophthalmologist. Nine of the 13 patients had deprivational
amblyopia associated with unilateral aphakia, 2 patients had strabismic
amblyopia, and the other 2 had mixed mechanism amblyopia. All
patients had failed traditional occlusion methods. Occlusion was
prescribed on a part-time basis to prevent occlusion amblyopia
to the better-seeing eye. Compliance with the OCLs was determined
by questioning the parents as to whether the prescribed occlusion
time was accomplished. RESULTS: Five of the 13 patients (38.4%)
did not succeed in the initial 1-mo trial period because of parental
difficulties with lens handling. Four patients (30.7%) achieved
partial success, as they were able to wear the lens between 4
to 14 mo, at which time they learned to remove the occluder lens.
The four remaining patients (30.7%) successfully wore the occluder
lenses until the conclusion of the study, a time period ranging
from 26 to 60 mo. No complications resulted from OCLs. CONCLUSIONS:
OCLs can provide an alternative to achieving occlusion compliance
after the failure of traditional occlusion therapy in infants
and young children with dense amblyopia.
-----
J Cataract Refract
Surg 2002 Jun;28(6):932-41
Photorefractive
keratectomy in children.
Astle WF, Huang PT, Ells AL, Cox RG, Deschenes MC, Vibert HM.
Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Division of
Ophthalmology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
PURPOSE: To evaluate
photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in pediatric patients who fail
traditional methods of treatment for myopic anisometropic amblyopia
and high myopia. SETTING: Nonhospital surgical facility with follow-up
in a hospital clinic setting. METHODS: Photorefractive keratectomy
was performed in 40 eyes of 27 patients. The patients were divided
into 4 groups based on the type of myopia: myopic anisometropic
amblyopia (15 eyes/13 patients), bilateral high myopia (20 eyes/10
patients), high myopia post-penetrating keratoplasty (3 eyes/2
patients), and combined corneal scarring and anisometropic amblyopia
(2 eyes/2 patients). All procedures were performed under general
anesthesia using the VISX 20/20 B laser and a multizone, multipass
ablation technique. Appropriate corneal fixation was achieved
with appropriate head positioning (turn and tilt) and an Arrowsmith
fixation ring. Myopia was as high as -25.00 diopter (D) spherical
equivalent (SE), but no treatment was for more than -17.50 D SE.
RESULTS: The mean SE decreased from -10.68 D to -1.37 D at 1 year,
a mean change of -9.31 D. At 1 year, the mean best corrected visual
acuity improved from 20/70 to 20/40 in the entire group. Forty
percent of eyes were within +/-1.0 D of the targeted refraction.
There was no haze in 59.5% of eyes. Three eyes initially had 3+
haze; 1 improved to 2+ and 2 required repeat PRK with significant
haze reduction. Five eyes (3 patients) with greater than -17.00
D SE myopia before PRK (range -17.50 to -25.00 D) had 3.42 D more
effect than predicted (range 0.50 to 5.50 D). A functional vision
survey demonstrated a positive effect on the children's ability
to function in their environments after the laser treatment. CONCLUSION:
Photorefractive keratectomy in children represents another method
of providing long-term resolution of bilateral high myopia and
myopic anisometropic amblyopia.
-----
Eye 2002 Mar;16(2):150-5
Psychosocial
and clinical determinants of compliance with occlusion therapy
for
amblyopic children.
Searle A, Norman P, Harrad R, Vedhara K.
MRC Health Services, Research Collaboration, Department of Social
Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. A.J.Searle@bristol.ac.uk
AIMS: The objective
of this study was to determine the extent that psychosocial and
clinical variables influence parental compliance with occlusion
therapy (eye patching) in children with amblyopia. METHODS: Children
(n = 151) receiving occlusion therapy (eye patching) for the treatment
of amblyopia were recruited from five orthoptic clinics in Bristol,
UK. Parents completed a questionnaire based on Rogers' (1983)
Protection Motivation Theory (PMT). The parents (n = 105) were
also followed up 2 months later. Clinical data, including measures
of visual acuity, were also recorded. Compliance with eye patching
was assessed through self-report accounts of parents. Stepwise
regression analyses were used to determine the factors predictive
of compliance with eye patching. RESULTS: Self-reported compliance
with eye patching at study entry revealed that only 54% of parents
were achieving orthoptists' recommendations to patch their child.
Perceived self-efficacy was positively associated with compliance
and perceived prohibition of the child's activities were negatively
associated with compliance. At follow-up, past behaviour accounted
for the largest proportion of explained variance in patching behaviour
followed by response efficacy, and prohibition of the child's
activities. CONCLUSION: The present findings may serve to inform
interventions aimed at enhancing current orthoptic practice to
improve compliance in amblyopic children. The importance of 'self-efficacy'
and past behaviour suggests that consultations with parents exhibiting
higher levels of success with patching may elicit strategies that
could be shared with parents experiencing difficulties with patching
their children. In addition, it is possible that the perceived
efficacy of the treatment could be enhanced if orthoptists emphasised
evidence of improvements in visual acuity which may, in turn,
foster the maintenance of eye patching.
------
Neurorehabil Neural
Repair 2001;15(3):223-7
Possible role
of corticosteroids in nervous system plasticity: improvement in
amblyopia after optic neuritis in the fellow eye treated with
steroids.
Constantinescu CS, Gottlob I.
Division of Clinical Neurology, University Hospital, Queen's Medical
Centre, Nottingham, UK. cris.constantinescu@nottingham.ac.uk
OBJECTIVE: Amblyopia
consists of reduced visual function in the absence of organic
disease, caused by deficient visual stimulation, most commonly
due to squint or refractive error. Amblyopia is thought to be
reversible up until the age of approximately 8 years (critical
period) and is usually treated with occlusion of the fellow eye.
There is recent evidence for visual system plasticity extending
beyond the critical period, supported by reports of improvement
in visual acuity in the amblyopic eye after loss of vision in
the contralateral eye. This suggests that the adult visual system
exhibits sufficient plasticity to allow such improvement. We describe
here improvement in visual acuity in three amblyopic patients
after they received high-dose intravenous glucocorticoids for
optic neuritis in the contralateral eye. METHODS: Clinical and
neurological evaluation added. RESULTS: In all cases, the improvement
was sustained, even after the recovery from the optic neuritis.
CONCLUSIONS: Because steroids affect neural plasticity, we hypothesize
that they facilitate and enhance visual improvement in amblyopia,
a quality that may be tested in future controlled trials.
-----
J Pediatr Ophthalmol
Strabismus 2002 Mar-Apr;39(2):81-9
Effect of
levodopa and carbidopa in human amblyopia.
Pandey PK, Chaudhuri Z, Kumar M, Satyabala K, Sharma P.
Department of Ophthalmology, Maulana Azad Medical College, University
of Delhi, New Delhi, India.
BACKGROUND: To
assess the role of continuous therapy for 3 weeks with levodopa
and carbidopa in the management of human amblyopia in children
and adults. METHOD: There were 88 amblyopic eyes of 82 subjects
included in this double masked randomized prospective clinical
trial. Levodopa and carbidopa combination in 2 different dosage
schedules were given to both adults and children. The response
was monitored of the improvement in visual acuity, contrast sensitivity,
and visually evoked potentials. RESULT: Patients receiving higher
dosages of levodopa and carbidopa in both adults and children
showed a better response to treatment. However, the effect did
not last beyond 9 weeks of stopping treatment. CONCLUSION: Though
levodopa and carbidopa therapy may not be able to ameliorate amblyopia
on its own on a long-term basis, it may be considered nonetheless
to be an important adjunct to conventional therapy because it
may improve patient compliance for occlusion by improving visual
acuity in the amblyopic eye. Thus, it offers promise of improving
the functional outcome in these cases. However, longer follow-up
trials are needed to substantiate these conclusions.
-----
Arch Ophthalmol
2002 Mar;120(3):268-78
Comment in: Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;120(3):387-8.
A randomized
trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia
in children.
The Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Fla. USA.
OBJECTIVE: To
compare patching and atropine as treatments for moderate amblyopia
in children younger than 7 years. METHODS: In a randomized clinical
trial, 419 children younger than 7 years with amblyopia and visual
acuity in the range of 20/40 to 20/100 were assigned to receive
either patching or atropine at 47 clinical sites. MAIN OUTCOME
MEASURE: Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye and sound eye after
6 months. RESULTS: Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye improved
in both groups (improvement from baseline to 6 months was 3.16
lines in the patching group and 2.84 lines in the atropine group).
Improvement was initially faster in the patching group, but after
6 months, the difference in visual acuity between treatment groups
was small and clinically inconsequential (mean difference at 6
months, 0.034 logMAR units; 95% confidence interval, 0.005-0.064
logMAR units). The 6-month acuity was 20/30 or better in the amblyopic
eye and/or improved from baseline by 3 or more lines in 79% of
the patching group and 74% of the atropine group. Both treatments
were well tolerated, although atropine had a slightly higher degree
of acceptability on a parental questionnaire. More patients in
the atropine group than in the patching group had reduced acuity
in the sound eye at 6 months, but this did not persist with further
follow-up. CONCLUSION: Atropine and patching produce improvement
of similar magnitude, and both are appropriate modalities for
the initial treatment of moderate amblyopia in children aged 3
to less than 7 years.
-----
Ophthalmology
2001 Sep;108(9):1552-5
Comment in: Ophthalmology. 2002 Oct;109(10):1757-8; discussion
1758.
Long-term
follow-up of occlusion therapy in amblyopia.
Leiba H, Shimshoni M, Oliver M, Gottesman N, Levartovsky S.
Department of Ophthalmology, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel.
leibalLA@tel-aviv.gov.il
OBJECTIVE: To
determine whether the results of occlusion therapy for amblyopia
are maintained into adulthood. DESIGN: Prospective, observational
case series. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-four patients, who were successfully
treated in childhood for unilateral amblyopia by occlusion, were
followed up to the age of 9 years, were evaluated in 1984 for
long-term results 6.4 years on average after cessation of treatment,
and accepted our invitation for reevaluation in 1999. METHODS:
All patients were given a complete eye examination. The visual
acuity (VA) was measured. RESULTS: The average period of follow-up
was 21.5 years (range, 17.2-25.1 years). The mean age at the most
recent examination was 29.0 +/- 2.1 years (range, 25.1-34). At
this examination, a best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40
or better was achieved by 72.3% of the patients. The mean BCVA
was 20/35 (20/25-20/70) at the end of occlusion therapy, 20/45
(20/20-20/300) in 1984, and 20/34 (20/15-20/100) at the present
examination. Relative to the results at the end of therapy, BCVA
at the present examination was maintained or improved in 66.7%
of the patients. Relative to 1984, the BCVA in 1999 was maintained
or improved in 87% of the patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Visual
acuity. CONCLUSION: Comparative evaluation of BCVA at a long-term
follow-up examination, performed 21.5 years on average after cessation
of occlusion therapy, showed that VA was maintained or improved
in two thirds of patients who had been successfully treated by
occlusion for unilateral amblyopia in childhood.
©Copyright 1992-date by The Center
for Current Research. The Amblyopia File is a proprietary compilation
of the Center for Current Research. The information in the File
is solely for your use, and the use of your family, friends, and
doctors. The information is the property of the individual researchers
and institutions that produced it. It is an infringement of copyright
law to attempt to "resell" the information as it is
presented here.
|