| |
Important Note: The following information
is provided for your education. It should not be relied upon
for personal diagnosis or treatment. If you believe that a particular
therapy applies to you or someone you care about, be sure to
consult a doctor before trying it.
Alcoholic Liver Disease
Research:
2002-2006
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006 Oct;40(9):833-841.
Acute Alcoholic Hepatitis.
Ceccanti M, Attili A, Balducci G, Attilia F, Giacomelli S, Rotondo C, Sasso GF,
Xirouchakis E, Attilia ML.
*Alcohol Liver Disease Unit daggerII Gastroenterology Unit, University "La
Sapienza", Roma, Italy double daggerIstituto Superiore di Sanita, Roma, Italy
section sign1st IKA Hospital Gastroenterology Unit, Athens, Greece.
Acute alcoholic hepatitis (AAH) is a frequent inflammatory liver disease with
high short-term mortality rate. In this review, relationships between alcohol
abuse and the epidemiology and the outcomes of AAH are discussed, as well as AAH
pathogenesis. The role of endotoxins, tumor necrosis factor alpha, fibroblasts,
and immune response to altered hepatocyte proteins is discussed. The need of a
careful prognosis, supported by the use of Maddrey score, by the model for
end-stage liver disease [Mayo end-stage liver disease (MELD)] score or by the
Glasgow alcoholic hepatitis score, is outlined, as the use of the most effective
drugs (glucocorticoids and anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha infliximab) is
recommended only in severe AAH cases. The problems of liver transplant in severe
AAH, and the need of a 6-month alcohol abstinence before transplant, are
discussed, as well as the need of a careful psychologic assessment before the
transplant.
-----
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Oct 15;24(8):1151-61.
Review article: alcoholic liver disease--pathophysiological
aspects and risk factors.
Gramenzi A, Caputo F, Biselli M, Kuria F, Loggi E, Andreone P, Bernardi M.
Dipartimento di Medicina Interna, Cardioangiologia ed Epatologia, Universita di
Bologna, Policlinico S. Orsola, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy.
BACKGROUND: Alcoholic liver disease has a known aetiology but a complex and
incompletely known pathogenesis. It is an extremely common disease with
significant morbidity and mortality, but the reason why only a relatively small
proportion of heavy drinkers progress to advanced disease remains elusive. AIM:
To recognize the factors responsible for the development and progression of
alcoholic liver disease, in the light of current knowledge on this matter.
METHODS: We performed a structured literature review identifying studies
focusing on the complex pathogenetic pathway and risk factors of alcoholic liver
disease. Results In addition to the cumulative amount of alcohol intake and
alcohol consumption patterns, factors such as gender and ethnicity, genetic
background, nutritional factors, energy metabolism abnormalities, oxidative
stress, immunological mechanisms and hepatic co-morbid conditions play a key
role in the genesis and progression of alcoholic liver injury. CONCLUSIONS:
Understanding the pathogenesis and risk factors of alcoholic liver disease
should provide insight into the development of therapeutic strategies.
-----
Br J Anaesth. 2006 Oct;97(4):496-8. Epub 2006 Jul 18.
One year outcome of intensive care patients with decompensated
alcoholic liver disease.
Mackle IJ, Swann DG, Cook B.
Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, The Royal
Infirmary of Edinburgh at Little France 51 Little France Crescent, Old Dalkeith
Road, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, UK.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the outcome of patients with decompensated
alcoholic liver disease (ALD) admitted to a general intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study of intensive care admissions
over a 3 yr period was conducted. The study was set in an ICU in a UK university
hospital with a tertiary liver referral unit. One hundred and ten admissions,
involving 107 patients, with decompensated ALD were included. Intensive care,
hospital, and 6 and 12 months mortality were recorded along with the outcome in
diagnostic and organ system support subgroups. Intensive care, hospital, 6 month
and 12 month mortality rates were 58, 71, 78 and 81%. RESULTS: Hospital
mortality in the sepsis/multiorgan failure group was 88%. Sixty-nine per cent of
patients who were ventilated but required no other organ support survived to
hospital discharge. However, the requirement for any other organ support, or a
raised creatinine (>120 mumol litre(-1)) in the first 24 h, reduced the hospital
survival to <15%. In those patients requiring acute renal replacement therapy,
the hospital mortality was 94%. CONCLUSION: Decompensated ALD requiring
intensive care admission is associated with a high hospital mortality and
consideration should be given to the futility of escalating organ support
measures, particularly when renal replacement therapy is required.
-----
Rev Med Suisse. 2006 Sep 6;2(77):1974-8.
[Clinical management of a patient with alcoholic cirrhosis]
[Article in French]
Nguyen-Trang T, Hadengue A, Spahr L.
Service de gastroenterologie et d'hepatologie, HUG, 1211 Geneve 14.
Prolonged abstinence from alcohol is crucial in the management and prognosis of
a patient with alcoholic cirrhosis. It is also important to prevent
complications such as variceal bleeding, hepatocellular and extrahepatic
cancers, and malnutrition. Liver transplantation should be considered in
patients with persistent liver failure in spite of complete cessation of alcohol
consumption. We provide some recommendations in commonly encountered clinical
situations for compensated and decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis.
-----
Methods Mol Biol. 2006;333:29-46.
Current status of liver transplantation.
Friend PJ, Imber CJ.
Nuffield Department of Surgery, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxfordshire, Oxford,
England.
Liver transplantation has become the treatment of choice for a wide range of
end-stage liver disease. As outcomes have improved, so the demand for this
therapy has increasingly exceeded the availability of donor organs. Access to
liver transplantation is controlled such that donor organs are generally
allocated to the patients who are likely to benefit most, although if all
patients who might benefit were placed on the waiting list, the donor shortage
would be greatly increased. Recurrence of the original liver disease is emerging
as an important issue. Fewer patients are transplanted for liver tumors, as
earlier results showed a very high rate of recurrence. In recent years there has
been a change in the underlying conditions of patients on the waiting list, and
a preponderance of patients now present with hepatitis C and alcoholic
cirrhosis. Increasingly, transplant units are looking to sources of donor organs
that would previously have been deemed unsuitable--such marginal donors include
non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs). Results from controlled NHBDs--those cases in
which cardiac arrest is predicted--suggest that this is a good source of viable
organs. Splitting a donor liver to provide two grafts has successfully enabled
the transplantation of a child and an adult from one organ. The transplantation
of two adults from a single organ remains a greater challenge. Transplantation
from living donors has been practiced increasingly over the last decade,
although anxieties have been expressed over donor safety. In many countries this
now represents a significant contribution to overall liver transplant activity.
-----
Hepatology. 2006 Sep;44(3):521-6.
Global challenges in liver disease.
Williams R.
UCL Institute of Hepatology, Division of Medicine, Royal Free and University
College Medical School, London, UK. roger.williams@ucl.ac.uk
Immigration, cheap air travel, and globalization are all factors contributing to
a worldwide spread of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)
infection. End-stage chronic liver disease (ESLD) as a result of co-infection
with HBV/HCV is now the major cause of death for individuals who have been
infected with the HIV virus. The high incidence of HCV infection in Egypt--the
legacy left from the mass use of tartar emetic to eradicate schistosomiasis, as
in other high prevalence areas--will take years to reduce. Steatohepatitis due
to non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is developing into a new and major health
problem as a result of rising levels of obesity in populations worldwide.
Hepatic steatosis also has an adverse influence on the progression of other
liver diseases including chronic HCV infection and alcoholic liver disease. In
many countries, considerable public concern is on the rise due to increased
levels of alcohol consumption adversely affecting younger and affluent age
groups. With the rising prevalence of cirrhosis, primary hepatocellular
carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in frequency as is that of primary intrahepatic
cholangiocarcinoma. Finally, despite the successes of liver transplantation,
many deserving patients are not getting transplants due to low levels of cadaver
organ donation in many countries, thereby increasing pressures on the use of
living donor liver transplantation. Only through a concerted effort from
governments, health agencies, healthcare professionals at all levels, and the
pharmaceutical industry can this grim outlook for liver disease worldwide be
reversed.
-----
Alcohol Alcohol. 2006 Jul-Aug;41(4):358-63. Epub 2006 Apr 24.
Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: a systematic
review of psychosocial selection criteria.
McCallum S, Masterton G.
Department of Psychiatry, Queen Margaret Hospital, Whitefield Road, Dunfermline,
Fife KY12 0RG, Scotland. seonaid.mccallum@faht.scot.nhs.uk
AIMS: To examine the evidence base for psychosocial selection criteria for liver
transplant candidates with alcoholic liver disease. METHOD: Systematic review
using three electronic databases supplemented by hand searches. RESULTS: Out of
96 published studies, 22 were included. All but one were cohort design, most
were retrospective, single centre, and small sample. Methodology varied
considerably, such that meta-analysis was not feasible. CONCLUSIONS: Social
stability, no close relatives with an alcohol problem, older age, no repeated
alcohol-treatment failures, good compliance with medical care, no current
polydrug misuse, and no co-existing severe mental disorder have all been
associated with future abstinence in more studies than not, in those that
examined these variables. Duration of preoperative abstinence was a poor
predictor. We recommend that, if predicting future abstinence is considered
necessary by transplant teams, a standardized approach is agreed and deployed
amongst transplant units, then audited and reviewed.
-----
Nutr Clin Pract. 2006 Jun;21(3):245-54.
Nutrition in alcoholic liver disease.
DiCecco SR, Francisco-Ziller N.
William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 201 W. Center
Street, Rochester, MN 55902, USA. dicecco.sara@mayo.edu
Liver disease secondary to alcohol ranges from alcoholic fatty liver disease to
acute hepatitis to cirrhotic liver disease. It is imperative that alcohol be
discontinued to allow for any potential improvement in liver function, with most
benefit being seen in the early stages of the disease. Alcoholic liver disease
has a profound effect on nutrient intake, nutrition status, and metabolism,
contributing to a high prevalence of malnutrition in this population. Early
intervention with nutrition therapy may improve response to treatment, alleviate
symptoms, and improve quality and quantity of life. In this review, nutrition
assessment parameters and medical nutrition therapy goals for alcoholic liver
disease are discussed.
-----
Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;101(6):1370-8. Erratum in: Am J Gastroenterol. 2006
Aug;101(8):1944.
Recurrence of diseases following orthotopic liver
transplantation.
Kotlyar DS, Campbell MS, Reddy KR.
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104,
USA.
Long-term graft survival and mortality after liver transplantation continue to
improve. However, disease recurrence remains a major stumbling block, especially
among patients with hepatitis C. Chronic hepatitis C recurs to varying degrees
in nearly all patients who undergo transplantation. Transplantation for
hepatitis C is associated with higher rates of graft failure and death compared
with transplantation for other indications, and retransplantation for hepatitis
C related liver failure remains controversial. Recurrence of hepatitis B has
been markedly reduced with improved prophylactic regimens. Further, rates of
hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence have also decreased, as improved patient
selection criteria have prioritized transplantation for those with a low risk of
recurrence. Primary biliary cirrhosis recurs in some patients, but it is often
relatively mild. Autoimmune liver disease has also been shown to have a
relatively benign post-transplantation course, but some studies have indicated
that it slowly progresses in most recipients. It has been recently reported that
alcoholic liver disease liver transplant recipients who return to drinking have
worsened mortality. In such patients worse outcomes are not due to graft
failure, but instead to other comorbidities. Recurrences of other diseases,
including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and primary sclerosing cholangitis, are
now being recognized as having potentially detrimental effects on graft survival
and mortality. Expert clinical management may help prevent and treat
complications associated with disease recurrence.
-----
Alcohol. 2006 May-Jun;41(3):278-83. Epub 2006 Feb 13.
Predictors of relapse to harmful alcohol after orthotopic liver
transplantation.
Kelly M, Chick J, Gribble R, Gleeson M, Holton M, Winstanley J, McCaughan GW,
Haber PS.
Drug Health Services, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Camperdown,
NSW 2050, Australia. phaber@mail.usyd.edu.au.
BACKGROUND: End-stage alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is a common indication for
liver transplantation. Outcomes may be limited by return to harmful drinking.
Previous studies have identified few predictors of drinking relapse. AIM: This
study examined novel postulated predictors of relapse to drinking. METHOD: The
case notes of all patients transplanted for ALD at the Royal Prince Alfred
Hospital from 1987-2004 were reviewed. Pre-transplant characteristics were rated
by a psychiatrist independent of the transplant team, blind to the outcome.
Outcomes were rated by a second independent alcohol treatment specialist also
blind to the pre-transplant ratings. RESULTS: Of 100 patients, 6 died before
discharge from hospital, 4 had <6 months follow-up, 18 relapsed to harmful
drinking, 10 drank below harmful levels, and 62 remained abstinent after a mean
of 5.6 years follow-up. Univariate analyses identified six potential
pre-transplant predictors of return to harmful drinking. These were a diagnosis
of mental illness (of which all cases were of depression), the lack of a stable
partner, grams per day consumed in the years before assessment for transplant,
reliance on 'family or friends' for post-transplant support, tobacco consumption
at time of assessment, and lack of insight into the alcohol aetiology. Duration
of pre-transplant abstinence and social class by occupation did not predict
relapse. A multivariate model based on the above characteristics correctly
predicted 89% of the outcomes. CONCLUSION: A model based on readily defined
behaviours and psychosocial factors predicted relapse to harmful drinking after
transplant for ALD. This model may improve assessment and post-transplant
management of patients with advanced ALD.
-----
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2006 May;22(3):263-71.
Alcohol and the liver.
Reuben A.
Liver Service, Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology and Liver Transplant
Program, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, 29425, USA. reubena@musc.edu
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To apprise the reader of advances in 2005 in the
epidemiology, pathogenesis, prognosis and treatment of alcoholic liver disease.
Alcohol use has declined in developed countries, but the opposite is true
elsewhere; alcoholic liver disease is a considerable burden worldwide. RECENT
FINDINGS: Genetic mechanisms for alcoholic liver disease are being discovered in
addition to aggravating cofactors, such as hepatitis C, obesity and iron
overload, and ameliorating ones, like coffee and tea drinking. The involvement
of the innate immune system and the mechanisms of apoptosis in alcoholic liver
disease are better appreciated, especially the emerging role of tumor necrosis
factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Steroid use and nutrition for
alcoholic hepatitis are being refined, and the validity of the model for
end-stage liver disease (MELD) score in predicting the outcome of alcoholic
liver disease is upheld. Recidivism after liver transplantation for alcoholic
liver disease adversely impacts long-term survival. SUMMARY: Inroads are being
made into the genetics of alcoholic liver disease and new phenomena are being
uncovered in its pathogenesis, but safe and effective therapies for both
alcoholic hepatitis and alcoholic cirrhosis are still wanting.
-----
Alcohol Alcohol. 2006 Apr 24; [Epub ahead of print]
Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease:
a systematic review of psychosocial selection criteria.
McCallum S, Masterton G.
Department of Psychiatry, Queen Margaret Hospital, Fife, Scotland.
AIMS: To examine the evidence base for psychosocial selection criteria for liver
transplant candidates with alcoholic liver disease. METHOD: Systematic review
using three electronic databases supplemented by hand searches. RESULTS: Out of
96 published studies, 22 were included. All but one were cohort design, most
were retrospective, single centre, and small sample. Methodology varied
considerably, such that meta-analysis was not feasible. CONCLUSIONS: Social
stability, no close relatives with an alcohol problem, older age, no repeated
alcohol-treatment failures, good compliance with medical care, no current
polydrug misuse, and no co-existing severe mental disorder have all been
associated with future abstinence in more studies than not, in those that
examined these variables. Duration of preoperative abstinence was a poor
predictor. We recommend that, if predicting future abstinence is considered
necessary by transplant teams, a standardized approach is agreed and deployed
amongst transplant units, then audited and reviewed.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19;(2):CD002235.
S-adenosyl-L-methionine for alcoholic liver diseases.
Rambaldi A, Gluud C.
BACKGROUND: Alcohol is a major cause of liver disease and disrupts methionine
and oxidative balances. S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAMe) acts as a methyl donor
for methylation reactions and participates in the synthesis of glutathione, the
main cellular antioxidant. Randomised clinical trials have addressed the
question whether SAMe may benefit patients with alcoholic liver diseases.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of SAMe for patients
with alcoholic liver diseases. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane
Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (May 2005), The Cochrane Central
Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE
(1950 to May 2005), EMBASE (1980 to May 2005), and Science Citation Index
Expanded (searched May 2005). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised
clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic liver diseases. Interventions
encompassed per oral or parenteral administration of SAMe at any dose versus
placebo or no intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We performed all
analyses according to the intention-to-treat method using RevMan Analyses
provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. We evaluated the methodological quality
of the randomised clinical trials by quality components. MAIN RESULTS: We
identified nine randomised clinical trials including a heterogeneous sample of
434 patients with alcoholic liver diseases. The methodological quality regarding
randomisation was generally low, but 8 out of 9 trials were placebo controlled.
Only one trial including 123 patients with alcoholic cirrhosis used adequate
methodology and reported clearly on all-cause mortality and liver
transplantation. We found no significant effects of SAMe on all-cause mortality
(relative risks (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30 to 1.26),
liver-related mortality (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.48), all-cause mortality or
liver transplantation (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.27 to 1.09), or complications (RR 1.35,
95% CI 0.84 to 2.16), but the analysis is based mostly on one trial only. SAMe
was not significantly associated with non-serious adverse events (RR 4.92; 95%
CI 0.59 to 40.89) and no serious adverse events were reported. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: We could not find evidence supporting or refuting the use of SAMe
for patients with alcoholic liver diseases. We need more long-term, high-quality
randomised trials on SAMe for these patients before SAMe may be recommended for
clinical practice.
-----
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2006 Apr;12(2):171-7.
The management of severe alcoholic liver disease and variceal
bleeding in the intensive care unit.
Berry PA, Wendon JA.
Institute of Liver Studies, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To address recent advances in the understanding and
management of alcohol-related chronic liver disease and its acute complications.
RECENT FINDINGS: Refinements have been made in the prognosis and treatment of
alcoholic hepatitis, and new insights have been gained into the pathophysiology
of the hepatorenal syndrome. Further trial evidence has emerged concerning
therapy in the hepatorenal syndrome, and there has been some clarification of
the benefits and risks relating to albumin dialysis/extracorporeal liver
support, and consensus in the early management of variceal haemorrhage. SUMMARY:
Recent developments have led to modifications in the standard of care of
patients with severe alcoholic liver disease, many of which are highly
applicable to the general critical care setting. These changes apply
specifically to alcoholic hepatitis, the hepatorenal syndrome and variceal
bleeding, common conditions with a high mortality rate, upon which changes in
practice can have a significant impact.
-----
Dig Dis. 2005;23(3-4):275-84.
Treatment of alcoholic liver disease.
Bergheim I, McClain CJ, Arteel GE.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Louisville Health
Sciences Center, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality
worldwide. For example, the Veterans Administration Cooperative Studies reported
that patients with cirrhosis and superimposed alcoholic hepatitis had a 4-year
mortality of >60% (worse than many common cancers such as breast and prostate).
The cornerstone for therapy for ALD is lifestyle modification, including
drinking cessation and treatment of decompensation, if appropriate. Nutrition
intervention has been shown to play a positive role on both an in-patient and
out-patient basis. Corticosteroids are effective in selected patients with
alcoholic hepatitis, and treatment with pentoxifylline appears to be a promising
anti-inflammatory therapy. Recent studies have indicated anti-TNFalpha therapy,
at least for alcoholic hepatitis. Some complementary and alternative medicinal
agents, such as milk thistle and S-adenosylmethionine, may be effective in
alcoholic cirrhosis. Treatment of the complications of ALD can improve the
quality of life and, in some cases, decrease short-term mortality. Copyright
2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
-----
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Dec;29(12 Suppl):259S-63S.
Difference and similarity between non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
and alcoholic liver disease.
Kojima H, Sakurai S, Uemura M, Takekawa T, Morimoto H, Tamagawa Y, Fukui H.
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Nara Medical University, Japan. kojima@nmu.gw.naramed-u.ac.jp
BACKGROUND: Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and alcoholic liver disease (ALD)
are extremely similar in the pathologic findings and pathogenesis. This study
aimed to elucidate the difference and similarity between these diseases.
METHODS: Twenty-six patients with NASH and 26 with ALD including 11 with
alcoholic hepatitis underwent clinico-pathologic analysis. The visceral fat area
and liver/spleen ratio, an index of the hepatic fat content, were evaluated with
computed tomography. The hepatic iron deposit and oxidative stress induced-lipid
peroxidation were estimated by Prussian blue staining and 3-nitrotyrosine
staining, respectively. RESULTS: The most prominent difference between NASH and
ALD was the nutritional status, although elevation of AST/ALT ratio and gamma-GT
is relatively characteristic of ALD. NASH was more frequently associated with
diabetes mellitus as compared with ALD. The BMI and serum levels of total
cholesterol and cholinesterase were higher in NASH than in ALD. Although the
degree and distribution of fibrosis and necro-inflammatory reaction were similar
in NASH and ALD, steatosis was more severe in NASH than in ALD. The liver/spleen
ratio was lower and the visceral fat area was larger in NASH than in ALD,
regardless of the coincidence of alcoholic hepatitis. Interestingly, the
visceral fat area positively correlated with ALT and HOMA-IR in NASH, whereas
these correlations were not observed in ALD. The hepatic iron deposit was less
in NASH than in ALD, whereas lipid peroxidation in NASH was similar to that in
ALD with alcoholic hepatitis and more advanced as compared with that in ALD
without alcoholic hepatitis. CONCLUSIONS: NASH was characterized with
over-nutrition and visceral fat type obesity as compared with ALD. The visceral
fat accumulation was associated with hepatic inflammation and insulin resistance
in NASH, but not in ALD. The difference in the nutritional status between NASH
and ALD is not only reflected in the clinical features but also may closely
associate with the mechanisms of hepatocellular damage in these diseases.
-----
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Nov;29(11 Suppl):162S-5S.
Glycine as a therapeutic immuno-nutrient for alcoholic liver
disease.
Yamashina S, Ikejima K, Enomoto N, Takei Y, Sato N.
>From the Department of Gastroenterology (SY, KI, NE, YT, NS), Juntendo
University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Activation of Kupffer cells by gut-derived endotoxin is an important factor in
ethanol hepatotoxicity. Further, it was shown that ethanol modulates both the
expression and activity of several intracellular signaling molecules and
transcription factors in Kupffer cells and chronic ethanol treatment enhances
Kupffer cell sensitivity to endotoxin. These findings suggest that inhibition of
Kupffer cell activation is effective for clinical application in alcoholic
hepatitis. Recently, accumulating lines of evidence suggest a possibility that
glycine is useful as an immuno-modulating amino acid. It has been shown that a
diet containing glycine improved survival in endotoxin shock by preventing
Kupffer cell activation. Glycine most likely prevents the LPS-induced elevation
of intracellular Ca concentration in Kupffer cells, thereby minimizing LPS
receptor signaling and cytokine production. Indeed, glycine prevents
alcohol-induced liver injury in a long-term enteral ethanol feeding rats
(Tsukamoto-French) by decreasing production of TNF-alpha in the liver. Moreover,
glycine is protective against apoptosis of sinusoidal endothelial cells (SECs)
that is one of the initial events in the development of liver injury. On the
other hand, epidemiologic data have identified chronic alcohol consumption as a
significant risk factor for carcinogenesis. Interestingly, glycine inhibits
growth of tumor in vivo most likely because of the inhibition of angiogenesis.
It was shown that the inhibitory effect of glycine on growth and migration of
endothelial cells is due to activation of a glycine-gated Cl channel. It is
hypothesized that the opening of this anion channel hyperpolarizes the cell
membrane, blocks influx of Ca through voltage-dependent Ca channel, thereby
blunting growth factor-mediated signaling. Therefore, glycine can be used not
only for treatment of alcoholic hepatitis, but also for chemoprevention and
treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in alcoholic cirrhosis. Taken together, it
is concluded that glycine is a potent therapeutic immuno-nutrient for various
kinds of chronic liver diseases including alcoholic liver disease (ALD).
-----
Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2583-91.
Milk thistle for alcoholic and/or hepatitis B or C liver
diseases--a systematic cochrane hepato-biliary group review with meta-analyses
of randomized clinical trials.
Rambaldi A, Jacobs BP, Iaquinto G, Gluud C.
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention Research, Rigshospitalet,
Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.
OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to assess the beneficial and harmful effects of
milk thistle (MT) or MT constituents versus placebo or no intervention in
patients with alcoholic liver disease and/or hepatitis B and/or C liver
diseases. METHODS: Randomized clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic
and/or hepatitis B or C liver diseases were included (December 2003). The
randomized clinical trials were evaluated by components of methodological
quality. RESULTS: Thirteen randomized clinical trials assessed MT in 915
patients with alcoholic and/or hepatitis B or C liver diseases. The
methodological quality was low: only 23% of the trials reported adequate
allocation concealment and only 46% were considered double blind. MT versus
placebo or no intervention for a median duration of 6 months had no significant
effects on all-cause mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval
(CI) 0.53-1.15), complications of liver disease, or liver histology.
Liver-related mortality was significantly reduced by MT in all trials (RR 0.50,
95% CI 0.29-0.88), but not in high-quality trials (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.28-1.19).
MT was not associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on high-quality trials, MT does not seem to significantly
influence the course of patients with alcoholic and/or hepatitis B or C liver
diseases. MT could potentially affect liver injury. Adequately conducted
randomized clinical trials on MT versus placebo may be needed.
-----
Liver Transpl. 2005 Nov;11(11 Suppl 2):S21-4.
Is alcoholic hepatitis an indication for transplantation? Current
management and outcomes.
Mathurin P.
Service d'Hepatogastroenterologie Hopital Claude Huriez and Equipe mixte INSERM
0114, CHU Lille, France. p-mathurin@chrulille.fr
1. In the absence of treatment, 50% of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis
(AH) [Maddrey function (DF) >or= 32] die 2 months later. Among patients with
severe AH treated by corticosteroids, 80% had 2-month survival. Pentoxifylline
is considered by some investigators to be an alternative option to
corticosteroids. 2. Non-responders to corticosteroids (NRCs) have poor survival
and require new strategies. Liver transplantation should be considered in order
to improve survival of non-responders to therapeutic agents. 3. Prognostic
models such as the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) and DF are useful
tools for predicting short-term mortality of patients with severe AH. Specific
models taking into account the particular settings of treated patients are
warranted. 4. In an era of organ shortage, use of liver transplants in patients
with severe AH may negatively affect the public attitude on transplantation and
organ donation, and may cause reluctance on the part of clinicians to modify
guidelines for alcoholic patients. 5. Therefore, a reasonable approach would be
to carry out only pilot studies on only a small cohort of patients to determine
whether transplantation improves survival in patients with severe AH.
-----
Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 2005;50:7-20.
Pathogenesis and treatment of alcoholic liver disease: progress
over the last 50 years.
Lieber CS.
Alcohol Research and Treatment Center, Section of Liver Disease and Nutrition,
Bronx VA Medical Center, New York 10468, USA. liebercs@aol.com
Fifty years ago the dogma prevailed that alcohol was not toxic to the liver and
that alcoholic liver disease was exclusively a consequence of nutritional
deficiencies. We showed, however, that liver pathology developed even in the
absence of malnutrition. This toxicity of alcohol was linked to its metabolism
via alcohol dehydrogenase which converts nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD)
to nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide-reduced form (NADH) which contributes to
hyperuricemia, hypoglycemia and hepatic steatosis by inhibiting lipid oxidation
and promoting lipogenesis. We also discovered a new pathway of ethanol
metabolism, the microsomal ethanol oxidizing system (MEOS). The activity of its
main enzyme, cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1), and its gene are increased by chronic
consumption, resulting in metabolic tolerance to ethanol. CYP2E1 also detoxifies
many drugs but occasionally toxic and even carcinogenic metabolites are
produced. This activity is also associated with the generation of free radicals
with resulting lipid peroxidation and membrane damage as well as depletion of
mitochondrial reduced glutathione (GSH) and its ultimate precursor, namely
methionine activated to S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe). Its repletion restores
liver functions. Administration of polyenylphosphatidylcholine (PPC), a mixture
of unsaturated phosphatidylcholines (PC) extracted from soybeans, restores the
structure of the membranes and the function of the corresponding enzymes.
Ethanol impairs the conversion of beta-carotene to vitamin A and depletes
hepatic vitamin A and, when it is given together with vitamin A or
beta-carotene, hepatotoxicity is potentiated. Our present therapeutic approach
is to reduce excess alcohol consumption by the Brief Intervention technique
found to be very successful. We correct hepatic SAMe depletion and
supplementation with PPC has some favorable effects on parameters of liver
damage which continue to be evaluated. Similarly dilinoleoylphosphatidylcholine
(DLPC), PPC's main component, also partially opposes the increase in CYP2E1 by
ethanol. Hence, therapy with SAMe +DLPC is now being considered.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD002800.
Propylthiouracil for alcoholic liver disease.
Rambaldi A, Gluud C, Rambaldi A.
BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials have addressed the question whether
propylthiouracil has any beneficial effects in patients with alcoholic liver
disease. OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful of propylthiouracil
for patients with alcoholic liver disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane
Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (May 2005), The Cochrane Central
Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE
(1950 to May 2005), EMBASE (1980 to May 2005), and The Web of Science (May 2005)
were searched. These electronic searches were combined with full text searches.
Manufacturers and researchers in the field were also contacted. SELECTION
CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic steatosis,
alcoholic fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and/or alcoholic cirrhosis were
included irrespective of blinding, publication status, or language.
Interventions encompassed propylthiouracil at any dose versus placebo or no
intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All analyses were performed
according to the intention-to-treat method in RevMan Analyses. The
methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by
components (generation of the allocation sequence; allocation concealment;
double blinding; follow-up). MAIN RESULTS: Combining the results of six
randomised clinical trials including 710 patients demonstrated no significant
effects of propylthiouracil versus placebo on all-cause mortality (relative
risks (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 1.30), liver-related
mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.29), complications of the liver disease, or
liver histology. Propylthiouracil was associated with a non-significant
increased risk of non-serious adverse events and with the seldom occurrence of
serious adverse events (leukopenia). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We could not
demonstrate any significant beneficial effect of propylthiouracil on all-cause
mortality, liver-related mortality, liver complications, and liver histology of
patients with alcoholic liver disease. Propylthiouracil was associated with
adverse events. Confidence intervals were wide. Accordingly, there is no
evidence for using propylthiouracil for alcoholic liver disease outside
randomised clinical trials.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD002800.
Propylthiouracil for alcoholic liver disease.
Rambaldi A, Gluud C, Rambaldi A.
BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials have addressed the question whether
propylthiouracil has any beneficial effects in patients with alcoholic liver
disease. OBJECTIVES: To assess the beneficial and harmful of propylthiouracil
for patients with alcoholic liver disease. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane
Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (May 2005), The Cochrane Central
Register of Controlled Trials in The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE
(1950 to May 2005), EMBASE (1980 to May 2005), and The Web of Science (May 2005)
were searched. These electronic searches were combined with full text searches.
Manufacturers and researchers in the field were also contacted. SELECTION
CRITERIA: Randomised clinical trials studying patients with alcoholic steatosis,
alcoholic fibrosis, alcoholic hepatitis, and/or alcoholic cirrhosis were
included irrespective of blinding, publication status, or language.
Interventions encompassed propylthiouracil at any dose versus placebo or no
intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All analyses were performed
according to the intention-to-treat method in RevMan Analyses. The
methodological quality of the randomised clinical trials was evaluated by
components (generation of the allocation sequence; allocation concealment;
double blinding; follow-up). MAIN RESULTS: Combining the results of six
randomised clinical trials including 710 patients demonstrated no significant
effects of propylthiouracil versus placebo on all-cause mortality (relative
risks (RR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 1.30), liver-related
mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.29), complications of the liver disease, or
liver histology. Propylthiouracil was associated with a non-significant
increased risk of non-serious adverse events and with the seldom occurrence of
serious adverse events (leukopenia). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We could not
demonstrate any significant beneficial effect of propylthiouracil on all-cause
mortality, liver-related mortality, liver complications, and liver histology of
patients with alcoholic liver disease. Propylthiouracil was associated with
adverse events. Confidence intervals were wide. Accordingly, there is no
evidence for using propylthiouracil for alcoholic liver disease outside
randomised clinical trials.
-----
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1337-46.
Alcoholic hepatitis: from pathogenesis to treatment.
Sougioultzis S, Dalakas E, Hayes PC, Plevris JN.
Department of Hepatology, The Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of
Edinburgh, UK.
Alcoholic hepatitis is a serious complication of alcohol abuse due to its high
mortality rates particularly at short term. It may complicate pre-existing
alcoholic fatty liver or cirrhosis and is mainly diagnosed on clinical and
laboratory grounds although liver biopsy is occasionally needed to exclude other
pathology and confirm the diagnosis. Accumulating evidence suggests that
cytokines and immunity are actively involved in its pathogenesis. Management
includes abstinence and supportive care. Treatment with corticosteroids has been
studied in several clinical trials with conflicting results. However, recent
evidence supporting the beneficial effect of TNF-alpha inhibition provides an
encouraging alternative. Here we summarise the current state in diagnosis and
management of alcoholic hepatitis and briefly review the latest advances in
pathophysiology that may lead to new therapeutic strategies for this difficult
clinical condition. Data sources: Medline 1966-2005, EMBASE/Excerpta Medica
1980-2005, The Cochrane Library (2005 Issue 2) and contact with authors of
published reports.
-----
Rev Prat. 2005 Sep 30;55(14):1539-48.
[Liver cirrhosis in adults: etiology and specific treatments]
[Article in French]
Fartoux L, Serfaty L.
Service d'hepatologie, hopital Saint-Antoine, 75571 Paris. laetitia.fartoux@sat.ap-hop.paris.fr
Cirrhosis is the result of chronic inflammation and of the progressive increase
of fibrosis. In France, hepatitis C infection is the second cause of cirrhosis
after alcohol abuse. The other causes of cirrhosis are: hepatitis B infection,
genetic haemochromatosis, autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis,
drug-induced cirrhosis, secondary biliary cirrhosis, Wilson's disease and al-antitrypsin
deficiency. Etiological treatment is based upon: abstinence in case of alcoholic
cirrhosis, the combination of pegylated interferon alpha (PEG IFN) with
ribavirin in case of C viral cirrhosis, the PEG IFN and the nucleoside analogs
in case of B viral cause; corticosteroids and immunosuppressive drugs in case of
autoimmune cirrhosis; venesections in case of genetic haemochromatosis and
stopping the drug in case of drug-induced cirrhosis. The complications of
cirrhosis such as ascites, oesophageal varices, bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy
and hepatocellular carcinoma mainly explain the high rate of morbidity and
mortality. Liver transplantation is the established therapy for decompensated
liver disease of any etiology significantly changed the outcome of patients with
advanced cirrhosis.
-----
Rev Med Suisse. 2005 Sep 7;1(31):2026-8, 2030-1.
[Alcoholic and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: the same disease! I.
Diagnosis and mechanisms]
[Article in French]
Spahr L, Rubbia-Brandt L, Hadengue A.
Service de gastroenterologie et d'hepatologie, Hopitaux universitaires de Geneve.
Laurent.Spahr@hcuge.ch
Alcoholic steatohepatitis includes steatosis, inflammatory changes and
hepatocellular damage. In severe form, jaundice and hepatic failure persist for
several weeks, while non severe alcoholic steatohepatitis may follow an
insidious course towards cirrhosis. Except for alcohol consumption, nonalcoholic
steatohepatitis shares histological features and pathogenic mechanisms with
alcoholic steatohepatitis, and is associated to the development of cirrhosis
over time. Thus, given the increasing epidemics of the metabolic syndrome in
industrialized countries, it is likely that alcoholic cirrhosis has been
overdiagnosed in the past years. Obesity, insulin resistance and the oxidative
stress including iron-mediated oxidative stress are involved both in alcoholic
and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.
-----
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005 Aug;40(8):972-9.
Magnesium supplementation and muscle function in patients with
alcoholic liver disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
Aagaard NK, Andersen H, Vilstrup H, Clausen T, Jakobsen J, Dorup I.
Department of Medicine V, Aarhus University Hospital, Arhus, Denmark. niels@as.aaa.dk
OBJECTIVE: The study was undertaken in order to evaluate the effect of magnesium
(Mg) supplementation on muscle contents of Mg, muscle strength, muscle mass and
sodium, potassium pumps (Na,K-pumps) in patients with alcoholic liver disease.
Retrospectively, patients were also stratified according to spironolactone
treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study comprised a placebo-controlled,
randomized trial in which 59 consecutive patients with alcoholic liver disease
were treated with Mg intravenously and orally (12.5 mmol daily) or placebo for 6
weeks. Muscle content of Mg, maximum isokinetic muscle strength, skeletal muscle
mass and muscle content of Na,K-pumps were measured before and after Mg
supplementation. RESULTS: Muscle Mg did not increase during the trial (paired
t-test), but Mg supplementation and the duration of pre-study spironolactone
treatment were independent predictors of muscle Mg (multiple regression). Muscle
strength increased by 14% during the trial (p<0.001) and muscle mass increased
by 11% (p=0.05), but with no difference between placebo and Mg treatment.
Spironolactone treatment was associated with a 33% increase in the content of
Na,K-pumps (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of Mg supplementation did not
increase muscle Mg, although Mg supplementation and spironolactone treatment
were independent predictors of muscle Mg. The intervention had no effect on
muscle strength and mass, but both increased during the study, probably owing to
the general care and attendance to the patients.
-----
Transplant Proc. 2005 Jul-Aug;37(6):2614-5.
Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in liver transplantation.
Pierini A, Mirabella S, Brunati A, Ricchiuti A, Franchello A, Salizzoni M.
Liver Transplantation Centre, Molinette Hospital, Turin, Italy.
AIM: Calcineurin inhibitors (CI) are associated with significant morbidity in
transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness
and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy in liver transplantation
(LT). METHODS: We analysed 32 patients (24 males, 8 female, of mean age 55.7
years) who underwent LT between 1994 and 2003. In 29 patients immunosuppressive
therapy was cyclosporine; in three patients it was tacrolimus. Eleven patients
were submitted for LT due to hepatitis B cirrhosis; eight for hepatitis C
cirrhosis, six for alcoholic cirrhosis, and seven for other diseases. In these
patients, MMF was added gradually, simultaneously reducing the dosage of CI up
to complete withdrawal. We considered the efficacy (decrease in serum creatinine)
and the incidence of complications (acute and chronic rejection, leukopenia,
diarrhea). RESULTS: Patients were converted to MMF after a median of 50 months
after LT. MMF monotherapy was started after a median of 9 months in association
with CI. Indications for switch to MMF monotherapy were adverse effects of CI
(renal disfunction in 30 patients) and de novo tumoral evidence after LT in two
patients. Median dosage of MMF was 750 mg twice daily (500-1500 mg). There was a
statistically significant decrease in serum creatinine levels (2.02-1.7 mg/dL; P
= .0001). Side effects were: leukopenia in five of 32 patients (15.6%), diarrhea
in four of 32 patients (12.5%), and one acute rejection. CONCLUSION: MMF
monotherapy improved renal function and was not associated with a significant
risk of allograft rejection. Side effects were mild with dose regimens up to 750
mg twice daily.
-----
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jul;17(7):759-62.
Bilirubin response to corticosteroids in severe alcoholic
hepatitis.
Morris JM, Forrest EH.
Victoria Infirmary, Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow, UK.
INTRODUCTION: There is little consensus on the management of alcoholic
hepatitis, particularly with regard to corticosteroid therapy. We aimed to
identify those patients who respond to corticosteroid therapy for alcoholic
hepatitis. METHODS: We identified 37 patients with alcoholic hepatitis with a
modified Maddrey's discriminant function of 32 or greater. We assessed their
outcomes at 28 and 56 days treatment after admission relative to their response
to corticosteroid treatment. RESULTS: Corticosteroid treated patients
experienced a change in the serum bilirubin concentration after 6-9 days of
-23.0+/-4.7%. Overall, the mortality was 18.9 and 35.1% at 28 and 56 days.
Response to corticosteroids was defined as a 25% fall in serum bilirubin after
6-9 days of treatment. The mortality of the non-responders was 36.8% and 57.9%
at 28 and 56 days compared with 0% (P=0.0148) and 11.1% (P=0.0084) for
corticosteroid responders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a 25% fall in bilirubin
after 6-9 days of corticosteroid therapy have a significant and sustained
improvement in outcome.
-----
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Jul;39(6):540-3.
Beneficial effects of a probiotic VSL#3 on parameters of liver
dysfunction in chronic liver diseases.
Loguercio C, Federico A, Tuccillo C, Terracciano F, D'Auria MV, De Simone C, Del
Vecchio Blanco C.
Department of Internistica Clinica e Sperimentale F. Magrassi e A. Lanzara,
Inter-University Research Center on Foods, Nutrition, and Gastrointestinal Tract
(CIRANAD), Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy. carmelina.loguercio@unina2.it
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether chronic therapy with probiotics affects plasma
levels of cytokines and oxidative/nitrosative stress parameters, as well as
liver damage, in patients with various types of chronic liver disease. PATIENTS
AND METHODS: A total of 22 nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 20
alcoholic liver cirrhosis (AC) patients were enrolled in the study and compared
with 36 HCV-positive patients with chronic hepatitis without (20, CH) or with
(16, CC) liver cirrhosis. All patients were treated with the probiotic VSL#3.
Routine liver tests, plasma levels of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha),
interleukin (IL)-6 and -10, malondialdehyde (MDA), and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE),
S-nitrosothiols (S-NO), were evaluated on days -30, 0, 90, and 120. RESULTS:
Treatment with VSL#3 exerted different effects in the various groups of
patients: in NAFLD and AC groups, it significantly improved plasma levels of MDA
and 4-HNE, whereas cytokines (TNF-alpha, IL-6, and IL-10) improved only in AC
patients. No such effects were observed in HCV patients. Routine liver damage
tests and plasma S-NO levels were improved at the end of treatment in all
groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results of the study suggest that manipulation of
intestinal flora should be taken into consideration as possible adjunctive
therapy in some types of chronic liver disease.
-----
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005 Jul;17(7):759-62.
Bilirubin response to corticosteroids in severe alcoholic
hepatitis.
Morris JM, Forrest EH.
Victoria Infirmary, Department of Gastroenterology, Glasgow, UK.
INTRODUCTION: There is little consensus on the management of alcoholic
hepatitis, particularly with regard to corticosteroid therapy. We aimed to
identify those patients who respond to corticosteroid therapy for alcoholic
hepatitis. METHODS: We identified 37 patients with alcoholic hepatitis with a
modified Maddrey's discriminant function of 32 or greater. We assessed their
outcomes at 28 and 56 days treatment after admission relative to their response
to corticosteroid treatment. RESULTS: Corticosteroid treated patients
experienced a change in the serum bilirubin concentration after 6-9 days of
-23.0+/-4.7%. Overall, the mortality was 18.9 and 35.1% at 28 and 56 days.
Response to corticosteroids was defined as a 25% fall in serum bilirubin after
6-9 days of treatment. The mortality of the non-responders was 36.8% and 57.9%
at 28 and 56 days compared with 0% (P=0.0148) and 11.1% (P=0.0084) for
corticosteroid responders. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a 25% fall in bilirubin
after 6-9 days of corticosteroid therapy have a significant and sustained
improvement in outcome.
-----
Liver Transpl. 2005 Jun;11(6):679-83.
Tobacco use following liver transplantation for alcoholic liver
disease: an underestimated problem.
DiMartini A, Javed L, Russell S, Dew MA, Fitzgerald MG, Jain A, Fung J.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh,
PA 15213, USA. dimartiniaf@upmc.edu
Alcohol and tobacco use commonly co-occur, with at least 90% of those with an
alcohol problem also using tobacco. Thus, 3 years ago when we discovered higher
rate of late deaths due to lung and oropharyngeal cancer in patients who had
received a transplant for alcoholic liver disease (ALD), we hypothesized that
these patients were continuing to expose themselves to tobacco after liver
transplantation (post-LTX) and that this behavior was increasing their risk for
cancer. We subsequently began a prospective investigation of post-LTX tobacco
use in patients having undergone LTX for ALD (n = 172). For 33 recipients we had
data starting from our first assessment at 3 months post-LTX and for this
subgroup we report on the details of the timing of tobacco use resumption and
the redevelopment of nicotine addiction. We found that on average more than 40%
are smoking across all time periods. ALD recipients resume smoking early post-LTX,
increase their consumption over time, and quickly become tobacco dependent.
These data highlight an underrecognized serious health risk for these patients
and demonstrate our need for more stringent clinical monitoring and intervention
for tobacco use in the pre- and post-LTX periods.
-----
J Hepatol. 2005 Jul;43(1):142-8. Epub 2005 Apr 9.
Albumin dialysis reduces portal pressure acutely in patients with
severe alcoholic hepatitis.
Sen S, Mookerjee RP, Cheshire LM, Davies NA, Williams R, Jalan R.
Liver Failure Group, Institute of Hepatology, University College London Medical
School, 69-75 Chenies Mews, London WC1E 6HX, UK.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: In patients with alcoholic hepatitis (AH), inflammation
contributes to the severity of portal hypertension. This study evaluates the
acute effects of albumin dialysis, using the Molecular Adsorbents Recirculating
System (MARS), on portal pressure in AH. METHODS: Eleven patients with AH and
portal hypertension were treated with MARS (n=8) or haemofiltration (n=3). All
patients had associated organ failure manifested by hepatic encephalopathy
(Grade 2 or more) or renal failure. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) was
measured before, during and after the treatment session. RESULTS: A rapid
significant reduction of HVPG was observed by 6 h (falling by > or =20% in 7/8
patients, reaching 12 mmHg in 6/8), which was sustained up to 18 h after
stopping dialysis. Similar rapid sustained improvements of systemic
haemodynamics were also observed. No changes occurred in three patients
receiving haemofiltration alone. CONCLUSIONS: Albumin dialysis produces
clinically significant, acute reduction in portal pressure but the mechanism by
which this effect is achieved is not clear. Our results suggest that MARS may be
a useful adjunct in management of portal hypertension, particularly in patients
with severe AH with associated organ failure.
-----
Transpl Int. 2005 May;18(5):491-8.
Liver transplantation in alcoholic patients.
Burra P, Lucey MR.
Section of Gastroenterology, Liver Gastroenterology Transplantation, Department
of Surgical and Gastroenterological Sciences, University Hospital, University of
the Study, Padua, Italy. burra@unipd.it
Alcoholic liver disease is one of the most common causes of cirrhosis and
indications for orthotopic liver transplantation in Europe and North America.
The reluctance to transplant alcoholics stems in part from the view that
alcoholics bear responsibility for their illness. There is also the perception
that the alcoholic person is likely to relapse into alcohol use after
transplantation and thereby damage the allograft. In this review, we considered
the evaluation for and outcome of liver transplantation in alcoholics with
special attention to the specific risks of alcohol relapse, to show that
alcoholism should be considered like other co-morbid states rather than as a
moral flaw.
-----
Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005 May;21(3):323-30.
Alcohol and the liver.
Willner IR, Reuben A.
Liver Transplantation Division of Gastroenterology/Hepatology Medical University
of South Carolina, Charleston, 29425, USA. willneri@musc.edu
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight salient recent discoveries and results of
clinical trials in alcoholic liver disease (ALD). The burden of care for ALD
patients is hefty and the prevalence of alcohol abuse may be increasing in both
the developed and the underdeveloped world. RECENT FINDINGS: Molecular
mechanisms of alcoholism are being identified but not of the predisposition to
alcoholic liver injury, except perhaps for polymorphism of a cytotoxic T-cell
antigen. The Mayo End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score performs well in
assessing the prognosis of ALD; serological biomarkers for predicting ALD
outcome are of uncertain value. Concomitant liver disease (e.g., obesity,
hepatitis C, and iron overload) aggravates the severity of ALD; conversely,
alcohol abuse may be a cryptic co-factor in some cases of non-alcoholic fatty
liver. For alcoholic hepatitis, nutritional support is the mainstay of
treatment; steroids are considered by some (but not all) as safe and effective
therapy, whereas manipulations of tumor necrosis factor-alpha activity have been
disappointing, or of unproven benefit at best. In liver transplantation for ALD,
methods are being devised to monitor recidivism and to ameliorate its risk and
that of co-morbid psychiatric conditions. SUMMARY: Much of the pathogenesis of
ALD has been identified and headway has been made in predicting its prognosis.
However, much remains to be done to elucidate the molecular genetics of the risk
of developing ALD and in formulating safe, effective therapies for alcoholic
hepatitis.
-----
Ann Transplant. 2005;10(1):38-43.
Wasting your organ with your lifestyle and receiving a new one?
Berlakovich GA.
Department of Transplant Surgery, University of Vienna, Austria.
gabriela.berlakovich@meduniwien.ac.at
Alcoholic liver disease is the leading cause of end-stage liver disease and the
second most common indication for liver transplantation (OLT) in the United
States and Europe, with the number of patients receiving transplants each year
representing about 5% of the estimated deaths from alcoholic cirrhosis.
Long-term patient survival rates compare favorable with those for other chronic
liver diseases. Nevertheless, there remains a certain ambivalence about the role
of OLT in patients suffering from alcoholic cirrhosis, based partly on concerns
regarding alcohol relapse and functional outcome post-transplant in an era of
donor organ shortage and priority setting. This review article focuses
especially on compliance and social rehabilitation of patients who have
undergone OLT for alcoholic cirrhosis. Furthermore, pre-transplant evaluation
and selection of potential candidates are discussed and guidelines are given to
clarify the role of OLT in the management of patients suffering from alcoholic
cirrhosis. It appears very important to mention that alcoholism is not a fault
but represents a disease, and provided that the underlying disease can be
treated, consequent disease (end-stage liver disease) should be treated, too.
-----
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003620.
Milk thistle for alcoholic and/or hepatitis B or C virus liver
diseases.
Rambaldi A, Jacobs B, Iaquinto G, Gluud C.
Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Department
7102, H:S Rigshospitalet,, Copenhagen University Hospital, Blegdamsvej 9,
Copenhagen, DENMARK, DK-2100.
BACKGROUND: Alcohol and hepatotoxic viruses cause the majority of liver
diseases. Randomised clinical trials have assessed whether extracts of milk
thistle, Silybum marianum (L) Gaertneri, have any effect in patients with
alcoholic and/or hepatitis B or C virus liver diseases. OBJECTIVES: To assess
the beneficial and harmful effects of milk thistle or milk thistle constituents
versus placebo or no intervention in patients with alcoholic liver disease
and/or viral liver diseases (hepatitis B and hepatitis C). SEARCH STRATEGY:
TheCochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane
Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and full text searches
were combined (December 2003). Manufacturers and researchers in the field were
contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised clinical trials in patients with
alcoholic and/or hepatitis B or C virus liver diseases (acute and chronic) were
included. Interventions encompassed milk thistle at any dose or duration versus
placebo or no intervention. The trials could be double blind, single blind, or
unblinded. The trials could be unpublished or published and no language
limitations were applied. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The primary outcome
measure was mortality. Binary outcomes are reported as relative risks (RR) with
95% confidence interval (CI). Subgroup analyses were performed with regard to
methodological quality. MAIN RESULTS: Thirteen randomised clinical trials
assessed milk thistle in 915 patients with alcoholic and/or hepatitis B or C
virus liver diseases. The methodological quality was low: only 23% of the trials
reported adequate allocation concealment and only 46% were considered adequately
double-blinded. Milk thistle versus placebo or no intervention had no
significant effect on mortality (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.15), complications of
liver disease (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.09), or liver histology. Liver-related
mortality was significantly reduced by milk thistle in all trials (RR 0.50, 95%
CI 0.29 to 0.88), but not in high-quality trials (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.19).
Milk thistle was not associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse
events (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.50). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Our results
question the beneficial effects of milk thistle for patients with alcoholic
and/or hepatitis B or C virus liver diseases and highlight the lack of
high-quality evidence to support this intervention. Adequately conducted and
reported randomised clinical trials on milk thistle versus placebo are needed.
-----
Gastroenterology. 2005 Apr;128(4):882-90.
Colchicine treatment of alcoholic cirrhosis: a randomized,
placebo-controlled clinical trial of patient survival.
Morgan TR, Weiss DG, Nemchausky B, Schiff ER, Anand B, Simon F, Kidao J, Cecil
B, Mendenhall CL, Nelson D, Lieber C, Pedrosa M, Jeffers L, Bloor J, Lumeng L,
Marsano L, McClain C, Mishra G, Myers B, Leo M, Ponomarenko Y, Taylor D, Chedid
A, French S, Kanel G, Murray N, Pinto P, Fong TL, Sather MR.
VA Long Beach Healthcare Systems, Long Beach, CA 90822, USA. timothy.morgan@med.va.gov
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Colchicine improved survival and reversed cirrhosis in
several small clinical trials. We compared the efficacy and safety of long-term
colchicine, as compared with placebo, in patients with advanced alcoholic
cirrhosis. METHODS: Five hundred forty-nine patients with advanced (Pugh B or C)
alcoholic cirrhosis were randomized to receive either colchicine 0.6 mg twice
per day (n = 274) or placebo (n = 275). Treatment lasted from 2 to 6 years. The
primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were liver-related
morbidity and mortality. Liver biopsy was requested prior to entry and after 24
months of treatment. RESULTS: Attendance at scheduled clinic visits and
adherence with study medication were similar in colchicine and placebo groups.
Alcohol intake was less than 1 drink per day in 69% of patients. In an
intention-to-treat analysis, all-cause mortality was similar in colchicine (49%)
and placebo (45%) patients (P = .371). Mortality attributed to liver disease was
32% in colchicine and 28% in placebo patients (P = .337). Fewer patients
receiving colchicine developed hepatorenal syndrome. In 54 patients with repeat
liver biopsies after 24 or more months of treatment, cirrhosis improved to
septal fibrosis in 7 patients (3 colchicine, 4 placebo) and to portal fibrosis
in 1 patient (colchicine). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced alcoholic
cirrhosis, colchicine does not reduce overall or liver-specific mortality. Liver
histology improves to septal fibrosis in a minority of patients after 24 months
of treatment, with similar rates of improvement in patients receiving placebo
and colchicine. Colchicine is not recommended for patients with advanced
alcoholic cirrhosis.
-----
Clin Liver Dis. 2005 Feb;9(1):171-81.
Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease.
Zetterman RK.
Nebraska-Western Iowa VA Health Care System, 4101 Woolworth Avenue, Omaha, NE
68105, USA. rzetterm@unmc.edu
Patients with end-stage alcoholic liver disease should be considered for liver
transplantation. A careful pretransplant evaluation must be undertaken to assess
for both medical and psychiatric factors that will continue to require attention
following transplantation. Although most programs require at least 6 months of
ethanol abstinence before consideration of liver transplantation, there is
little evidence that this conclusively predicts a reduction in recidivism. Most
programs continue to exclude those with alcoholic hepatitis. Postoperatively,
attention to psychiatric issues, recidivism, compliance, and assessment for
tumors, especially squamous cell carcinomas, should be undertaken.
-----
Clin Liver Dis. 2005 Feb;9(1):135-49.
Long-term management of alcoholic liver disease.
Wakim-Fleming J, Mullen KD.
Case Western Reserve School of Medicine, 2580 Metrohealth Drive, Room G-632A,
Cleveland, OH 44109, USA. jwfleming@metrohealth.org
Despite the epidemics of viral hepatitis C and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,
alcohol remains one of the major causes of liver disease. Commonly, hepatitis C
and other liver diseases are found in association with alcohol consumption. This
association in many instances is noted to accelerate the progression of liver
disease. In many respects, the long-term management of alcoholic liver disease
is not dissimilar from the long-term management of patients with cirrhosis from
other etiologies. One major element is the abstinence of alcohol use. The
ability to maintain sobriety has a major impact on the outcome of patients with
alcoholic cirrhosis because maintaining abstinence can lead to significant
regression of fibrosis and possibly early cirrhosis. Similarities in managing
patients with cirrhosis due to alcohol or cirrhosis from other causes include
vaccination to prevent superimposed viral hepatitis and screening for esophageal
varices and hepatocellular carcinoma with subsequent appropriate therapy.
-----
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2005 Feb;4(1):12-7.
Treatment of patients with alcoholic liver disease.
Zhang FK, Zhang JY, Jia JD.
Liver Research Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital University of
Medical Sciences, Beijing 100050, China. frankliver@yahoo.com.cn
BACKGROUND: The proportion of alcoholic liver disease among all kinds of liver
diseases in China is increasing. Recent research has elucidated the mechanisms
of alcohol-induced liver injury and offered the prospect of advances in the
management of alcoholic liver disease. DATA RESOURCES: Searching MEDLINE
(1982-July 2004) for papers on alcoholic liver disease, especially those on the
treatment of alcoholic liver disease. RESULTS: Abstinence remains the
cornerstone of management of all forms of alcoholic liver disease. Nutritional
support therapy is also a basal treatment. Corticosteroids may be benefitial for
some severe alcoholic hepatitis. None of other measures including
anti-inflammatory agents, antioxidants or colchicine has been shown consistently
to improve the course of alcoholic liver damage. Ultimately, liver
transplantation remains an option for selected patients with liver failure due
to chronic alcoholic liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Abstinence and nutritional
support remain the base management of alcoholic liver disease. Corticosteroid is
efficient for some severe alcoholic hepatitis. Anti-inflammatory agents and
antioxidants may be of benefit but need further studies. The efficacy of other
measures including the use of colchicine and propylthiouracil is controversial.
Liver transplantation remains an option for selected patients with liver
failure.
-----
Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2005 Jan-Mar;68(1):19-25.
Longitudinal prospective study on quality of life and
psychological distress before and one year after liver transplantation.
Burra P, De Bona M, Canova D, Feltrin A, Ponton A, Ermani M, Brolese A, Rupolo
G, Naccarato R.
Department of Surgical and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua,
Padua, Italy. burra@unipd.it
BACKGROUND: The impact of liver disease and medical complications on quality of
life (QOL) and psychological distress before and after liver transplantation
(LT) is a matter of growing interest. METHODS: In a longitudinal prospective
study, perceived QOL (LEIPAD Quality of Life test) and psychological distress
(Brief Symptom Inventory, BSI) were assessed in 25 cirrhotic patients when they
were listed for LT and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after LT. Patients were also
evaluated for medical complications and blood levels of immunosuppressive
agents. RESULTS: Overall QOL and psychological distress improved significantly
and rapidly in most domains from the first month and up to a year after LT.
Medical complications and immunosuppressive agents did not correlate with any
changes in QOL and psychological distress after LT. When patients were divided
according to liver disease etiology: 1. HCV patients listed for LT had worse QOL
levels than the group of patients as a whole or the alcoholic liver disease (ALD)
patients; 2. HCV patients reported a significant improvement in QOL only 6 and
12 months after LT, and still suffered more psychological distress 12 months
after surgery; 3. in ALD patients, overall QOL and psychological distress
improved significantly at all follow-up points after LT; 4. HCV patients
reported a worse QOL and greater psychological distress 1 and 3 months after LT
than the group as a whole or the ALD patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Liver
transplantation improves QOL and psychological distress in most recipients, but
not in the early stages after LT in patients transplanted for HCV cirrhosis.
-----
Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2004 Dec;7(6):451-458.
Alcoholic Hepatitis.
Agarwal K, Kontorinis N, Kontorinis N, Dieterich DT, Dieterich DT.
Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave Levy Place, New
York, NY 10029-6574, USA.
Alcoholic hepatitis (AH) is a common disease associated with significant
morbidity and mortality. Most often the diagnosis is suggested by a history of
heavy alcohol excess in a patient with features of hepatic decompensation. In
its purest form, AH is a histologic diagnosis of acute hepatic inflammation in
response to alcohol. The primary objective of treatment for AH is to support
long-term alcohol abstinence and to achieve adequate nutrition with lifestyle
modification; goal setting and education are integral to long-term medical
management. Severity at presentation (calculated by way of the Maddrey score)
determines outcome. Patients with AH represent a heterogeneous group with regard
to severity and pathogenesis, with various therapeutic interventions assessed in
patients with severe AH. To date, corticosteroids have been studied most, and
despite remaining controversial, warrant a place in the treatment of selected
patients. Recent advances in unraveling the aspects of disease pathogenesis in
AH have raised the possibility of targeted therapies, such as anti-tumor
necrosis factor-a monoclonals and pentoxifylline. Orthotopic liver
transplantation is not recommended for patients with severe acute AH, as most
have an unclear long-term prognosis in the context of ongoing excess alcohol
ingestion at presentation.
-----
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Nov;16(12):1375-80.
Combining steroids with enteral nutrition: a better therapeutic
strategy for severe alcoholic hepatitis? Results of a pilot study.
Alvarez MA, Cabre E, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Montoliu S, Planas R, Gassull MA.
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol,
Badalona, Catalonia, Spain.
BACKGROUND: Results of a previous randomized controlled trial comparing the
outcome of patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis treated with total enteral
nutrition (TEN) or corticosteroids suggest that these treatments act through
different mechanisms and may be complementary. We report a pilot study of
combined treatment with TEN and a shorter course of steroids in patients with
severe alcoholic hepatitis. METHODS: Thirteen patients with severe alcoholic
hepatitis were treated with systemic steroids and TEN. Steroid therapy started
with 40 mg oral prednisolone daily, and was progressively tapered as soon as
both serum bilirubin and prothrombin time decreased below 50% of their baseline
values. TEN (2000 kcal, or 8374 kJ, daily) was administered throughout the
hospital stay. Patients were followed for at least 12 months or until death.
RESULTS: Tapering of prednisolone dose could be started after a mean (SD) of
15.4 (3.8) days, whereas TEN was maintained for 22 (3.8) days. TEN was tolerated
in 10 of the 13 patients. The major adverse event attributable to therapy was
hyperglycemia requiring insulin therapy, which occurred in 12 of 13 patients.
Only two patients (15%) died during the treatment period. Another patient died
within the first 2 months of follow-up. In no case was the death due to
infectious complications, despite two-thirds of patients developing infections
during the treatment period. Infections during follow-up occurred only in three
patients. CONCLUSION: This pilot study suggests that TEN associated with a short
course of steroids could be a good therapeutic strategy for severe alcoholic
hepatitis. This possibility deserves investigation in a randomized controlled
trial.
-----
Alcohol. 2004 Aug;34(1):3-8.
Role of fatty liver, dietary fatty acid supplements, and obesity
in the progression of alcoholic liver disease: introduction and summary of the
symposium.
Purohit V, Russo D, Coates PM.
Division of Metabolism and Health Effects, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse
and Alcoholism, National Institutes of Health, 5635 Fishers Lane, Room 2035,
Bethesda, MD 20892-9304, USA.
Alcoholic liver disease is a major cause of illness and death in the United
States. In the initial stages of the disease, fat accumulation in hepatocytes
leads to the development of fatty liver (steatosis), which is a reversible
condition. If alcohol consumption is continued, steatosis may progress to
hepatitis and fibrosis, which may lead to liver cirrhosis. Alcoholic fatty liver
has long been considered benign; however, increasing evidence supports the idea
that it is a pathologic condition. Blunting of the accumulation of fat within
the liver during alcohol consumption may block or delay the progression of fatty
liver to hepatitis and fibrosis. To achieve this goal, it is important to
understand the underlying biochemical and molecular mechanisms by which chronic
alcohol consumption leads to fat accumulation in the liver and fatty liver
progresses to hepatitis and fibrosis. In addition to alcohol consumption,
dietary fatty acids and obesity have been shown to affect the degree of fat
accumulation within the liver. Again, it is important to know how these factors
modulate the progression of alcoholic liver disease. The National Institute on
Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism and the Office of Dietary Supplements, National
Institutes of Health, sponsored a symposium on "Role of Fatty Liver, Dietary
Fatty Acid Supplements, and Obesity in the Progression of Alcoholic Liver
Disease" in Bethesda, Maryland, USA, October 2003. The following is a summary of
the symposium. Alcoholic fatty liver is a pathologic condition that may
predispose the liver to further injury (hepatitis and fibrosis) by cytochrome
P450 2E1 induction, free radical generation, lipid peroxidation, nuclear
factor-kappa B activation, and increased transcription of proinflammatory
mediators, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Increased acetaldehyde
production and lipopolysaccharide-induced Kupffer cell activation may further
exacerbate liver injury. Acetaldehyde may promote hepatic fat accumulation by
impairing the ability of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha to
bind DNA, and by increasing the synthesis of sterol regulatory binding
protein-1. Unsaturated fatty acids (corn oil, fish oil) exacerbate alcoholic
liver injury by accentuating oxidative stress, whereas saturated fatty acids are
protective. Polyenylphosphatidylcholine may prevent liver injury by
down-regulating cytochrome P450 2E1 activity, attenuating oxidative stress,
reducing the number of activated hepatic stellate cells, and up-regulating
collagenase activity. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis may develop through several
mechanisms, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and associated
impaired fat metabolism, dysregulated cytokine metabolism, insulin resistance,
and altered methionine/S-adenosylmethionine/homocysteine metabolism. Obesity
(adipose tissue) may contribute to the development of alcoholic liver disease by
generating free radicals, increasing tumor necrosis factor-alpha production,
inducing insulin resistance, and producing fibrogenic agents, such as
angiotensin II, norepinephrine, neuropeptide Y, and leptin. Finally, alcoholic
fatty liver transplant failure may be linked to oxidative stress. In vitro
treatment of fatty livers with interleukin-6 may render allografts safer for
clinical transplantation.
-----
Liver Transpl. 2004 Oct;10(10 Suppl 2):S31-8.
Liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease: current
concepts and length of sobriety.
Lim JK, Keeffe EB.
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Stanford
University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
1. The 1-year and 5-year actuarial survival rates following liver
transplantation for patients with alcoholic liver disease are 82% and 68%,
respectively, in the United States and 85% and 70%, respectively, in Europe.
These survival rates are similar to the outcomes of patients who undergo
transplantation for other types of chronic liver disease. 2. Posttransplant
improvements in health-related quality of life are similar in patients who
undergo transplantation for alcoholic liver disease compared to those who
undergo transplantation for other causes of end-stage liver disease. 3.
Approximately 20% of patients who undergo transplantation for alcoholic liver
disease use alcohol posttransplant, with one-third of these individuals
exhibiting repetitive or heavy drinking. Surprisingly, little evidence exists to
document a significant detrimental effect on graft or patient survival
associated with resumption of drinking. 4. There are few reliable predictors of
relapse in alcoholic patients after liver transplantation. Although not
supported by all studies, abstinence of fewer than 6 months prior to
transplantation may be a reasonable predictor of recidivism and is widely
employed as a criterion for listing for liver transplantation. There are no good
data to determine if some patients with sobriety fewer than 6 months might
benefit from liver transplantation.
-----
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2004 Oct;28(10 Pt 1):845-51.
Predictive factors of alcohol relapse after orthotopic liver
transplantation for alcoholic liver disease.
Miguet M, Monnet E, Vanlemmens C, Gache P, Messner M, Hruskovsky S, Perarnau JM,
Pageaux GP, Duvoux C, Minello A, Hillon P, Bresson-Hadni S, Mantion G, Miguet
JP.
Hopital Jean Minjoz, Besancon. scoffre@club-internet.fr
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this prospective study was to determine whether
sociological and/or alcohol-related behavioral factors could be predictive of
relapse after orthotopic liver transplantation for alcoholic liver disease.
METHODS: Fifty-five liver-transplanted patients out of a series of 120 alcoholic
cirrhotic patients were enrolled in a randomized prospective study. This study
was initially designed to compare the 2 year survival in intent-to-transplant
patients versus in-intent-to-use conventional treatment patients. For all
patients, an identical questionnaire was completed at inclusion, and every 3
months for 5 years to collect data on alcohol-related behavior factors. RESULTS:
Fifty-one patients fulfilled the criteria for the study. The mean follow-up was
35.7 months (range: 1-86). Rate of alcohol relapse was 11% at one year and 30%
at 2 years. Alcohol intake above 140 g a week was declared by 11% and 22% of
patients at one and 2 years, respectively. The only variable leading to a
significantly lower rate of relapse was abstinence for 6 months or more before
liver transplantation (23% vs 79%, P=0.0003). This variable was also significant
for patients whose alcohol intake was greater than 140 g per week (P=0.003)
(adjusted relative risk=5.5; 95%CI=1.3-24.5; P=0.02). Multivariate analysis (Cox
model) showed that abstinence for 6 months or more before liver transplantation
was the unique predictive variable. CONCLUSION: In this prospective study of 51
patients transplanted for alcoholic liver disease, abstinence before liver
transplantation was the only predictive factor of alcohol relapse after liver
transplantation.
-----
Scott Med J. 2004 Aug;49(3):84-7.
The impact of specialist management of jaundiced alcoholic liver
disease patients.
Forrest EH.
Department of Gastroenterology, Victoria Infirmary, Glasgow. Ewan.Forrest@gvic.scot.nhs.uk
BACKGROUND: Patients with alcoholic liver disease (ALD) presenting with jaundice
have advanced chronic ALD and/or acute alcoholic hepatitis. Their prognosis is
poor. These patients may be managed by General Medical physicians (GM) or by
Gastroenterologists (GE). AIM: This study aimed to retrospectively assess the
differences in management and outcome of jaundiced ALD between GM and GE.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a serum bilirubin greater than 80 mmol/l on
admission and a history of alcohol excess until within three weeks of admission
were identified retrospectively. In particular the use of corticosteroids (CS),
nutritional support (N) and the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (A/b) were
noted. RESULTS: 97 patients were identified, 62 managed by GE. Differences were
apparent between GE and GM managed patients with respect to CS (p = 0.017), N (p
< 0.001) and A/b (p < 0.001). The overall mortality was 27.8%, 34.0%, and 37.1%
at 28, 56, and 84 days respectively. Mortality for patients with a Discriminant
Function approximately 32 was greater in GM managed patients compared with GE at
28 (p = 0.006), 56 (p = 0.013), and 84 days (p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Differences
exist between the management of jaundiced ALD between GM and GE. Such
differences may translate into improved outcomes.
-----
Ther Umsch. 2004 Aug;61(8):505-12.
[Alcoholic and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis]
[Article in German]
Dufour JF, Oneta CM.
Institut fur klinische Pharmakologie der Universitat Bern. jf.dufour@ikp.unibe.ch
Chronic aethylism has always been a major social as well as health problem. It
may lead, at least in some patients, to steatohepatitis (ASH) which is known to
progress to cirrhosis more rapidly. Because of the fact that the prevalence of
obesity in association with the metabolic syndrome (insulin resistance) is
strikingly increasing in the Western world, we will more and more often be faced
with a second form of steatohepatitis, the so called non-alcoholic
steatohepatitis (NASH). Clinical differentiation between these two entities may
often be difficult. The use of the CAGE-questions as well as interviewing family
members can help to indentify hidden alcohol abuse. Clinically, the presence of
both diseases can only be speculated. To get the diagnosis, liver biopsy must be
performed to show the typical histologic feature of fatty liver with hepatocyte
necrosis as well as infiltration of polymorphcellular leukocytes. Histology
cannot differentiate between ASH and NASH. Therefore, similar pathogenetic
mechanisms are supposed. However, therapeutic approaches are different.
Treatment of choice in ASH is alcohol abstinence, that of NASH the reduction of
insulin resistance, primarily by weight loss.
-----
Semin Liver Dis. 2004 Aug;24(3):289-304.
Nutrition and alcoholic liver disease.
Halsted CH.
Department of Internal Medicine and Nutrition, University of California Davis,
Davis, California 95616, USA. chhalsted@ucdavis.edu
Malnutrition is a common finding in chronic alcoholics, and protein calorie
malnutrition (PCM) is universal and predictive of survival in patients with
established alcoholic liver disease (ALD). These patients also demonstrate
frequent deficiencies of folate, thiamine, pyridoxine, and vitamin A, which
enhance the likelihood of anemia, altered cognitive states, and night blindness.
The etiologies of malnutrition in ALD patients are multiple and interactive and
include anorexia with inadequate dietary intake, abnormal digestion of
macronutrients and absorption of several micronutrients, increased skeletal and
visceral protein catabolism, and abnormal interactions of ethanol and lipid
metabolism. Numerous, and mostly inadequately controlled, studies have evaluated
the potential efficacies of oral, enteral, and parenteral nutrition approaches
to treatment of ALD, with mixed results on liver function, clinical
improvements, and short- or long-term survival. Targeted metabolic treatments
include supplementation with S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) or phosphatidylcholine
derivatives, each with promising experimental bases but inconclusive clinical
trials.
-----
Semin Liver Dis. 2004 Aug;24(3):249-55.
Transplantation in the alcoholic patient.
Watt KD, McCashland TM.
Department of Internal Medicine and Hepatology, University of Nebraska Medical
Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198-3285, USA.
Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) is the second leading indication for
transplantation in the United States. Most transplant programs in the United
States require a minimum of 6 month's abstinence before transplantation is
performed. Most studies have shown a recidivism rate of between 20 and 30% by 2
years after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Higher rates of recidivism
are reported if pre-OLT abstinence was < 6 months. The impact of recidivism on
patient and graft survival is not clear because most reports include patients
who consume alcohol in small amounts or infrequently. Equal post-OLT survival
for ALD patients and non-ALD patients has been demonstrated, and ALD patients
are not thought to suffer greater morbidity post transplant than non-ALD
patients. Careful pretransplant assessment for concomitant medical and
psychosocial ailments associated with alcoholism is important. Posttransplant
monitoring for cardiovascular disease and withdrawal syndromes is required in
the early postoperative setting, whereas monitoring for recidivism and
malignancy are late postoperative issues.
-----
Semin Liver Dis. 2004 Aug;24(3):233-47.
Diagnosis and therapy of alcoholic liver disease.
Levitsky J, Mailliard ME.
University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine,
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198, USA.
Alcoholic liver disease (ALD) presents considerable challenges to clinicians.
Screening for alcohol abuse and alcoholism should be routine and repeated
annually with close attention to signs and symptoms of liver disease. In
patients with evidence of liver dysfunction or injury, consideration should be
given to performance of liver biopsy for diagnosis and prognosis and prior to
initiation of medication with the potential for significant side effects.
Therapy depends on the spectrum of pathological liver injury: alcoholic fatty
liver, alcoholic hepatitis, and cirrhosis. Abstention is the foundation of
therapy for an alcohol problem. Alcoholic fatty liver should improve with
abstention, but the similarity to the pathogenesis of nonalcoholic fatty liver
and potential for progressive injury merits consideration of lipotropic agents.
The continuing mortality, poor acceptance of corticosteroids, and identification
of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) as an integral component has led to
studies of pentoxifylline and, recently, anti-TNF antibody to neutralize
cytokines in the therapy of severe alcoholic hepatitis. Antioxidant therapy of
alcoholic cirrhosis has significant promise but will require large clinical
trials.
-----
Liver Transpl. 2004 Jul;10(7):886-97.
Survival after liver transplantation in the United States: A
disease-specific analysis of the UNOS database.
Roberts MS, Angus DC, Bryce CL, Valenta Z, Weissfeld L.
Section of Decision Sciences and Clinical Systems Modeling, Division of General
Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.
Our goal was to describe disease-specific survival and the clinical variables
that predict survival in a large national cohort of adult liver transplant
recipients. Data on 17,044 adult patients who received an initial orthotopic
liver transplant between 1990 and 1996 with follow-up through 1999 was obtained
from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS). Disease-specific Kaplan-Meier
survival plots and Cox Proportional Hazards models were estimated, and
differences in the clinical characteristics of patients at the time of
transplantation by disease were examined. Overall posttransplant survival
currently exceeds 85% in the first year and is approaching 75% at 5 years.
Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival is improved for recipients who are younger,
female, and in better clinical condition. Survival is a function of disease and
level of illness: cancer, fulminant liver failure, alcoholic liver disease, and
the hepatitidies have the poorest prognosis, while primary billiary cirrohsis
and sclerosing cholangitis have the best. Recipients who were outpatients before
transplantation have longer survival than those transplanted from the hospital
or intensive care unit. Although the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD)
score was designed to predict pretransplant survival, patients with higher MELD
scores have poorer posttransplant survival, but the MELD score is less
predictive than the specific disease. Differences in disease-specific survival
are partially explained by differences in disease severity at the time of
transplantation. In conclusion, Disease-specific survival models indicate that
there remains tremendous variability in survival as a function of underlying
liver disease. However, a significant portion of the difference in survival
between diseases arises from differences in clinical characteristics at the time
of transplantation. (Liver Transpl 2004;10:886-897.)
-----
Hepatology. 2004 May;39(5):1390-7.
A double-blind randomized controlled trial of infliximab
associated with prednisolone in acute alcoholic hepatitis.
Naveau S, Chollet-Martin S, Dharancy S, Mathurin P, Jouet P, Piquet MA, Davion
T, Oberti F, Broet P, Emilie D; Foie-Alcool group of the Association Francaise
pour l'Etude du Foie.
Services d'Hepato-Gastroenterologie, Hopital Antoine Beclere, Clamart,
Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, France. sylvie.naveau@abc.ap-hop-paris.fr
Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) may contribute to the progression of
acute alcoholic hepatitis (AAH). The aim of this study was to evaluate the
efficacy of an association of infliximab and prednisolone at reducing the
2-month mortality rate among patients with severe AAH. Patients with severe AAH
(Maddrey score >/=32) were randomly assigned to group A receiving intravenous
infusions of infliximab (10 mg/kg) in weeks 0, 2, and 4; or group B receiving a
placebo at the same times. All patients received prednisolone (40 mg/day) for 28
days. Blood neutrophil functional capacities were monitored over 28 days. After
randomization of 36 patients, seven patients from group A and three from group B
died within 2 months. The probability of being dead at 2 months was higher (not
significant [NS]) in group A (39% +/- 11%) than in group B (18% +/- 9%). The
study was stopped by the follow-up committee and the sponsor (Assistance
Publique-Hopitaux de Paris). The frequency of severe infections within 2 months
was higher in group A than in group B (P <.002). This difference was potentially
related to a significantly lower ex vivo stimulation capacity of neutrophils.
There were no differences between the two groups in terms of Maddrey scores at
any time point. In conclusion, three infusions of 10 mg/kg of infliximab in
association with prednisolone may be harmful in patients with severe AAH because
of the high prevalence of severe infections.
-----
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Apr 1;19(7):707-14.
Review article: current management of alcoholic liver disease.
Tome S, Lucey MR.
Liver Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de
Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Alcoholic liver disease, including acute alcoholic hepatitis and alcoholic
cirrhosis, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the Western world.
Abstinence remains the cornerstone of management of all forms of alcoholic liver
disease. Recent research, which has elucidated the mechanisms of alcohol-induced
liver injury, offers the prospect of advances in the management of alcoholic
liver disease. We review the most recent data on the efficacy of treatment of
acute alcoholic injury, including nutritional support, corticosteroids,
anti-inflammatory agents and antioxidants, and agents that are directed against
the progression to fibrosis, such as colchicines, propylthiouracil and
antioxidants. Although these therapies offer a tantalizing glimpse into a future
that may include therapies that directly alter the process of injury and repair
in the liver, none has been shown consistently to improve the course of
alcoholic liver damage. Consequently, liver transplantation remains an ultimate
option for selected patients with liver failure due to chronic alcoholic liver
damage.
-----
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Feb;99(2):255-60.
A pilot study of the safety and tolerability of etanercept in
patients with alcoholic hepatitis.
Menon KV, Stadheim L, Kamath PS, Wiesner RH, Gores GJ, Peine CJ, Shah V.
Advanced Liver Disease Study Group, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology,
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
BACKGROUND: Alcoholic hepatitis is a cause of major morbidity and mortality, and
effective therapeutic regimens to treat this condition are lacking. Both
experimental and clinical evidence indicates that tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF),
and the downstream cytokine interleukin-6 (IL-6), correlate with disease
severity and may contribute to the pathogenesis and clinical sequelae of
alcoholic hepatitis, thereby implicating a possible role for inhibition of TNF
in the treatment of alcoholic hepatitis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study
was to assess the safety and tolerability of a p75-soluble TNF receptor:FC
fusion protein (etanercept), an agent that binds and neutralizes soluble TNF in
patients with alcoholic hepatitis in the form of an open-label pilot trial.
METHODS: Etanercept administration was targeted for 2 wk duration in 13 patients
with moderate or severe alcoholic hepatitis as assessed by a discriminant
function value greater than 15 and/or the presence of spontaneous hepatic
encephalopathy. RESULTS: CONCLUSIONS: On an intention-to-treat basis, the 30-day
survival rate of patients receiving etanercept was 92% (12/13). Adverse events
that were encountered included infection, hepatorenal decompensation, and GI
bleeding, which required premature discontinuation of etanercept in 23% of
patients (3/13). This is the first study to examine TNF inhibition with
etanercept in patients with alcoholic hepatitis and the results of this study
support the rationale for larger controlled studies to further assess safety and
efficacy.
-----
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Jan;16(1):9-18.
Ten years' follow-up of 472 patients following transjugular
intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt insertion at a single centre.
Tripathi D, Helmy A, Macbeth K, Balata S, Lui HF, Stanley AJ, Redhead DN, Hayes
PC.
Liver Unit, The Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK. d.tripathi@ed.ac.uk
BACKGROUND: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPSS) is
increasingly used for the management of portal hypertension. We report on 10
years' experience at a single centre. METHODS: Data held in a dedicated database
was retrieved on 497 patients referred for TIPSS. The efficacy of TIPSS and its
complications were assessed. RESULTS: Most patients were male (59.4%) with
alcoholic liver disease (63.6%), and bleeding varices (86.8%). Technical success
was achieved in 474 (95.4%) patients. A total of 13.4% of patients bled at
portal pressure gradients < or = 12 mmHg, principally from gastric and ectopic
varices. Procedure-related mortality was 1.2%. The mean follow-up period of
surviving patients was 33.3 +/- 1.9 months. Primary shunt patency rates were
45.4% and 26.0% at 1 and 2 years, respectively, while the overall secondary
assisted patency rate was 72.2%. Variceal rebleeding rate was 13.7%, with all
episodes occurring within 2 years of TIPSS insertion, and almost all due to
shunt dysfunction. The overall mortality rate was 60.4%, mainly resulting from
end-stage liver failure (42.5%). Patients who bled from gastric varices had
lower mortality than those from oesophageal varices (53.9% versus 61.5%, P <
0.01). The overall rate of hepatic encephalopathy was 29.9% (de novo
encephalopathy was 11.5%), with pre-TIPSS encephalopathy being an independent
predicting variable. Refractory ascites responded to TIPSS in 72% of cases,
although the incidence of encephalopathy was high in this group (36.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: TIPSS is effective in the management of variceal bleeding, and has
a low complication rate. With surveillance, good patency can be achieved.
Careful selection of patients is needed to reduce the encephalopathy rate.
-----
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Apr;19(7):707-14.
Current management of alcoholic liver disease.
Tome S, Lucey MR.
Liver Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Complejo Hospitalario
Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Summary Alcoholic liver disease, including acute alcoholic
hepatitis and alcoholic cirrhosis, is a major cause of morbidity
and mortality in the Western world. Abstinence remains the cornerstone
of management of all forms of alcoholic liver disease. Recent
research, which has elucidated the mechanisms of alcohol-induced
liver injury, offers the prospect of advances in the management
of alcoholic liver disease. We review the most recent data on
the efficacy of treatment of acute alcoholic injury, including
nutritional support, corticosteroids, anti-inflammatory agents
and antioxidants, and agents that are directed against the progression
to fibrosis, such as colchicines, propylthiouracil and antioxidants.
Although these therapies offer a tantalizing glimpse into a future
that may include therapies that directly alter the process of
injury and repair in the liver, none has been shown consistently
to improve the course of alcoholic liver damage. Consequently,
liver transplantation remains an ultimate option for selected
patients with liver failure due to chronic alcoholic liver damage.
-----
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2004 Jan;96(1):60-73.
Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to cholestatic
liver disease.
[Article in English, Spanish]
Perez Fernandez T, Lopez Serrano P, Tomas E, Gutierrez ML, Lledo
JL, Cacho G, Santander C, Fernandez Rodriguez CM.
Unit of Digestive Diseases, Fundacion Hospital Alcorcon, Madrid,
Spain.
When cholestatic liver disease is present, liver ultrasound
should be performed to ascertain if cholestasis is extrahepatic
or intrahepatic. If bile ducts appear dilated and the probability
of interventional treatment is high, endoscopic retrograde cholagio-pancreatography
(ERCP) or trans-hepatic cholangiography (THC) should be the next
step. If the probability of interventional therapeutics is low,
cholangio-MRI should be performed. Once bile duct dilation and
space occupying lesions are excluded, a work up for intrahepatic
cholestasis should be started. Some specific clinical situations
may be helpful in the diagnostic strategy. If cholestasis occurs
in the elderly, drug-induced cholestatic disease should be suspected,
whereas if it occurs in young people with risk factors, cholestatic
viral hepatitis is the most likely diagnosis. During the first
trimester of pregnancy cholestasis may occur in hyperemesis gravidorum,
and in the third trimester of gestation cholestasis of pregnancy
should be suspected. A familial history of recurrent cholestasis
points to benign recurrent intrahepatic cholestasis. The occurrence
of intrahepatic cholestasis in a middle-aged woman is a frequent
presentation of primary biliary cirrhosis, whereas primary sclerosing
cholangitis should be suspected in young males with inflammatory
bowel disease. The presence of vascular spider nevi, ascites,
and a history of alcohol abuse should point to alcoholic hepatitis.
Neonatal cholestasis syndromes include CMV, toxoplasma and rubinfections
or metabolic defects such as cystic fibrosis, alpha1-antitrypsin
deficiency, bile acid synthesis defects, or biliary atresia. The
treatment of cholestasis should include a management of complications
such as pruritus, osteopenia and correction of fat soluble vitamin
deficiencies. When hepatocellular failure or portal hypertension-related
complications occur, liver transplantation should be considered.
-----
Ann Surg. 2004 Jan;239(1):93-8.
Societal reintegration after liver transplantation:
findings in alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related transplant
recipients.
Cowling T, Jennings LW, Goldstein RM, Sanchez EQ, Chinnakotla
S, Klintmalm GB, Levy MF.
Transplantation Services, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas,
TX 76104, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of societal reintegration
between alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related liver transplant
recipients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Orthotopic liver transplantation
(OLTX) is the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease
of various etiologies. Returning patients to society to lead active
and productive lives is a key goal of OLTX. METHODS: A questionnaire
assessing societal reintegration was administered by phone to
84 alcoholic liver disease (ALD) OLTX recipients (ALDs) and 68
non-ALD OLTX recipients having undergone OLTX at a single-center
urban not-for-profit teaching hospital. Sixty-eight non-ALD OLTX
recipients, serving as the control group (Controls), were matched
to the ALDs by age, sex, and length of follow-up. Participation
levels were assessed in the following areas: employment, homemaking,
academic study, support of others through financial and/or care-giving
efforts, and involvement in social or community groups and activities.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of ALDs and 81% of Controls were
male. Median age was 53 years for ALDs and 54 years for Controls.
Median length of follow-up for both groups separately was 52 months.
No significant differences were noted between ALDs and Controls
in the proportion of employed individuals, homemakers, students,
and supporters of others. Controls were significantly more likely
than ALDs to be involved in structured social activities and routine
volunteer work. CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol-related and non-alcohol-related
OLTX recipients appear to return to society to lead similarly
active and productive lives. ALD OLTX recipients appear less likely
to be involved in structured social activities and routine volunteer
work than non-ALD OLTX recipients.
-----
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Dec;18(12):1332-44.
Pathogenesis and management of alcoholic hepatitis.
Haber PS, Warner R, Seth D, Gorrell MD, McCaughan GW.
Drug Health Services and AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver
Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, and Department of Medicine,
University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. phaber@mail.edu.au
Alcoholic hepatitis is a potentially life-threatening complication
of alcoholic abuse, typically presenting with symptoms and signs
of hepatitis in the presence of an alcohol use disorder. The definitive
diagnosis requires liver biopsy, but this is not generally required.
The pathogenesis is uncertain, but relevant factors include metabolism
of alcohol to toxic products, oxidant stress, acetaldehyde adducts,
the action of endotoxin on Kupffer cells, and impaired hepatic
regeneration. Mild alcoholic hepatitis recovers with abstinence
and the long-term prognosis is determined by the underlying disorder
of alcohol use. Severe alcoholic hepatitis is recognized by a
Maddrey discriminant function >32 and is associated with a
short-term mortality rate of almost 50%. Primary therapy is abstinence
from alcohol and supportive care. Corticosteroids have been shown
to be beneficial in a subset of severely ill patients with concomitant
hepatic encephalopathy, but their use remains controversial. Pentoxifylline
has been shown in one study to improve short-term survival rates.
Other pharmacological interventions, including colchicine, propylthiouracil,
calcium channe |